Monthly Archives: May 2012

Top football stadiums in the country (Part 3)

Kansas Football 2007

Here is a list of the top football stadiums in the country.

Power Ranking All 124 College Football Stadiums  

By Alex Callos

(Featured Columnist) on April 19, 2012 

When it comes to college football stadiums, for some teams, it is simply not fair. Home-field advantage is a big thing in college football, and some teams have it way more than others.

There are 124 FBS college football teams, and when it comes to the stadiums they play in, they are obviously not all created equal.

There is a monumental difference from the top teams on the list to the bottom teams on the list. Either way, here it is: a complete ranking of the college football stadiums 1-124.

___________

Former Kansas coach Eric Mangino was one of my favorite speakers at the Little Rock Touchdown Club in 2011.

Mangino, 55, and living in Naples, Fla., spoke Monday at the Little Rock Touchdown Club’s weekly luncheon at the Embassy Suites hotel. When asked about his departure from Kansas, he didn’t elaborate, choosing to focus on the positives in an eight-year run that resulted in a 50-48 record, including 23-41 in Big 12 games and a 3-1 in bowl games.

“I choose to dwell on the positives and all the good things we did,” Mangino said after pausing when asked what happened during his final year at Kansas. “We accomplished a lot of things that gave me a sense of pride.”

________

Mangino at a 2007 KU basketball game 

110. Ladd-Peebles Stadium: South Alabama Jaguars

Large_ladd-peeblesstadium_display_image

Located in Mobile, Alabama, this stadium is not only the home of the South Alabama Jaguars, but is also where the Senior Bowl is played every year, along with the GoDaddy.com Bowl.

Built in 1948, this old stadium has a seating capacity of 40,646.

It is not a bad spot for a team like South Alabama, but could certainly use a little work.

 

109. University Stadium: New Mexico Lobos

220px-university-stadium3_display_image

University Stadium is located in Albuquerque in a nice area, and if there was more inside the stadium, it would certainly be ranked higher on the list.

While the fans here are not the best, they do support their team.

The stadium was built in 1960 and has a capacity of 38,634.

 

108. Peden Stadium: Ohio Bobcats

Peden2_display_image

This stadium is easy to get to and offers a lot of parking, which is a bonus.

It seats 24,000 and is one of the oldest stadiums in the country, having originally been built in 1929.

The Ohio Bobcats do not have the best facilities, and this certainly fits that mold. The location is great, but the crowd is usually small.

 

107. Wallace Wade Stadium: Duke Blue Devils

350px-wallace_wade_stadium_2005_virginia_tech_at_duke_display_image

Wallace Wade Stadium is the home of the Duke Blue Devils and is the first stadium on the list for a team from a BCS Conference.

It was built in 1929, and the football team here is clearly not supported like the basketball team.

While big-name teams come to play here, the fanbase does not really seem to care too much, and the stadium is relatively old on top of that.

 

106. Memorial Stadium: Kansas Jayhawks

Stadium-sellout-450w_display_image

This home of the Kansas Jayhawks is ancient in terms of football stadiums.

It was originally built in 1921 and is large for its age, with a seating capacity of 50,071.

Similar to Duke, Kansas is a basketball school, and the football team clearly does not get the support from the fans that the basketball team does.

The stadium is located in a perfect college town, however.

 

105. Kelly Shorts Stadium: Central Michigan Chippewas

Kocsejfpxebhedy

With a capacity of 30,199, Kelly Shorts Stadium is located in Mount Pleasant Michigan and is in the middle of the pack as far as MAC stadiums are concerned. 

The stadium was built in 1972 and is located in a perfect college town, making the atmosphere and the surrounding area that much better.

While the stadium inside is still lacking, there are a lot of positive things going on in Mount Pleasant.

“Woody Wednesday” Biography of Woody Allen

Here is a great link on Woody Allen.

With at least four distinct phases throughout his long career, writer-director-actor Woody Allen was one of the few American filmmakers rightly labeled an auteur. From the irreverent absurdity of his early satires like “Bananas” (1971) and “Sleepers” (1973) to his chronicles of neurotic New Yorkers in “Annie Hall” (1977), “Manhattan” (1979) and “Hannah and Her Sisters” (1986), Allen’s obsessions with beauty, psychiatry, intellect and relationships existed in all his work. Unique among filmmakers, Allen made highly personal films with mainstream money while managing to exert creative control over the product – all the while earning a high-level of critical respect and numerous Academy Awards. By keeping budgets low, the prolific filmmaker reached his mostly urban audience on a regular basis, churning out one movie practically each year. His creative fires never extinguished, as he directed dramas like “Interiors” (1978), morally ambiguous tragicomedies like “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (1989) and period comedies like “Bullets Over Broadway” (1994). Even when stepping outside of his comfort zone with “Everyone Says I Love You” (1996) and “Sweet and Lowdown” (1999), Allen had the creative acumen to pull it off. Though he suffered personal scandal over his romantic involvement with adopted daughter, Soon Yi Previn, as well as a professional nadir with “Small Time Crooks” (2000) and “The Curse of the Jade Scorpion” (2001), Allen regained his critical stature with “Match Point” (2005), “Vicky Christina Barcelona” (2008) and “Midnight In Paris” (2011), which cemented his place in cinema history as one of its finest directors.

Allen Stewart Konigsberg was born on Dec. 1, 1935, in Brooklyn, NY. He was the only son of Orthodox Jewish parents Nettie, a bookkeeper, and Martin, who held a series of odd jobs, including waiter and jewelry engraver. Growing up in the middle class neighborhood of Midwood, Allen spent his free time at the local movie theaters where he was drawn into the worlds of the Marx Brothers and Humphrey Bogart. In stark contrast to Allen’s screen persona as an awkward outsider, he was well-liked in school, playing on the baseball team and entertaining students with card tricks and jokes. When he was still a teenager, he began selling his jokes to newspaper columnists and officially adopted the pen name Woody Allen. He was contributing material to such programs as “The Colgate Comedy Hour” (NBC, 1950-55) and Sid Caesar’s “Your Show of Shows” (NBC, 1950-54) before he even graduated from Midwood High School in 1953. After a brief stint at New York University where he purportedly failed a film course, Allen wrote for Caesar’s “Caesar’s Hour” (NBC, 1954-57) while writing jokes for comics and nightclub performers including Carol Channing, Art Carney and Buddy Hackett. He eventually took the stage and became a stand-up comedian himself, honing the intellectual “schnook” persona that would become his trademark.

Allen’s stage act was uniquely New York – Jewish, intellectual, guilt-ridden and anxious, with an insecure, halting stammer. His monologues poked fun at everything from sex and marriage to religion and politics and his refreshing personal style proved popular in liberal Greenwich Village cabarets and on college campuses. During the early 1960s, Allen found more and more outlets for his imagination and humor, publishing short stories in the New Yorker, co-writing a musical comedy revue called “A to Z” and writing his first feature film, the farcical “What’s New, Pussycatfi” (1965), directed by Clive Donner. Allen also starred in the film that served as an introduction to career-long recurring themes of romantic complications and a reliance on psychotherapy. He married Broadway actress and singer Louise Lasser in 1966 (an earlier teenage marriage had ended in 1962) and debuted as a filmmaker of sorts when he re-dubbed a minor Japanese spy thriller with his own irreverent dialogue and plot, releasing it as “What’s Up Tiger Lilyfi” (1966). That, along with the James Bond spoof “Casino Royale” (1967), which he co-wrote and acted in, launched one of the most successful and unusual careers in American filmmaking history.

Following the production of two more stage plays – “Don’t Drink the Water,” about a New Jersey family spying in an Iron Curtain country, and “Play It Again, Sam” (1969) about a film critic who invokes the spirit of Humphrey Bogart to guide him through life – Allen wrote, directed and starred in “Take the Money and Run” (1969). The unceasingly funny parody of both gangster films and cinema verite documentaries starred Allen as an unlikely escaped convict. The loose structure, lack of technical polish, and indebtedness to his nightclub one-liners was also evident in “Bananas” (1971), a satire lambasting both politics and mass media that starred Lasser as an idealistic leftie with a groupie-like admiration for a South American rebel leader who turns out to be her ex-boyfriend (Allen) in disguise. Another madcap satire, “Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex (But Were Afraid to Ask)” (1972), consisted of a series of loosely related shorts debunking various sexual myths while poking fun at the era’s self-help craze. The already prolific filmmaker followed up with a screen adaptation of his stage production “Play it Again Sam” (1972), which established Allen’s indebtedness to classic films and began his long association with actress Diane Keaton. Allen’s marriage to Lasser had ended several years earlier and Keaton took over the role of Allen’s girlfriend, muse and star of his films.

As the 1970s progressed, Allen began to find his voice as a filmmaker, rounding out his “slapstick” period with “Sleeper” (1973), about a health food store owner cryogenically frozen and thawed out after 200 years. “Love and Death” (1975) marked a leap forward for Allen, raising philosophical questions and showcasing a love of great literature and arts with its spoof of Russian culture. Allen’s aspirations to be considered a “serious” moviemaker were acutely evident in “Annie Hall” (1977), the first of his films to achieve widespread critical and box office popularity. While still anchored in comedy, it clearly tackled themes that reflected his own concerns in life and he utilized sophisticated narrative devices such as breaking the fourth wall, and relied less on slapstick and sight gags. In the lead role as Alvy Singer, the writer-director-actor solidified his screen persona as the urban, Jewish intellectual outsider; this time pursuing the love of a quirky but ethereal WASPY beauty (Keaton). Often considered the quintessential Allen movie – personal and thoughtful yet satiric and entertaining – “Annie Hall” earned four Academy Awards including beating out “Star Wars” for Best Picture, Best Actress (Diane Keaton), Best Director (Allen) and Best Original Screenplay (Allen and Marshall Brickman).

As a surprising follow-up, Allen shifted to more dramatic material and focused on the starchy, repressed WASP milieu in “Interiors” (1978). Owing more than a passing debt to Ingmar Bergman, Shakespeare and Eugene O’Neill, “Interiors” probed the angst and petty betrayals of an upper-class family with three daughters. Many critics and audience members were confounded by the deadly earnest tone, but inarguably the film was beautifully shot by cinematographer Gordon Willis and strongly acted by a cast that included Geraldine Page, E.G. Marshall, Diane Keaton and Maureen Stapleton. “Interiors” earned a surprising five Oscar nominations, including nods to Allen for direction and writing. The following year, he re-teamed with Marshall Brickman to write his most profitable (and arguably best) film, “Manhattan” (1979). With its lush Gershwin score, gorgeous black-and-white photography (again by Willis) and brilliant ensemble cast, the film marked a return to comedy peppered with autobiographical and romantic elements. It was also notable as Allen’s last film with Diane Keaton for many years, as their off-screen relationship was ending around the same time. The film engendered mild controversy over Allen’s onscreen love interest, a teenaged Mariel Hemingway.

In “Stardust Memories” (1980), Allen’s character of a film director is exhorted to “make funny movies,” something the character is adamant about no longer doing. Allen was sorry that audiences largely interpreted this as autobiographical, though he did follow it up with a return to slapstick in “A Midsummer Night’s Sex Comedy” (1982), where he also found a new on- and off-screen leading lady in Mia Farrow. The period mockumentary “Zelig” (1983) melded Allen’s fascination with celebrity with his growing grasp of cinematic methods. A marvel of technical wizardry, Allen intercut and merged new footage with old to recreate vintage newsreels and sound recordings. “Broadway Danny Rose” (1984) was primarily dismissed by critics as a minor outing, yet it centered on a marvelous performance from Farrow who was virtually unrecognizable as the Brooklyn-accented former mistress of a gangster. Farrow gave another outstanding lead performance as the timid, Depression-era wife of an abusive husband who finds refuge at the movie theater in the “The Purple Rose of Cairo” (1985). Another technical tour de force, the delightful fantasy took a turn when a matinee idol (Jeff Daniels) stepped off the screen to woo the unhappy woman. Tying together several of Allen’s major themes – fame, romance, fantasy and art – the film earned Best Screenplay and Best Director Oscar nominations for Allen.

For much of the decade, Allen concentrated on drama with the exception of “Radio Days” (1987), a charming memoir of life in World War II Brooklyn, threaded together by a wonderful soundtrack of the era’s hits. He was nominated for a Best Screenplay Oscar, an award he had won the previous year for his Chekhovian “Hannah and Her Sisters” (1986), a chronicle of New York family relationships and a set of very different sisters. The bloodless “September” (1987) and the Bergman-esque “Another Woman” (1988), featuring a virtuoso leading turn from Gena Rowlands, were further examinations of the emotionally bereft worlds of WASPy New Yorkers. With the outstanding “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (1989), Allen closed the decade with a pessimistic examination of the morality of murder and earned more Oscar nominations for his screenplay and direction. In a lighter mode, 1990’s “Alice,” a riff on Lewis Carroll’s Alice and Wonderland, cast Farrow as a wealthy but shallow uptown woman who receives a new perspective on life thanks to a Chinatown herbalogist. Allen had a rare starring role in a film not of his own making, playing Bette Midler’s husband in Paul Mazursky’s seriocomic look at contemporary marriage, “Scenes from a Mall” (1991) – a film which tanked miserably. Back behind the camera, his critically reviled “Shadows and Fog” (1992) was an allegory about anti-Semitism that combined homages to 1930s German expressionism and 1950s European art films but was plagued by one-note characterizations.

Though not without humor, “Husbands and Wives” (1992) marked one of Allen’s most emotionally violent films. Highlighted by jittery, hand-held cinema verite camerawork and a pessimistic view of enduring love, the film was released early by its distributor in part to capitalize on its uncanny parallels with the real-life turmoil between Allen and Farrow. Their very public break-up, spurred by Allen’s romantic involvement with Farrow’s adopted daughter, Soon Yi, was followed by Farrow’s public accusations that Allen had molested their adopted daughter, Dylan (now Malone). In the midst of all the Sturm und Drang, Allen made the frothy but fun “Manhattan Murder Mystery” (1993), which reunited him with Marshall Brickman and ex-flame, Diane Keaton. The comic thriller attempted to recreate the banter and urbanity of such seminal films as “The Thin Man,” though it proved to be a financial disappointment, overshadowed by Allen’s personal troubles – which by this time, were monumental, when Soon Yi left her family to be with Allen. By the time “Bullets Over Broadway” was released in 1994, Allen was out of the headlines and audiences were ready to embrace his work anew. The hilarious period comedy about a 1930s New York playwright (John Cusack as Allen’s screen alter ego) banked on a lush, dramatic portrayal of the era’s theater world and benefited from an outstanding ensemble cast, including Oscar-winning performances from Dianne Wiest as a past-her-prime stage diva and a nomination for Chazz Palminteri as a thug-turned-ghost writer. Under it all, the film was a successful meditation on the definition of an artist.

Allen returned to TV to adapt, direct and co-star in a small screen remake of his 1968 stage play “Don’t Drink the Water” (ABC, 1994). On the big screen, “Mighty Aphrodite” (1995) was an uneven attempt that baldly proclaimed its indebtedness to Greek theater with the use of a chorus. Allen played a middle-aged sportswriter searching for the birth mother of his adopted child, who turns out not to be the cultured woman he imagined but a prostitute. With “Everyone Says I Love You” (1996), he combined frothy 1930s musical sensibilities with his familiar themes, resulting in a mixed response that divided audiences and critics. “Deconstructing Harry” (1997) was an Oscar-nominated screenplay – a scatological and complex look at a writer’s life employing black comedy and dramatizations of his works to comment on the function of the artist in society. “Celebrity” (1998) with Kenneth Branagh doing a mannered Allen impersonation in the leading role, was considered a misbegotten, poorly cast take on the contemporary obsession with fame. Paying his own price for fame, Allen was in the tabloids again for his 1997 marriage to Soon Yi Previn, 35 years his junior. The marriage reminded all of the sordid story from only six years prior, but the couple seemed in love. The following year, documentarian Barbara Kopple released “Wild Man Blues” (1998). Rather than focusing on Allen the filmmaker, Allen the amateur clarinet player was the central character, from the Monday evening club engagement he held for decades to a European tour.

Allen the filmmaker continued to put out one movie per year for the next five years. Still dabbling in different genres and new techniques, 1999’s clever mockumentary/dramedy hybrid “Sweet and Lowdown” cast Sean Penn in one of his finest performances as a fictional 1930s jazz guitarist and hothead. He followed up with the surprisingly mainstream but highly comic heist picture, “Small Time Crooks” (2000) and the disappointing period faux noir “Curse of the Jade Scorpion” (2001). “Hollywood Ending” (2002), where Allen played a film director who goes blind, was poorly received. The target of much criticism for his series of disappointing films, Allen mined familiar territory in 2003 with “Anything Else,” which did little groundbreaking besides casting Jason Biggs in the Allen-esque lead as a young writer bedeviled by his torturous relationship with a neurotic actress (Christina Ricci), with Allen playing the role of Biggs’ conspiracy-minded mentor. He rebounded with the novel “Melinda and Melinda” (2005), which offered two parallel interpretations of the romantic troubles of a neurotic, self-destructive woman (Radha Mitchell); one tragic and one comic. The film’s intriguing structure and fresh cast, including Will Ferrell, Amanda Peet, Chl Sevigny, Chiwetel Ejiofor and Mitchell as two widely differing Melindas, made the film one of the more satisfying efforts from Allen in recent years.

Even better was his next project, “Match Point” (2005), an entirely serious, morality-minded effort featuring Jonathan Rhys Myers as a social climbing tennis pro who believes he would rather “be lucky than good,” who finds himself torn between his comfortable, practical, status-confirming union with a loving wife (Emily Mortimer) and his torrid affair with a sensual but ultimately demanding American actress (Scarlett Johansson). Allen did not appear as an actor in the film, and even more significantly, neither did New York City: the film was shot entirely in London. “Match Point” demonstrated that Allen still had considerable power as a filmmaker and fresh subject matter to explore as a screenwriter. His continued significance as a writer was validated with an Academy Award nomination for Best Original Screenplay. “Scoop” (2006), a comedy about an American journalism student in London, and “Cassandra’s Dream” (2007), a morality tale about a pair of brothers also set in London, earned lukewarm reviews but his fourth European outing, “Vicky Cristina Barcelona” (2008) was a critical pick. An evocative new locale and a well-matched cast including Allen’s latest muse, Scarlett Johansson, as well as Penelope Cruz and Javier Bardem, spelled a return to Allen’s strength with intelligent and thoughtful romantic comedies. The filmmaker’s next project was “Whatever Works” (2009), starring Larry David. After writing and directing his fourth London film, “You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger” (2010), Allen returned to prominence with “Midnight in Paris” (2011), an engrossing comedy-drama where a despondent Hollywood hack (Owen Wilson) dreams of writing his novel and is mysteriously transported to the past where he meets his artistic heroes Ernest Hemingway (Corey Stoll), F. Scott Fitzgerald (Tom Hiddleston) and Salvador Dali (Adrien Brody). The film received widespread acclaim – including a Golden Globe for Allen for Best Screenplay – and became his highest-grosser at the box office, surpassing “Hannah and Her Sisters.” Meanwhile, Allen earned his 22nd and 23rd career Academy Award nominations with nods for Best Director and Best Original Screenplay for “Midnight in Paris.”

midnight-in-paris-movie-image-slice-01

Great website discusses the influences on Woody Allen:

We can no longer afford the welfare state (Part 3)

Ep. 4 – From Cradle to Grave [3/7]. Milton Friedman’s Free to Choose (1980)

With the national debt increasing faster than ever we must make the hard decisions to balance the budget now. If we wait another decade to balance the budget then we will surely risk our economic collapse.

The first step is to remove all welfare programs and replace them with the negative income tax program that Milton Friedman first suggested.

Milton Friedman points out that though many government welfare programs are well intentioned, they tend to have pernicious side effects. In Dr. Friedman’s view, perhaps the most serious shortcoming of governmental welfare activities is their tendency to strip away individual independence and dignity. This is because bureaucrats in welfare agencies are placed in positions of tremendous power over welfare recipients, exercising great influence over their lives. In addition, welfare programs tend to be self-perpetuating because they destroy work incentives. Dr. Friedman suggests a negative income tax as a way of helping the poor. The government would pay money to people falling below a certain income level. As they obtained jobs and earned money, they would continue to receive some payments from the government until their outside income reached a certain ceiling. This system would make people better off who sought work and earned income.

Here is a  portion of the trancript of the “Free to Choose” program called “From Cradle to Grave” (program #4 in the 10 part series):

Friedman: Joe Gardner helped to set up an organization of local black people to protect their own interests. Previously, the blacks had rioted in the streets to try to get their way. Now it was to be done peacefully using government money.

When government funds became available, the Woodlawn Organization got control. They used them to build the kind of houses they wanted. Low rise apartments like these.

The bureaucrats, planners and architects told them that it was uneconomical. That only high-rise blocks would work. They were wrong.

Joe Gardner: A lot of people have this view that, the disadvantaged if you will, have no ideas what their problems are and how to resolve them, that it takes outside professionals to do that. And we say that’s baloney because the outside professional does not feel in his gut what a woman on welfare with six kids living off of a $100 a month in a deteriorated building feels. She can come up with solutions much better than a bureaucrat.

Friedman: The intentions of this local community group are good. They want to rebuild the community as the community wants.

Joe Gardner talking to an elderly woman: I can’t hear you. I said are you pretty pleased with the work we are doing? Yes I am very pleased with it.

Friedman: But government money always corrupts. Look at the number of people rebuilding this garage. It doesn’t make sense except that these are CETA workers paid for by taxpayers money.

Government funds have allowed the organization to take over a whole area of Chicago. They now have their own supermarket.

They’ve built splendid houses for middle class occupiers. Very expensive, protected by the latest security systems. All at the taxpayers expense.

Joe Gardner: In a sense TWA is rapidly becoming a mini-government. At this particular point we have approximately 400 employees. We have an operating budget of, in excess of $5 million per year. So we are large.

Friedman: Large and expanding. Their next project is to redevelop this site. And that’s only the first step in a 20 year plan that will cost $220 million. Most of it coming from the taxpayers.

In the South Bronx, they are very familiar with government protection. Like the rent controls have made it uneconomic for landlords to maintain their buildings. They’ve moved out and the vandals have moved in. The South Bronx is an area where many of the people are on welfare, and where the crime rate is high. But all this could change. A group of local people has begun to renovate these buildings to build new homes. They call themselves “Sweat Equity.” Because at first sweat and effort was all they could put into the project. Only later did they accept a small government grant.

Friedman and Robert Foster: How long ago did you start working on this building? Four months ago for this building right here. And I take it what you are going…to gut the whole thing from beginning to end. Totally gut it. And you’ll have to rewire, right, roof, put new walls up, new floors, new ceilings, new everything in winter and summer whenever there was a chance to work. How many people do you have working here? A good 40 people. How do you keep them working? You know, some of them must want to, get tired of it. We show them what can be done in the future and what will be done in the future. And they get, at first, it’s kind of hard to prove to somebody that in the next three or four years what will come out of it. They can’t see it in long range terms. They only see it in short, they need money right now, not in two years. So we try to show them that it will happen.

Friedman: It’s true they now accept some government money. But so far they’ve managed to retain their original philosophy. That the best way to get something done well is to do it yourself.

Robert Foster: Like what we’re doing. We’re bringing people out of the street and giving them something to look forward to. They have their own apartment, they’ll be taken care of, the area around it, they have a garden, they have something to look forward to. They even get off welfare, you even give them a job. They can drop the welfare and have some self pride. That’s the only thing about it, self pride. The longer you take from the government and sitting back, you’ve got no worries. We’re not sitting back, we’re working. We’re making our money come in. And we are putting it into our building, we’re building ourselves up as well as the buildings.

Friedman: Some of these people are CETA workers. Paid for by the taxpayer. But this isn’t as useful as it might appear.

You ask these fellows which would they rather have, the CETA workers or the money that’s being paid to the CETA workers? Laughter. Which would you rather have?

Robert Foster: The money paid to the workers. Friedman: That’s your answer. That’s very expensive help. In terms of what these people could use with the money. You give these people the amount of money you’re paying to that CETA worker and I’ll bet they’ll have twice as much, three times as much, work. Am I wrong?

Robert Foster: Your right.

Friedman: So it’s a very inefficient way to use their money. The problem is you’ve got bureaucracy and the government bureaucrats, they want to decide what to do. They don’t want to let you decide what to do.

Robert Foster: Exactly.

Friedman: Ask yourself, how does this place get built up in the first place. After all, this was a pretty respectable, solid, substantial region when it was first developed. It wasn’t done through a government project. It was done by people individually having an incentive to put up these buildings and occupying them. What these people we’ve been seeing here are doing is they are trying to restore that feeling and that attitude. You’ll have a far healthier community here that grows out of the self-help of people like the people we’ve been talking to. That it is a paternalistic venture undertaken by governmental civil servants and bureaucrats who have to plan on a large scale for other people.

We must find a way to give everyone caught in the welfare trap the kind of initiative these people have.

The best, or should I say the least bad, solution I have even been able to devise was something called the negative income tax. This is the idea that we should get rid of a large part of the welfare bureaucracy, and for demeaning rules, and we should help people who are poor fundamentally by giving them money.

With a positive income tax, you’re entitled to a certain amount of personal exemptions and deductions. And above that amount you pay tax. But suppose you have no income. Under a negative income tax a fraction of your unused exemptions would be paid to you by the government. Guaranteeing at least a minimum income.

If you earned something, you’d still get a fraction of your unused exemptions. And you’d end up better off.

As your earnings rose, the supplement to your income would become smaller and smaller until your earnings equaled your exemptions. At that point, you’d break even. Neither paying tax nor receiving a subsidy.

It’s not an ideal system. It’s not the system we might have liked to get into, but it’s a system which would have the effect of eliminating the separation of a society into those to receive and those who pay. A separation that tends to destroy the whole social fabric. It would mean that we could each of us take advantage of opportunities that opened up without fearing that if by some chance we lost our jobs, it would be a long time before we could get back on assistance. It would be a system that would give all of us an incentive gradually to improve our lives would perhaps enable us, over time, to work ourselves out of the kind of mess we’ve gotten ourselves into. A mess we’ve gotten ourselves into for the very best of motives but with the very worst of results.

We’ve become increasing dependent on government. We’ve surrendered power to government, nobody has taken it from us. It’s our doing. The results, monumental government spending. Much of it wasted, little of it going to the people whom we would like to see helped. Burdensome taxes, high inflation, a welfare system under which neither those who receive help nor those who pay for it are satisfied. Trying to do good with other people’s money simply has not worked.

David Barton: Was John Adams really an enemy of Christians? (Part 6)

2 Of 5 / The Bible’s Influence In America / American Heritage Series / David Barton

Evangelical leader Ken Ham rightly has noted, “Most of the founding fathers of this nation … built the worldview of this nation on the authority of the Word of God.” I strongly agree with this statement by Ham.

Dr. Michael Davis of California has asserted that he has no doubts that our President is a professing Christian, but his policies are those of a secular humanist. I share these same views. However, our founding fathers were anything but secular humanists in their views. John Adams actually wrote in a letter, “There is no authority, civil or religious – there can be no legitimate government – but that which is administered by this Holy Ghost.”

In June of 2011 David Barton of Wallbuilders wrote the article, “John Adams: Was He Really an Enemy of Christians?Addressing Modern Academic Shallowness,” and I wanted to share portions of that article with you.


 At WallBuilders, we are truly blessed by God, owning tens of thousands of original documents from the American Founding – documents clearly demonstrating the Christian and Biblical foundations both of America and of so many of her Founding Fathers and early statesmen. We frequently postoriginal documents on our website so that others may enjoy them and learn more about many important aspects of America’s rich moral, religious, and constitutional heritage that are widely unknown or misportrayed today.

____________________________________________________

Adams letter to Rush merely reinforces the contempt that he and most Americans had for the autocratic Divine Right of Kings doctrine – a doctrine still believed by many at that time to have been delivered directly from Heaven by the Holy Spirit Himself. Adams saw this as a complete perversion of true Bible teachings regarding the role of the Holy Spirit. He therefore queried of Rush:

Do you wonder that Voltaire and Paine have made proselytes [converts]? Yet there [is] near as much subtlety, craft, and hypocrisy in Voltaire and Paine, and more, too, than in Ignatious Loyola [a Spanish knight who was a founder of the Jesuits]. 32

That is, given the bad “Christian” teachings that caused so much misery and suffering across Europe, it was not surprising that atheists and anti-religionists such as Voltaire and Paine had such a strong following. It remains an unfortunate fact to this day that non-Biblical Christianity and non-Biblical Christians still drive people away from the Christian faith rather than to it. As affirmed by the Apostle Paul in Romans 2:24, “God’s name is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you” – that is, it is God’s people who often give God a bad name among non-believers. (The prophet Nathan stated the same message in 2 Samuel 12:24 when he said to David, “By this deed, you have given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme.”)

The final evidence that Adams was not being disrespectful to the Holy Ghost or Christians in his letter is seen in his closing statement to Rush that:

Your prophecy, my dear friend, has not become history as yet. 33

This is a very respectful reference to the dream Rush believed that God had given him. There is nothing derogatory or scornful in Adams’ reference to “prophecy” – a direct and positive product of the Holy Spirit (2 Peter 1:21).

The Bible contains the most profound philosophy, the most perfect morality, and the most refined policy that ever was conceived upon earth. . . .The curses against fornication and adultery, and the prohibition of every wanton glance or libidinous ogle at a woman, I believe to be the only system that ever did or ever will preserve a republic in the world. . . . I say then that national morality never was and never can be preserved without the utmost purity and chastity in women; and without national morality a republican government cannot be maintained. 44 1807

I think there is nothing upon this earth more sublime and affecting than the idea of a great nation all on their knees at once before their God, acknowledging their faults and imploring His blessing and protection. 45 1809

[I]t is notorious enough that I have been a church-going animal for seventy-six years from the cradle. 46 1811

The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were . . . . the general principles of Christianity. . . . I will avow that I then believed (and now believe) that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God. 47 1813

I have examined all [religions], . . . and the result is that the Bible is the best book in the world. 48 1813

Without religion, this world would be something not fit to be mentioned in polite company: I mean hell. 49 1817

There are numerous similar quotes by Adams. This certainly is not the profile of an individual who would blaspheme the Holy Spirit, Christianity, or religion.

32. John Adams letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush on December 21, 1809, from an original in our possession (see original at:http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=59755). (Return)

33. John Adams letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush on December 21, 1809, from an original in our possession (see original at:http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=59755). (Return)

44. John Adams, Old Family Letters, Alexander Biddle, editor (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1892), pp. 127-128, to Benjamin Rush on February 2, 1807. (Return)

45. John Adams, The Works of John Adams, Charles Francis Adams, editor (Boston: Little, Brown & Company, 1854), Vol. IX, p. 291, correspondence originally published in the Boston Patriot, 1809, Letter XIII. (Return)

46. John Adams, The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, Charles Francis Adams, editor (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1854), Vol. IX, p. 637, to Benjamin Rush on August 28, 1811.(Return)

47. Thomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew A. Lipscomb, editor (Washington, D. C.: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904), Vol. XIII, p. 293, from John Adams on June 28, 1813.(Return)

48. John Adams, The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, Charles Francis Adams, editor (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1856), Vol. X, p. 85, to Thomas Jefferson on December 25, 1813.(Return)

49. John Adams, The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, Charles Francis Adams, editor (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1856), Vol. X, p. 254, to Thomas Jefferson on April 19, 1817.(Return)

Why was the “Battle for the Beer Barrel” between Tennessee and Kentucky discontinued in 1997? (Part 1)

In the movie “Alvin York” Gary Cooper play York and 14 minutes into the move there is a scene where Alvin goes to a bar that is on the Kentucky and Tennessee line. It is a very funny scene where Alvin is trying to get drunk but his little brother fetches him home at gunpoint. A lot of times we laugh at drunks when they are pictured in comedies but in real life the results can be fatal.

I recently posted about the Battle for the Beer Barrel that started in 1925 between the Kentucky and Tennessee football teams, but was discontinued due to the tragic deaths of several Kentucky football players in 1997 in an alcohol-related car crash.

Several of my relatives live in Lowell, Arkansas where Police Chief Joseph Landers had served for years. Sadly his life was taken by a drunk driver. Below are the facts:

The Battle For The Beer Barrel (aka The Border War)

Beerbarreltrophy_display_image

The prize: The Beer Barrel

Florida Man Arrested In Chief Landers’ Death

Police: More Charges Could Be Filed

POSTED: 8:44 am CDT May 8, 2012
UPDATED: 9:08 am CDT May 8, 2012

 LOWELL, Ark. — A Florida man has been arrested in connection with the death of Lowell Police Chief Joe Landers who was killed in a motorcycle crash in April.The Florida Highway Patrol arrested Jimmy John Christo Jr. on Monday and booked him into the Bay County Jail on charges of leaving the scene of a crash with death. Additional charges are pending the completion of the traffic homicide investigation.Landers died Friday at Bay Medical Center from injuries suffered in the crash.Authorities said Landers was riding with a group of motorcyclists at 8:30 p.m. on April 27 when a driver pulled in front of him. He hit the vehicle and went over his handlebars to the ground. Christo, 52, was driving the Nissan Maxima that police said pulled in front of Landers.Deputies said Christo fled the scene but was caught a short time later. The Florida Highway Patrol arrested Cristo and charged him with fleeing the scene of a critical injury accident, possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia and other traffic violations.”From speaking to the trooper, the gentleman pretty much confessed to drinking, confessed to causing the accident, confessed to leaving the scene,” said Sgt. Paul Pillaro.

_____________
I really enjoyed the article below which appeared on May 15, 2012 in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette:

Live life for today

Over in an instant

By Mike Masterson

This article was published today at 3:45 a.m

LITTLE ROCK — If you’re searching for evidence of how unpredictable physical existence can be, look no further than Joseph Landers, the popular police chief for 15 years in Lowell before his death, following a motorcycle accident, nearly two weeks ago in Panama City, Florida.

I’d met Chief Joseph last Christmas Day at a family gathering with my son Brandon, his wife, Sarah and granddaughter Elizabeth. Joe had come with his sweetheart, Sarah’s sister, Kelly Arnold Long.

I liked Joe right away. He was a friendly, soft-spoken, insightful and confident man with a good heart.

Yet he wasn’t your conventional buttoned-down chief of police. Instead, he was what I think of as a “working man’s” chief. Anyone who’d spent a year as part of an international police training unit helping teach (well, trying to) a timid group of Iraqi citizens to be professionals amidst such anarchy was definitely a hands-on lawman.

We chatted, took pictures, laughed and visited that Christmas morning. And when the time felt right we scattered in different directions.

I saw him several weeks later when he and Kelly came to Elizabeth’s 5th birthday party, then again a few weeks ago at Kelly’s home during an evening visit.

On that night, he was doing what he truly enjoyed: riding his Harley.

As fate would have it, it would be the same cycle he was on at a motorcycle rally in Panama City after enjoying dinner with friends. The story of what happened next has become sadly familiar to many over the past weeks.

A man identified in a Florida news story as Jimmy John Christo turned directly in front of Joe’s cycle as Joe was accelerating, sending Joe into the side of Christo’s car and over it to slam head-first onto the pavement. His pelvis was shattered and arm broken. That’s what the police report says.

In Arkansas and Florida, motorcycling adults are not legally required to wear helmets. Like many Harley owners, Joe understandably preferred to risk riding without one when he wasn’t officially on the police motorcycle back home.

Police soon found Christo, who they said had fled the scene and parked in a friend’s driveway. He’s since been charged with leaving the scene of a fatal accident, a first-degree felony. A conviction could bring up to 30 years in prison. Yet the local court saw fit to free him on a paltry $10,000 bond.

The bottom line is that Joe’s 51 years of life effectively ended in an instant. And not because of anything he’d done wrong.

Back in Northwest Arkansas, all who knew Chief Joseph were stunned and saddened in the way folks feel when someone they care for departs suddenly. The outpouring of grief and support down in Florida and at his memorial service at home was overwhelming.

If prayers could be numbered in books, those sent up on Landers’ behalf undoubtedly would easily have filled the Washington and Benton county libraries.

Joe was in great shape physically. And he’d fought like the dickens to remain in this world. His children, Kelly and friends remained by his side supporting his struggle for nearly a week.

But the damage to his swelling brain was just too extensive. Even radical lifesaving measures didn’t help. No matter what the surgeons and medical staff did, he remained unresponsive, though his vital signs remained surprisingly strong after being removed from the ventilator.

After two days in hospice, Joe surrendered and drew his final breath.

And so can too easily go the unpredictable days of our own lives, my friends. One second Joe Landers was happy, looking forward to Kelly joining him in the coming days. The next-and from out of nowhere on a Florida city street-all those hopes and dreams vanished in an instant.

I’ve become fond of quoting the late actor Michael Landon of Bonanza and Little House on the Prairie fame. Before his death, he advised each of us to get on with living our lives today, right now, this very moment because tomorrow may never come.

There’s a mysterious and uplifting footnote to share in connection with Joe’s passing.

His final posting on Facebook on the evening he died simply said he was “missing Kelly” followed by the symbol of a sad face.

Kelly told me that after flying home from Florida to Rogers, she went out the following morning to retrieve her newspaper.

There she noticed something glistening in the driveway. Bending down, she collected pieces of a small, scalloped object that, on closer examination, turned out to be a broken seashell.

But how was that even possible? Especially when the broken white shell matched the one she’d collected on the Panama City beach to bring home after being at Joe’s deathbed.

She says there’s no question in her mind where this little crushed shell (now saved in a bag) came from and how it wound up 900 miles away in her particular Northwest Arkansas driveway.

For Kelly, it was Joe’s way of letting her know he’s still missing her and is still with her. And I wouldn’t begin to tell her any differently. How about you?

———◊-

———

Mike Masterson is opinion editor of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette’s Northwest edition.

Editorial, Pages 13 on 05/15/2012

Print Headline: Over in an instant

______________

ryan dunn Jackass dead in crash

Bam Margera’s First Interview After Ryan Dunn’s Death

Ryan Dunn and his friends moments before they died.

Flickr user Eric Lewis posted the image below with a caption that says the photo shows what’s left of Dunn’s car.

Related posts:

News of Pat Summerall’s conversion brought a smile to Tom Landry’s face jh38

  I got to ask Pat Summerall a question at the Little Rock Touchdown Club meeting back in October of 2010. Summerall had pointed out that Tom Landry was the defensive coordinator and Vince Lombardi was the offensive backfield coach when he played for the Giants.  Summerall had shared how he had recovered from his […]

Should recent events in Little Rock be reason to blog about the dangers of drug use? (jh18c)

I welcome the input from those that read my blog. Recently I received some criticism from readers and Jordan is probably more of the most vocal. He wrote today, “I hardly see a ‘tragic’ death as you call it, a morally sound reason to throw in people’s faces what drugs do to people…You know as […]

Ron “Pigpen” McKernan of the Grateful Dead didn’t survive but Barry McGuire did (jh17c)

Drugs and alcohol have always been a pitfall that many of the wealthy fall into. We see rock bands that become famous have lots of temptations thrown their way and many fall into these traps. Ron “Pigpen” McKernan and Barry McGuire fell into these traps. One joined the “27 Club” and the other left the […]

Dave Hope and Kerry Livgren of Kansas: Their story of deliverance from drugs jh16c

The recent events in Little Rock concerning KARK TV’s top weatherman Brett Cummins and his experience of drinking alcohol and snorting coke has left a lot of people asking questions. Since the evening ended in the tragic death of one of Brett’s friends, Dexter Williams, many questions have centered on the use of illegal drugs. […]

Brett Cummins turns to drugs instead of God jh15c

Brett Cummins has risen to be the top tv weatherman in the evening at KARK News 4. However, something is missing in his life. (I wish Brett would just take the time to read the story by Marvin A. McMickle | Senior Pastor, Antioch Baptist Church, Cleveland, Ohio at the end of this post). I […]

The sad case of Brett Cummins: Alcohol takes another victim jh14c

Brett Cummins and his friends were drinking heavily and taking drugs on Sunday night and all three of them went to sleep under the influence of alcohol and drugs and only 2 of them woke  up.  This reminds me of a few verses from the Old Testament. (There is hope. Check out the video interviews of Kerry Livgren […]

Ron “Pigpen” McKernan of the Grateful Dead is a member of “27 Club” because of alcohol (Part 8)

cc ‘Janis Joplin’ 2/5 from True Hollywood Story (Janis was having affair with Pigpen) Jerry Garcia (guitar, vocals), Ron “Pigpen” McKernan (vocals, harmonica), Bob Weir (guitar, vocals), Phil Lesh (bass), Mickey Hart (drums), Bill Kreutzman (drums). Grateful Dead “Don’t Ease Me In” Live @ Canadian National Exhibition Hall Toronto, CA June 27th, 1970 Grateful Dead […]

Former Vol and Knoxville radio personality’s DUI charge and why I don’t drink

There are so many reasons to abstain from drinking. (At the end of this post I will give three more reasons I do not drink.) Below is an excellent reason to avoid drinking because you realize that just after two drinks you may end up facing the legal difficulties that Heather Harrington is now facing. Many […]

Characters referenced in Woody Allen’s movie “Midnight in Paris” (Part 38,Alcoholism and great writers and artists)

I have really enjoyed going through all the characters mentioned in Woody Allen’s latest film “Midnight in Paris.” One think that shocked me was that many of these great writers mentioned in the film were also alcoholics. Why is that? It is my view that if a sensitive person really does examine life closely without […]

Ryan Dunn part of statistic: “Drunk Drivers are responsible for 50% of highway fatalities” (3 reasons I don’t drink)

Ryan Dunn seen on Sunday night. This shot was removed from his tumblr site. Ryan Dunn tweeted a picture of himself drinking from a bar. At 2 am he left the bar and a few minutes later he was killed after running off the road in his car.There are three reasons that I do not […]

Open letter to President Obama (Part 80)

President Obama c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here.

It seems to me that we should stop raising the debt ceiling so much or we will end up like Greece. Below is some great information from Reason Magazine:

Uploaded by on Mar 1, 2011

[Editor’s Note: Go to http://reason.com/blog/2011/03/01/raising-the-debt-limit-it-just for details, charts, and links]

Some say the world will end in fire and some say in ice.

But in Washington, a lot of people say it will end if we don’t continually raise the debt ceiling.

The statutory debt limit, or debt ceiling, represents the maximum amount of debt the federal government can carry at any given time. The limit was created in 1917 so that Congress wouldn’t have to vote every time the government wanted to increase the amount of debt (which was becoming a more and more frequent occasion). Since then, the Treasury Department has had the authority to issue new debt up to whatever the limit is to fund government needs. Last year, the limit was raised to $14.3 trillion, an amount that is about to reached.

As it approaches, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has said failing to raise the limit would likely mean the U.S. would default on its debt, creating “real chaos” in place of the fake chaos that’s out there now. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said that failing to raise the limit would be “deeply irresponsible” and and Austan Goolsbee, President Obama’s chief economic adviser, has said that not raising the limit would create “the first default in history caused purely by insanity.”

Eh, maybe.

As Reason columnist and Mercatus Center economist Veronique de Rugy, has pointed out, we’ve maxed out the nation’s credit card in the past without such dire results. In the mid-1980s, the mid-1990s, and in 2002, for instance, the debt limit wasn’t raised for months at a time and the government got along just swell. The government has a big bag of tools it can use, ranging from playing around with the amount of spending that is liable to the limit to prioritizing interest and debt payments over other outlays. Interest on the debt for this year is projected to be about $225 billion and government revenue is expected to be around $2.2 trillion, so the government can easily pay the vig and avoid defaulting.

What it shouldn’t do is simply keep piling on the debt. The limit has been raised no fewer than 10 times in the past decade. When Republicans ran the White House and the Congress, they voted overwhelmingly to charge it and Democrats, including Sen. Obama, hollered bloody murder. In 2006, he called the need to yet again increase the debt limit “a sign of leadership failure.” Now that Dems run the show, the GOP has suddenly rediscovered its inner cheapskate.

So it goes.

The boldest plan to rein in spending and debt comes from newcomer Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), a Tea Party favorite who dispatched Republican incumbent Bob Bennett in the primaries before coasting to victory in the general election last fall. Lee has vowed to block passage of a debt-limit increase unless Congress signs on to his balanced-budget amendment which would cap annual federal spending at 18 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The amendment would require a super-majority of two-thirds in the Senate and House of Representatives. Lee’s bill is competing with another Republican proposal from Sens. Hatch (Utah) and Cornyn (Texas) to cap spending at 20 percent of GDP. The Hatch-Cornyn bill has weaker rules on its higher cap as well.

In 2010, spending came to about 24 percent of GDP and it’s expected to come in around 25 percent of GDP in 2011. Since 1950, total federal revenues have averaged 17.8 percent and have reached higher than 20 percent exactly once. Spending over the same time has averaged just under 20 percent.

Whether Lee’s proposal carries the day — and there’s a strong case that its passage would do more to calm financial markets than simply bumping up the federal credit line — neither the Democratic nor the Republican leadership has yet to advance a serious proposal to cut spending and reduce outstanding debt. Indeed, both the president’s budget proposal for 2012 and the generally non-existent Republican response are not only deeply irresponsible but clear signs of insanity.

That ain’t right. But it does help explain why a government that has increased spending over 62 percent in real dollars can no longer get by on a $14 trillion debt ceiling.

____________

If we keep raising the debt ceiling it seems to me we are not tackling the problem which is excessive spending. Are we going to end up where Greece is?

Thank you so much for your time. I know how valuable it is. I also appreciate the fine family that you have and your commitment as a father and a husband.

Sincerely,

Everette Hatcher III, 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002, ph 501-920-5733, lowcostsqueegees@yahoo.com

10 SEC Football Rivalries that count (because there’s a trophy) Part 1 KY v. UT Vols

Every conference has their football rivalries and the SEC is no different. The rivalry games are the best games of the season. Win against your biggest rival and even a bad season becomes good. Lose and the season is lost, even if that was your only loss.

The best rivalries have two things: A name and a trophy. In this slide show I have three things: A name, a trophy and at least one SEC Team.

This is how we do it in the SEC!

 

The Battle For The Beer Barrel (aka The Border War)

Beerbarreltrophy_display_image

The prize: The Beer Barrel

The original Battle for the Beer Barrel was conceived in 1925 by a Kentucky booster club for the football rivalry with Tennessee, so that the series would have a trophy similar to Purdue’s Old Oaken Bucket and Michigan’s Little Brown Jug.

Tennessee held a 60-23-9 edge in the series with Kentucky when the Beer Barrel trophy game was discontinued due to the tragic deaths of several Kentucky football players in 1997 in an alcohol-related car crash.

In addition to the schools’ rivalry, blood banks in the home cities of each university (Lexington, Kentucky and Knoxville, Tennessee) compete to see who can raise the most units of blood. This is known informally as the Blue-Orange Crush.

Tennessee leads the series 72-23-9

_________________

Kentucky finally broke the streak this year in a hard fought game with the Vols.

From Wikipedia:

Most consecutive wins over one opponent (NCAA football)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Jump to: navigation, search

The following is a list of the all-time leading NCAA Division I FBS (Football Bowl Subdivision) college football single-opponent winning streaks. Teams are ranked by the number of consecutive wins they’ve posted against a specific opponent. All streaks of at least 20 games are in the list.

Most consecutive wins over an opponent
School Opponent Number From Through Uninterrupted series Notes/References
Notre Dame Navy 43 1964 2006 Yes Navy won in 2007[1][2]
Nebraska Kansas 36 1969 2004 Yes KU won in 2005[3]
Oklahoma Kansas State 32 1937 1968 Yes [3]
Nebraska Kansas State 29 1969 1997 Yes [3]
Clemson Virginia 29 1955 1989 No, the games were played over a 35-year period. [3]
Penn State Temple 29 † 1952 Present No, the games have been played over a 60-year period. Penn State won in 2011.[4] Penn State has an unbeaten streak dating back 10 more years. Temple’s last win over Penn State was a 14-0 victory in 1941.
Texas Rice 28 1966 1993 Yes [3]
Syracuse Hobart 26 1906 1931 Yes [3]
USC Oregon State 26 1968 1999 No, the games were played over a 32-year period. [3]
Tennessee Kentucky 26 1985 2010 Yes Kentucky won in 2011.[5]
Florida Kentucky 25 † 1987 Present Yes Florida won in 2011.[6][7]
Penn State West Virginia 25 1959 1983 Yes [3]
Texas TCU 24 1968 1991 Yes [3]
Texas A&M TCU 24 † 1973 Present No, the games have been played over a 28-year period. Texas A&M won 23 consecutive times from 1973 to 1995, then beat TCU in the Galleryfurniture.com bowl in 2001. The two teams have not played since but A&M still holds the active streak.[8]
Nebraska Missouri 24 1979 2002 Yes [3]
Nebraska Oklahoma State 24 1974 1999 No, the games were played over a 26-year period. [3]
Penn State Maryland 24 1962 1988 No, the games were played over a 27-year period. The streak began following Maryland’s only win in the 37-game series in 1961, and finally ended with the only tie in 1989.[9]
Oklahoma Iowa State 23 1937 1959 Yes [1]
Tennessee Vanderbilt 22 1983 2004 Yes [3]
Nebraska Oklahoma State 22 1974 1995 Yes These games were a subset of the non-continuous series 1974-1999.[3]
Arkansas TCU 22 1959 1980 Yes [3]
Alabama Mississippi State 22 1958 1979 Yes [3]
Iowa Northwestern 22 1974 1994 Yes [3] In 1995, Northwestern also ended a 19 game (30 year) losing streak to Michigan and a 14 game (33 year) streak to Notre Dame.
Ohio State Northwestern 21 1972 2004 No, these games were played over a 32-year period. [3]
LSU Louisiana Lafayette 22 † 1902 Present No, the games were played over a 107 year period. [3]
Purdue Iowa 20 1961 1980 Yes [3]
Oklahoma Baylor 20 1901 2011 No, the games were played over a 109 year period. Baylor ended the streak with a 45-38 victory in 2011.[2]

† Active Streak

[edit] References and sources

  1. ^ “Notre Dame’s NCAA-record 43-game win streak over Navy ends”. ESPN.com. 3 November 2007. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=273070087. Retrieved 2007-11-03. 
  2. ^ “Navy 46, Notre Dame 44 – Play by Play”. ESPN.com. November 3, 2007. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=273070087&confId=18. Retrieved 2007-11-03. 
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s “Streaks and Rivalries” (PDF). Official 2007 NCAA Division I Football Records Book (NCAA): p. 112. 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-30. http://web.archive.org/web/20070930220759/http://www.ncaa.org/library/records/football/football_records_book/2007/2007_d1_football_records_book.pdf. Retrieved 2007-11-07. 
  4. ^ “Penn State vs Temple Historical Record”. stassen.com. http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin/records/opp-opp.pl?start=1951&end=2011&team1=Penn+State&team2=Temple. Retrieved 2008-09-23. 
  5. ^ Associated Press (November 26, 2011). “Kentucky ends 26-game skid vs. Tennessee, which will miss bowl”. ESPN.com. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=313300096. Retrieved November 26, 2011. 
  6. ^ Associated Press (September 24, 2011). “Florida clocks Kentucky behind Jeff Demps’ 157 rushing yards”. ESPN.com. http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=312670096. Retrieved November 26, 2011. 
  7. ^ “History of Opponents”. GatorZone.com. 2007-08-10. http://gatorzone.com/football/history/opponents.pdf. Retrieved 2007-08-10. 
  8. ^ “All-Time Football Scores: TCU”. aggieathletics.com. http://www.aggieathletics.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/tcu.html. Retrieved 2008-05-07. 
  9. ^ “Penn State vs Maryland Historical Record”. stassen.com. http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin/records/opp-opp.pl?start=1961&end=1989&team1=Penn+State&team2=Maryland. Retrieved 2007-12-31. 

Is Bobby Petrino through or will he return as a top coach in the future?

Bobby Petrino and Jessica Dorrell

Bobby Petrino and Jessica Dorrell

I was so happy a few months ago with the Razorbacks’ football future firmly in Bobby Petrino’s hands. Things were going so well.  I mentioned to a friend that I was 16 back in 1977 when Lou Holtz led the Razorbacks that season to a 11-1 record and a third place finish in the 1978 January final poll for the 1977 season. Think about the fact that it took the Razorbacks 34 seasons later to get back into the top 5 (2011 finished ranked 5th) and I am now 50 years old. IF HISTORY REPEATED ITSELF I WOULD BE 84 BEFORE WE FINISHED IN THE TOP 5 AGAIN.  We both laughed at that silly suggestion.

However, since then we have lost Petrino as our coach. That thought of not returning to the top 5 is not as silly as I first thought. (Now 6 players are off the team for now Arkansas Sports 360 has reported.) Petrino was respected nationally. Take a look at this article below that mentions Petrino as possibly returning as one of the nations best coaches.

Mike Strange: Who will be the top-ranked coaches in 2022?

Mike Strange
  • By Mike Strange
  • govolsxtra.com
  • Posted May 12, 2012 at 4:56 p.m.

No games, no spring practice. Recruiting in a lull. What’s a collegefootball fan to do?

How about reading all these lists that are proliferating because the college football media folks don’t have much to do, either?

We’ve got hot-seat lists (seeDerek Dooley), lists of the freakiest athletes (see Justin Hunter) and top pass-catch combos (see Tyler Bray-Da’Rick Rogers).

The big talker this week was the ranking of FBS coaches, from 1 to 124, by The Sporting News. Nick Saban was No. 1. Charlie Molnar of UMass was No. 124. Poor guy’s never coached a game.

Dooley, Tennessee’s coach, checked in at No. 99, right behind 66-year-old Norm Chow, who finally landed his first head-coaching gig at Hawaii, and 74 spots below Vanderbilt’s James Franklin.

Hats off to Franklin for shaking up the status quo at Vandy in his first year as a head coach. But how that justifies shooting him up the chart to No. 25 is beyond me.

We can debate the rankings — which, of course, is why they’re there — from now until the Poinsettia Bowl. But here’s my wrinkle:

What will the rankings look like in 10 years? Who’s in the top 20 in 2022?

We can eliminate Saban, Steve Spurrier and Frank Beamer. Saban isn’t going to be coaching at 70. Bill Snyder’s the only guy doing so now.

I was surprised to find 21 coaches 60 or older at FBS jobs. For the record, there are 15 older thanPhillip Fulmer, who turns 62 and qualifies for Social Security on Sept. 1.

I’m going to further rule out the AARP guys who are at least 55. Cross off Les Miles, Kirk Ferentz, Tommy Tuberville and June Jones.

The guys in the 50-54 age group are borderline. The good ones are banking a ridiculous amount of money. Will they have the drive to stay at it? Based on the examples of Beamer and Spurrier, some will.

Some won’t. I can’t see No. 14 Mark Richt coaching at 62. Can Mike Leach carry on as a 61-year-old pirate? Probably.

Perhaps the biggest enigma is the guy who could be No. 1 in 2022. Or, he could be long gone.

Urban Meyer is 47. He’s chalked up two national titles at Florida and won big at Bowling Green and Utah. He’s also burned out once already.

After a one-year sabbatical, Meyer is back in the game at Ohio State. There’s no reason to think he won’t win big again.

His kids will be out of the nest. No reason to spend more time with the family. The hunch here is Meyer will be going strong in 2022.

So will Chris Peterson. Also 47, Peterson is 73-6 at Boise State. That’s no misprint.

Sporting News ranks him No. 2 now and Peterson might still be there in 2022. The question whether he’ll still be at Boise State.

Bob Stoops (51), Oregon’s Chip Kelly (48) and TCU’s Gary Patterson (52) could easily still be coaching in 10 years. What about Brady Hoke (53)?

He was an instant fit at Michigan last year. Maybe Hoke and Meyer settle in for a Woody-Bo rivalry that brews for a decade.

Mike Gundy is a man. He’s 44. Oklahoma State’s coach is 59-30, ranks No. 10 and could be even higher in 2022.

Bret Bielema is in the same category. At 42 with a 60-19 record at Wisconsin, Bielema has excellent long-term prospects.

The Sporting News likes Lane Kiffin. I agree Kiffin’s a heckuva coach and Southern Cal is a place to win a ton of games. But I’ll bet Kiffin’s back in the NFL before 2022.

Some other relatively new head coaches will enjoy a prosperous decade. I’d bet on Jimbo Fisher at Florida State.

Maybe Franklin will be one of them. Maybe Will Muschamp, too. But one season is too little evidence for me to make that projection.

Keep an eye on Troy Calhoun, Chip Kelly, Kevin Sumlin and Al Golden. Don’t count out 48-year-old Rich Rodriguez, who starts fresh at Arizona.

Here’s a wild card: Bobby Petrino. He’s 51, banished from the current rankings but there’s still time to get back in the hunt.

And what, you’re probably wondering, about Dooley? At 43 he faces a make-or-break season. The jury is very much out.

If he’s still at Tennessee in 2022, he will have vaulted way up the rankings.

And if he is still No. 99, he won’t be at Tennessee.

Mike Strange may be reached at strangem@knoxnews.com.

Related posts:

Youtube has not been too kind to Arkansas’ new football coach John L. Smith April 23, 2012 – 3:50 pm

John L. Smith new razorback coach, Who is he? April 23, 2012 – 2:19 pm

 
 

Bobby Petrino’s phone records come out April 12, 2012 – 6:50 am

Jessica Dorrell and Bobby Petrino on ESPN together in 2011 April 12, 2012 – 6:38 am

 

How about a coach swap? :Charlie Strong to Arkansas and Bobby Petrino to Louisville April 11, 2012 – 7:37 am

 

Bobby Petrino statement April 11, 2012 – 6:51 am

 

Bobby Petrino fired, but now seeking forgiveness April 11, 2012 – 6:20 am

 

Video and transcript of Jeff Long’s press conference announcing firing of Bobby Petrino April 11, 2012 – 5:53 am

 

Bobby Petrino’s arrogance led to his downfall April 10, 2012 – 3:46 pm

 

 

Petrino 911 Call – Jessica Dorrell And Bobby Petrino Refuse Help April 9, 2012 – 7:03 am

 

Earlier concerns about Petrino’s character are coming back up again April 9, 2012 – 6:24 am

 

Bobby Petrino has achieved the American Dream, but still is looking for something more April 8, 2012 – 1:46 pm

Rex Nelson speculates that Petrino may be fired because “…trust has been so broken…” April 8, 2012 – 12:06 pm

Lying about Jessica Dorrell may get Bobby Petrino in a lot of trouble April 7, 2012 – 1:38 pm

Can Bobby Petrino, Tom Brady and Coldplay all find the satisfaction they are seeking? April 6, 2012 – 2:15 pm 

Bobby Petrino to survive this wreck? April 6, 2012 – 11:08 am

Pictures of Bobby Petrino April 6, 2012 – 9:11 am

Who is Jessica Dorrell? (with pictures) April 6, 2012 – 9:06 am

Major coverage of Bobby Petrino mistake April 6, 2012 – 6:51 am

What will be Jeff Long’s decision on Bobby Petrino? April 6, 2012 – 5:36 am

Bobby Petrino admits to an affair April 6, 2012 – 4:41 am

What impact will breaking trust with Bobby Petrino’s family have? April 6, 2012 – 4:24 am

Two choices now for Bobby Petrino: Follow the path of purity or impurity

If Bobby thinks he is bruised now, then he needs to read about the guy in Proverbs 7:10-27 and what happened to him. I really am hoping that Bobby Petrino can put his marriage back together. He has a clear choice between two paths. In the sermon at Fellowship Bible Church at July 24, 2011, […]

Jessica Dorrell was taking a long ride with Bobby Petrino April 5, 2012 – 4:52 pm

Top football stadiums in the country (Part 2)

2011 Arkansas State Football Highlights

Here is a list of the top football stadiums in the country.

Power Ranking All 124 College Football Stadiums  

By Alex Callos

(Featured Columnist) on April 19, 2012 

When it comes to college football stadiums, for some teams, it is simply not fair. Home-field advantage is a big thing in college football, and some teams have it way more than others.

There are 124 FBS college football teams, and when it comes to the stadiums they play in, they are obviously not all created equal.

There is a monumental difference from the top teams on the list to the bottom teams on the list. Either way, here it is: a complete ranking of the college football stadiums 1-124.

___________

Tennessee takes on the Akron Zips this year in Knoxville on September 22, 2012. They are in the list below and so are the Arkansas St Redwolves. I have been to Jonesboro many times and the last time I went the Memphis Tigers won on a last second field goal. With Gus Malzahn as the head coach I will be back again soon. I remember well when Malzahn was a high school coach and beat my Arkansas Baptist Eagles when Josh Floyd led the Saints to their first State Championship in 1998. A lot of things have happened since then.

Many were confused when Gus Malzahn left Auburn where he had a 1.3 million contract to come to Arkansas State where he makes around 800,000, but Gus pointed out that a few years ago he was making 70,000. I really respect the staff he has put together. John Thompson is an excellent defensive coordinator.

116. InfoCision Stadium: Akron Zips

171205_display_image

When it comes to college football in Akron, everything would have to be rated slightly below-average.

Also known as Summa Field, this stadium is one of the newest in the country, having just been built in 2009. It has a seating capacity of 30,000, making it slightly on the larger side when it comes to teams in the MAC.

 

115. Scheumann Stadium: Ball State Cardinals

Laqtrejuqzrwgtq

Located in Muncie, Indiana, Ball State University is a nice college town with a slightly below-average MAC Stadium.

The stadium seats 25,400 people and was built in 1967.

There is not much immediately surrounding the stadium as far as tailgating or other pregame activities go.

 

114. Huskie Stadium: Northern Illinois Huskies

Huskie-stadium2-430_display_image

Built in 1965 with a capacity of 24,000, Huskie Stadium has a unique college feel to it, but is extremely outdated and could use a little bit of a makeover.

While there is not much in and around the stadium, what it does offer is a solid fanbase that comes out to support their team, which is usually competitive in the MAC.

Now if the fans here just had an updated version of the place to cheer on their team.

 

113. Spartan Stadium: San Jose State Spartans

Spartan_stadium_dsc0768-edit_display_image

Spartan Stadium is the next in a long line of old, outdated stadiums that could use a little help.

It was originally opened in 1933 with a seating capacity of 30,456.

There are a lot of positives that go along with this stadium, as it is slightly above-average in nearly everything, but could use a little update sometime soon.

 

112. Houchens-Smith Stadium: Western Kentucky Hiltoppers

Wnhtjfwivjdecay

Houchens-Smith Stadium is rather small and may not be the best place to watch a college football game, but it still has some benefits.

The stadium only seats 22,000 and was built in 1968. It does not always sell out, but the team can usually get a decent crowd no matter what their record is.

One unique aspect of the stadium is the grassy area in the north end zone, where fans can enjoy the game from a different perspective.

 

111. ASU Stadium: Arkansas State Red Wolves

300px-arkansas_state_-_field_view_display_image

Arkansas State is one of the better teams in the Sun Belt Conference and has a slightly below-average stadium with a capacity of 30,964.

It was opened in 1974 and is middle-aged compared to other stadiums.

There is nothing really special about the stadium or the area around it.

Charles Stanley and David Barton email about President Obama

4 Of 5 / The Bible’s Influence In America / American Heritage Series / David Barton

A relative sent me this email that has been going around the internet about what Charles Stanley and David Barton had to say about President Obama:

Should Christians Support President Obama?
This man was on Dr. Charles Stanley’s program “In Touch” as a guest speaker.
I almost shouted “HALLELUJAH” when I finished reading. Forward or discard….it’s your choice…but PLEASE read before you do!
[]
Dr. David Barton is more of a historian than a Biblical speaker, but very famous for his knowledge of historical facts as well as Biblical truths.
Dr. David Barton – on Obama
Respect the Office? Yes.
Respect the Man in the Office? No, I am sorry to say.
I have noted that many elected officials, both Democrats and Republicans, called upon America to unite behind Obama.
Well, I want to make it clear to all who will listen that I AM NOT uniting behind Obama!
I will respect the Office which he holds, and I will acknowledge his abilities as an orator and wordsmith and pray for him, BUT that is it.
I have begun today to  see what I can do to make sure that he is a one-term President!
Why am I doing this ?
It is because: – I do not share Obama’s vision or value system for America ;
– I do not share his Abortion beliefs;
– I do not share his radical Marxist’s concept of re-distributing wealth;
– I do not share his stated views on raising taxes on those who make$150,000+ (the ceiling has been changed three times since August);
– I do not share his view that America is Arrogant;
– I do not share his view that America is not a Christian Nation;
– I do not share his view that the military should be reduced by 25%;
– I do not share his view of amnesty and giving more to illegals than our American Citizens who need help;
– I do not share his views on homosexuality and his definition of marriage;
– I do not share his views that Radical Islam is our friend and Israel is our enemy who should give up any land;
– I do not share his spiritual beliefs (at least the ones he has made public);
– I do not share his beliefs on how to re-work the healthcare system in America ;
– I do not share his Strategic views of the Middle East ; and
– I certainly do not share his plan to sit down with terrorist regimes such as Iran .
Bottom line: my America is vastly different from Obama’s, and I have a higher obligation to my Country and my GOD to do what is Right!
For eight (8) years, the Liberals in our Society, led by numerous entertainers who would have no platform and no real credibility but for their celebrity status, have attacked President Bush, his family, and his spiritual beliefs!
They have not moved toward the center in their beliefs and their philosophies, and they never came together nor compromised their personal beliefs for the betterment of our Country!
They have portrayed my America as a land where everything is tolerated except being intolerant!
They have been a vocal and irreverent minority for years!
They have mocked and attacked the very core values so important to the founding and growth of our Country!
They have made every effort to remove the name of GOD or Jesus Christ from our Society!
They have challenged capital punishment, the right to bear firearms, and the most basic principles of our criminal code!
They have attacked one of the most fundamental of all Freedoms, the right of free speech!
Unite behind Obama? Never!
I am sure many of you who read this think that I am going overboard, but I refuse to retreat one more inch in favor of those whom I believe are the embodiment of Evil!
PRESIDENT BUSH made many mistakes during his Presidency, and I am not sure how history will judge him. However, I believe that he weighed his decisions in light of the long established Judeo-Christian principles of our Founding Fathers!!!
Majority rules in America , and I will honor the concept; however, I will fight with all of my power to be a voice in opposition to Obama and his “goals for America …”
I am going to be a thorn in the side of those who, if left unchecked, will destroy our Country! Any more compromise is more defeat!
I pray that the results of this election will wake up many who have sat on the sidelines and allowed the Socialist-Marxist anti-GOD crowd to slowly change so much of what has been good in America!
GOD bless you and GOD bless our Country!
(Please, please, please, pass this on if you agree. If you don’t agree, just delete it.)
Thanks for your time, may you and yours be safe.
“In GOD We Trust”
 
   “There is no right way to do the wrong thing.”
____________________________
 

5 Of 5 / The Bible’s Influence In America / American Heritage Series / David Barton

__________________________________________