Monthly Archives: July 2012

“Feedback Friday” Letter to White House generated form letter response June 22, 2012(part B) on Healthcare (part 11)

I have been writing President Obama letters and have not received a personal response yet.  (He reads 10 letters a day personally and responds to each of them.) However, I did receive a form letter in the form of an email on June 22, 2012. I don’t know which letter of mine generated this response so I have linked several of the letters I sent to him below with the email that I received.  I think it could have been this one 84.4 but maybe not.  Most likely it was this one below:

Religious Liberty: Obamacare’s First Casualty

Uploaded by on Feb 22, 2012

http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/22/morning-bell-religious-liberty-under-attack/ | The controversy over the Obama Administration’s anti-conscience mandate and the fight for religious liberty only serves to highlight the inherent flaws in Obamacare. This conflict is a natural result of the centralization laid out under Obamacare and will only continue until the law is repealed in full.

___________________________

President Obama c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here.

Max Brantley on the Arkansas Times Blog on 3-6-12 again claimed that the Republicans will lose this debate with you on Obamacare and conscience. However, I don’t see how that is true and it clearly interferes unconstitutionally with the liberty of Americans.

David S. Addington

February 29, 2012 at 12:31 pm

Congress recognizes more each day that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known widely as the Obamacare statute, interferes unconstitutionally with the liberty of Americans.  From the Obamacare individual mandate to buy health insurance that awaits the action of the Supreme Court, to the Obamacare mandate that many religious hospitals, charities, and schools abandon the tenets of their faiths and include in their group health insurance for employees coverage of abortion-inducing drugs, contraception, and sterilization, Obamacare assaults the Constitution and American freedom.

Fortunately, Members of Congress and the American people are waking up to the need to repeal the Obamacare statute and move instead to market-based, patient-centered health care.  Action in Congress this week to defend religious liberty continues to highlight the need to repeal the Obamacare statute.

The Obama Administration continues to trample on religious liberty by applying the Obamacare statute to mandate that many religious institutions’ group health insurance for employees cover abortion-inducing drugs, contraceptives, and sterilization.  The Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Treasury, and Labor published on February 15, 2012 final regulations that compel many religious hospitals, charities, and schools to abandon the tenets of their faiths and comply with that mandate beginning April 16, 2012, or pay fines for maintaining their religious faiths.  The final regulations did not include any changes to respect religious liberty that President Obama had led people to expect.

Although Secretary of HHS Sebelius has said that, for one year, she will simply not perform her duty to enforce the final regulations, her decision not to enforce the regulations temporarily as a matter of grace does not eliminate the mandate’s interference with religious liberty.  Indeed, her pronouncements reflect a failure to understand that religious liberty in America is an unalienable right with which our Creator has endowed us and a right that our Constitution’s First Amendment protects.  Our religious liberty does not arise from the discretion of the Federal Government to do Americans a “favor” and tolerate their religions.  Because President Obama and his agents continue to attack the constitutionally-guaranteed right of these religious institutions to free exercise of religion, Members of Congress are stepping forward to protect the Constitution.

Senator Roy Blunt (R-Missouri) has fought for religious liberty against the Obamacare assault.  He plans to offer this week Senate Amendment No. 1520 to S. 1813, the highway authorization bill, to protect the right to religious liberty against the Obamacare mandate.  The Blunt Amendment notes that, until the enactment of the Obamacare statute in 2010, “the Federal Government has not sought to impose specific coverage or care requirements that infringe on the rights of conscience . . . .”  The Blunt Amendment would override the Obamacare mandate that religious institutions provide coverage for abortion-inducing drugs, contraceptives, and sterilization when it is contrary to their faiths, allowing them to keep their faiths and provide health care coverage for their employees.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) has announced his intention to keep the Senate from voting on the Blunt Amendment by making a motion to “table” — that is, to refuse to consider — the Blunt Amendment.  Senator Reid said he considered the Blunt Amendment that  protects religious liberty to be a “distracting proposal.”  Senator Reid may treat legislation to protect religious liberty as a “distraction,” but hundreds of millions of Americans hold their right to free exercise of religion to be a precious freedom.

President Obama and Senator Reid can man the ramparts of Castle Obamacare against the people for only so long.  The American people want their liberty and they shall have it.  The Obamacare statute must go.

__________-

Thank you so much for your time. I know how valuable it is. I also appreciate the fine family that you have and your commitment as a father and a husband.

Sincerely,

Everette Hatcher III, 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002, ph 501-920-5733, lowcostsqueegees@yahoo.com

___________

Here is the response I got from the White House on June 22, 2012:

The White House, Washington June 22, 2012
 

Dear Friend:

Thank you for writing.  President Obama has heard from many Americans about the Administration’s decision to ensure women have access to preventive care with no co-pays or deductibles, including contraceptive services.  The President is committed to both preserving religious liberty and protecting women’s health.  He appreciates your perspective.

 

The Affordable Care Act requires insurance companies to cover additional preventive services for women without charging a co-pay or deductible beginning August 1, 2012.  These preventive services include well women visits, domestic violence screening, and contraception.  The independent Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Science recommended coverage of these procedures to the Secretary of Health and Human Services.  The vast majority of women have relied on contraception at some point in their lives, but too many have struggled to afford it.  The scientists and experts at the Institute of Medicine have documented significant health benefits for women that come from using contraception.

  • Get the facts about the Obama Administration’s plans to implement this policy.

The President understands the importance of the work faith-based organizations do and continues to take the ideas and concerns of religious groups seriously.  On February 10, 2012, President Obama announced his Administration will implement this policy in a manner that fully accommodates religious liberty while protecting the health of women.  After a transition, if a woman’s employer is a religious non-profit organization, such as a charity or hospital, and has a religious objection to providing contraceptive services as part of its health plan, her insurance company—not the employer—will be required to reach out and provide contraceptive care free of charge.  And, consistent with previously existing conscience clauses, no religious doctor will have to prescribe these services.  We will ensure religious liberty remains protected, and that women will receive the critical preventive services guaranteed by the law.

Thank you, again, for writing.

 

Sincerely,

 

The White House

You are receiving this one-time email because you contacted the White House about a particular issue.

 

If you are interested in receiving regular updates from President Obama and senior White House officials, please visit our subscription page to sign up www.WhiteHouse.gov/get-email-updates.

 

The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. • Washington, D.C.  20500 • 202-456-1111

Related posts:

Open letter to President Obama (Part 95)

Religious Liberty: Obamacare’s First Casualty Uploaded by HeritageFoundation on Feb 22, 2012 http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/22/morning-bell-religious-liberty-under-attack/ | The controversy over the Obama Administration’s anti-conscience mandate and the fight for religious liberty only serves to highlight the inherent flaws in Obamacare. This conflict is a natural result of the centralization laid out under Obamacare and will only continue until […]

“Feedback Friday” Letter to White House generated form letter response June 15, 2012 on Healthcare (part 8)

I have been writing President Obama letters and have not received a personal response yet.  (He reads 10 letters a day personally and responds to each of them.) However, I did receive a form letter in the form of an email on June 15, 2012. I don’t know which letter of mine generated this response so I have […]

Open letter to President Obama (Part 94)

President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here. In your […]

 

Open letter to President Obama (Part 113)

President Obama c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here.

I really don’t think that socialism works in the real world because it destroys the motivation to work hard. How you respond to these facts below?

Another great article from Dan Mitchell (an updated version is also posted).

I posted a video making this point earlier in the year, and I also posted a version of this joke back in 2010, but here’s another version that’s worth sharing because of the five lessons to be learned at the conclusion.

=================================

An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had never failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class. That class had insisted that Obama’s socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.

The professor then said, “OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama’s plan”. All grades will be averaged and everyone will receive the same grade so no one will fail and no one will receive an A…. (substituting grades for dollars – something closer to home and more readily understood by all).

After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so they studied little.

The second test average was a D! No one was happy.

When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F.

As the tests proceeded, the scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else.

To their great surprise, ALL FAILED and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed.
It could not be any simpler than that.

There are five morals to this story:

1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.

2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!

5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.

=================================

I’ll make one final point. There are five morals to the story, but there are dozens of nations giving us real-world examples every day.

Sort of makes you wonder why some people still believe this nonsense?

__________________

Thank you so much for your time. I know how valuable it is. I also appreciate the fine family that you have and your commitment as a father and a husband.

Sincerely,

Everette Hatcher III, 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002, ph 501-920-5733, lowcostsqueegees@yahoo.com

Switchfoot coming to Hot Springs, Arkansas on July 14th!!!!

Saturday 14 July 2012

Switchfoot

Venue

Magic Springs Theme Park 1701 E. Grand Ave. 71901 Hot Springs, AR, US

Venue info and map

Uploaded by  on Aug 20, 2007

Interview with Tim Foreman and Chad Butler airing February 26th, 2007.
Discuss: cowbell, Christianity, fan connection

_______________________________________

SwitchfootSwitchfootCourtesy of: EMI

 

Making of Stars-Switchfoot

 

Switchfoot The Documentary

 

Discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (Part 2)

Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Discussion: Part 2

Uploaded by on Sep 23, 2007

Part 2 of 3: ‘What Does The Movie Tell Us About Ourselves?’
A discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie, perhaps his finest.
By Anton Scamvougeras.

http://camdiscussion.blogspot.com/
antons@mail.ubc.ca

_________________-

One of my favorite Woody Allen movies and I reviewed it earlier but I wanted you to hear from somone else:

Guest Review: Crimes and Misdemeanors

07.13.11 | guest-blogs | FanFare Guests<!–Email this Post | –>Print this Post

Tags:

Crimes and Misdemeanors starring Martin LandauGuest blogger Alex Kittle writes:

Since enjoying Midnight in Paris so much, I’ve been dipping more intoWoody Allen‘s filmography. First up was Crimes and Misdemeanors, which interested me since it’s more of a drama than a romantic comedy (which is primarily what I’ve seen from him, it feels). The sizable cast features a number of loosely interconnected figures, all somehow dealing with love and disappointment. Judah (Martin Landau), a prominent ophthalmologist, is facing threats from his slightly unhinged mistress (Anjelica Huston) and is given a difficult choice to protect his marriage. Meanwhile, struggling documentary filmmaker Cliff (Woody Allen) is filming a special on his asshole brother-in-law (Alan Alda), a successful and lecherous comedy producer. He finds himself falling for the documentary’s producer Halley (Mia Farrow), as his own marriage has been failing. The two men’s lives seem unrelated, but come together through mutual acquaintances at a dinner party.

Crimes and Misdemeanors has a lot going on, balancing traumatic ruminations on death and faith with light-hearted romance and comedic dialogue. It’s a bit off-putting at times, but eventually the very different experiences of the two main characters begin to betray the darkness that can pervade any lifestyle or worldview. Cliff comes off as a slightly silly, intelligent film buff, but it’s clear he uses humor to overcome his own insecurities and cannot responsibly deal with his crumbling marriage. Judah seems so put-together, a wealthy doctor, husband, and father, but his own misgivings about his Jewish background and atheist present lead to a complete shift in ideology after he makes a life-changing decision. Their final meeting at the end is a pivotal scene.

The dialogue and characters are the standout of the film, with the story and tone a little too uneven for me. It’s a decent mix of comedy and drama, but doesn’t quite nail it, plus the ending felt abrupt despite the voiceover montage, somehow. But I loved the interactions between Allen and Farrow (they hang out and watch Singin’ in the Rain!) and his adorable niece. Alan Alda is hilarious and douchebaggy; Martin Landau brings the gravitas. It’s an interesting and entertaining film overall, but I didn’t all-out love it. For one thing, the way it ends with Farrow and Allen’s characters is frustratingly written, and I can’t help but think that this is the sort of thing that influences the one-sided sexism of movies like (500) Days of Summer, wherein women are untrustworthy and fickle just because they don’t fall for the protagonist. That’s a bit extreme, I guess, but I couldn’t help but have that line of thinking.

4/5

Pair This Movie With: Oh jeez. Um. Maybe something kind of noir-y, like The Square.

Alex Kittle is an art, movie, and comic geek with a penchant for nonsensical jokes and exaggerated claims. Her blog Film Forager explores movies of every genre, from weird high-concept sci-fi to classic brooding romance.

Related posts:

Discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (Part 1)

Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Discussion: Part 1 Uploaded by camdiscussion on Sep 23, 2007 Part 1 of 3: ‘What Does Judah Believe?’ A discussion of Woody Allen’s 1989 movie, perhaps his finest. By Anton Scamvougeras. http://camdiscussion.blogspot.com/ antons@mail.ubc.ca _____________ Today I am starting a discusssion of the movie “Crimes and Misdemeanors” by Woody Allen. This 1989 […]

Woody Allen’s movie “Midnight in Paris” wins an academy award (link to complete listing of all historical figures mentioned in “Midnight in Paris”)

Sleepers (1973)   Allen (left) wrote, directed and starred in this oddball love story, set 200 years in the future.  It was his first on-screen collaboration with Diane Keaton (second left), who went on to become one of the director’s muses in the early days of his career.   ___________ I have written more on […]

Can we learn from Woody Allen Films? (Part 2)

Looking at the (sometimes skewed) morality of Woody Allen’s best films. Hannah and Her Sisters (1986) Allen continues the art-as-salvation theme in Hannah and Her Sisters, an ensemble drama about family and infidelity. The film tells three stories, one of which stars Allen as a hypochondriac named Mickey. Terrified of death, Mickey begins a search […]

Chris Martin of Coldplay unknowingly lives out his childhood Christian beliefs (Part 3 of notes from June 23, 2012 Dallas Coldplay Concert, Martin left Christianity because of teaching on hell then he writes bestselling song that teaches hell exists)

Viva La Vida Published on Jun 23, 2012 by TheRyanj64 Coldplay’s Viva La Vida at American Airlines Center in Dallas on June 22, 2012 __________ Coldplay brought confetti, lights and thousands of fans to the American Airlines Center; see photos from their colorful show Photo Gallery News Sports Lifestyles   Comments (0)   5/11 Chris […]

“Woody Wednesdays” Woody Allen on God and Death

Good website on Woody Allen How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue caught in the roller of an electric typewriter? If Jesus Christ came back today and saw what was being done in his name, he’d never stop throwing up. If only God would give me some clear […]

Michelangelo Antonioni influenced Woody Allen and was discussed by Francis Schaeffer

Francis Schaeffer discussed modern films and how they showed the state of man. That is why I like Woody Allen’s films so much. He knows what the big issues are in life and even though he present the right answers he does grapple with the right questions. Michelangelo Antonioni heavily influenced Allen and below is […]

Review of “To Rome with Love”

Jesse Eisenberg – Press Conference “To Rome With Love” Published on Apr 21, 2012 by portugal888 Review: Allen’s ‘Rome’ delivers lackluster love Published: Tuesday, June 19 2012 11:06 a.m. MDT By David Germain View 4 photos » This film image released by Sony Pictures Classics shows, : Alec Baldwin as John, left, and Jesse Eisenberg […]

Woody Allen, ‘To Rome With Love’ Director, Talks ‘Midnight In Paris’ Success, Acting Career

How To Recover From a Break Up With Greta Gerwig Published on May 16, 2012 by younghollywood Young Hollywood is hanging out in NYC during the Tribeca film festival, where we chat with rising star Greta Gerwig about her hip slice-of-life movie, ‘Lola Versus’. Greta offers up some advice on how to get over a […]

June 14, 2012 Wall Street Journal interview of Woody Allen and he is still talking about the meaninglessness of existence

TO ROME WITH LOVE – conferenza stampa con Allen, Benigni e Cruz http://WWW.RBCASTING.COM Published on Apr 18, 2012 by RBcasting http://www.rbcasting.com Conferenza stampa del film “To Rome With Love”, scritto e diretto da Woody Allen. Tra gli interpreti, lo stesso Allen, Alec Baldwin, Roberto Benigni, Penelope Cruz, Judy Davis, Jesse Eisenberg, Ellen Page e Greta […]

Woody Allen’s worldview as seen in his movies

  I love the movie Crimes and Misdemeanors and have written on it many times in the past. This quote below sums up Woody Allen’s worldview which I disagree with. In fact, the person who said this actually could not live with its conclusions in the movie and committed suicide.   Because Allen continues to […]

Atheists have no basis for saying that Hitler was wrong!!!!!

On April 30, 2012 (67 years after Hitler killed himself) I stated on the Arkansas Times Blog: Hitler’s last few moments of life were filled with anxiety as they should have been. He went on to face his maker and pay dearly for his many sins. When I look at the never before released pictures […]

“Woody Wednesday” Will Allen and Martin follow same path as Kansas to Christ?

Several members of the 70′s band Kansas became committed Christians after they realized that the world had nothing but meaningless to offer. It seems through the writings of both Woody Allen and Chris Martin of Coldplay that they both are wrestling with the issue of death and what meaning does life bring. Kansas went through […]

 

The best quarterbacks in the SEC in 2012? (Part 5)

I think Tyler Wilson is the best quarterback in the SEC but here is what others think:

The Southeastern Conference possesses some of college football’s best quarterbacks, and plenty of youngsters ready to emerge.  Here are my rankings of the signal callers headed into the season:

1. A.J. McCarron, Alabama, Jr.

McCarron tops the list, and looks to pick up where he left off in 2011 after he lead the Crimson Tide to an 11-1 regular-season record and a BCS title. McCarron commands an offense that will rely heavily on the run with running back Eddie Lacy. Lacy takes over for Heisman Trophy winner Trent Richardson.

If Lacy does his best Richardson impersonation and McCarron duplicates his 2,400 yard, 16 touchdowns, five interceptions and 66 percent completion percentage performance in 2011—while developing a young talented receiving corps—the Tide will be in the running for another crystal football in 2012.

2. Aaron Murray, Georgia, Jr.

Murray comes into 2012 at the top of many quarterback lists.  Murray’s numbers jump out at you,  with 3,149 yards  and 35 touchdowns in 2011; make a strong case for the top spot, but his slightly less efficient 59 percent completion percentage and 14 interceptions last season have him in the number two spot here.

Nonetheless, Murray looks poised to lead Georgia to another SEC Championship appearance, and could easily be number one at season’s end.

3. Tyler Wilson, Arkansas, Sr.

Wilson had arguably a better 2011 statistically than both McCarron and Murray, with more yards than both, (3,638) fewer interceptions than Murray (6) and more touchdowns than McCarron (24).

The fact that Wilson loses his top two wide receivers from a year ago, senior Colbi Hamilton enters as the only returning upperclassman at that position with experience in the system, and Bobby Petrino’s firing in the middle of spring drills has Wilson’s standing in question. If Wilson overcomes these pitfalls he will challenge Murray for second on the list, if not McCarron for first by the end of 2012.

4. Tyler Bray, Tennessee, Jr.

Bray at No. 4 hinges on the return of Tennessee’s two-headed monster at wide receiver in the persons of juniors Justin Hunter and Da’Rick Rodgers in 2012. Hunter looked poised for a breakout season with Bray in 2011 connecting with Bray for 302 yards and two touchdowns through just two games, but an ACL injury against Florida derailed any chance of that. Rogers picked up the slack leading the SEC in the regular season with 67 receptions and 1,040 yards, and added nine touchdowns on the year.

Bray had injury problems of his own in 2011, a thumb injury sidelined him from October 8-November 19. Despite the injury, Bray threw for 1,983 yards, 17 touchdowns and just 6 interceptions in seven games. If Bray, Rodgers and Hunter stay healthy, look for big things from the Tennessee passing attack in 2012.

5. James Franklin, Missouri, Jr.

Missouri comes into the SEC with its starter on the shelf for the spring recovering from offseason shoulder surgery on his non-throwing shoulder. If healthy, Franklin looks to give SEC defenses fits with his dual threat ability.

In 2011, Franklin threw for 2,865 yards, 21 touchdowns. Franklin rushed for 981 yards and 15 touchdowns. If Franklin enters the season healthy, watch for the Tigers to challenge Georgia, and South Carolina in the SEC East.

6. Connor Shaw, South Carolina, Jr.

Shaw lands at No. 6 thanks to the departure of go-to wide receiver Alshon Jeffery to the NFL and a lack of experience, just 9 starts. Shaw, however, boasts an 8-1 record as a starter, a bowl win and had 1,671 yards 15 touchdowns, eight interceptions in those starts.

Shaw could be the quarterback Head Coach Steve Spurrier has hoped for at South Carolina. It will be interesting to see if Spurrier pulls Shaw at any time if he struggles in 2012.

Rick Crawford again makes conservatives mad

Earlier I posted about Rick Crawford’s mistake where he said he agree to tax increases if the Democrats tried to balance the budget. Now he has allowed a bloated bill that includes Food Stamps to get out of committee and it has angered the conservative Cato Institute.

GOP Freshmen Vote to Move Farm Bill Out of Committee

Posted by Tad DeHaven

In the latest example of the so-called “Tea Party Class” of House Republicans not living up to the hype, GOP freshmen on the House Agriculture Committee voted overwhelmingly to approve a bloated $957 billion farm subsidy/welfare bill.

The overall vote was 35-11. Only 4 Republicans voted against it – the rest appear to be Democrats who weren’t happy that the bill doesn’t spend more money on food stamps. Republican freshmen occupy 16 of the 25 GOP seats on the committee. Only 3 out of the 16 voted against the bill.

  • Bob Gibbs (Ohio)
  • Tim Huelskamp (Kansas)
  • Marlin Stutzman (Indiana)

Here are the names of the 13 GOP freshmen who supported it:

  • Austin Scott (Georgia)
  • Scott Tipton (Colorado)
  • Steve Southerland (Florida)
  • Rick Crawford (Arkansas)
  • Martha Roby (Alabama)
  • Scott DeJarlais (Tennessee)
  • Renee Ellmers (North Carolina)
  • Chris Gibson (New York)
  • Randy Hultgren (Illinois)
  • Vicky Hartzler (MO)
  • Robert Schilling (Illinois)
  • Reid Ribble (Wisconsin)
  • Kristi Noem (South Dakota)

The question now is whether the House Republican leadership will allow the bill to come to the floor. According to the Washington Post, Speaker Boehner hasn’t decided:

Agriculture Chairman Frank Lucas, R-Okla., feels the committee did “an awful lot of good work,” Boehner said at a weekly news conference. But “no decisions about it coming to the floor at this point,” Boehner said…“There are some good reforms in this bill. There are other parts of the farm bill that I have concerns with,” Boehner said. He referred to what he said was “a Soviet-style dairy program in America today and one of the proposals in this farm bill would actually make it worse.”

Boehner has voted against farm bills in the past so he’s probably not eager to get this one to the floor, especially since advocates for free markets and limited government rightly consider the bill to be a disaster. But Boehner helped create this dilemma for himself when his Steering Committee gave Frank Lucas the chairman’s gavel after the 2010 elections. As Chris Edwards and I noted in a recent op-ed, Lucas is a big supporter of farm subsidies and takes pride in having been named a “Wheat Champion” by the National Association of Wheat Growers.

Back in December 2010, I wrote that “An indicator of the incoming House Republican majority’s seriousness about cutting spending will be which members the party selects to head the various committees.” Lucas’s chairmanship indicated that when it comes to bloated farm bills, the House leadership wasn’t serious. If this bill is allowed to reach the floor, any doubts will have been erased.

Russ Vought of the Red State Blog noted:

The fundamental problem with incrementalism is that you can never win the argument, because you never set out to have a debate on principle.

Instead, the debate is always about making some federal program run a little better or cost a little less. It is never about the underlying benefit or activity being fundamentally inconsistent with a limited government or the Constitution. No matter how common sense the reform, the Left immediately demonizes the effort as a “cut,” either scaring the reformers to the sidelines or sparking the same ideological firefight that the reformers were trying to avoid. The reformers get caught unprepared to argue on principle, and the proposed reform itself then proves to be well south of the herculean political effort needed to get it signed into law.

Consider the “farm” bill just passed out of the House Agriculture Committee.

Its $957 billion over ten years. The last farm bill in 2008 was $604 billion over ten years—a 63% increase. 80% of the bill is now food stamp funding. This is because there are now 46 million individuals on food stamps, compared with 17 million in 2000 and 30 million in 2008 respectively. 1 out of every 7 Americans are on food stamps. Chairman Frank Lucas is proposing to tweak the program to save just $16 billion or 2%. The Left is predictably freaking out. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities claims that the, “Lucas-Peterson proposed farm bill would throw 2 to 3 million people off” food stamps. Assistant Democrat Leader James Clyburn is calling the reforms “an abomination.” This freakout will inevitably result in some compromise that is even more worthless.

This is not the approach that you would take if you were, say, trying to drastically roll back the welfare state. You would take a much harder line. You would break up the food stamp portion from the commodity portion. You would go back to pre-Obama or pre-Bush levels and block grant the program (surely the nation can exist on the same food stamp levels enjoyed by the Clinton Administration, no?). You would be proposing a work requirement for the food stamp program. You might bring back the paper stamps and discontinue the EBT system. In other words, you would force a real debate about food stamps and dependency in America—about what we can afford given our fiscal situation and how to get people off of welfare for their and our benefit.

Despite

Related posts:

Republicans for more food stamps?

Eight Reasons Why Big Government Hurts Economic Growth __________________ We got to cut spending and we must first start with food stamp program and we need some Senators that are willing to make the tough cuts. Food Stamp Republicans Posted by Chris Edwards Newt Gingrich had fun calling President Obama the “food stamp president,” but […]

Obama promotes food stamps but Milton Friedman had a better suggestion

Milton Friedman’s negative income tax explained by Friedman in 1968: We need to cut back on the Food Stamp program and not try to increase it. What really upsets me is that when the government gets involved in welfare there is a welfare trap created for those who become dependent on the program. Once they […]

More Than Half of the President’s Budget Would Be Spent on Entitlement Programs

More Than Half of the President’s Budget Would Be Spent on Entitlement Programs Everyone wants to know more about the budget and here is some key information with a chart from the Heritage Foundation and a video from the Cato Institute. In combination with other entitlements, such as food stamps, unemployment, and housing assistance,Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security constitute the lion’s share […]

Federal spending continues to skyrocket

Government Spending Doesn’t Create Jobs Uploaded by catoinstitutevideo on Sep 7, 2011 Share this on Facebook: http://on.fb.me/qnjkn9 Tweet it: http://tiny.cc/o9v9t In the debate of job creation and how best to pursue it as a policy goal, one point is forgotten: Government doesn’t create jobs. Government only diverts resources from one use to another, which doesn’t […]

Open letter to President Obama (Part 87)

Uploaded by oversightandreform on Mar 6, 2012 Learn More at http://oversight.house.gov The Oversight Committee is examining reports of food stamp merchants previously disqualified who continue to defraud the program. According to a Scripps Howard News Service report, food stamp fraud costs taxpayers hundreds of millions every year. Watch the Oversight hearing live tomorrow at 930 […]

Obama brags of progress in USA on economy to G-8 audience

1,000 Days Without A Budget Uploaded by HeritageFoundation on Jan 24, 2012 http://blog.heritage.org | Today marks the 1,000th day since the United States Senate has passed a budget. While the House has put forth (and passed) its own budget, the Senate has failed to do the same. To help illustrate how extraordinary this failure has […]

Spending more money on welfare is not the answer

We have spent over 19 trillion on welfare since LBJ started the war on poverty and it has only brought us several generations who are dependent on the government. Welfare: Tackling the Fastest-Growing Part of Government Spending Rachel Sheffield April 20, 2012 at 2:45 pm Multiple reports of welfare abuse have hit the headlines in […]

A handout is not what the poor needs

Welfare Can And Must Be Reformed Uploaded by HeritageFoundation on Jun 29, 2010 If America does not get welfare reform under control, it will bankrupt America. But the Heritage Foundation’s Robert Rector has a five-step plan to reform welfare while protecting our most vulnerable. ______________ I don’t understand why liberals do not see that they […]

Overspending Obama style

This excessive spending by Washington today is not responsible government in action. Obama’s Comments: A Gift that Keeps on Giving Posted by Roger Pilon Today POLITICO Arena asks: Does Senator Grassley’s tweet, that the American people “r not stupid as this x prof of con law,” make an important point or was it disrespectful? Is this […]

400% increase in food stamps since 2000

Welfare Can And Must Be Reformed Uploaded by HeritageFoundation on Jun 29, 2010 If America does not get welfare reform under control, it will bankrupt America. But the Heritage Foundation’s Robert Rector has a five-step plan to reform welfare while protecting our most vulnerable. __________________________ If welfare increases as much as it has in the […]

“Friedman Friday” :“A Nobel Laureate on the American Economy” VTR: 5/31/77 Transcript and video clip (Part 4)

Milton Friedman on the American Economy (4 of 6)

 

Uploaded by on Aug 9, 2009

THE OPEN MIND
Host: Richard D. Heffner
Guest: Milton Friedman
Title: A Nobel Laureate on the American Economy VTR: 5/31/77
_____________________________________

Below is a transcipt from a portion of an interview that Milton Friedman gave on 5-31-77:

Friedman: “What’s good for General Motors is good for the United Sates and vice versa,” in that famous phrase of Mr. Wilson’s. So I don’t think you can distinguish between these two. I think that politicians and people, everybody, businessmen, politicians, scholars, we’re all seeking to pursue our own interests. We don’t have to interpret it as narrowly. My interests are in ideas as much as they are in dollars and cents or something else. But we’re all seeking to pursue our own interests. Politicians, their interests are closely connected with getting reelected. And therefore they will put primary emphasis on what will get me votes next time.

HEFFNER: Well, I was thinking of an analogy. I was thinking of drawing this comparison with the medical scientists; economic scientist and medical scientists. Medical scientists presumably will disagree minimally about what all other factors…

FRIEDMAN: Not at all. Not at all.

HEFFNER: On certain things they may disagree minimally in terms of the technical means that they should employ to deal with, to treat a patient. But in terms of considering the patients, in terms of considering their needs that are more than technical, they may disagree. And quite honestly, as to the approach to take, wouldn’t it be fair to say that this is as much a consideration as what you consider political, a political consideration among economists, which I would relate to how is my party going to be elected more readily the next time around?

FRIEDMAN: Well, I don’t either want to rule out completely that narrow interpretation, nor rule it in completely. I think economists are human beings like everybody else. Many of them do establish party loyalties. What’s more important, many have very strong private interests that are associated with which party is in power.

HEFFNER: Like what?

FRIEDMAN: Like what jogs they have. Like what prestige they have. Like what outside income they will be able to earn. You know, it was not a joke only, for years that the Brookings Institution in Washington was a home away from home for out-of-power Democratic economists. It’s not a joke now that the American Enterprise Institute is serving a similar function for out-of-power Republican economists. Surely these are not trivial and negligible. But they are not the only thing, I agree with you.

HEFFNER: You don’t really think that determinations of public policy or contributions by major economists in terms of the determination of public policy, that in those determinations one’s job in the next administration has played a major role; or do you?

FRIEDMAN: You know, you want to make it black and white. Human beings are distinguished from animals much more by the ability to rationalize than by the ability to reason. Sincerity is a much overrated virtue. It’s possible for anybody to be sincere about anything. I’m not questioning the sincerity or the motives of anybody. I’m only saying a human being is affected by those things that affect his image.

HEFFNER: Are your economic policies affected in that way?

FRIEDMAN: Of course they must have been. I can’t deny that they could have been.

HEFFNER: No, no, I’m not talking about could have been.

FRIEDMAN: Or that they have been. Or that they have been. I mean, we never know ourselves. And the man who says, “I am objective,” you k now that can’t be the case. We’re all of us imperfect human beings. We’re all of us going to be affected by these things. I’m not saying anybody else is any more or less affected than I am. Some people are less affected; some people are more. I would say on the whole you’ve got to look at it in a more complex and sophisticated way. Most people develop beliefs and ideas. Those beliefs and ideas in turn determine what policies they approve, what directions they move. That in turn reacts on them and affects their beliefs and ideas. And the whole thing is a kind of biological process of creating a complex structure that can/t be dissected into the simple black-and-white category. He is in favor of this policy because if he is in favor of that policy he will get this and this job. You can’t say that. That’s not true. I’m not saying that of anybody.

HEFFNER: Okay. I wondered about that because the question of self-interest did come up, and I was shocked by it.

FRIEDMAN: Well, you see, the economists… Take the economics profession as a whole. Because I think it’s very interesting from this point of view. The economists have a very schizophrenic situation. Our discipline of economics, as a science, predisposes all economists to be in favor of a market system, of a free market. Because that’s our business. We come to understand how a market operates. It’s a much more sensitive and sophisticated instrument than may appear on the surface or that the ordinary man in the street believes it. So every economist has a predisposition to be in favor of a market system. On the other hand, the major growth area for jobs for economists has arisen out of government regulation. So the special interests of economists is to be in favor of government regulation. How do you reconcile this? Again, don’t misunderstand me. I’m not saying anyone is doing this in a Machiavellian way. I’m just describing the unobserved forces that are at work on it. Well, the way in which many economists have implicitly reconciled it is by being in favor of the free market in general, and opposed to the free market in particular. “And this area is a special case that needs regulation, this area is a special case.” You know, the same thing happens to businessmen. Every businessman is in favor of private enterprise.

HEFFNER: Except in his…

FRIEDMAN: Except for himself. And he isn’t – let me emphasize – in both cases, he isn’t being Machiavellian. He isn’t being insincere. He isn’t being devious. He sincerely believes. He knows his own case. And he sincerely is persuaded that his own case is special and that it’s in the national interest to treat it differently than other cases.

HEFFNER: But this concept of the marketplace, has it always been with us?

FRIEDMAN: Yes. Oh, every society is primarily run by the marketplace. But there are many kinds of marketplaces. The political marketplace…

HEFFNER: And aren’t you talking about a particular kind?

FRIEDMAN: I’m talking… But even the particular kind, yes, there are two main kinds of marketplaces. The economic marketplace in which you buy and sell, which has much broader relevance than you might a first suppose. And the political marketplace in which decisions are made by votes or by authority through political position by command.

HEFFNER: I understand. But I just wondered whether this basic agreement that you referred to among economists, all of whom relate to the economic marketplace, I was about to ask where is it written…

FRIEDMAN: (Laughter)

HEFFNER: …where is it written that the concept of the marketplace shall prevail? Isn’t this a rather modern concept? And if it is, why must we tie ourselves to it as tightly as you would have us do, as tightly as you suggest all economists would have us?

FRIEDMAN: Well, let’s answer that in two different ways. You say, “Why must we tie to it?” Because the fact of the matter is that there is no alternative mechanism that has so far been devised which will enable large and complex societies to exist. Consider what seems like the most extreme exception: the Soviet Union. It’s not, in the first instance you would say that’s not a market economy. And yet, the main organization of resources in the Soviet Union is through the marketplace and not through government command. And this is true in all sorts of ways. Anybody who read Hedric Smith’s fascinating book on the Russians will discover that if something goes wrong with you electricity in your house, you don’t call a state office and have them send somebody. You get a government employee on his spare time to come in and fix it for you.

HEFFNER: The same thing is true here, if you can.

FRIEDMAN: Of course, of course. Well, no, if you can here, you hire somebody. But in Russia supposedly you ought to get a state official, governmental official. It’s all done by government agencies. It’s not here, yet.

Go on. Take food. Something like 25, 30, 35 percent of the people in the Soviet Union are required to produce a food. They permit small private plots. Those plots account for two to three percent of the arable land of the Soviet Union. They produce a third of the food in private markets and distributed through markets. If you have, if you look at the way in which labor is organized, the buyers are governmental agencies. But people are attracted to one job or another by the job or by the pay that is offered to them. Fundamentally, the Soviet Union is a market economy, but it’s distorted market economy because the extraordinarily great role of government forces the market into channels which are not efficient and not effective. And so much of its power is wasted in simply overcoming the bureaucratic mess of the government. That’s why the Soviet Union has such a low standard of life. So it’s interesting, on a matter of theory. Well, I don’t like that word. ON a matter of sort of abstract ideal, you can conceptualize a command economy in which the market plays no role. It’s an army. A general gives an order to a colonel, a colonel to a major, a major to a captain, and so on down the line. Or you can visualize a voluntary exchange economy, a pure market economy in which everything is conducted by voluntary agreement among individuals’ purchase and sale.

Misquotes, Fake Quotes, and Disputed Quotes of the Founders

1 Of 5 / The Bible’s Influence In America / American Heritage Series / David Barton

2 Of 5 / The Bible’s Influence In America / American Heritage Series / David Barton

3 Of 5 / The Bible’s Influence In America / American

Heritage Series / David Barton

4 Of 5 / The Bible’s Influence In America / American Heritage Series / David Barton

5 Of 5 / The Bible’s Influence In America / American Heritage Series / David Barton

__________________________________________

3 Of 3 / Faith Of The Founding Fathers / American Heritage Series / David Barton

________________Many inauthentic quotes attributed to the Founding Fathers have been in circulation for much of the 20th century. These are still being used frequently, especially by those in the religious right.

Fortunately we have many of the letters, diaries, and notes written by the Founding Fathers. Thomas Jefferson wrote many letters daily. John Quincy Adams wrote in his diary every day for 18 years straight. During the 1787 Constitutional Convention, James Madison wrote notes in shorthand which he converted into longhand every night. Newspapers of the day are also a good source. Actually, George Washington’s farewell Presidential Address in 1796 was only a newspaper article. In sum, our prolific Founders left us with many sources of material.

Misquotes

If one quotes the actual words of a Founding Father but does not give the context, then he is guilty of misquoting.

John Adams (1735-1826) “This would be the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in it.”

John George and Paul Boller, Jr. in their book They Never Said It set the record straight:

Adams did indeed make the statement, but only to repudiate it. In a letter to Thomas Jefferson about religion on April 19, 1817, he mentioned reading some polemical books that reminded him of the way his boyhood minister, Lemuel Bryant, and his Latin schoolmaster, Joseph Cleverly, used to argue ad nausea about religion, and he told Jefferson: “Twenty times, in the course of my late reading, have I been on the point of breaking out, ‘this would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it!!!!’ But in this exclamation, I should have been as fanatical as Bryant or Cleverly. Without religion, this world would be something not fit to be mentioned in public company–I mean hell.”

 Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) “I therefore beg leave to move–that henceforth prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven, and its blessing on our deliberations, be held in this assembly every morning before we proceed to business, and that one or more of the clergy of this city be requested to officiate in that article.”

This is exactly what Franklin said at the 1787 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. However, many in the religious right ignore that fact that his motion was tabled and never voted on. For instance, Tal Brooke comments, “It was Benjamin Franklin who called the Constitutional Convention to prayer with a powerful statement of their debt to God. As mere men, they could not presume to undertake so great a task without petitioning Him for guidance. America abounds with Christian evidences from its earliest days.”

Actually this version of the Franklin prayer motion originated with a letter written in September of 1825 from William Steele to his son, Jonathan. The letter told about William’s recollection of a conversation with General Jonathan Dayton, a member of the Constitutional Convention. This incorrect account later appeared in the National Intelligencer, and other sources as well. According to Steele, Dayton recalled that “the motion for appointing a chaplain was instantly seconded and carried.” However, James Madison in a letter to Thomas S. Grimke (January 6, 1834) stated that Franklin’s “proposition was received and treated with the respect due to it; but the lapse of time which had preceded, with consternations growing out of it, had the effect of limiting what was done, to a reference of the proposition to a highly respectable Committee… That the communication [Steele’s account of Dayton testimony] was erroneous is certain; whether from misapprehension or misrecollection, uncertain.”

We should learn a lesson from James Madison. It is one thing to correct a person who is mistaken about historical details, but it is quite another to accuse someone of intentionally fabricating a story. Note that Madison stopped short of doing the latter.

Fake Quotes

A fake quote is an inauthentic quote attributed to a Founding Father. The late Robert S. Alley, former professor at the University of Richmond has rightly stated that “proving that a quotation does not exist is a daunting task…” However, evidence exists that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the following quote is not authentic.

James Madison (1751-1836) “Religion …[is] the basis and foundation of government.”

This fake quote is taken from Madison’s Memorial and Remonstrance. The subject in this sentence is not “Religion,” but actually the “Declaration of those rights ‘which pertain to the good people of Virginia.'” Nevertheless, this inauthentic quote has been circulated for many years.

Disputed Quotes

A disputed quote may actually be authentic, but no primary source has been found. Some scholars would put the following two quotes in the previous category of “Fake Quotes” while other scholars may hold out hope that a primary source will be found.

James Madison (1751-1836) “We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves…according to the Ten Commandments of God.”

Possibly this quote was originally given by Bishop James Madison (a cousin) or from James Madison’s father, James Madison, Sr., but this is pure speculation. There is always a distant chance that a quote could turn up from a primary source that was found in someone’s attic. In fact, a primary document from James Madison surfaced as late as 1946, but don’t hold your breath till that happens again. The fact remains that there is not a shred of evidence that links James Madison to this quote. Moreover, Paul F. Boller, Jr. in a personal letter to me stated, “The Madison quote about the Ten Commandments sounds un-Madisonian. I’ve read a lot of Madison, and I know he didn’t express himself that way…Sometimes the questionable quote can’t be found in any of the writings that have survived of the person who is supposed to have made the statement. The Madison quote doesn’t appear in any of Madison’s writings.”

Christian apologist Gary DeMar wrote concerning his research concerning the quote:

I credited this quotation to Madison in the first edition of the first volume of God and Government. Nearly every book written by a Christian author to support the Christian America thesis claims Madison as the quotation’s author. I have searched in vain for the quotation’s original source. American Vision even contacted a Madison scholar for help. He was not familiar with the quotation. Further study led me to the January 1958 calendar published by Spiritual Mobilization. What was Spiritual Mobilization’s source for the quotation? None was listed. Additional detective work led me to another James Madison, a cousin of President Madison. Madison served as president of William and Mary College and was the first Protestant Episcopal bishop of Virginia. Is he the source of the quotation? Very possibly. Christians should stop attributing of the quotation to President James Madison until we find out.

 It is my opinion that this disputed quote attributed to Madison has been the one used more than any other by the religious right. This is probably due to the fact that the Supreme Court banned the display of the Ten Commandments in the public school rooms in the case Stone v. Graham in 1980.

George Washington (1732-1799) “It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible.”

Several years ago, I was guilty of using this disputed quote, and the late Professor John George of the University of Central Oklahoma, Political Science Department, told me that there is not a shred of evidence to link Washington to this quote. Professor George was a leading expert on this subject, and he co-authored They Never Said It: A Book of Fake Quotes, Misquotes, and Misleading Attributions with Paul F. Boller, Jr. of Texas Christian University.

I had copied this disputed quote off of a bumper sticker that my friend from church had on his truck. However, I was surprised at my friend’s reaction when I told him he should remove his sticker. He said,  “Is Professor George a Christian? If not then he probably has an axe to grind.” I later discovered that Professor George had corrected many atheists too. Nevertheless, I tried to find someone in the religious right who also had some knowledge on the subject.

So I called up the company that specialized at putting out bumper stickers with quotes from the  Founding Fathers dealing with God. The owner of the company actually spent a whole year researching the Washington quote and he said he concluded that Washington did not say it. He commented, “Washington did not talk that way. He did not use the word ‘Bible’ any that I can remember, and I believe, I have read everything available that Washington wrote.”

This fellow was a Christian lawyer, and he said he could no longer sell the Washington bumper sticker even though it made up 90% of his sales. Again I went back to my friend, but he replied, “That fellow is not a historian. David Barton has studied the history of the founding fathers for over 20 years. I have a lot of respect for Barton.”

Then I contacted Barton’s organization, Wallbuilders Inc of Aledo, Texas. They mailed me the “Unconfirmed or Questionable Quote” list and it featured the Washington quote. Furthermore, it recommended not using this quote until it is authenticated.

When confronted with this opinion from Barton my friend responded, “I am not going to take my bumper sticker off until I have an explanation of how the quote could have possibly been mistakenly attributed to Washington in the first place.”

Then I received a few weeks later an updated “Unconfirmed Quote” list from Wallbuilders, and under the Washington disputed quote is this explanation:

There is a very real possibility that the quotation has its origin in an 1835 biography by James K. Paulding. In a description of Washington’s character, with supporting quotations, Paulding declares Washington to have said, “It is impossible to account for the creation of the universe without the agency of a Supreme Being. It is impossible to govern the universe without the aid of a Supreme Being.” The similarities are obvious; a paraphrase of these quotes could have easily generated the words in question. However, we have not been able to trace Paulding’s cite to a more scholarly reference. He offers no footnotes.

I thought my friend would finally back down when I showed him this evidence, but I was about to learn something about human nature. I explained to him that this quote originated around 1835 when someone read Paulding’s book A Life of Washington. This is because it contained another unconfirmed quote of Washington which also had the words “impossible” and “govern.” Obviously a paraphrase took place at that time. My friend replied, “Are you 100% sure it is a bad quote? If not then I am going to continue to use it!”

Needless to say I have learned a lot about people’s tendency to ignore evidence when it goes against their presuppositions. Furthermore, I have quit trying to convince my friend that a disputed quote should be shelved until it is authenticated. He truly believes if Washington were here today he would say it now even if he didn’t say it the first time.

  Everette Hatcher is a businessman in Little Rock, and his blog is www.thedailyhatch.org . He is a conservative Republican and he has confronted over 30 religious right authors over their misuse of disputed quotes. (The article above has been recommended by unlikely advocates such as the atheist Farrell Till of the Skepitcal Review.)

(Update: You will notice above in the section labeled “Fake Quotes” that I linked a comment by the late Dr. Robert Alley to an article by Rob Boston of Americans United published in 1996. I posted earlier how I was the source for the two articles that Rob Boston wrote on David Barton but unfortunately he implied that Barton made up these quotes. Fortunately I was given the opportunity to set the record straight in The Freedom Writer.

Later I got several board members of Americans United to contact Boston on my behalf and voice their opinion of how unfair Boston had been to Barton in his article  “Consumer Alert”. On March 7, 1997, I spoke with Barry Lynn the executive director of Americans United. Lynn was very gracious on the phone and  promised to consider an article from me in response to the slanted  “Consumer Alert” article Boston had written earlier. Americans United board member Dr. Paul Simmons of Louisville helped me write the aritcle, but ultimately it was never published until today.)

George Washington (Lansdowne portrait) by Gilbert Stuart, oil on canvas, 1796

George Washington (Lansdowne portrait) by Gilbert Stuart, oil on canvas, 1796
National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution. Acquired as a gift to the nation through the generosity of the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation.

 

Nancy Carlton on climate change

Patrick J. Michaels on Climate Change

Uploaded by on Nov 18, 2008

Cato Institute Senior Fellow Patrick J. Michaels discusses climate change on various television programs. Michaels is a research professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia and visiting scientist with the Marshall Institute in Washington, D.C. He is a past president of the American Association of State Climatologists and was program chair for the Committee on Applied Climatology of the American Meteorological Society

______________-

Mitt Romney earlier held the view that we had to take an aggressive view concerning climate change but has lightened up on that view since then.  I have big doubts concerning climate change and I am willing to say that I don’t know for sure but now the facts indicate to me that global warming is happening. It may just be a cycle that includes periods of cool downs too in the past.

Below is an interesting article that I wanted to pass along.

Check your calendar – Is it 1984 yet?

Living in Quadrant 2 is the same as living in Saline County, he thought to himself. Vaguely he could still perceive the term “Saline County”, even though all his neighbors had forgotten it.

From his dingy window overlooking the People’s Ministry Headquarters in Bentonia, he could see the lines of uniformed workers already waiting impatiently to be let into their work stations.

He knows that the main reason they are anxious to get inside is that their breakfast rations are laid out for them in the entry hall, to be picked up on the way to their cubicles. It’s a good thing that the food is neatly cut into perfect squares, each with its complete nutrition, low fat, high fiber, artificial taste, designed by a GS-12 dietitian, for quick consumption and zero waste.

This Orwellian, far-fetched scenario may seem like a total outlandish exaggeration when compared with the reality of 2011 in Saline County, Arkansas. But have you seen how quickly things are changing? If you have read George Orwell’s “1984”, look around you and see literature come to life!

“Newspeak” is the language of Orwell’s land of Oceania, where the government has taken over the language and is changing it rapidly to incrementally conform the thinking of all citizens to the official view handed down by the administration. Couldn’t happen here, you say?

Tell me where the following terms came from: Smart Growth. Green Economy. Sustainable Development. Undocumented Workers. Climate Change. Kinetic Military Action. Carbon Footprint.

This is your government telling you how to think. Business must not grow for profit – it must grow “smartly”. It must conform to a thousand regulations. It must not leave behind any unsightly traces. It must be globally fair and internationally lawful.

The economy mustn’t be robust. It must be environmentally pure. It must be inoffensive to other countries. It must be controlled. It must be manipulated.

The environment has been exalted by our government and the media to a higher status than people. Indeed a huge part of “Smart” and “Sustainable” projects to many futuristic thinkers in this world involves many, many fewer human beings than now inhabit this planet. The United Nations and I.C.L.E.I. have dire plans for the human race. Do yourself a favor and go to http://www.freedomadvocates.org. Look at the ICLEI Primer. Read the articles. See what is about to happen to our “unalienable rights” if the globalists get their way. The attack on America started decades ago. The dumbing down of our people by controlled media and public education which has been saturated with globalist attitudes and values is sucking the lifeblood from our nation. By the way, in case you think that surely nobody in our fair state would be radical enough or stupid enough to allow this ICLEI monster into our local governments – Pulaski County, North Little Rock and Fayetteville, Arkansas have all three already signed on. Check it out.

On another front, Al Gore and his merry band of junk scientists have convinced our schoolchildren that evil America is drowning the baby Polar Bears, when in truth the Polar Bears are thriving. Someone slipped up and told the truth about the global farce that is Climate Change. Will Al Gore give back his Nobel Peace Prize?

We have to stop the “death by regulation” and the organized brainwashing that is being perpetrated on us by Big Government.

As I am emphatically the Conservative columnist, you may ask,”What does this have to do with Conservatism vs. Liberalism?” Pretty much everything. For some reason, most Liberals seem to have an appetite for big government. They strive for the bliss they feel will come when government levels every playing field to the point that no one person even feels the need to try to excel anymore. Big Government left unchecked could easily become the “Big Brother” of Orwell’s “1984”. Maybe not in every detail, but the complete stifling of freedom would be the same.

I find some comfort in knowing that I am not sounding this alarm alone. Besides the Freedom Advocates website I gave you, also look at http://securearkansasnetwork.org for plenty of good local information.

If you don’t want to wake up some morning living in Quadrant 2 and lining up to get your rations along with your comrades, do some research.

Let’s make sure that we can continue to sing “The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave” without having to lie.

__________

Related posts:

Romney believes in global warming

Romney reaffirms stance that global warming is real Bucking skeptics, he urges changes Mitt Romney, at UNH yesterday, said if elected, he would pursue more oil drilling, as well as natural gas and nuclear energy. (Stephan Savoia/Associated Press) By Matt Viser MANCHESTER, N.H. — In the first town hall of his freshly announced presidential campaign, Mitt […]

Open letter to President Obama (Part 93)

President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here. I wondered […]

Hurtful regulations from Obama

I wondered why President Obama was claiming that he was not increasing regulations as much as Bush did. However, the real truth coming out  in this article below: Chart of the Week: Obama Tops Bush With More, Costlier Major Regulations Alison Meyer March 18, 2012 at 2:40 pm President Obama famously declared in this year’s […]

Newt is a poor excuse for a candidate

I used to like Newt back in the 1990′s but a lot has changed since then. Take a look at this fine article from the Cato Institute: Gingrich Rise Is Triumph of Style over Substance by Gene Healy   Gene Healy is a vice president at the Cato Institute and the author of The Cult […]

Federal government runs up cost by increasing regulations

The Heritage Foundation website does it again. Take a look. CAFE Standards: Fleet-Wide Regulations Costly and Unwarranted By Diane Katz November 28, 2011 Automakers would be required to double current fleet-wide fuel economy by 2025 under regulations proposed last week by the Obama Administration. Advocates contend that this crackdown on the internal combustion engine would […]

Climategate

What about climategate? Here is an article from the Wall Street Journal: OPINION NOVEMBER 28, 2011 Climategate 2.0 A new batch of leaked emails again shows some leading scientists trying to smear opponents. By JAMES DELINGPOLE Last week, 5,000 files of private email correspondence among several of the world’s top climate scientists were anonymously leaked […]

John Huntsman: “I believe in evolution and trust scientists on global warming”

This may get interesting. AFP reported today: Republican presidential hopeful Jon Huntsman took a swipe at his rivals and warned his party against rejecting science in an interview that will air Sunday. “I think there’s a serious problem. The minute that the Republican Party becomes the party — the anti-science party — we have a […]

Is Al Gore Misrepresenting Global Warming? – Patrick Michaels

I ran across this great video above on global warming. ____________________ Uploaded by ForaTv on Apr 15, 2009 Complete video at: http://fora.tv/2009/03/12/Climate_of_Extremes Patrick Michaels argues that, when discussing climate change, “people accept the strangest things without really fact checking.” Michaels argues that many of Al Gore’s claims and presumptions about global warming are false. —– […]

Global Warming is not happening in last 15 years

I love it when the facts come out and contradict the liberal spin on things. “Why Hasn’t the Earth Warmed in Nearly 15 Years?”by Patrick J. Michaels.   Patrick Michaels is senior fellow in environmental studies at the Cato Institute and author of Climate Coup: Global Warming’s Invasion of our Government and our Lives. Added to […]

The best quarterbacks in the SEC in 2012? (Part 4)

I think Tyler Wilson is the best quarterback in the SEC, but what do others think?

247 sports notes:

First in a series that goes position by position to rate the best players and units in the Southeastern Conference. Today: the quarterbacks.

Aaron Murray at GeorgiaGeorgia’s Aaron Murray will be the top rated quarterback in the SEC heading into the 2011 season.

In a league that’s known for its defensive linemen, it’s hard to overlook the quarterbacks in the Southeastern Conference. This is a glamour position in the nation’s number one football league but this year there is no Tim Tebow or Cam Newton on the horizon. Even though there is only one returning starter with star quality stats in Georgia’s Aaron Murray, there is no lack of talent heading into 2011.

Now that spring football is over, here is an early look at the quarterback position, rating by units and individually.

SEC EAST

1. Georgia:Aaron Murray is the top returning quarterback in the league after throwing for 3,049 yards and 24 touchdowns (only eight picks) as a redshirt freshman in 2010. Murray won’t have the luxury of throwing to A.J. Green in 2011, but the Bulldogs will have competent receivers. If Murray gets the protection, he should build upon last year’s work to become an All-SEC type this year. Sophomore Hutson Mason is the backup but he threw only 17 passes last year. Behind him is talented freshman Christian LeMay, whose problems in high school kept him from playing as a senior, and redshirt freshmen Greg Bingham and Parker Welch.

2. Florida:John Brantley is the incumbent and now that he will have the chance to run a pro style offense instead of the spread and get his coaching from Charlie Weis, he should be substantially better in 2011. Although Brantley didn’t have a great spring game, he will benefit from three months of working in the film room with Weis before practice begins again in August. Given Weis’ track record with quarterbacks, Brantley could be the most improved player in the SEC next season. Behind him are athletic redshirt freshman Tyler Murphy and touted freshmen Jeff Driskel, the Gatorade National Player of the Year, and athletic Jacoby Brissett, who could play Division I basketball as well as football.

3. South Carolina:Stephen Garcia’s future at South Carolina is completely up in the air but even if the oft-troubled Garcia doesn’t come back, South Carolina should be in very good hands. Conner Shaw backed up Garcia last year and while he doesn’t have the arm strength that Garcia has, he’s less likely to throw into double coverage, too. He will be backed up by junior Seth Strickland, sophomore Andrew Clifford and redshirt freshman Dylan Thompson. Whoever quarterbacks the Gamecocks will be able to hand the ball off to Marcus Lattimore, the best running back in the conference and maybe the country, and throw to Alshon Jeffery, arguably the best wide receiver in the nation. That should take the pressure off and considering it’s Steve Spurrier who will be coaching the position, figure South Carolina will be productive at quarterback.

4. Tennessee: A quarterback controversy is entirely possible in Knoxville. The incumbent is Tyler Bray, who threw for 18 touchdowns and 1,849 yards as a true freshman, but Bray was 5-30 in the spring game while Matt Simms, who threw for eight touchdowns and 1,460 yards last season, threw for a touchdown and ran for a touchdown in the spring game and was much, much sharper. Bray will be given every chance to retain his starting job but if he falters, Simms has SEC starts under his belt. Neither quarterback got any real separation in the spring. Freshman Justin Worley, who enrolled early, showed a strong arm and good decision making skills in the spring. The other quarterback on the roster is Nash Nance, who redshirted last year as a freshman.

5. Kentucky:Morgan Newton at and watched senior Mike Hartline last season but when Hartline was ineligible to play in the bowl game, Newton took over and completed 21-36 passes for 211 yards. He threw for six touchdowns and 706 yards as a true freshman in 2009. Newton had a good spring that had some Kentucky observers comparing him to former UK standout Andre Woodson, who threw for 71 touchdowns and 7,224 yards as a starter in 2006-07. Newton’s backup figures to be true freshman Maxwell Smith, a strong armed kid from California who enrolled early and played well during spring practice.

6. Vanderbilt: The good news for new coach James Franklin is that he has a two-year starter in Larry Smith. That’s also the bad news because Smith has never completed more than 50 percent of his passes and he has averaged a little more than 5.0 yards per attempt. Those numbers better improve if Franklin intends to improve Vandy’s anemic offense. The backup is Jordan Rogers, who redshirted last season. He’s never been healthy since he’s been at Vandy but he’s a far better passer than Smith and with a good August, he could take over as the #1 QB. Rogers’ brother is Green Bay Packers’ quarterback Aaron Rogers. Sophomore John Townsley and redshirt sophomore Charlie Goro back up Rogers and Smith.

SEC WEST

1. Arkansas:Bobby Petrino is such a good quarterbacks coach that whoever he lines up under center figures to be one of the best in the SEC. Tyler Wilson spent the 2010 season backing up Ryan Mallett, but he showed what he could do against Auburn last year when Mallett went down with a concussion. All Wilson did was complete 25-34 passes for 332 yards and four touchdowns. He comes into the season having thrown for 740 yards and seven touchdowns in his two years of apprentice work. Now Wilson is ready to start and considering he will be throwing to the nation’s best set of wide receivers and can hand the ball off to Knile Davis, who ran for 1,322 yards and 13 touchdowns last year, he figures to have something close to an All-SEC season. Behind Wilson are backups Brandon Mitchell, who impresses everyone with his strong arm and quick feet, and freshman Jacoby Walker, another big arm type who can run the ball as well.

2. Mississippi State: A year ago, who would have thought that Chris Relf would establish himself as one of the top quarterbacks in the SEC? Everybody knew he could run the ball but he proved he can be a capable passer as well in leading the Bulldogs to a 9-4 record that included a smashing bowl win over Michigan. Relf threw for 1,776 yards and 12 touchdowns while rushing for 701 and five more out of Dan Mullen’s spread option offense. If Relf improves on those numbers, he could contend for All-SEC. Mullen has an experienced backup in Tyler Russell, who threw for 635 yards and five touchdowns last year as a redshirt freshman. Redshirt freshman Dylan Favre, the nephew of Brett Favre, had an outstanding spring and in the fall, Mullen brings in highly regarded Dak Prescott, a terrific athlete with outstanding size (6-4, 230).

3. LSU: On the SEC Coaches Teleconference on Wednesday, Les Miles went on and on about the strides Jordan Jefferson made in the spring under new offensive coordinator Steve Kragthorpe. Jefferson is a terrific athlete who is better known for running the ball (383 yards and six touchdowns in 2010) than throwing it although he did throw for 17 touchdowns and 2,166 yards as a sophomore in 2009. If Jefferson can hold his position and actually excel, it would allow Miles to redshirt big arm juco transfer Zach Mettenberger, the former Georgia signee. Senior Jarrett Lee, who has started nine games and thrown 18 touchdown passes in his career, is a capable backup. Metterberger has the best physical tools of the three but Miles has made it very clear that he would be most comfortable with a senior starter at quarterback. In the all, those three will be joined by athletic Jerrard Randall, who might end up at another position before his career is through.

4. Alabama: A.J. McCarron always looked good in his relief appearances for Greg McElroy (completed 30-48 passes for 389 yards and three touchdowns) but now he has to prove he can be the starter. That’s going to be a tough job since he couldn’t distance himself in the spring from redshirt freshman Phillip Sims. Mark Ingram is gone from the offense as is Julio Jones, but Alabama has competent receivers in Marquis Maze and Darius Hanks, and tailback Trent Richardson figures to have a monster season, so neither McCarron or Sims will have to be great. All they will have to do is avoid fumbling and throwing the ball to the other team to be competent. Freshman Phillip Ely will make all the road trips but he’s got to spend his first year in the weight room getting strong enough to play Division I football.

5. Auburn: No one will have a greater statistical dropoff at the quarterback position than Auburn. Auburn doesn’t have one quarterback capable of matching Cam Newton’s Heisman Trophy stats of 2,854 passing yards and 30 touchdowns to go with 1,473 rushing yards and another 20 touchdowns and no one is sure there are any two who could put up those numbers. Barrett Trotter, who ran for 68 yards and passes for 64 more last year, ended the spring locked in a battle with redshirt freshman Clint Moseley, but no one would be surprised if they have to take a backseat to hotshot freshman Kiehl Frazier, who spent four years in high school running the Gus Malzahn offense at a very high level. Frazier has the strong arm to throw the ball in the SEC and he runs the ball better than either Trotter or Moseley.

6. Ole Miss: When senior Nathan Stanley left the program during spring practice that pretty much left the Ole Miss quarterback job a tossup between juco transfer Randall Mackey and West Virginia transfer Barry Brunetti. Mackey finished the spring just ahead of Brunetti, but in the spring game, Brunetti threw for 211 yards and two touchdowns while Mackey threw for 151 and one touchdown plus threw an interception. Also in the mix is juco transfer Zach Stoudt and athletic freshman Maikhail Miller. The quarterback position figures to be like the rest of the Ole Miss team, a real question mark for 2011.

RATING THE STARTERS:

1. Aaron Murray, Georgia
2. Tyler Wilson, Arkansas
3. Chris Relf, Mississippi State
4. John Brantley, Florida
5. Jordan Jefferson, LSU
6. A.J. McCarron, Alabama
7. Conner Shaw, South Carolina
8. Tyler Bray, Tennessee
9. Morgan Newton, Kentucky
10. Barrett Trotter, Auburn
11. Larry Smith, Vanderbilt
12. Randall Mackey, Ole Miss