Category Archives: Current Events

States should vote down federal spending on farm bill and return more control to states!!!!

States should vote down federal spending on farm bill and return more control to states!!!!

Some say here in Arkansas that we have to do whatever it takes to support Riceland Foods, but in other states they try to protect federal government handouts to their biggest companies. We need politicians to stop looking out for just their states selfishness wants and vote for what is good for the country. It is in the best interest of all 50 states that we cut back on excessive federal spending and return more dollars to the local states for them to spend. Ronald Reagan rightly pointed out that the founding fathers favored more local control and a more limited federal government for good reason.

The Rich and Famous at the Farm Bill Trough

May 29, 2013 at 1:00 pm

Joe Sohm Visions of America/Newscom

Joe Sohm Visions of America/Newscom

Congress is considering the renewal of massive agriculture subsidies that proponents characterize as a crucial “safety net” for struggling family farms. In fact, most of the taxpayer support is actually pocketed by the well-to-do, including former President Jimmy Carter, the current Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the families of members currently serving on the House and Senate Agriculture Committees.

Subsidies flowing to the likes of Carter, USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack, and other relatively wealthy farm owners demonstrate just how incoherent the subsidy regime has become. New legislation in both the House and the Senate would eliminate some long-standing “direct” payments, but both bills would also establish new, potentially more costly revenue and price “protections.”

Despite record-high farm income and record-low debt, farm-state politicians and agriculture lobbyists insist that taxpayers continue to forfeit their earnings to highly successful agricultural enterprises such as Carter’s Farms, Inc., of Plains, Georgia. According to government data compiled by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), the farm owned by former President Carter and his family collected $272,288 in subsidy payments from 1995 through 2012.

During that same period, Vilsack received $82,874 in USDA benefits for his 592-acre farm in Davis County, Iowa. And USDA Under Secretary Michael T. Scuse owns 20.8 percent of a farm in New Castle County, Delaware, upon which taxpayers have lavished $1,051,107 from 1995 through 2012.

There are no farms in Manhattan, but residents there have collected subsidies totaling nearly $9 million in the past seven years. Recipients also include Mark F. Rockefeller ($356,018) and David Rockefeller ($591,057). Yes, the Rockefeller family (Standard Oil, Chase Manhattan Bank, etc.).

Over on the West Coast, in Beverly Hills 90210, the estate of comedian Jack Benny has collected $18,120 for a farm in Madera County, California, while $142,933 was paid to Mary Ann Mobley (Miss America of 1959) for a farm in Madison County, Mississippi.

These examples are not exceptions but the norm. The USDA’s Economic Research Service reports that two-thirds of the farms with income exceeding $1 million annually received government payments averaging $54,745 in 2011. Meanwhile, just 27 percent of farms with income of less than $100,000 received payments—averaging just $4,420 in 2011.

The top recipient of subsidies in the EWG data base is Riceland Foods, Inc., self-described as “the world’s largest miller and marketer of rice.” It collected $554,343,039 between 1995 and 2012. According to news reports, Riceland reported sales of $1.16 billion during 2011–2012, the fifth consecutive year of billion-plus revenues for the company.

The subsidies collected by large enterprises make it more difficult for small farms to stay in business. The flow of free dollars to big farms increases demand for farmland, which, in turn, raises the price of property. Smaller players and newcomers are priced out or left to compete in niche markets.

Members of Congress and their families routinely collect subsidies as well. For example, Lynda L. Lucas, the wife of House Agriculture Committee chairman Frank Lucas (R–OK), collected $40,613 in payments for their farm in Roger Mills County, Oklahoma. (Lucas has served on the Agriculture Committee since he was first elected in 1994. He became chairman in 2011. Lynda Lucas has received four payments between 1999 and 2003, a fifth in 2007, a sixth in 2011, and a seventh in 2012.)

Likewise, the Iowa family farm of Senator Charles Grassley (R–IA) has collected $955,192 in taxpayer subsidies from 1995 through 2012. (Grassley served on the Agriculture Committee since 1992. The Grassley farm has received payments each year from 1995 to 2012, according to the EWG.)

The payments have proved irresistible even to environmental groups that openly criticize the impact of subsidies on land use. For example, the Nature Conservancy accumulated a whopping $4,795,786 from 1995 through 2012 despite its own findings that such payments promote the conversion of natural habitat to cropland—threatening wildlife in the process. The National Audubon Society collected $932,801 from 1995 through 2012, according to the EWG.

Serious reform is obviously needed, and the time for an overhaul is ripe. The USDA forecasts that net farm income will reach $128.2 billion this year, the highest level in four decades. At the same time, farmers’ debt levels have dropped to historic lows. This means agriculture is well insulated against the risks associated with commodity production, including adverse weather and economic fluctuations.

There are a host of nongovernmental methods with which farmers can manage risk, including futures contracts and hedging, crop diversification, credit reserves, and private insurance. Given the enormous burdens already shouldered by taxpayers, there is no justification for robbing millions of middle-class Peters to subsidize Jimmy, Tom, David, and all the other hugely successful owners of farmland.

Related posts:

Congress needs to remove subsidies from the farm bill, not expand them

Congress needs to remove subsidies from the farm bill, not expand them Farm Bill Wastes More Taxpayer Money on Green Subsidies Nicolas Loris May 13, 2013 at 11:27 am Design Pics / Dave Reede/Dave Reede/Newscom Slapping the word rural in front of a bunch of green subsidies does not mean they’re not subsidies. But that’s […]

If increase in food stamps was just because of recession then why spending go from $19.8 billion in 2000 to $37.9 billion in 2007?

If the increase in food stamps was just because of the recession then why did the spending go from $19.8 billion in 2000 to $37.9 billion in 2007? The Facts about Food Stamps Everyone Should Hear Rachel Sheffield and T. Elliot Gaiser May 27, 2013 at 12:00 pm (7) Newscom A recent US News & […]

Food stamp spending has doubled under the Obama Administration

The sad fact is that Food stamp spending has doubled under the Obama Administration. A Bumper Crop of Food Stamps Amy Payne May 21, 2013 at 7:01 am Tweet this Where do food stamps come from? They come from taxpayers—certainly not from family farms. Yet the “farm” bill, a recurring subsidy-fest in Congress, is actually […]

Agriculture Dept is bloated

Agriculture: Downsizing The Federal Government Uploaded on Dec 19, 2008 Agriculture is easily the most distorted sector, with high tariffs and, in developed countries at least, large amounts of government subsidies through price supports and direct payments. On the other hand, developing countries, who have a comparative advantage in these products, cannot afford to subsidize […]

Which states are the leaders in food stamp consumption?

I am glad that my state of Arkansas is not the leader in food stamps!!! Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, Which State Has the Highest Food Stamp Usage of All? March 19, 2013 by Dan Mitchell The food stamp program seems to be a breeding ground of waste, fraud, and abuse. Some of the horror stories […]

Open letter to President Obama (Part 255)

Government Must Cut Spending Uploaded by HeritageFoundation on Dec 2, 2010 The government can cut roughly $343 billion from the federal budget and they can do so immediately. __________   President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day […]

Mission accomplished!!! Rick Crawford joins Tea Party Republicans and votes against kick the can down the road “fiscal cliff deal”

  _________________ President Ronald Reagan wisely said: “The federal government has taken too much tax money from the people, too much authority from the states, and too much liberty with the Constitution.” You would think that the Republicans who talk so much of cutting spending would try to get a plan that cuts spending 3 […]

Representative Crawford reads and responds to my letter

  I recently wrote an open letter to Congressman Rick Crawford and I put it on his facebook page. I personally do not have a facebook page so I used my son Wilson’s facebook page and here is what Congressman Crawford said: Wilson- I agree with you that we have a spending problem and not […]

The Obama administration should take up for free speech instead of pandering to Muslim extremists

Great video on free speech and religion. The Obama administration should take up for free speech instead of pandering to Muslim extremists.

May 28, 2013 9:10AM

Does Freedom of Speech Conflict with Freedom of Religion?

This is a provocative question, of course, or at least it is seemingly everywhere in the world but the United States. In just the last three years, the Supreme Court has protected highly offensive funeral protests, violent video games, animal “crush” videos, and a host of other types of expression. No law punishing blasphemy or “defamation of religion”—as approved by various UN resolutions and making inroads into the legal codes of even Western countries—could possibly survive First Amendment scrutiny. But that’s not the case elsewhere in the world, as an excellent new video by Danish human rights lawyer Jacob Mchangama shows (courtesy of Free to Choose TV; see press release):

America isn’t immune from increasing demands that free speech be limited to respect religious feelings. Recall the condemnations of the anti-Islamic video that may have caused rioting in Cairo on September 11 of last year (but not in Beghazi, as details of that scandal develop). The outcome of this battle will have profound consequences for the ability of people everywhere to freely express themselves and follow their beliefs. Democratic governments play a dangerous game when appeasing religious sensitivities rather than defending free speech.

Mchangama, not coincidentally, is affiliated with the invaluable Human Rights Foundation—an organization that deals with actual human rights violations rather than simply being a vehicle for pushing a transnational leftist agenda—whose president, Thor Halvorssen (with whom I’ve been acquainted since college), calls himself a “classical liberal” rather than a man of the Right or Left.

Related posts:

Do some Muslims had American and British military personnel?

Do some Muslims had American and British military personnel? Brutal Murder in London Highlights Dangers Faced by Military Personnel Scott Erickson May 23, 2013 at 11:36 am ANDREW YATES/AFP/Getty Images/Newscom In a brutal murder committed on the streets near the Royal Artillery Barracks in South London, a British soldier became the latest victim of an […]

Muslim Maj. Nidal Hasan has drawn $278,000.00 since 2009 killing of 13 people at Ft Hood

American Family Radio reported that Fox News said: The Army psychiatrist accused of killing 13 people and wounding 32 others during a shooting at Fort Hood has reportedly been paid more than $278,000 since the 2009 incident. U.S. Department of Defense officials confirmed to NBCDFW.com that Maj. Nidal Hasan’s salary cannot be suspended unless he […]

Do Christians or Muslims commit more acts of terror?

Today the world has learned that yesterday’s tragic events in Norway where over 90 individuals were killed, was NOT THE ACT OF A MUSLIM AS EARLIER REPORTED.  Actually now it seems that this person may have been a member of an extremist Christian group that opposed multiculturalism. At least that is the information that we […]

On what basis can murder be called “wrong”?

On what basis can someone say that murder is wrong if they don’t believe in special revelation? On what basis can we say there is dignity for humankind? Francis Schaeffer takes a look at this issue in the following video and Chuck Colson tackles that this issue in this article from 1996 on the Bosnia […]

Why is President Obama reluctant to talk about terrorism?

Why is President Obama reluctant to talk about terrorism? Obama Administration Refuses to Label London Attack as Terrorism Daniel Kochis May 23, 2013 at 4:00 pm Newscom Yesterday’s appalling attack on a London street in the middle of the day, which left a British solider dead, was a barbaric act of terrorism perpetrated by Islamist […]

J.I. Packer on Francis Schaeffer

J.I. Packer on Francis Schaeffer Episode VII – The Age of Non Reason ____________________ Episode 8: The Age Of Fragmentation Published on Jul 24, 2012 Dr. Schaeffer’s sweeping epic on the rise and decline of Western thought and Culture _______________________ I love the works of Francis Schaeffer and I have been on the internet reading […]

New video from Heritage Foundation on Benghazi Scandal

New video from Heritage Foundation on Benghazi Scandal. White House Spins Obama’s Role in Benghazi: From Competence to Irrelevance (VIDEO) Helle Dale May 21, 2013 at 5:04 pm Benghazi: Demand the Truth Published on May 21, 2013 President Obama has dismissed questions about the Benghazi debacle as a political “side show.” Demand the truth. The American […]

Bill Maher Surprises Even Me! Comparing Islamic Violence to Christianity

Bill Maher Surprises Even Me! Comparing Islamic Violence to Christianity Published on Apr 20, 2013 One time and One time only will you see me upload a video from Bill Maher but he has it together with this interview! ___________________ Bill Maher: Islamic violence ‘more than just a fringe element’ Comedian Bill Maher butted heads […]

Overview of Ecclesiastes

Ecclesiastes 2-3

Published on Sep 19, 2012

Calvary Chapel Spring Valley | Sunday Evening | September 16, 2012 | Derek Neider

_____________________________

I have written on the Book of Ecclesiastes and the subject of the meaning of our lives on several occasions on this blog. In this series on Ecclesiastes I hope to show how secular humanist man can not hope to find a lasting meaning to his life in a closed system without bringing God back into the picture. This is the same exact case with Solomon in the Book of Ecclesiastes. Three thousand years ago, Solomon took a look at life “under the sun” in his book of Ecclesiastes. Christian scholar Ravi Zacharias has noted, “The key to understanding the Book of Ecclesiastes is the term ‘under the sun.’ What that literally means is you lock God out of a closed system, and you are left with only this world of time plus chance plus matter.”

Let me show you some inescapable conclusions if you choose to live without God in the picture. Solomon came to these same conclusions when he looked at life “under the sun.”

  1. Death is the great equalizer (Eccl 3:20, “All go to the same place; all come from dust, and to dust all return.”)
  2. Chance and time have determined the past, and they will determine the future.  (Ecclesiastes 9:11-13)
  3. Power reigns in this life, and the scales are not balanced(Eccl 4:1)
  4. Nothing in life gives true satisfaction without God including knowledge (1:16-18), ladies and liquor (2:1-3, 8, 10, 11), and great building projects (2:4-6, 18-20).

You can only find a lasting meaning to your life by looking above the sun and bring God back into the picture.

ECCLESIASTES – BIBLE SURVEY
 

Author:  The writer says that he was “the Son of David, King in Jerusalem” (1:1, 12, 16).  The writer is Solomon, and the book is an autobiography of his experiences and reflections while he was out of fellowship with God.

Solomon may have been wise, but he did not follow his own wisdom.  Ecclesiastes has its origin in his tragic sin of forsaking God and seeking satisfaction in many things “under the sun”.  

Message: The message of Ecclesiastes is that, apart from God, Life is full of weariness and disappointment.

Major Theme:  What is the meaning of life? The writer is pointing out the folly of human reasoning in order to focus on the true satisfaction, which is to be found in God.

Key term: “vanity of vanities” (1:2, 12:8) states that authors theme.  The word vanity in the Hebrew means “breath” or “vapor” and thus speaks of life as “quickly passing”. 

Vanity: Strong’s # 1892: This word basically means “vapor” or “breath”, such as the rapidly vanishing vapor of one’s warm breath in the cool air. (See Psalms 39:5, 11; 62:9; 144:4)

Wherever we read the Word vanity in Ecclesiastes, we should think of what is “quickly passing”. This is one of the key terms in the Book of Ecclesiastes, for it is found 38 times there, but only 34 times in the rest of the Old Testament.  With this word, Solomon received worldly pursuits such as wealth, honor, fame, and various pleasures as similar to desperately grasping at air (2:17).

Chapter 1: Vanity of life and pleasure

Solomon’s search of satisfaction were in wisdom (1:12 – 18) and acquiring more knowledge.  Humanistic wisdom without God, leads to grief and sorrows.

Chapter 2: Pleasures are meaningless

Solomon built houses (See 1 Kings 9:10), water reservoirs, planted vineyards, gardens, parks and trees, had a large number of servants, herds of cattle, wealth in silver and gold, choirs and orchestras, had 700 wives and 300 concubines (1 Kings 11:3).

2:10) all my eyes desired: Solomon had limitless ability to fulfill any and all desires.

2:11) at the end of his quest for possessions and experiences, Solomon concluded that it was vanity or “vapor”, a grasping for wind.  Even with all he had done and experienced, there was still a sense that nothing lasting or enduring had been achieved. 

Chapter 3: A time for everything

To everything there is a season . . . a time.  Both words are usually regarded as being specific points in time.  See Daniel 2:21:  Seasons here in Daniel refers to the events of history. See Esther 4:14: “yet who knows whether you have come to the kingdom for such a time as this?” God sets a time for everything.

Chapter 4 – 5: The writer considers oppression

Probably the poor and the downtrodden (See Amos 5:11, 8:4-6)

The fool folds his hands:  being lazy better a handful with quietness – moderation, than both hands full together with toil and grasping for wind – moderation is better than being over worked.

A man is envied by his neighbors: I wish I had what my neighbor has (a nice new boat or car) today this is called “keeping up with the Jones’”.

Walking prudently: God has no pleasure in those who do the right things for all the wrong reasons.

Chapters 6 – 12: The best advice the writer gives is to obey God.

At the end of the book in 12:8, the writer again returns to the theme of the book found in verse 1:2, “vanity of vanities”.  Such is life “under the sun” (or Earth) apart from God, is “vanities of vanities”. Solomon concluded that it was all vanity, or “vapor”, a grasping for the wind, all that he had done and experienced, apart from God.

Related posts:

The Humanist takes on Solomon and the Book of Ecclesiastes

This from the American Humanist website: This week we’re pleased to publish a new poem “Ecclesiastes” by Frank S. Robinson. Frank S. Robinson is a retired New York State administrative law judge, a rare coin dealer, and author of five books, most recently The Case for Rational Optimism. He is married to the poet Therese […]

Avril Lavigne commits “the fool’s sin” in front of family crowd in Tampa (Avril and the Book of Ecclesiastes Part 1)

Tampa Bay Rays apologize for Avril Lavigne TMZ reported: According to local reports, Avril’s mic didn’t work at the start of her show … and she responded to the cavalcade of boos by yelling obscenities at crowd. Rays rep Rick Vaughn tells TMZ, “The Rays demand profanity-free performances from all of our concert performers and […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part U “Do men have a say in the abortion debate?” (includes the film SLAUGHTER OF THE INNOCENTS and editorial cartoon)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

2008 article on Woody Allen on the meaning of life

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

If I see Chris Martin of Coldplay in person what would I say to him? (Part 3)

Chris Martin revealed in his interview with Howard Stern that he was rasied an evangelical Christian but he has left the church. I believe that many words that he puts in his songs today are generated from the deep seated Christian beliefs from his childhood that find their way out in his songs. His belief in […]

Part 4 Adrian Rogers on Proverbs “How To Be The Father Of A Wise Child” (video too)

Picture of Adrian Rogers above from 1970′s while pastor of Bellevue Baptist of Memphis, and president of Southern Baptist Convention. (Little known fact, Rogers was the starting quarterback his senior year of the Palm Beach High School football team that won the state title and a hero to a 7th grader at the same school named […]

If I see Chris Martin of Coldplay in person what would I say to him? (Part 2)

Chris Martin revealed in his interview with Howard Stern that he was rasied an evangelical Christian but he has left the church. I believe that many words that he puts in his songs today are generated from the deep seated Christian beliefs from his childhood that find their way out in his songs. His belief in […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part N “A discussion of the Woody Allen Movie CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS”(includes film DEATH BY SOMEONE’S CHOICE)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part L “On what basis do you say murder is wrong?”Part 2 (includes the film THE BASIS FOR HUMAN DIGNITY)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part K “On what basis do you say murder is wrong?”Part 1 (includes film ABORTION OF THE HUMAN RACE)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

“Woody Wednesday” Another look at Woody Allen’s movie Crimes and Misdemeanors

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

“Woody Wednesday” A 2010 review of Woody Allen’s Annie Hall

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

Robert Dick Wilson’s talk “Is the Higher Criticism Scholarly?” (part 6 of transcript)

The Bible and Archaeology (3/5) For many more archaeological evidences in support of the Bible, see Archaeology and the Bible . (There are some great posts on this too at the bottom of this post.) Robert Dick Wilson at the Grove City Bible Conference in 1909. IS THE HIGHER CRITICISM SCHOLARLY?Clearly attested facts showing that thedestructive […]

“Woody Wednesday” In 2009 interview Woody Allen talks about the lack of meaning of life and the allure of younger women

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

“Woody Wednesday” Woody Allen on the Emptiness of Life by Toby Simmons

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

12 Questions for Woody Allen (Woody Wednesday)

Above is a clip of 12 questions for Woody Allen. Below is a list of some of his movies. WOODY’S FINEST: Philip French’s favourite five Annie Hall (1977) In his first fully achieved masterwork, a semi-autobiographical comedy in which his ex-lover Diane Keaton and best friend Tony Roberts play versions of themselves, Allen created a […]

“Woody Wednesday” Allen on the meaning of life (part 2)

September 3, 2011 · 5:16 PM ↓ Jump to Comments Woody Allen on the Emptiness of Life In the final scene of Manhattan, Woody Allen’s character, Isaac, is lying on the sofa with a microphone and a tape-recorder, dictating to himself an idea for a short story. It will be about “people in Manhattan,” he says, […]

Video interviews of Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin (Part 4)

As far as I know they have never done an interview together. Therefore, I have included separate interviews that they have done below and I have some links to past posts I have done on them too. Shane Warne – Chris Martin Interview (Part 1) Uploaded by HandyAndy136 on Nov 24, 2010 Originally broadcast on […]

“Woody Wednesday” Allen realizes if God doesn’t exist then all is meaningless

The Bible and Archaeology (1/5) The Bible maintains several characteristics that prove it is from God. One of those is the fact that the Bible is accurate in every one of its details. The field of archaeology brings to light this amazing accuracy. _________________________- I want to make two points today. 1. There is no […]

Milton Friedman’s religious views

John Lofton noted: “DR. FRIEDMAN an evolutionist with ‘values’ of unknown origin but he said they were not ‘accidental.’ “   If anyone takes time to read my blog for any length of time they can not question my respect for the life long work of Milton Friedman. He has advanced the cause of freedom […]

John MacArthur on Proverbs (Part 10) Summing up Proverbs study

Over and over in Proverbs you hear the words “fear the Lord.” In fact, some of he references are Proverbs 1:7, 29; 2:5; 8:13; 9:10;14:26,27; 15:16 and many more. Below is a sermon by John MacArthur from the Book of Luke on 3 reasons we should fear the Lord. (I have posted John MacArthur’s amazing sermon on the fulfillment of Old Testament scripture before on my blog.)

_____________

PART 10

People just don’t fear the Lord like they need to and if they did then they would not sin so much because they don’t want to displease the Lord. Phillippians 4:8-9 is one of my favorite scriptures. If you practice that verse then you can guard your mind like Proverbs instructs us to do.

Philippians 4:8

The Message (MSG)

8-9 Summing it all up, friends, I’d say you’ll do best by filling your minds and meditating on things true, noble, reputable, authentic, compelling, gracious—the best, not the worst; the beautiful, not the ugly; things to praise, not things to curse. Put into practice what you learned from me, what you heard and saw and realized. Do that, and God, who makes everything work together, will work you into his most excellent harmonies.

Obeying our parents is a must if we want to have a blessed life. Look at this passage:

Exodus 20:12

Amplified Bible (AMP)

12 Regard (treat with honor, due obedience, and courtesy) your father and mother, that your days may be long in the land the Lord your God gives you.

__________

I want to live a long life so I better respect and obey my parents. I also need to surround myself with wise companions. Check out Proverbs 13:20:

King James 2000 Bible (©2003)
He that walks with wise men shall be wise: but a companion of fools shall be destroyed.

American Standard Version
Walk with wise men, and thou shalt be wise; But the companion of fools shall smart for it.

Douay-Rheims Bible
He that walketh with the wise, shall be wise: a friend of fools shall become like to them.

Darby Bible Translation
He that walketh with wise men becometh wise; but a companion of the foolish will be depraved.

English Revised Version
Walk with wise men, and thou shalt be wise: but the companion of fools shall smart for it.

Webster’s Bible Translation
He that walketh with wise men shall be wise: but a companion of fools shall be destroyed.

World English Bible
One who walks with wise men grows wise, but a companion of fools suffers harm.

Young’s Literal Translation
Whoso is walking with wise men is wise, And a companion of fools suffereth evil.

John MacArthur

I remember hearing Dr. Adrian Rogers say that if he had to do it over again he would read from Proverbs every day to his kids. They turned out to be great kids and they were raised right. Nevertheless, if he had to do it over again he thought a more emphasis on Proverbs is the way to go. That is why I am spending so much time in Proverbs with my kids today.

John MacArthur does a great job on Proverbs and here is a portion of his sermon on Proverbs.

Well, such is the duty of a father. And I close with this, listen carefully. You have this duty as a father and I want to lay it as clear as I can at your feet.

1. If you fail, father, to teach your son to fear God, the devil will teach him to hate God.

2. If you fail to teach your son to guard his mind, the devil will gladly teach him to have an open mind.

3. If you fail to teach your son to obey his parents, the devil will teach him to rebel and break his parent’s heart.

4. If you fail to teach your son to select his companions, the devil will gladly choose them for him.

5. If you fail to teach your son to control his body, the devil will teach him to give it over completely to lust.

6. If you fail to teach your son to enjoy the marriage partner that God has given him, the devil will teach him to destroy the marriage.

7.If you fail to teach your son to watch his words, the devil will fill his mouth with filth.

8. If you fail to teach your son to pursue his work, the devil will make his laziness a tool of hell.

9. If you fail to teach your son to manage his money, the devil will teach him to waste it on riotous living.

10. And if you fail to teach your son to love his neighbor, the devil will gladly teach him to love only himself. We have a great responsibility to this generation and the next as fathers.

Lord, we thank You for our time this morning in worship and the Word. I would pray for all here who are fathers that we might be faithful to teach what we should teach to our sons, to all our children, that we might be instruments of Your grace to bring about a godly seed in the next generation. Amen.

______________

ONE FINAL QUESTION: WHAT DOES PROVERBS 6:34 MEAN?

Adultery is a brainless act,
soul-destroying, self-destructive;
Expect a bloody nose, a black eye,
and a reputation ruined for good.

Ecclesiastes chapter 1 and the humanist outlook on life

Ecclesiastes 1

Published on Sep 4, 2012

Calvary Chapel Spring Valley | Sunday Evening | September 2, 2012 | Pastor Derek Neider

_____________________

I have written on the Book of Ecclesiastes and the subject of the meaning of our lives on several occasions on this blog. In this series on Ecclesiastes I hope to show how secular humanist man can not hope to find a lasting meaning to his life in a closed system without bringing God back into the picture. This is the same exact case with Solomon in the Book of Ecclesiastes. Three thousand years ago, Solomon took a look at life “under the sun” in his book of Ecclesiastes. Christian scholar Ravi Zacharias has noted, “The key to understanding the Book of Ecclesiastes is the term ‘under the sun.’ What that literally means is you lock God out of a closed system, and you are left with only this world of time plus chance plus matter.”

Let me show you some inescapable conclusions if you choose to live without God in the picture. Solomon came to these same conclusions when he looked at life “under the sun.”

  1. Death is the great equalizer (Eccl 3:20, “All go to the same place; all come from dust, and to dust all return.”)
  2. Chance and time have determined the past, and they will determine the future.  (Ecclesiastes 9:11-13)
  3. Power reigns in this life, and the scales are not balanced(Eccl 4:1)
  4. Nothing in life gives true satisfaction without God including knowledge (1:16-18), ladies and liquor (2:1-3, 8, 10, 11), and great building projects (2:4-6, 18-20).

You can only find a lasting meaning to your life by looking above the sun and bring God back into the picture.

Here are some good comments:

Ecclesiastes 1
« Proverbs 31 | Ecclesiastes 1 | Ecclesiastes 2 »

Introduction to Ecclesiastes

The book at a glance.

12 chapters, 222 verses. Herman Melville called it “the truest of all books,” and his fellow American novelist Thomas Wolfe described it as “the highest flower of poetry, eloquence, and truth.” Despite the attempts of biblical scholars and others to make the book seem problematical and inaccessible, it is an easy book to read and grasp. The viewpoint espoused by the author is a virtual summary of the biblical worldview: life lived by purely human and earthly standards is empty, while life with God at the center is fulfilling. The author tells us near the end of the book (12:9-10) exactly how he went about his task, and in the same passage provides his self-characterization: he is a teacher, a collector and careful arranger of proverbs, a stylist and wordsmith, and a person in quest of the truth. The book of Ecclesiastes has been aptly called the most contemporary or modern book in the Bible.

Passage Subject Matter Dominant Mood Literary Forms and Motifs
1:1–3 Introduction to author and theme Negative Superscription
1:4–2:23 Life under the sun: meaningless cycles; pursuit of knowledge, pleasure, wealth, work Negative Lyric meditation; brief narrative; quest motif
2:24–26 Life above the sun: the God-centered life Positive Declarations by the wise man
3:1–22 Two views of time Positive Lyric meditation; declarations by the wise man
4:1–5:17 Life under the sun: how life fails to satisfy Negative Catalog of observations; commands to the reader
5:18–20 Life above the sun: the God-centered life Positive Declarations by the wise man
6:1–9:6 Life under the sun: the disappointments and disillusionments of life Negative Observations and exhortations by the wise man
9:7–10 The enjoyment of life Positive Commands
9:11–10:20 Life under the sun: disillusionment and folly Negative Observations by the wise man
11:1–12:8 How to live well despite the limitations that are inevitable parts of life Positive Commands by the wise man
12:9–14 Wrap-up: concluding thoughts Positive Rituals of closure

Format.

Although Ecclesiastes is a collection of proverbs, it does not read like a typical collection of proverbs. This is because the proverbs are molded into clusters and furthermore because there is a unifying plot line that holds the units together. The units fall into the three categories of recollections, reflections, and mood pieces. All of these are expressed by a single narrator, who in effect tells the story of his quest to find satisfaction in life. This quest is reconstructed from the safe position of someone whose quest ended satisfactorily. The transitions between units often keep the quest in view: “so I turned to consider,” “again I saw,” “then I saw,” etc. As we watch the quest unfold, we are continuously aware of the discrepancy between the narrator’s present outlook and his futile search undertaken in the past. In effect, the speaker recalls the labyrinth of dead ends that he pursued, recreating his restless past with full vividness but not representing it as his mature outlook. Along with the narrative thread, the observational format of much of the material gives the book a meditative cast.

The book’s dialectical structure.

Ecclesiastes is organized as a prolonged contrast between two viewpoints. In terms of space, the major theme is the emptiness of life under the sun, that is, life lived by merely human and earthly values. The counterpart, which is intertwined and does not (contrary to a common misconception) surface only at the end, asserts an alternative to life at ground level. We might call it life above the sun—a God-centered view that opens the door to finding meaning in the earthly sphere. The book shuttles back and forth between negative and positive sections. The key to interpreting the parts of the book accurately is to note into which of the two contexts a passage falls. The writer himself gives us hints in this regard. The phrase “under the sun” or an equivalent appears conspicuously in the negative sections. The positive sections, which are briefer than the negative ones (like a breath of fresh air), refer conspicuously to God. The negative passages tell us the truth just as thoroughly as the positive sections do: they tell us the truth about life without God.

Unifying image patterns and motifs.

The phrase “under the sun” or its equivalent occurs more than thirty times. The word translated “vanity” appears as the word for vapor or breath in the original Hebrew text; it appears thirty-one times and suggests the fleetingness and emptiness of life lived without God at the center. To keep us rooted in real life, the author repeatedly uses imagery of eating, drinking, toil, sleep, death, and the cycles of nature. The book of Ecclesiastes has a flavor all its own; we recognize it instantly when we read or hear a passage, and no other book is quite the same.

The rhetoric of the book.

The book of Ecclesiastes has a strong persuasive cast, as the author attempts to persuade us of the futility of life under the sun and the glory of life above the sun. However, the Hebrew way of conducting an argument is not to lay out a logical sequence of arguments. Instead, the author of Ecclesiastes keeps repeating his claims so often that we come to agree with him. His appeal is to observable human experience, and his persuasive purpose is gained by getting us to feel the truthfulness of his viewpoint.

Genres.

The *proverb is the basic building block of the book. Although the book is not primarily structured like a story, the underlying *quest motif gives it a *narrative effect—an effect heightened by the continuous presence of a first-person narrator. Many of the negative, under-the-sun passages are voiced as a protest, so that the genre of protest literature comes into play. While all wisdom literature tends to make use of the resources of *poetry, including the verse form of *parallelism, the book of Ecclesiastes flaunts its poetic medium much more than ordinary wisdom literature does. The author is a master of *image, *metaphor, and *simile. (For more information on items accompanied by an asterisk, see the glossary at the back of this Bible.)

Tips for reading Ecclesiastes.

Individual passages need to be read in light of the dialectical structure of the book as a whole. Assertions made in the “under the sun” passages do not represent the author’s final viewpoint, whereas those that appear in the positive passages do. The book is partly observational and descriptive in format; we need to approach such passages in a meditative way, reflecting on our own experiences of the phenomena that the author describes. The book is also very affective, so we need to be receptive of the moods that it seeks to instill. Proverbs rely on real life as their best context, so we need to illustrate them from our own observations and experiences. Additionally, we will do justice to the book of Ecclesiastes only if we are receptive to the poetic medium in which it is couched.

Inferred literary intentions.

The book is designed to achieve the following literary purposes:

  • make the reader feel the emptiness of life lived by purely human and earthly values
  • lead the reader to feel the exaltation of a God-centered life
  • be truthful to human experience
  • appeal to our emotions and imagination as well as our reason
  • express truth in the form of poetry and proverb
  • lead us to share the author’s quest to find satisfaction in life
  • unify the individual proverbs and clusters around a central conflict between negative and positive viewpoints, as well as around a unifying quest motif
  • embody much of the meaning of the work in image patterns

Theological themes.

(1) The nature of people: the book of Ecclesiastes presents authentic human experience and excels in showing essential human nature. (2) The good life: by means of its quest motif, the book shows by negative and positive example how to live well and the restlessness of the human soul until it rests in God. (3) The nature of God: God is implicitly shown to be creator, judge, and provider, as well as the all-sufficient goal of human longing. (4) The Fall: behind the restlessness of the speaker’s futile quest to find meaning apart from God lies the story of Genesis 3 (see 7:29 for confirmation).

Ecclesiastes as a chapter in the master story of the Bible.

The purpose of the Bible’s master story is to lead the reader to faith in God and in Christ as the supreme sacrifice. Whatever the particular slant of a given book of the Bible, the overall purpose is the same. The book of Ecclesiastes has been called a Christ-shaped vacuum. Its contribution to the story line of the Bible is to record the longing of the human soul to find satisfaction and to point us toward the satisfaction of that longing in a Christ-centered experience of life. Jesus is the meaning of life, and if he is not at the center of our daily experience, we will find only futility and frustration.

Prologue 1:1–3 ]. The forthrightness of the author (identified as King Solomon) is one of his most attractive traits. He tells us at once who he is and the keynote of his book. The word translated as “vanity” appears thirty-one times in the book and in the original Hebrew is a concrete image—vapor or breath. We need to turn that metaphor like a prism in the light, teasing out how it relates to the overall effect of Ecclesiastes.

1:1 The words of the Preacher, 1 the son of David, king in Jerusalem.

Vanity 2 of vanities, says the Preacher,
vanity of vanities! All is vanity.
What does man gain by all the toil
at which he toils under the sun?

Meditation on the futile cycles of life 1:4–11 ]. The author’s first meditation on the emptiness of life under the sun is a mood piece in which he gives example after example of the cycles of nature (vv. 4–7) and the corresponding cycles in human experience (vv. 8–11). The common denominator in all of the cycles that are portrayed is that there is repetition but no progress. The first half of the poem is a tissue of contrasts—between the changing generations and the unchanging earth, the sun’s rising and setting (east vs. west), the wind’s blowing to the south and the north (opposites) but always returning, and streams running to the sea but returning to the place of origin. As a pivot between the two halves of the poem stands the statement of theme: “All things are full of weariness” (v. 8). Then the poet shifts the focus from nature to people, still with a view toward getting us to feel how futile our repeated actions in life are. He records a litany of failures—failure to find satisfaction in seeing and hearing (v. 8), failure to introduce genuine progress or change into human history (vv. 9–10), failure of memory, resulting in oblivion to the individual (v. 11). Verse 8 uses the formula “not satisfied,” and one of the distinguishing features of Ecclesiastes is that the voice of unsatisfied desire runs strong.

A generation goes, and a generation comes,
but the earth remains forever.
The sun rises, and the sun goes down,
and hastens 3 to the place where it rises.
The wind blows to the south
and goes around to the north;
around and around goes the wind,
and on its circuits the wind returns.
All streams run to the sea,
but the sea is not full;
to the place where the streams flow,
there they flow again.
All things are full of weariness;
a man cannot utter it;
the eye is not satisfied with seeing,
nor the ear filled with hearing.
What has been is what will be,
and what has been done is what will be done,
and there is nothing new under the sun.
10 Is there a thing of which it is said,
“See, this is new”?
It has been already
in the ages before us.
11 There is no remembrance of former things, 4
nor will there be any remembrance
of later things 5 yet to be
among those who come after.

The futile quest to find meaning in knowledge 1:12–18 ]. This unit is a mininarrative—an abbreviated quest story in which the speaker pictures himself as the archetypal quester who speaks of applying his heart (vv. 13, 17), seeking and searching (v. 13), seeing everything (v. 14), and acquiring great wisdom (v. 16). We should note the following things about the quest: (1) it was a humanistic quest that the speaker undertook by himself (vv. 13, 16, 17); (2) it was a comprehensive quest (vv. 13, 14, 16); (3) it was an unsuccessful quest (vv. 13, 14, 15, 17); (4) it was a self-centered quest. This passage records one of the dead ends that the speaker pursued in this quest to find meaning in life.

12 I the Preacher have been king over Israel in Jerusalem. 13 And I applied my heart 6 to seek and to search out by wisdom all that is done under heaven. It is an unhappy business that God has given to the children of man to be busy with. 14 I have seen everything that is done under the sun, and behold, all is vanity and a striving after wind. 7

15 What is crooked cannot be made straight,
and what is lacking cannot be counted.

16 I said in my heart, “I have acquired great wisdom, surpassing all who were over Jerusalem before me, and my heart has had great experience of wisdom and knowledge.” 17 And I applied my heart to know wisdom and to know madness and folly. I perceived that this also is but a striving after wind.

18 For in much wisdom is much vexation,
and he who increases knowledge increases sorrow.

Footnotes

1 1:1 Or Convener, or Collector; Hebrew Qoheleth (so throughout Ecclesiastes)
2 1:2 Hebrew vapor (so throughout Ecclesiastes)
3 1:5 Or and returns panting
4 1:11 Or former people
5 1:11 Or later people
6 1:13 The Hebrew term denotes the center of one’s inner life, including mind, will, and emotions
7 1:14 Or a feeding on wind; compare Hosea 12:1 (so throughout Ecclesiastes)

Related posts:

The Humanist takes on Solomon and the Book of Ecclesiastes

This from the American Humanist website: This week we’re pleased to publish a new poem “Ecclesiastes” by Frank S. Robinson. Frank S. Robinson is a retired New York State administrative law judge, a rare coin dealer, and author of five books, most recently The Case for Rational Optimism. He is married to the poet Therese […]

Avril Lavigne commits “the fool’s sin” in front of family crowd in Tampa (Avril and the Book of Ecclesiastes Part 1)

Tampa Bay Rays apologize for Avril Lavigne TMZ reported: According to local reports, Avril’s mic didn’t work at the start of her show … and she responded to the cavalcade of boos by yelling obscenities at crowd. Rays rep Rick Vaughn tells TMZ, “The Rays demand profanity-free performances from all of our concert performers and […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part U “Do men have a say in the abortion debate?” (includes the film SLAUGHTER OF THE INNOCENTS and editorial cartoon)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

2008 article on Woody Allen on the meaning of life

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

If I see Chris Martin of Coldplay in person what would I say to him? (Part 3)

Chris Martin revealed in his interview with Howard Stern that he was rasied an evangelical Christian but he has left the church. I believe that many words that he puts in his songs today are generated from the deep seated Christian beliefs from his childhood that find their way out in his songs. His belief in […]

Part 4 Adrian Rogers on Proverbs “How To Be The Father Of A Wise Child” (video too)

Picture of Adrian Rogers above from 1970′s while pastor of Bellevue Baptist of Memphis, and president of Southern Baptist Convention. (Little known fact, Rogers was the starting quarterback his senior year of the Palm Beach High School football team that won the state title and a hero to a 7th grader at the same school named […]

If I see Chris Martin of Coldplay in person what would I say to him? (Part 2)

Chris Martin revealed in his interview with Howard Stern that he was rasied an evangelical Christian but he has left the church. I believe that many words that he puts in his songs today are generated from the deep seated Christian beliefs from his childhood that find their way out in his songs. His belief in […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part N “A discussion of the Woody Allen Movie CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS”(includes film DEATH BY SOMEONE’S CHOICE)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part L “On what basis do you say murder is wrong?”Part 2 (includes the film THE BASIS FOR HUMAN DIGNITY)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part K “On what basis do you say murder is wrong?”Part 1 (includes film ABORTION OF THE HUMAN RACE)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

“Woody Wednesday” Another look at Woody Allen’s movie Crimes and Misdemeanors

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

“Woody Wednesday” A 2010 review of Woody Allen’s Annie Hall

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

Robert Dick Wilson’s talk “Is the Higher Criticism Scholarly?” (part 6 of transcript)

The Bible and Archaeology (3/5) For many more archaeological evidences in support of the Bible, see Archaeology and the Bible . (There are some great posts on this too at the bottom of this post.) Robert Dick Wilson at the Grove City Bible Conference in 1909. IS THE HIGHER CRITICISM SCHOLARLY?Clearly attested facts showing that thedestructive […]

“Woody Wednesday” In 2009 interview Woody Allen talks about the lack of meaning of life and the allure of younger women

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

“Woody Wednesday” Woody Allen on the Emptiness of Life by Toby Simmons

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

12 Questions for Woody Allen (Woody Wednesday)

Above is a clip of 12 questions for Woody Allen. Below is a list of some of his movies. WOODY’S FINEST: Philip French’s favourite five Annie Hall (1977) In his first fully achieved masterwork, a semi-autobiographical comedy in which his ex-lover Diane Keaton and best friend Tony Roberts play versions of themselves, Allen created a […]

“Woody Wednesday” Allen on the meaning of life (part 2)

September 3, 2011 · 5:16 PM ↓ Jump to Comments Woody Allen on the Emptiness of Life In the final scene of Manhattan, Woody Allen’s character, Isaac, is lying on the sofa with a microphone and a tape-recorder, dictating to himself an idea for a short story. It will be about “people in Manhattan,” he says, […]

Video interviews of Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin (Part 4)

As far as I know they have never done an interview together. Therefore, I have included separate interviews that they have done below and I have some links to past posts I have done on them too. Shane Warne – Chris Martin Interview (Part 1) Uploaded by HandyAndy136 on Nov 24, 2010 Originally broadcast on […]

“Woody Wednesday” Allen realizes if God doesn’t exist then all is meaningless

The Bible and Archaeology (1/5) The Bible maintains several characteristics that prove it is from God. One of those is the fact that the Bible is accurate in every one of its details. The field of archaeology brings to light this amazing accuracy. _________________________- I want to make two points today. 1. There is no […]

Milton Friedman’s religious views

John Lofton noted: “DR. FRIEDMAN an evolutionist with ‘values’ of unknown origin but he said they were not ‘accidental.’ “   If anyone takes time to read my blog for any length of time they can not question my respect for the life long work of Milton Friedman. He has advanced the cause of freedom […]

“Woody Wednesday” Trivia about Woody Allen Part 9

Small Time Crooks 10

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopelessmeaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of his own secular view. I salute him for doing that. That is why I have returned to his work over and over and presented my own Christian worldview as an alternative.

My interest in Woody Allen is so great that I have a “Woody Wednesday” on my blog www.thedailyhatch.org every week. Also I have done over 30 posts on the historical characters mentioned in his film “Midnight in Paris.” (Salvador Dali, Ernest Hemingway,T.S.Elliot,  Cole Porter,Paul Gauguin,  Luis Bunuel, and Pablo Picasso were just a few of the characters.) Check out these trivia facts below.

Here is some trivia about Woody Allen:

[on Match Point (2005)] To me, it is strictly about luck. Life is such a terrifying experience – it’s very important to feel, “I don’t believe in luck, Well, I make my luck.” Well, the truth of the matter is, you don’t make your luck. So I wanted to show that here was a guy – and I symbolically made him a tennis player – who’s a pretty bad guy, and yet my feeling is, in life, if you get the breaks – if the luck bounces your way, you know – you can not only get by, you can flourish in the same way that I felt Marty Landau could in Crimes and Misdemeanors (1989). If you can kill somebody – if you have no moral sense – there’s no God out there that’s suddenly going to hit you with lightning. Because I don’t believe in God. So this is what was on my mind: the enormous unfairness of the world, the enormous injustice of the world, the sense that every day people get away with the worst kinds of crimes. So it’s a pessimistic film, in that sense.

[on his least favorite of his own films, Manhattan (1979)] I hated that one. I even made Stardust Memories (1980) for United Artists just so Manhattan would stay on the shelf. And even after those efforts, I still can’t believe even to this day how it became so commercially successful. I can’t believe I got away with it.

I’m kind of, secretly, in the back of my mind, counting on living a long time. My father lived to a hundred. My mother lived to 95, almost 96. If there is anything to heredity, I should be able to make films for another 17 years. You never know. A piano could drop on my head. (December 2005)

I’ve never, ever in my life had any interference. I’ve always had final cut, no-one saw scripts, no-one saw casting. So since Take the Money and Run (1969), I’ve been spoiled. But recently, at about the time of Match Point (2005), the studios began to behave differently. They started to say, “Look, we like to make films with you and we’ll give you the money, but we don’t want to be treated as if we’re just a bank, putting money in a bag and then just going away. You’ll still have final cut and all of that, but we would like to see a script, know who you’re casting and be involved in some way.” I feel that this is a completely reasonable request, but I just wasn’t used to working that way, so I went over to Europe. There’s no studio system, so they don’t care about any of that stuff. They’re bankers. And they’re happy to be bankers. They put up the money, you give them the film, and that’s what they care about. That worked very well for me on Match Point (2005). So I did it again with Scoop (2006) and Cassandra’s Dream (2007). And I made Vicky Cristina Barcelona (2008) in Spain under the same circumstances.

If they said to me tomorrow, “We’re pulling the plug and we’re not giving you any more money to make films,” that would not bother me in the slightest. I mean, I’m happy to write for the theatre. And if they wouldn’t back any of my plays, I’m happy to sit home and write prose. But as long as there are people willing to put up the vast sums of money needed to make films, I should take advantage of it. Because there will come a time when they won’t.

Retire and do what? I’d be doing the same thing as I do now: sitting at home writing a play, then characters, jokes and situations would come to me. So I don’t know what else I would do with my time.

[on Shelley Duvall] She’s a true one of a kind. She’s so effective on the screen, that if she’s cast properly, she’s incapable of being anything else but fascinating.

[on Michelangelo Antonioni] I knew him slightly and spent some time with him. He was thin as a wire and athletic and energetic and mentally alert. And he was a wonderful ping-pong player. I played with him; he always won because he had a great reach. That was his game.

[on Ingmar Bergman] He and I had dinner in his New York hotel suite; it was a great treat for me. I was nervous and really didn’t want to go. But he was not at all what you might expect: the formidable, dark, brooding genius. He was a regular guy. He commiserated with me about low box-office grosses and women and having to put up with studios. The world saw him as a genius, and he was worrying about the weekend grosses. Yet he was plain and colloquial in speech, not full of profound pronunciamentos about life. Sven Nykvist told me that when they were doing all those scenes about death and dying, they’d be cracking jokes and gossiping about the actors’ sex lives. I liked his attitude that a film is not an event you make a big deal out of. He felt filmmaking was just a group of people working. I copied some of that from him. At times he made two and three films in a year. He worked very fast; he’d shoot seven or eight pages of script at a time. They didn’t have the money to do anything else. I think his films have eternal relevance, because they deal with the difficulty of personal relationships and lack of communication between people and religious aspirations and mortality, existential themes that will be relevant a thousand years from now. When many of the things that are successful and trendy today will have been long relegated to musty-looking antiques, his stuff will still be great.

The biggest personal shock to me of all the movies that I’ve done is that Hollywood Ending (2002) was not thought of as a first-rate, extraordinary comedy. I was stunned that it met with any resistance at all. I thought it was a very, very funny idea and I thought that I executed it absolutely fine, and that I was funny and that Téa Leoni was great. I thought it was a simple, funny idea that worked. I didn’t think I blew it anywhere along the line – in performance, in shooting it, in the jokes, situations. When I showed it to the first couple of people, film writers, they said, “This is just great. This is one of the funniest movies you’ve done.” But that’s not what the subsequent reactions were. And I was so shocked. I generally don’t love my own finished product but this one I did. I don’t think many people would, but I would put it toward the top of my comedies. The audience didn’t show up. I think if people had gone to see it they would have enjoyed it. But they didn’t go to see it.

[on Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964)] Everything wonderful about that movie… is because of the way it was directed. Otherwise, I thought there were flaws in the writing of the movie and flaws in some of the performances of the movie. But the directing of the movie was so bravura and so superb, that it was just a knockout.

Whenever they ask women what they find appealing in men, a sense of humor is always one of the things they mention. Some women feel power is important, some women feel that looks are important, tenderness, intelligence…but sense of humor seems to permeate all of them. So I’m saying to that character played by Goldie Hawn, “Why is that so important?” But it is important apparently because women have said to us that that is very, very important to them. I also feel that humor, just like Fred Astaire dance numbers or these lightweight musicals give you a little oasis. You are in this horrible world and for an hour and a half you duck into a dark room and it’s air-conditioned and the sun is not blinding you and you leave the terror of the universe behind and you are completely transported into an escapist situation. The women are beautiful, the men are witty and heroic, nobody has terrible problems and this is a delightful escapist thing, and you leave the theatre refreshed. It’s like drinking a cool lemonade and then after a while you get worn down again and you need it again. It seems to me that making escapist films might be a better service to people than making intellectual ones and making films that deal with issues. It might be better to just make escapist comedies that don’t touch on any issues. The people just get a cool lemonade, and then they go out refreshed, they enjoy themselves, they forget how awful things are and it helps them-it strengthens them to get through the day. So I feel humor is important for those two reasons: that it is a little bit of refreshment like music, and that women have told me over the years that it is very, very important to them.

I think what I’m saying is that I’m really impotent against the overwhelming bleakness of the universe and that the only thing I can do is my little gift and do it the best I can, and that is about the best I can do, which is cold comfort.

You want some kind of relief from the agony and terror of human existence. Human existence is a brutal experience to me…it’s a brutal, meaningless experience-an agonizing, meaningless experience with some oases, delight, some charm and peace, but these are just small oases. Overall, it is a brutal, brutal, terrible experience, and so it’s what can you do to alleviate the agony of the human condition, the human predicament? That is what interests me the most. I continue to make the films because the problem obsesses me all the time and it’s consistently on my mind and I’m consistently trying to alleviate the problem, and I think by making films as frequently as I do I get a chance to vent the problems. There is some relief. I have said this before in a facetious way, but it is not so facetious: I am a whiner. I do get a certain amount of solace from whining.

I love the movie “Midnight in Paris” by Woody Allen and I have done over 30 posts on the historical characters mentioned in the film. Take a look below:

“Midnight in Paris” one of Woody Allen’s biggest movie hits in recent years, July 18, 2011 – 6:00 am

(Part 32, Jean-Paul Sartre)July 10, 2011 – 5:53 am

 (Part 29, Pablo Picasso) July 7, 2011 – 4:33 am

(Part 28,Van Gogh) July 6, 2011 – 4:03 am

(Part 27, Man Ray) July 5, 2011 – 4:49 am

(Part 26,James Joyce) July 4, 2011 – 5:55 am

(Part 25, T.S.Elliot) July 3, 2011 – 4:46 am

(Part 24, Djuna Barnes) July 2, 2011 – 7:28 am

(Part 23,Adriana, fictional mistress of Picasso) July 1, 2011 – 12:28 am

(Part 22, Silvia Beach and the Shakespeare and Company Bookstore) June 30, 2011 – 12:58 am

(Part 21,Versailles and the French Revolution) June 29, 2011 – 5:34 am

(Part 16, Josephine Baker) June 24, 2011 – 5:18 am

(Part 15, Luis Bunuel) June 23, 2011 – 5:37 am

“Woody Wednesday” A 2010 review of Woody Allen’s Annie Hall

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

“Woody Wednesday” In 2009 interview Woody Allen talks about the lack of meaning of life and the allure of younger women

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

Woody Allen video interview in France talk about making movies in Paris vs NY and other subjects like God, etc

Woody Allen video interview in France Related posts: “Woody Wednesdays” Woody Allen on God and Death June 6, 2012 – 6:00 am Good website on Woody Allen How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue caught in the roller of an electric typewriter? If Jesus Christ came back today and […]

“Woody Wednesday” Woody Allen on the Emptiness of Life by Toby Simmons

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

Woody Allen interviews Billy Graham (Woody Wednesday)

A surprisingly civil discussion between evangelical Billy Graham and agnostic comedian Woody Allen. Skip to 2:00 in the video to hear Graham discuss premarital sex, to 4:30 to hear him respond to Allen’s question about the worst sin and to 7:55 for the comparison between accepting Christ and taking LSD. ___________________ The Christian Post > […]

“Woody Allen Wednesdays” can be seen on the www.thedailyhatch.org

Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Discussion: Part 1 If you like Woody Allen films as much as I do then join me every Wednesday for another look the man and his movies. Below are some of the posts from the past: “Woody Wednesday” How Allen’s film “Crimes and Misdemeanors makes the point that hell is necessary […]

“Woody Wednesday” Great Documentary on Woody Allen

I really enjoyed this documentary on Woody Allen from PBS. Woody Allen: A Documentary, Part 1 Published on Mar 26, 2012 by NewVideoDigital Beginning with Allen’s childhood and his first professional gigs as a teen – furnishing jokes for comics and publicists – WOODY ALLEN: A DOCUMENTARY chronicles the trajectory and longevity of Allen’s career: […]

“Woody Wednesday” Discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (Part 6)

Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Discussion: Part 3 Uploaded by camdiscussion on Sep 23, 2007 Part 3 of 3: ‘Is Woody Allen A Romantic Or A Realist?’ A discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie, Crimes and Misdemeanors, perhaps his finest. By Anton Scamvougeras. http://camdiscussion.blogspot.com/ antons@mail.ubc.ca ______________ One of my favorite Woody Allen movies and I reviewed […]

“Woody Wednesday” Discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (Part 5)

Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Discussion: Part 2 Uploaded by camdiscussion on Sep 23, 2007 Part 2 of 3: ‘What Does The Movie Tell Us About Ourselves?’ A discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie, perhaps his finest. By Anton Scamvougeras. http://camdiscussion.blogspot.com/ antons@mail.ubc.ca _________________- One of my favorite Woody Allen movies and I reviewed it earlier but […]

In 2009 interview Woody Allen talks about the lack of meaning of life and the allure of younger women

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

“Woody Allen Wednesdays” can be seen on the www.thedailyhatch.org

Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Discussion: Part 1 If you like Woody Allen films as much as I do then join me every Wednesday for another look the man and his movies. Below are some of the posts from the past: “Woody Wednesday” How Allen’s film “Crimes and Misdemeanors makes the point that hell is necessary […]

Woody Allen on the Emptiness of Life by Toby Simmons

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

“Woody Wednesday” Discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (Part 4)

Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Discussion: Part 1 Uploaded by camdiscussion on Sep 23, 2007 Part 1 of 3: ‘What Does Judah Believe?’ A discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie, perhaps his finest. By Anton Scamvougeras. http://camdiscussion.blogspot.com/ antons@mail.ubc.ca _____________ One of my favorite films is this gem by Woody Allen “Crimes and Misdemeanors”: Film Review By […]

“Woody Wednesday” Discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (Part 3)

Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Discussion: Part 3 Uploaded by camdiscussion on Sep 23, 2007 Part 3 of 3: ‘Is Woody Allen A Romantic Or A Realist?’ A discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie, Crimes and Misdemeanors, perhaps his finest. By Anton Scamvougeras. http://camdiscussion.blogspot.com/ antons@mail.ubc.ca ______________ One of my favorite Woody Allen movies and I reviewed […]

“Woody Wednesday” Discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (Part 2)

Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Discussion: Part 2 Uploaded by camdiscussion on Sep 23, 2007 Part 2 of 3: ‘What Does The Movie Tell Us About Ourselves?’ A discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie, perhaps his finest. By Anton Scamvougeras. http://camdiscussion.blogspot.com/ antons@mail.ubc.ca _________________- One of my favorite Woody Allen movies and I reviewed it earlier but […]

“Woody Wednesday” Discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (Part 1)

Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Discussion: Part 1 Uploaded by camdiscussion on Sep 23, 2007 Part 1 of 3: ‘What Does Judah Believe?’ A discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie, perhaps his finest. By Anton Scamvougeras. http://camdiscussion.blogspot.com/ antons@mail.ubc.ca _____________ Today I am starting a discusssion of the movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” by Woody Allen. This 1989 […]

The most popular posts in the last 30 days about the spiritual quest of Chris Martin of Coldplay that can be found on www.thedailyhatch.org

These are some of the most popular posts in the last 30 days about the spiritual quest of Chris Martin of Coldplay that can be found on http://www.thedailyhatch.org:

Chris Martin of Coldplay unknowingly lives out his childhood Christian beliefs (Part 3 of notes from June 23, 2012 Dallas Coldplay Concert, Martin left Christianity because of teaching on hell then he writes bestselling song that teaches hell exists) 

If I see Chris Martin of Coldplay in person what would I say to him? (Part 2)
If I see Chris Martin of Coldplay in person what would I say to him? (Part 3)

Insight into what Coldplay meant by “St. Peter won’t call my name” (Series on Coldplay’s spiritual search, Part 3)jh61

Chris Martin revealed in his interview with Howard Stern that he was rasied an evangelical Christian but he has left the church. I believe that many words that he puts in his songs today are generated from the deep seated Christian beliefs from his childhood that find their way out in his songs. His belief in being generous with charities, and the fact Coldplay’s songs  deal so much with death and the search for meaning and purpose of life (similar to Solomon’s search in Ecclesiastes), and  that our actions are being watched, and Chris describes different ways God tries to reveal himself to us, and many songs deal with trying to find a way to an afterlife and heaven, and he stills uses Christian terms like being “blessed” and “grateful.”

Related posts:

 

Chris Martin of Coldplay unknowingly lives out his childhood Christian beliefs (Part 8 of notes from June 23, 2012 Dallas Coldplay Concert)

Coldplay 6-22-12 Dallas, TX Best Opening.MOV Published on Jun 23, 2012 by jaimenolga 1 of Don’t miss the second song of this clip!! It was incredible! (One eye watching you song was great.) Coldplay brought confetti, lights and thousands of fans to the American Airlines Center; see photos from their colorful show Photo Gallery News […]

 

Chris Martin of Coldplay unknowingly lives out his childhood Christian beliefs (Part 7 of notes from June 23, 2012 Dallas Coldplay Concert)

Coldplay Live in Dallas – Lover’s in Japan Ball Drop Published on Jun 23, 2012 by TheRyanj64 Live From the American Airlines Center in Dallas Texas June 22, 2012 Coldplay – Lover’s in Japan Ball Drop Coldplay brought confetti, lights and thousands of fans to the American Airlines Center; see photos from their colorful show […]

 

Chris Martin of Coldplay unknowingly lives out his childhood Christian beliefs (Part 6 of notes from June 23, 2012 Dallas Coldplay Concert)

Coldplay – Yellow (Live) @ American Airlines Center Published on Jun 23, 2012 by Crwdickerson Coldplay Performing Yellow @ American Airlines Center Dallas June 22, 2012 Coldplay brought confetti, lights and thousands of fans to the American Airlines Center; see photos from their colorful show Photo Gallery News Sports Lifestyles Comments (0)   3/11 Chris […]

 

Chris Martin of Coldplay unknowingly lives out his childhood Christian beliefs (Part 5 of notes from June 23, 2012 Dallas Coldplay Concert)

Coldplay “paradise” Dallas Texas 6/22/12 ( Floor View ) Published on Jun 23, 2012 by ccam cher Awesome concert Coldplay brought confetti, lights and thousands of fans to the American Airlines Center; see photos from their colorful show Photo Gallery News Sports Lifestyles Comments (0)   9/11 Chris Martin was brought up as an evangelical […]

 

Chris Martin of Coldplay unknowingly lives out his childhood Christian beliefs (Part 4 of notes from June 23, 2012 Dallas Coldplay Concert)

Coldplay – In My Place (Live in Dallas) June 22 2012 Published on Jun 24, 2012 by maimiaa Coldplay performing at American Airlines Center in Dallas, TX Coldplay brought confetti, lights and thousands of fans to the American Airlines Center; see photos from their colorful show Photo Gallery News Sports Lifestyles Comments (0)   7/11 […]

 

Chris Martin of Coldplay unknowingly lives out his childhood Christian beliefs (Part 3 of notes from June 23, 2012 Dallas Coldplay Concert, Martin left Christianity because of teaching on hell then he writes bestselling song that teaches hell exists)

Viva La Vida Published on Jun 23, 2012 by TheRyanj64 Coldplay’s Viva La Vida at American Airlines Center in Dallas on June 22, 2012 __________ Coldplay brought confetti, lights and thousands of fans to the American Airlines Center; see photos from their colorful show Photo Gallery News Sports Lifestyles Comments (0)   5/11 Chris Martin […]

 

Chris Martin of Coldplay unknowingly lives out his childhood Christian beliefs (Part 2 of notes from June 23, 2012 Dallas Coldplay Concert)

Coldplay – Mylo Xyloto/Hurts Like Heaven (Live) @ American Airlines Center Coldplay brought confetti, lights and thousands of fans to the American Airlines Center; see photos from their colorful show Photo Gallery News Sports Lifestyles Comments (0)   2/11 Published on Jun 24, 2012 by Crwdickerson Coldplay Performing Mylo Xyloto/Hurts Like Heaven @ AAC Dallas […]

 

Chris Martin of Coldplay unknowingly lives out his childhood Christian beliefs (Part 1 of notes from June 23, 2012 Dallas Coldplay Concert)

Coldplay-DALLAS-2012-”Opening, Mylo Xyloto, and Hurts like Heaven!” Published on Jun 24, 2012 by ColdplayDALLAS2012 1:10 is where the concert starts! Sorry for the shaking and sound audio! It was really loud! AND AWESOME! Please THUMB UP and COMMENT if u went to this coldplay concert! And I also hope that this will get a few […]

 

“Music Monday” Chris Martin’s favorite song has a deep meaning

Uploaded by emimusic on Feb 28, 2009 Pre-VEVO play count: 22,581,204 Music video by The Verve performing Bitter Sweet Symphony. ________ At the 4.40 mark in the clip below Chris Martin identifies the best song ever written in his estimation: What does the song mean? Here is a thought off the internet: This song is […]

 

“Music Monday” Video interviews of Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin (Part 2)

As far as I know they have never done an interview together. Therefore, I have included separate interviews that they have done below and I have some links to past posts I have done on them too. Gwyneth Paltrow & Robert Downey Jr. on Jonathan Ross 2010.04.23 (Part 1) Coldplay: Chris Martin and Jonny Buckland […]

Here are other blog posts that have got lots of hits in the last 30 days:
Origin of Hatfield-McCoy feud may have been a fight over a pig
Jim Kelly’s wife Jill and her Christian Testimony (Part 1)
Review of the movie “Mud” which was made in Arkansas
Comparison of crime data and concealed carry gun laws between Houston and Chicago (includes funny gun control posters)
What do the locals think of the Hatfield-McCoy tv series?
Did you know that Peyton and Ashley Manning had kids?
Milton Friedman’s religious views
Former Vol and Knoxville radio personality’s DUI charge and why I don’t drink
Louis Zamperini: American Hero part 3
What was D Day really like for those soldiers who took the beach?
“Payday Someday” by Robert G. Lee (Part 1 of transcript and video)
Who is Jessica Dorrell? (with pictures)
Some say Steve Jobs was an atheist jh42
Joplin Tornado hits gas station, video during tornado and aftermath
Great, great, granddaughter of Devil Anse Hatfield said he came to Christ
Hitler’s last few hours before entering hell (never before released photos)
Bobby Petrino had other girlfriends besides Jessica Dorrell? UPDATED
Tim Tebow being persecuted for his Christian faith?
About
The Characters referenced in Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris” (Part 17, J. M. W. Turner)
Gun control can cost lives!!!!!
The Characters referenced in Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris” (Part 8, Henri Toulouse Lautrec)
Pictures and videos of 5 presidents together at one time
Christopher Hitchens’ view on abortion may surprise you
Peyton Manning speaking in Little Rock on June 1, 2013
Was George Washington our best president?
The characters referenced in Woody Allen’s movie “Midnight in Paris” (Part 25, T.S.Elliot)
Picasso painting “The acrobat” in Woody Allen movie “Midnight in Paris”
Dying laughing at Obamacare
Peyton and Ashley Manning show off their baby boy
Did Steve Jobs help people even though he did not give away a lot of money?
Milton Friedman videos and transcripts Part 8
The characters referenced in Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris” (Part 16, Josephine Baker)
The Characters referenced in Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris” (Part 6 Gertrude Stein)
Thomas Cullen Davis guilty or innocent?
Best Storm Chaser videos of Joplin Tornado May 22, 2011
D Day was 68 years ago, Joe Speaks of Arkansas was captured twice during the European battles
The Characters referenced in Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris” (Part 27, Man Ray)
The characters referenced in Woody Allen’s movie “Midnight in Paris” (Part 31, Jean Cocteau)
The Characters referenced in Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris” (Part 1 William Faulkner)
The characters referenced in Woody Allen’s movie “Midnight in Paris” (Part 30, Albert Camus)
Little Jimmy Dickens: The oldest living member of the original Grand Ole Opry
Discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (Part 1)
What the Sam Hill is going on? (Phrase came out of Hatfield-McCoy feud)
Matt Jones speaks at Little Rock Touchdown Club Part 2
The Welfare trap can be destroyed by Milton Friedman’s negative income tax
More about the historical characters mentioned in the movie “Lincoln” by Steven Spielberg (Part 2) (Pictures of historical figures)
Dan Mitchell, Ron Paul, and Milton Friedman on Immigration Debate (includes editorial cartoon)
D-Day Landings,”Saving Private Ryan” most frightening and realistic 15 minutes ever
Famous Arkansas murder trials
IRS cartoons from Dan Mitchell’s blog
Tell the 48 million food stamps users to eat more broccoli!!!!
Arkansas connection to the Hatfield McCoy feud!!!!
Oldest person in the world cursed? Jeanne Calment wasn’t, she lived to 122 yrs and told of meeting Van Gogh
John Calipari’s religious views
What Adrian Rogers said to pro-abortion activist at the U.S. Senate in the 1990′s
The Characters referenced in Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris” (Part 7 Paul Gauguin)
We know the IRS commissioner wasn’t telling the truth in March 2012, when he testified: “There’s absolutely no targeting.”
Senator Pryor asks for Spending Cut Suggestions! Here are a few!(Part 20)(The Conspirator, Part 19, Lewis Powell Part B)
MUSIC MONDAY: Lou Graham knows what love is
The Life and Ministry of Adrian Rogers (Part 1)
War Hero Joe Speaks and D Day pictures
Meaning of the song “Up on Cripple Creek”
Bill Clinton has a great appreciation for Mel Brooks’ movies like I do!!!
Pictures of Tornado damage May 24, 2011 Oklahoma, Arkansas Kansas
John MacArthur: Fulfilled prophecy in the Bible? (Ezekiel 26-28 and the story of Tyre, video clips)
People in the Johnny Cash video “God’s Gonna Cut You Down”
Misquotes, Fake Quotes, and Disputed Quotes of the Founders
Evie
The characters referenced in Woody Allen’s movie “Midnight in Paris” (Part 36, Alice B. Toklas, Woody Allen on the meaning of life)
Medicaid mistake in Arkansas
Funny cartoon from Dan Mitchell’s blog on Greece
Review and trailer of the movie “Safe Haven”
Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 22
Discussion on Equality from Milton Friedman and Bradley Gitz
The Characters referenced in Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris” (Part 18, Claude Monet)
Atheists confronted: How I confronted Carl Sagan the year before he died jh47
People hated tax collectors like Zacchaeus 2000 years ago and they hate them today too!!!
John MacArthur on Proverbs (Part 4) “Bad company corrupts…”
Gael Monfils “Tennis Tuesday”
Matt Chandler:Journey with Christ through hardship of brain cancer (Part 2)
Pictures of aftermath of Springfield, Mass Tornado
Listing of transcripts and videos of Free to Choose by Milton Friedman: Episode “Created Equal” on www.theDailyHatch.org
Videos and Pictures of Explosion at Boston Marathon 2013 and JFK Library
Pictures in happier times of Arnold Schwarzenegger and Maria Shriver
Reason’s Peter Suderman highlights six reasons why states should refuse to implement any part of ObamaCare
Louis Zamperini: Great American War Hero gave good interview to Jay Leno on Tonight Show last night
Michael Cannon on Obamacare (editorial cartoons on Judge Roberts and Obamacare)
Video clips and pictures from the new film “42″ and documentary of Jackie Robinson
“Woody Wednesday” Discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (Part 3)
The Characters referenced in Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris” (Part 4 Ernest Hemingway)
Is the Bible historically accurate?(Part 14B)(The Conspirator Part 5)
David and Hope Solo
Paul Dexter Williams died from asphyxiation police said
Did Hitler go to hell?
Peyton Manning and wife did not want to leave Indy (Part 2)
Did David Barton fabricate quotes and attribute them to the founding fathers?
Gary Thain of Uriah Heep is a member of the “27 Club” (Part 7)
Founders Fathers were against welfare state
The characters referenced in Woody Allen’s movie “Midnight in Paris” (Part 32, Jean-Paul Sartre)
Bielema says his staff has great recruiting abilities
Bob Costas needs to think gun control logic through
Last hours of Marilyn Monroe’s life indicates she committed suicide because of unhappiness (Marilyn part 2)
Cartoons from Dan Mitchell’s blog that demonstrate what Obama is doing to our economy Part 1
Who is Jessica Dorrell’s future husband Josh Morgan?
Rogelio Baena learned last week he was not boy’s father, but Arnold Schwarzenegger was
Pictures of Dexter Williams
Steve Jobs left conservative Lutheran upbringing behind
Johnny Cash a Christian?
Laffer curve hits tax hikers pretty hard (includes cartoon)
Tim and Elisabeth Hasselbeck: Christians in a secular world (Part 2)
The characters referenced in Woody Allen’s movie “Midnight in Paris” (Part 24, Djuna Barnes)
Peyton Manning and wife did not want to leave Indy (Part 1)
We could put in a flat tax and it would enable us to cut billions out of the IRS budget!!!!
Quotes from Milton Friedman (part 3)
Skillet is a Christian Heavy Metal Band from Memphis Part 2
Alice Cooper is a Christian
Carl Sagan versus RC Sproul
Milton Friedman videos and transcripts Part 4
Why are we subsidizing the security of wealthy allies?
Little Rock native David Hodges has song used in “Safe Haven” trailer

s

University of Arkansas Law Professor quoted in Wall Street Journal Concerning Grading Standards

I found this article in the Wall Street Journal and several other publications.

Law Blog

WSJ on the cases, trends and personalities of interest to the business community.

iStock

Law schools should embrace grade inflation, says Professor Joshua Silverstein of the William H. Bowen School of Law.

In a forthcoming paper in the University of San Francisco Law Review, Mr Silverstein makes the case for why law schools should substantially eliminate C grades and raise the minimum cumulative GPA for good academic standing to a B minus.

Under such a system, says Mr. Silverstein, law professors would probably award C’s about as often as they currently award D’s.

So what’s the benefit in that?

Silverstein’s argument for grade inflation is more subtle than a “grades-are-bad” argument.

He makes two main points: First, he says that the inconsistent use of C grades puts students “at an unfair disadvantage when competing for employment with students from institutions that award mostly A’s and B’s.”

Second, he says there’s nothing gentle about the “Gentleman’s C.” Law students actually dread C’s, he says. Grade inflation would improve their “psychological well-being” by easing stress. He writes:

Why do C grades cause such distress among law students? Why is it so difficult for law professors to convince their students that C’s are acceptable under the grading systems generally in operation in legal education? Because our students are raised in an “A and B world.” More specifically, they receive mostly A’s and B’s in high school and college. As a result, they are conditioned to expect marks above the C level.

Mr. Silverstein says he’s not arguing that law schools should stop distinguishing between differences in achievement.

In fact, he thinks law schools should add more layers of distinction between a 2.7, or B minus, and a 4.0. They could do this by adopting “a fine grade scale with a large number of intervals, such as a four-point or 100-point scale that uses number grades instead of letters.”

But if they didn’t fear getting a C, wouldn’t students slack off?

Mr. Silverstein concedes that substantially eliminating C grades “will cause some students to cut back on the amount of work they do,” particularly among average students. But he says weaker students would have more incentive to work. Those who would otherwise feel “crushed” by a C would be less likely to tune out and give up, he argues.

Arkansas related posts:

Arkansas a model for other states on Medicaid expansion, I hope not!!!!

Arkansas a model for other states on Medicaid expansion, I hope not!!!! This is a great article and I am sad that many of the Republicans in Arkansas are actually trusting the Obama administration to keep their word. Currently we have 3 scandals with this administration and that speaks volumes about their integrity. Think Again: […]

 

Medicaid mistake in Arkansas

I know and love many of the Arkansas Republicans that voted for this poor solution in Arkansas but my friend Dan Greenberg got it right in this article below when he takes them to task. Medicaid Expansion in Arkansas: A Fig Leaf, Not a Solution Dan Greenberg April 30, 2013 at 5:05 pm As action […]

 

Are the Republicans in Arkansas true Tea Party Ronald Reagan Republicans?

Ronald Reagan said, “We will never compromise our principles and standards.” Are the Republicans in Arkansas true Tea Party Ronald Reagan Republicans? According to Americans for Prosperity in the last 5 years Arkansas’ current Medicaid program has run a deficit of a billion dollars. Why expand it willingly with Obama? The “Do Nothing” expansion plan increases […]

 

Rick Crawford warns Republican state lawmakers about expanding medicaid program in Arkansas

Nic Horton Medicaid Expansion will “Cost Almost Double than Doing Nothing” part II _______ I am hopeful that the Arkansas Republican state lawmakers will not expand the broken medicaid program. Evidently Congressman Rick Crawford feels strongly about this too. Crawford: Even With Arkansas Plan, ObamaCare Is Unaffordable Crawford urges state legislators to reject ObamaCare, because […]

 

Heritage Foundation mentions Arkansas lawmakers and medicaid expansion

Mike Maharrey talks AR Medicaid Expansion on the PHP ______________ This article from the Heritage Foundation mentions that the lawmakers in Arkansas are getting ready to make a big mistake if they think they will get flexibility from Obamacare on Medicaid expansion. Administration Rules Out “Deals” on Medicaid Expansion Edmund Haislmaier April 3, 2013 at […]

 

Americans for Prosperity against expanding Medicaid in Arkansas

  A Red-Ink Train Wreck: The Real Fiscal Cost of Government-Run Healthcare Uploaded on Nov 9, 2009 This CF&P Foundation video explains why healthcare proposals in Washington will result in bloated government and higher deficits. This mini-documentary exposes the pervasive inaccuracy of congressional forecasts and succinctly lists 12 reasons why Obamacare will be a budget […]

 

The last hope for sanity in Arkansas: Tea Party Republicans

A Red-Ink Train Wreck: The Real Fiscal Cost of Government-Run Healthcare Uploaded on Nov 9, 2009 This CF&P Foundation video explains why healthcare proposals in Washington will result in bloated government and higher deficits. This mini-documentary exposes the pervasive inaccuracy of congressional forecasts and succinctly lists 12 reasons why Obamacare will be a budget buster. […]

 

Republicans in Arkansas messing up by endorsing Obamacare

  Enlarge image Credit Nathan Vandiver / KUAR Michael Cannon of the Cato Institute told lawmakers March 19, 2013 that abandoning plans to partner with the federal government on a health insurance exchange would both benefit the state and reduce the power of the Affordable Care Act. __________________ I am very pleased with the Republican lawmakers in […]

 

Great article by Michael Cannon on Arkansas Medicaid expansion plan

CATO Institute Michael Cannon on the OReilly Factor Published on Mar 19, 2013 The CATO Institute’s Michael Cannon spoke at the Arkansas Conservative Caucus on Tuesday March 19th. Several conservatives were present. Cannon talked about how to defeat Obamacare in Arkansas & how the states can stop Obamacare on a national level. __________________ CATO Institute […]

 

Michael Cannon of Cato Institute speaks to Arkansas Senators (Part 3 includes editorial cartoon)

Jacque Martin asks CATO Institute Michael Cannon about Obamacare Published on Mar 19, 2013 The CATO Institute’s Michael Cannon spoke at the Arkansas Conservative Caucus on Tuesday March 19th. Several conservatives were present. Cannon talked about how to defeat Obamacare in Arkansas & how the states can stop Obamacare on a national level. Jacque Martin […]

 

Ecclesiastes “Life under the sun”

Ecclesiastes 6-8 | Solomon Turns Over a New Leaf

Published on Oct 2, 2012

Calvary Chapel Spring Valley | Sunday Evening | September 30, 2012 | Pastor Derek Neider

_____________________

I have written on the Book of Ecclesiastes and the subject of the meaning of our lives on several occasions on this blog. In this series on Ecclesiastes I hope to show how secular humanist man can not hope to find a lasting meaning to his life in a closed system without bringing God back into the picture. This is the same exact case with Solomon in the Book of Ecclesiastes. Three thousand years ago, Solomon took a look at life “under the sun” in his book of Ecclesiastes. Christian scholar Ravi Zacharias has noted, “The key to understanding the Book of Ecclesiastes is the term ‘under the sun.’ What that literally means is you lock God out of a closed system, and you are left with only this world of time plus chance plus matter.”

Let me show you some inescapable conclusions if you choose to live without God in the picture. Solomon came to these same conclusions when he looked at life “under the sun.”

  1. Death is the great equalizer (Eccl 3:20, “All go to the same place; all come from dust, and to dust all return.”)
  2. Chance and time have determined the past, and they will determine the future.  (Ecclesiastes 9:11-13)
  3. Power reigns in this life, and the scales are not balanced(Eccl 4:1)
  4. Nothing in life gives true satisfaction without God including knowledge (1:16-18), ladies and liquor (2:1-3, 8, 10, 11), and great building projects (2:4-6, 18-20).

You can only find a lasting meaning to your life by looking above the sun and bring God back into the picture.

Life Under The Sun

E-mail Print PDF

“Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity”
Ecclesiastes 1:2

It has been said that we are living in a post-Christian society. Whether America was ever a “Christian” country at all (an arguable hypothesis), I think most readers would agree that it is not “Christian” as it nears the close of the twentieth century. Instead, a worldview known as “secularism” prevails. Secularism will always fill the void that is created whenever the Lord Jesus Christ and His word is dismissed as the basis of ethics. A post-Christian society, like a pre-Christian society, an unChristian society, and an anti-Christian society, is, by definition, a secular society.

What, then, is secularism? The book of Ecclesiastes provides an intriguing answer to that question.

A Sermon About Wisdom

Ecclesiastes is one of three Old Testament books classified as “wisdom literature” (with Job and Proverbs). Unlike Proverbs, which contains very practical wisdom for daily living, Ecclesiastes and Job explore the deeper philosophical questions of life. While Job explores the emotionally charged issue concerning the purpose of human suffering, Ecclesiastes is concerned to address the more basic question of the meaning of life. Why am I here? What is the purpose of my existence? Does life have meaning? These are the questions haunting the man who calls himself “the Preacher” (Ecc. 1:1).

By designating himself “the Preacher,” the writer implies that he is going to deliver a sermon. The text for the sermon is 1:2: “Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity.” The next ten chapters are an exposition of that text from an autobiographical perspective as the Preacher records his own personal search for meaning in life. Chapters eleven and twelve form the application of the sermon.

The Mood of Modern Man

Though Ecclesiastes was written some three thousand years ago, its message is remarkably contemporary. The key word in the book, appearing some thrity-eight times, is vanity. The Hebrew word hevel, translated vanity, suggests the thought of what is left after a bubble bursts. The word means futility, emptiness, and meaninglessness. “Futility of futilities,” the Preacher sighs, “all is futile.” This tone of despair and pessimism pervades the entire sermon. Solomon’s message is unmistakable: “Life is futile and meaningless. There is no purpose to human existence.” Now, the concept of futility is pessimistic enough, in and of itself, but the Preacher compounds the mood by using a literary form that expresses the superlative degree: “Vanity of vanities….” He is talking about futility taken to the maximum degree – the epitome of emptiness – ultimate meaninglessness. That is about as cynical and pessimistic as a person can be.

No doubt, many modern people would agree with the Preacher that life is not worth living. It seems senseless and absurd. Such a mood of skepticism and cynicism prevails today. Depression is epidemic, maybe even pandemic, in our society. Prozac, Eli Lilly and Co.’s wonder drug, is a household word for more than twelve million people around the world.(“The Wizard of Prozac” by Tracy Thompson, Washington Post, Nov.21,93). Those who are not depressed are, in many cases, generally pessimistic and unhappy in the routines of daily life. The routine and mundane dimension of life is looked upon as a necessary evil that must be endured until 5:00 p.m. on Friday. Modern man lives for the weekend, saying “thank goodness it’s Friday,” and dreads “blue Monday” because it begins a new work week of the mundane and the ordinary. Why do people think like this? Because they have bought into a hedonistic philosophy that teaches that happiness is the summum bonum (the chief good) of life: In the words of a popular shoe commercial, “Life is short; play hard.” So they pursue leisure as the ultimate diversion from what Sigmund Freud called “the every day unhappiness of normal human experience.” They indulge themselves in recreation, hobbies, amusement, and leisure in a quest for personal happiness. Ironically, in their pursuit of pleasure, however, they only serve to compound their misery.

Does “every day, normal human experience” have to be unhappy? Scripture says ‘no.’ God desires man to enjoy all of life (I Tim. 6:17). Sadly, however, our leisure oriented society is more depressed than ever. Modern conveniences and comforts have not produced greater happiness, but it seems, less contentment with life. This is the paradox of hedonism.

Philosophically, this mood of despair is called nihilism. Nihilism, meaning “nothingness,” operates on the basis that everything is meaningless and chaotic. The nihilist believes that nothing has ultimate meaning or significance. Because he is committed to being “realistic” the nihilist has no tolerance for optimistic concepts like humanism. In fact, he considers the humanist, who believes in the innate dignity and potential of man, supremely näive and pollyanna-ish. As this, the bloodiest century in human history, draws to a close, the nihilist cannot accept, in the name of realism, the humanists utopian claim that man is evolving into godhood. All evidence argues against the idea that people are inherently good. The nihilist is, in other words, too honest to be a humanist, for humanism is unrealistic. It is inconsistent with the facts. The humanist says that life has meaning because each individual is unique and important, and has unlimited human potential. It looks for meaning in life subjectively, in one’s own self. Convinced to the contrary by the evidence the nihilist concludes that there is no meaning to life and settles for despair. He is, admittedly, more realistic than the humanist, but he fails to consider that reality is not limited to the physical, tangible, and material universe. The person who fails to factor the existence of God into the equation of life, if he is realistic, will ultimately come to the conclusion that all is futile and purposeless. If he is realistic! In the final analysis, there are only two possible worldviews open to realistic thinkers: secularism and theism. Secularism leads inevitably to the despair and hopelessness of nihilism. Theism, a belief in the existence and providential intervention of God, leads to hope and meaning.

One does not have to look far to witness indications of nihilism in modern Western culture. Hope is conspicuous by its absence in practically every genre. The things that help us to understand a culture because they reflect and mirror the mood of the age, like music, art, literature, and theater, all breathe a spirit of despair. The crude, the crass and the vulgar are celebrated in the fashion world. Contemporary musical styles express a kind of disorder and dissonance, in sharp contrast to the symmetrical melody and harmony of say, classical or even folk music. Much modern art is sensual, chaotic, and dissonant, an existential expression of the mood of the artist. Even literature today breathes this spirit of despair like the familiar poem “Rugby Chapel” by Matthew Arnold:

Most men eddy about

Here and there -eat and drink,

Chatter and love and hate,

Gather and squander, are raised

Aloft, are hurled in the dust,

Striving blindly, achieving

Nothing, and then they die.

In movies, the despair of an existential (i.e. subjective, man-centered) philosophy of life is evident in the crass thirst for violence and destruction. Nihilism produces a desire to destroy, because if life is meaningless, death becomes the ultimate solution. Though he promises happiness and fulfillment, Satan, the thief of hope and purpose, ultimately kills and destroys (Jno. 10:10).

The sexual perversion of our society, furthermore, is another expression of the mood of despair. Francis Schaeffer writes, “it is often in the sexual area of life that men hope to find some kind of meaning when they have abandoned the search elsewhere.” (p.38) Harry Blamires concurs, pinpointing the philosophical basis of sexual ethics: “In no field of human experience does secularism more insidiously drag man towards a sub-human level of living than in that of sexuality…glamorizing passion at the expense of responsibility, duty, and chastity.” (p183).

What is the cause, then, of this mood of despair? A view of life and the world known as secularism.

Secularism, The Spirit of the Age

People believe that life is futile and meaningless because they fail to factor God into the equation of life. Secularism operates as if this world were all that there is, disregarding the eternal and thinking only in terms of the “now.” Carl Sagan, in the introduction to the television series “Cosmos,” expresses the essence of secularism concisely. As the camera pans the starry heavens, Sagan says, in deep reverential tones, “The cosmos is all that is or ever was or ever will be.” That is pure, unabashed secularism.

In Ecclesiastes, the Preacher defines a secular worldview by the phrase “under the sun”: “What profit hath a man of all his labor which he taketh under the sun?” (Ecc. 1:3). That phrase, used over thirty times in the book, is the key to understanding Ecclesiastes. Life under the sun is life from a strictly earthly perspective, without God in the picture. Life without God inevitably produces a spirit of despair and hopelessness. There is no meaning, no happiness, no sense of purpose, and no joy when life is confined to this world alone without consideration of the One who is beyond the sun. That’s the message of Ecclesiastes.

Peggy Noonan, former speech writer for Presidents Reagan and Bush, wrote in a 1992 issue of Forbes magazine:

“I think we have lost the knowledge that happiness is over-rated – that, in a way, life is over-rated. We have lost, somehow, a sense of mystery – about us, our purpose, our meaning, our role. Our ancestors believed in two worlds, and understood this to be the solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short one. We are the first generations of man that actually expected to find happiness here on earth, and our search for it has caused such unhappiness. The reason: if you do not believe in another, higher world, if you believe only in the flat material world around you, if you believe that this is your only chance at happiness – if that is what you believe, then you are not disappointed when the world does not give you a good measure of its riches, you are despairing.” (From The Florida Times Union, Jacksonville, Thurs. June 23,1994)

The connection between secularism and despair she cites is the very point Solomon makes in Ecclesiastes. The individual who says “Vanity of vanities, all is vanity” is the person who lives “under the sun,” without an eternal perspective. Secularism inevitably leads to cynicism and hopelessness because hope depends upon the existence and providence of the God of hope (Rom. 15:13).

Secularism, life lived from a strictly “this-world” perspective without consideration of how God fits into the picture, is the spirit of our age, the dominant philosophy of the day. In fact, it is the spirit of every age because it is “the pattern of this world.” When the New Testament speaks about “the world” (e. g. “Love not the world…” [I Jno. 2:14]; “Be not conformed to this world…” [Rom. 12:2]; “Whosoever is a friend of the world is the enemy of God” [Jas. 4:4]; “Keep yourselves unspotted from the world” [Jas. 1:27]), the reference is to this dominant worldview known as secularism. “The World” might be defined as “life, lived and thought, apart from God.” According to this definition, even professed Christians can be worldly. The tendency to live as if God does not exist, like practical atheists, is very real. The temptation to conform to the pattern of this age, to fall in line with popular culture, to accommodate the world, to restrict our lives to “under the sun” criteria, to maintain the status quo, and to operate from a strictly secular frame of reference is very strong, even in the lives of believers. It is possible for a Christian to get so caught up in “the rat race,” and, by virtue of the sheer pace of daily life, lose contact with God. If it wasn’t possible there would be no need for warnings such as “Be not conformed to this world” and “Love not the world.” The professed believer who fails to spend time with God in prayer each day, read and study God’s word, attend public worship, encourage his Christian brother, and submit his thinking and behavior to the Lordship of Jesus Christ at each new juncture in the road of life is worldly to the degree that God is not a part of his life. The more the world controls the lives of individual believers, the less power the church will wield in its Christian testimony.

In contrast to the secularist who thinks only of his interests, his moment in history, his place in society, and his life now, the individual who thinks Biblically approaches life in the light of two worlds. A Christian is someone who once lived for this world alone, but now he confesses that he belongs to the next world (Ps. 17:14-15):

“Once earthly joy I craved, sought peace and rest; Now Thee alone I seek, give what is best.”

He now travels earth’s roads by heaven’s map, weighs earth’s treasure on heaven’s scale, bears earth’s burdens in heaven’s strength, views earth’s tragedies in terms of heaven’s triumph, fights earth’s battles with heaven’s weapons, and values earth’s trophies by heaven’s standards. He thinks in terms of both life now and life hereafter regarding suffering (Rom. 8:18; 2 Cor. 4:17-18), priorities (1 Tim. 4:8), and even death (Phi. 1:21). He says with Asaph, “Thou shalt guide me with thy counsel, and afterward, receive me to glory. Whom have I in heaven but thee? and there is none upon earth that I desire beside thee” (Ps. 73:24-25). He lives by faith, persuaded that God is (that is, that God exists, that God is real, that God is there) and that God is active in the lives of those who diligently seek him (Heb. 11:6). Because his life is based on this other-worldly perspective, it also assumes a richness of meaning and sense of purpose now. Harry Blamires summarizes these two competing worldviews insightfully:

“To think secularly is to think within a frame of reference bounded by the limits of our life on earth: it is to keep one’s calculations rooted in this-worldly criteria. To think christianly is to accept all things with the mind as related, directly or indirectly, to man’s eternal destiny as the redeemed and chosen child of God.” (Blamires, p44)

Chasing the Wind

We have seen that worldliness is essentially a matter of eliminating God from the picture and focusing instead only on life “under the sun.” Those who live by this philosophy inevitably become so preoccupied with this life that personal happiness and welfare become their sole concern. In their quest for that ever elusive peace and contentment, however, they eventually become so frustrated that they adopt a spirit of pessimism, cynicism, and despair. It is significant that “the Preacher” illustrates the futility of this search for meaning and purpose by the image of the circle in Ecclesiastes 1:4-7:

“One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh…The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose. The wind goeth toward the south, and turneth about unto the north; it whirleth about continually, and the wind returneth again according to his circuits. All the waters run into the sea…unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again.”

When God is left out of the definition of life, all appears terribly monotonous and aimlessly repetitious. Few images illustrate futility like a circle. People commonly express frustration at a lack of forward progress by saying, “I feel like I’ve been going in circles.” Like a hamster in a wheel, many people expend tremendous amounts of energy in the tasks and responsibilities of daily life, but because life is not lived for God’s glory, according to the guidelines laid down in his word, and in the awareness of his daily presence, they make no progress for all their effort. They are going in circles, living aimlessly. Living without God is like breathing without air, eating without food, seeing without sight, talking without words, and hearing without sound. Because God is not factored into the equation of life, secular thinkers can make no sense out of the world. All appears random, arbitrary, disconnected, and disjointed. There is no rhyme nor reason. Hic et nunc – life is meaningless.

The Christian, however, because he thinks in terms of God’s existence and personal presence in the world, sees history, not in terms of a circle, but of a straight line, with a definite point of beginning (Gen. 1:1), a specific goal (I Tim. 6:15), and a progressive development of the Divine plan moving toward the attaining of that goal. History is really His story, the unfolding of the drama of redemption that God purposed before the world began. Does that mean that everything that happens in history is predestined by God? Absolutely not, for God is not the author of sin. But it does mean that he is in sovereign control of creation, superintending his world, working his will and providentially overruling even the wicked acts of men to our good and to his own greater glory (Ps. 76:10; Gen. 50:20). In a word, the difference between secularism and Christianity is the difference between a natural and a supernatural view of the world.

In his search for meaning, the Preacher pursued the whole gamut of human experience. He sought fulfillment in labor (1:8,13,14), in knowledge (1:16-18), in pleasure (2:1-3), and in the accumulation of material things (2:4-10), but he came to the conclusion “all is vanity and vexation of the spirit” (1:14,17; 2:11). The phrase “vexation of the spirit” is a picturesque phrase that means “chasing the wind” or “grasping for the wind.”

Have you ever watched a little boy playing outfield on a Little League baseball team? Every coach knows the frustration of looking up and watching his centerfielder pretending to catch imaginary fly balls with his glove. “Johnny, what are you doing?” the coach yells. “Keep your mind on the game.” So many people live life like little Johnny plays centerfield, oblivious to the real issues, grasping for the wind.

How long would a person have to chase the wind in order to catch up to it and finally seize it? Yet so many people spend their lives chasing happiness and contentment apart from God, only to find that they are chasing wind. Apart from God, the search for significance in life under the sun is an optical illusion, a mirage, a pipe dream. It is an attempt to grasp the wind. It is not wisdom to live like that. It is the quintessence of folly. Yet that is the way that most people spend their days, running in circles, chasing the wind.

It’s no wonder that Solomon sinks in the mire of despair and hopelessness. “Therefore I hated life,” he says, “because the work that is wrought under the sun is grievous unto me: for all is vanity and vexation of spirit. Yea, I hated all my labor which I had taken under the sun…Therefore I went about to cause my heart to despair of all the labor which I took under the sun…” (Ecc. 2:17-23). As the hopes and dreams of youth give way to the disappointments and frustrations of mid-life, the person who, by faith, cannot see God “standing somewhere in the shadows keeping watch above his own,” will slide faster and faster down the slippery slope of cynicism. I am convinced that the great challenge of aging is the challenge to resist the tendency to become cynical, mean-spirited, bitter, and sour and to retain that childlike sense of wonder, joy, gratitude, humility, and faith in one’s Heavenly Father. When I hear people say, “Oh, nothing surprises me anymore; I didn’t expect it to turn out anyway; nothing ever works out for me; youth is a mistake; manhood a struggle; old age a regret,” I know I’m talking to someone who has lost sight of God. Secular thinking will always end in cynicism.

Is Life Futile?

Ecclesiastes does not end on this pessimistic note, however. After analyzing the futility of life without God, the Preacher affirms that life lived with a conscious awareness of God is supremely meaningful: “Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth” the Preacher counsels (12:1). Moreover, “because the preacher was wise, he still taught the people knowledge” (12:9; emphasis mine). He concludes “the whole matter” by urging his young auditors, “Fear God and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil” (12:13-14). With God in the picture, all of life, be it work, education, recreation, leisure, relationships, or the use of material things, is meaningful. The purpose of life, consequently, is to enjoy life as God’s gift and to devote it to his glory by worshipping him and obeying his commandments. That is the whole duty of man. That is a real sense of purpose.

When we, as believers in the Lord Jesus Christ, factor in the further truth of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, life takes on even richer meaning. In I Corinthians 15, Paul was dealing with the same spirit of skepticism in the church of Corinth expressed by Solomon centuries earlier. The social pressure in that intellectual climate to the doctrine of the resurrection had intimidated some of the Corinthian Christians to abandon the doctrine. Throughout the chapter, Paul argues that all is futile if Christ is not alive. If Christ is not risen, he says, then you “believed in vain” (v. 2). “Your profession of faith in him was meaningless,” says Paul. If he is not alive, he further argues, then my personal experience was “in vain” (v. 10). If Jesus is still in the grave, then preaching is vain, your belief of the gospel is meaningless (v. 14), and your trust in Christ for the forgiveness of your sins is futile (v. 17). Paul’s point is that the whole Christian life is an empty sham if Christ is not alive. But, he affirms, he is alive, risen from the dead, and because he lives the Corinthians would live after death also (vs. 20-57). Listen now to his grand conclusion:

“Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye steadfast, unmovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labor is not in vain in the Lord.” (v.58)

Is there rhyme or reason to life? Is teaching God’s word an exercise in futility? Is contending for the faith once delivered to the saints a meaningless endeavor? Is faithfulness to the doctrinal and ethical principles of Scripture in a pagan environment just so much unnecessary trouble? Is it vain to resist temptation, to risk the public antagonism associated with following Christ, to seek to cultivate true Christian character, or to throw oneself into the lives of others in the service of Christ? Is it futile to make a living, to train your children to be godly, to build a Christian marriage, and to ease the burdens of those less fortunate than yourself?

The answer to all of these questions is a resounding “no.” Labor in the Lord is not in vain; it never has been in vain and it never will be in vain. On what basis can Paul make such a claim? On the basis of the fact that Jesus Christ is alive! Because he lives, nothing we do “in his name” is futile, but supremely purposeful and meaningful. What a message of hope! Without God, all is vanity and vexation of the spirit. But when we live “under the sun” in the knowledge of the One who lives and reigns “beyond the sun,” all of life has significance. Futility gives way to purpose. Chasing wind is abandoned for pursuing Christ. Despair gives way to unspeakable and glorious joy.

Related posts:

The Humanist takes on Solomon and the Book of Ecclesiastes

This from the American Humanist website: This week we’re pleased to publish a new poem “Ecclesiastes” by Frank S. Robinson. Frank S. Robinson is a retired New York State administrative law judge, a rare coin dealer, and author of five books, most recently The Case for Rational Optimism. He is married to the poet Therese […]

Avril Lavigne commits “the fool’s sin” in front of family crowd in Tampa (Avril and the Book of Ecclesiastes Part 1)

Tampa Bay Rays apologize for Avril Lavigne TMZ reported: According to local reports, Avril’s mic didn’t work at the start of her show … and she responded to the cavalcade of boos by yelling obscenities at crowd. Rays rep Rick Vaughn tells TMZ, “The Rays demand profanity-free performances from all of our concert performers and […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part U “Do men have a say in the abortion debate?” (includes the film SLAUGHTER OF THE INNOCENTS and editorial cartoon)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

2008 article on Woody Allen on the meaning of life

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

If I see Chris Martin of Coldplay in person what would I say to him? (Part 3)

Chris Martin revealed in his interview with Howard Stern that he was rasied an evangelical Christian but he has left the church. I believe that many words that he puts in his songs today are generated from the deep seated Christian beliefs from his childhood that find their way out in his songs. His belief in […]

Part 4 Adrian Rogers on Proverbs “How To Be The Father Of A Wise Child” (video too)

Picture of Adrian Rogers above from 1970′s while pastor of Bellevue Baptist of Memphis, and president of Southern Baptist Convention. (Little known fact, Rogers was the starting quarterback his senior year of the Palm Beach High School football team that won the state title and a hero to a 7th grader at the same school named […]

If I see Chris Martin of Coldplay in person what would I say to him? (Part 2)

Chris Martin revealed in his interview with Howard Stern that he was rasied an evangelical Christian but he has left the church. I believe that many words that he puts in his songs today are generated from the deep seated Christian beliefs from his childhood that find their way out in his songs. His belief in […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part N “A discussion of the Woody Allen Movie CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS”(includes film DEATH BY SOMEONE’S CHOICE)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part L “On what basis do you say murder is wrong?”Part 2 (includes the film THE BASIS FOR HUMAN DIGNITY)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

Taking on Ark Times Bloggers on various issues Part K “On what basis do you say murder is wrong?”Part 1 (includes film ABORTION OF THE HUMAN RACE)

I have gone back and forth and back and forth with many liberals on the Arkansas Times Blog on many issues such as abortion, human rights, welfare, poverty, gun control  and issues dealing with popular culture. Here is another exchange I had with them a while back. My username at the Ark Times Blog is Saline […]

“Woody Wednesday” Another look at Woody Allen’s movie Crimes and Misdemeanors

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

“Woody Wednesday” A 2010 review of Woody Allen’s Annie Hall

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

Robert Dick Wilson’s talk “Is the Higher Criticism Scholarly?” (part 6 of transcript)

The Bible and Archaeology (3/5) For many more archaeological evidences in support of the Bible, see Archaeology and the Bible . (There are some great posts on this too at the bottom of this post.) Robert Dick Wilson at the Grove City Bible Conference in 1909. IS THE HIGHER CRITICISM SCHOLARLY?Clearly attested facts showing that thedestructive […]

“Woody Wednesday” In 2009 interview Woody Allen talks about the lack of meaning of life and the allure of younger women

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

“Woody Wednesday” Woody Allen on the Emptiness of Life by Toby Simmons

I have spent alot of time talking about Woody Allen films on this blog and looking at his worldview. He has a hopeless, meaningless, nihilistic worldview that believes we are going to turn to dust and there is no afterlife. Even though he has this view he has taken the opportunity to look at the weaknesses of […]

12 Questions for Woody Allen (Woody Wednesday)

Above is a clip of 12 questions for Woody Allen. Below is a list of some of his movies. WOODY’S FINEST: Philip French’s favourite five Annie Hall (1977) In his first fully achieved masterwork, a semi-autobiographical comedy in which his ex-lover Diane Keaton and best friend Tony Roberts play versions of themselves, Allen created a […]

“Woody Wednesday” Allen on the meaning of life (part 2)

September 3, 2011 · 5:16 PM ↓ Jump to Comments Woody Allen on the Emptiness of Life In the final scene of Manhattan, Woody Allen’s character, Isaac, is lying on the sofa with a microphone and a tape-recorder, dictating to himself an idea for a short story. It will be about “people in Manhattan,” he says, […]

Video interviews of Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin (Part 4)

As far as I know they have never done an interview together. Therefore, I have included separate interviews that they have done below and I have some links to past posts I have done on them too. Shane Warne – Chris Martin Interview (Part 1) Uploaded by HandyAndy136 on Nov 24, 2010 Originally broadcast on […]

“Woody Wednesday” Allen realizes if God doesn’t exist then all is meaningless

The Bible and Archaeology (1/5) The Bible maintains several characteristics that prove it is from God. One of those is the fact that the Bible is accurate in every one of its details. The field of archaeology brings to light this amazing accuracy. _________________________- I want to make two points today. 1. There is no […]

Milton Friedman’s religious views

John Lofton noted: “DR. FRIEDMAN an evolutionist with ‘values’ of unknown origin but he said they were not ‘accidental.’ “   If anyone takes time to read my blog for any length of time they can not question my respect for the life long work of Milton Friedman. He has advanced the cause of freedom […]

John MacArthur on Proverbs (Part 9) “Love your neighbor” When we say you don’t co‑sign for a stranger we don’t mean you don’t give money to someone in need. No. Chapter 3 verse 27, “Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due when it is in your power to do it.” If you’ve got the money, give it. If you’ve got the goods, give them to the person in need.

Over and over in Proverbs you hear the words “fear the Lord.” In fact, some of he references are Proverbs 1:7, 29; 2:5; 8:13; 9:10;14:26,27; 15:16 and many more. Below is a sermon by John MacArthur from the Book of Luke on 3 reasons we should fear the Lord. (I have posted John MacArthur’s amazing sermon on the fulfillment of Old Testament scripture before on my blog.)

PART 9

So many times at work we are rude and strike back at those who are unkind to us. At home we may find that a neighbor has done something to our property and get upset and then plan how we can get back at them. Instead, we should love our neighbor and reach out to them.

I learned a lot from Adrian Rogers’ message on this subject. Rogers observed:

God put you in that place so you could serve Him. We are to let our light shine in every place where God has places us! Matthew 5:14-16 says,
“Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.

Your job is the lampstand that God has ordained where you let your light shine!

You have been saved out of the world and then sent back into the world to witness to the world, and that’s the only business in the world you have in the world, till you’re taken out of the world!

_____________

John MacArthur

I remember hearing Dr. Adrian Rogers say that if he had to do it over again he would read from Proverbs every day to his kids. They turned out to be great kids and they were raised right. Nevertheless, if he had to do it over again he thought a more emphasis on Proverbs is the way to go. That is why I am spending so much time in Proverbs with my kids today.

John MacArthur does a great job on Proverbs and here is a portion of his sermon on Proverbs.

One final lesson. Son, love your neighbor. When we say you don’t co‑sign for a stranger we don’t mean you don’t give money to someone in need. No. Chapter 3 verse 27, “Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due when it is in your power to do it.” If you’ve got the money, give it. If you’ve got the goods, give them to the person in need. Generosity to the poor, meeting the needs of people around you when you have the resources is a part of honoring God. You’re to be generous in showing sacrificial love to your neighbor. Don’t say…verse 28…”Go, come back and tomorrow I’ll give it.” Don’t do that, if you’ve got it in your pocket, give it. If you have it, give it. Don’t tell them to come back. He has a need, you give the need. If you have it with you don’t send him away and have him come back.

Another thing about your neighbor while you’re loving him, don’t devise harm against your neighbor when he lives in security beside you. He feels well being beside you and you’ve got some plot going on where you’re going to get back at him in retaliation for something he did, or where you’re going to confiscate the corner of his property, or you’re going to do something to cut off his water or whatever it is. Don’t do anything that is going to harm your neighbor. Don’t contend with your neighbor, verse 30, without any reason if he’s done you no harm. Don’t be vengeful, is verse 31. Don’t have vengeance toward a neighbor. Don’t envy people who resolve all issues with violence and say…Boy, I wish I could…if I had my way I’d cut him up…don’t be vengeful. Don’t choose any of the ways of violent men. The curse of the Lord is on those kinds of people.

So, take care of your neighbor. Love him, live with him in peace. Forgive him, meet his needs. Those are the rules. And verse 35 says you’ll inherit honor…honor.

_________________

Adrian Rogers photo

Dr. Adrian Rogers

In all labour there is profit: but the talk of the lips tendeth only to penury.
Proverbs 14:23

I’ve heard people say, I sure would like to be in a Christian company and be surrounded by Christians. The only time I hear God’s name mentioned where I work now is when people are cursing. And you just cannot believe the obscene jokes, gossip, greed, back-stabbing, throat-cutting, and all of the materialism! Oh if God would only get me out of this place so I could serve Him!

Do you know how I would respond? I would tell them, God put you in that place so you could serve Him. We are to let our light shine in every place where God has places us! Matthew 5:14-16 says,
“Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.

Your job is the lampstand that God has ordained where you let your light shine!

You have been saved out of the world and then sent back into the world to witness to the world, and that’s the only business in the world you have in the world, till you’re taken out of the world!

Now, let me give you four rules for witnessing to those with whom you work.


Don’t Brag

The Bible says let your light shine. It doesn’t say make it shine. Your light is to glow, not glare. Also, people are to see the light, not the source of the light.

If you go to work with an air of self-righteousness, you’re going to make your coworkers sick and not want to even be around you. 1 Corinthians 1:30-31 says,

“It is because of Him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God — that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption. Therefore, as it is written: “Let him who boasts boast in the Lord.”


Don’t Nag

If you’re always thumping a Bible or nagging somebody when he gambles, smokes, or curses, you’re not going to win that person to Christ. You may think that you’re doing a good job, but that person is not going to take a step closer to Jesus Christ through that kind of witness.

You see, his behavior is not his problem. You would be just like that person if you didn’t know the Lord Jesus Christ. He needs Jesus Christ. So let’s see how we are to respond from Colossians 4:5-6:
“Walk in wisdom toward them that are without, redeeming the time. Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man.”


Don’t Lag

If you’re a lazy Christian — not getting to work on time, doing personal stuff on company time, procrastinating on work that you ought to do, then you’re a disgrace to grace. It is a sin for a Christian to do less than his best. Let’s revisit Colossians 3:23-24 says,
“And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men; Knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance: for ye serve the Lord Christ.”

Don’t see if the boss is looking before you work hard. I don’t care how dull or boring, it may seem. It’s not that way…if you’re working to the glory of God. Do your job to the best of your ability.


Don’t Sag

I want to tell you something about those people with whom you work. Most of them are not all that interested in going to heaven or hell. They just want to know how to hack it on Monday. And when they see you come in the office without a hangover and with the joy of the Lord Jesus on your face, they’re going to ask you, “What makes you so happy?”

And at that moment, you’re going to be able to share the Lord Jesus with him because you will have sanctified the Lord God in your heart. 1 Peter 3:15 says,
“But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear.”

____________________

ONE FINAL QUESTION: WHAT DOES THIS VERSE MEAN?

Colossians 4:5-6:
“Walk in wisdom toward them that are without, redeeming the time. Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man.”