I found this article in the Wall Street Journal and several other publications.
By Jacob Gershman

iStock
Law schools should embrace grade inflation, says Professor Joshua Silverstein of the William H. Bowen School of Law.
In a forthcoming paper in the University of San Francisco Law Review, Mr Silverstein makes the case for why law schools should substantially eliminate C grades and raise the minimum cumulative GPA for good academic standing to a B minus.
Under such a system, says Mr. Silverstein, law professors would probably award C’s about as often as they currently award D’s.
So what’s the benefit in that?
Silverstein’s argument for grade inflation is more subtle than a “grades-are-bad” argument.
He makes two main points: First, he says that the inconsistent use of C grades puts students “at an unfair disadvantage when competing for employment with students from institutions that award mostly A’s and B’s.”
Second, he says there’s nothing gentle about the “Gentleman’s C.” Law students actually dread C’s, he says. Grade inflation would improve their “psychological well-being” by easing stress. He writes:
Why do C grades cause such distress among law students? Why is it so difficult for law professors to convince their students that C’s are acceptable under the grading systems generally in operation in legal education? Because our students are raised in an “A and B world.” More specifically, they receive mostly A’s and B’s in high school and college. As a result, they are conditioned to expect marks above the C level.
Mr. Silverstein says he’s not arguing that law schools should stop distinguishing between differences in achievement.
In fact, he thinks law schools should add more layers of distinction between a 2.7, or B minus, and a 4.0. They could do this by adopting “a fine grade scale with a large number of intervals, such as a four-point or 100-point scale that uses number grades instead of letters.”
But if they didn’t fear getting a C, wouldn’t students slack off?
Mr. Silverstein concedes that substantially eliminating C grades “will cause some students to cut back on the amount of work they do,” particularly among average students. But he says weaker students would have more incentive to work. Those who would otherwise feel “crushed” by a C would be less likely to tune out and give up, he argues.
Arkansas related posts:
Arkansas a model for other states on Medicaid expansion, I hope not!!!! This is a great article and I am sad that many of the Republicans in Arkansas are actually trusting the Obama administration to keep their word. Currently we have 3 scandals with this administration and that speaks volumes about their integrity. Think Again: […]
I know and love many of the Arkansas Republicans that voted for this poor solution in Arkansas but my friend Dan Greenberg got it right in this article below when he takes them to task. Medicaid Expansion in Arkansas: A Fig Leaf, Not a Solution Dan Greenberg April 30, 2013 at 5:05 pm As action […]
Ronald Reagan said, “We will never compromise our principles and standards.” Are the Republicans in Arkansas true Tea Party Ronald Reagan Republicans? According to Americans for Prosperity in the last 5 years Arkansas’ current Medicaid program has run a deficit of a billion dollars. Why expand it willingly with Obama? The “Do Nothing” expansion plan increases […]
Nic Horton Medicaid Expansion will “Cost Almost Double than Doing Nothing” part II _______ I am hopeful that the Arkansas Republican state lawmakers will not expand the broken medicaid program. Evidently Congressman Rick Crawford feels strongly about this too. Crawford: Even With Arkansas Plan, ObamaCare Is Unaffordable Crawford urges state legislators to reject ObamaCare, because […]
Mike Maharrey talks AR Medicaid Expansion on the PHP ______________ This article from the Heritage Foundation mentions that the lawmakers in Arkansas are getting ready to make a big mistake if they think they will get flexibility from Obamacare on Medicaid expansion. Administration Rules Out “Deals” on Medicaid Expansion Edmund Haislmaier April 3, 2013 at […]
A Red-Ink Train Wreck: The Real Fiscal Cost of Government-Run Healthcare Uploaded on Nov 9, 2009 This CF&P Foundation video explains why healthcare proposals in Washington will result in bloated government and higher deficits. This mini-documentary exposes the pervasive inaccuracy of congressional forecasts and succinctly lists 12 reasons why Obamacare will be a budget […]
A Red-Ink Train Wreck: The Real Fiscal Cost of Government-Run Healthcare Uploaded on Nov 9, 2009 This CF&P Foundation video explains why healthcare proposals in Washington will result in bloated government and higher deficits. This mini-documentary exposes the pervasive inaccuracy of congressional forecasts and succinctly lists 12 reasons why Obamacare will be a budget buster. […]
Enlarge image Credit Nathan Vandiver / KUAR Michael Cannon of the Cato Institute told lawmakers March 19, 2013 that abandoning plans to partner with the federal government on a health insurance exchange would both benefit the state and reduce the power of the Affordable Care Act. __________________ I am very pleased with the Republican lawmakers in […]
CATO Institute Michael Cannon on the OReilly Factor Published on Mar 19, 2013 The CATO Institute’s Michael Cannon spoke at the Arkansas Conservative Caucus on Tuesday March 19th. Several conservatives were present. Cannon talked about how to defeat Obamacare in Arkansas & how the states can stop Obamacare on a national level. __________________ CATO Institute […]
Jacque Martin asks CATO Institute Michael Cannon about Obamacare Published on Mar 19, 2013 The CATO Institute’s Michael Cannon spoke at the Arkansas Conservative Caucus on Tuesday March 19th. Several conservatives were present. Cannon talked about how to defeat Obamacare in Arkansas & how the states can stop Obamacare on a national level. Jacque Martin […]