Category Archives: Current Events

Have educational funds been slashed?

Have educational funds been slashed?

On rare occasions, when I get really irked, I complain about media bias. Examples include this AP story on poverty, the Brian Ross Tea Party slur, this example of implicit bias by USA Today, and a Reuters report on job creation and so-called stimulus.

On other occasions, though, you stumble upon a news report or column that is ignorant beyond belief and you have to assume that the person has transcended ordinary bias and belongs in a special category.

The Washington Post seems to specialize in this kind of über-mistake. It was a Post reporter, after all, who wrote last year about a GOP plan to “slash” spending when timid GOPers were merely trying to trim 0.15 percent from the growth of federal spending. Not 15 percent. Not 1.5 percent. A mere $6 billion out of a bloated federal budget of $3,800,000,000,000.

And it was the Washington Post that decided to refer to a certain country as fiscally conservative. Was the reporter writing about Hong Kong or Singapore, the two jurisdictions with the smallest government and freest markets? Nope. Was the reporter referring to Switzerland, with its strong human rights policy on financial privacy, or Australia, with its personal retirement accounts? Nope, the reporter wrote about “fiscally conservative Germany.”

I guess the folks at the New York Times were feeling left out, because our latest example comes from that newspaper. Someone named Chrystia Freeland wrote an article about income inequality, making some decent points about cronyism, but also reflexively regurgitating talking points on class-warfare tax policy. What caught my eye, though, was this incredible assertion about government funding of education.

Educational attainment, which created the American middle class, is no longer rising. The super-elite lavishes unlimited resources on its children, while public schools are starved of funding. …elite education is increasingly available only to those already at the top. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama enrolled their daughters in an exclusive private school; I’ve done the same with mine.

So “public schools are starved of funding”? That’s a strong statement. It implies very deep reductions in the amount of money being diverted from taxpayers to the government schools. So where are the numbers?

You won’t be surprised to learn that Ms. Freeland doesn’t offer any evidence. And there’s a good reason for that. As show in this chart, government spending on education has skyrocketed in recent years.

This data isn’t adjusted for inflation or population, but you can peruse this amazing chart put together by one of Cato’s education experts to see that per-pupil spending has skyrocketed even after adjusting for inflation.

In other words, Ms. Freeland has no clue what she’s talking about. Or, to be fair, she made a giant-sized mistake, perhaps because she’s lives in a statist bubble and blindly assumes that left-wing politicians tell the truth.

Though I do want to giver her credit. She acknowledges that Obama and Clinton both decided to save their kids from a failed government-run school system, thus exposing some hypocrisy on the left. So it’s quite possible that she wanted to write a fair piece, but simply had a few major blind spots.

And it goes without saying that none of the editors or (non-existent?) fact checkers at the New York Times knew enough or cared enough to catch a huge blunder.

P.S. You can enjoy some cartoons about media bias here, here, and here, with the last one being my favorite.

P.P.S. Yes, I know Paul Krugman writes at the New York Times and sometimes seems to specialize in big mistakes. But he’s explicitly an opinion writer, so readers are forewarned to expect a certain point of view.

Remembering Francis Schaeffer at 100 (Part 5) “Schaeffer Sunday”

This year Francis Schaeffer would have turned 100 on Jan 30, 2012. I remember like yesterday when I first was introduced to his books. I was even more amazed when I first saw his films. I was so influenced by them that I bought every one of his 30 something books and his two film series. Here is a tribute that I got off the internet from Chuck Colson’s website www.breakpoint.org :

Enlightened Ethics?
By Chuck Colson|Published Date: August 08, 2011

The Failure of Secularized Morality

Cheat

This commentary was first published November 1, 1995.

Christina Hoff Sommers, who teaches ethics at Clark University, tells a wonderful story—one that exposes the bankruptcy of modern ethics. After Sommers had written an article arguing that a just society begins with individual virtue, one of her colleagues berated her for holding to “an antiquated, Victorian, view of ethics.”

Modern ethics, her colleague informed her, is social justice. It is concerned not with personal morality but with causes, such as saving Brazilian rain forests and preventing Third World exploitation by multinational corporations.

Three months later the same colleague came back sheepishly to Sommers and said: “I have just had a shocking experience in my ethics class. Half of my students cheated on a take-home exam. And this is an ethics course!”

The woman confessed she needed to reread Sommers’s article about private virtue. When people see how flawed the modern view of ethics is, it opens a grand opportunity for a Christian apologetic.

Our modern dilemma in ethics began with the French Enlightenment. Like Sommers’s colleague, the Enlightenment thinkers believed that Christians were wrong about individual sin, that people were good, corrupted only by social structures. So reforming social structures would produce a perfect society.

For 200 years ethicists have tried to create ethical systems without God. The result has been the dismantling of any objective standard of right and wrong, leaving the individual to act according to his or her own “personal preference.”

But what happens when someone’s “personal preference” happens to be cheating on an exam? Or stealing? Or—for example—collaborating with murderous Nazis? That is exactly what happened in the very homeland of the Enlightenment. During wartime France the Vichy government rounded up Jews and handed them over to the Nazis. Seventy-five thousand French Jews perished in the death camps. French President Jacques Chirac recently acknowledged that shameful chapter of his country’s history. “France,” he said, “the homeland of the Enlightenment, and of the rights of man . . . committed the irreparable. Breaking its word, it handed over those who were under its protection to their executioners.”

How did the Enlightenment notion of the “rights of man” break down in wartime France? Well, ethical precepts in themselves have no moral force unless individuals view themselves as responsible to a Supreme Being. The French existentialist Jean Paul Sartre understood very well that ethics had no meaning once God was removed from the equation. “It doesn’t matter how you act,” Sartre said, “as long as you ‘authenticate yourself’ by an act of the will.”

Thus, to borrow a trenchant Francis Schaeffer illustration, you can decide to help an old lady across the street—or to push her into the path of an oncoming car. For Sartre, because there is no God, it doesn’t matter what one chooses to do. (WATCH THE 9 MINUTE VIDEO CLIP FOR THE CLASSIC EXAMPLE SCHAFFER GAVE.)

So the next time someone argues that ethics has nothing to do with obedience to God, show him exactly where that logic leads. And remind him that it is precisely because God exists that there is ultimately no getting away with cheating—or, for that matter, murder.

Want to learn more about the crisis of ethics in America? Order your copy of the DVD series, Doing the Right Thing, and gather with some friends to study this important 6-part series on why natural law matters.

schaeffer

Related posts:

Francis Schaeffer would be 100 years old this year (Schaeffer Sunday)

Dr. Francis Schaeffer – Extra – Interview – Part 2 Francis Schaeffer had a big impact on me in the late 1970′s and I have been enjoying his books and films ever since. Here is great video clip of an interview and below is a fine article about him. Francis Schaeffer 1912-1984 Christian Theologian, Philosopher, […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 10 “Final Choices” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 1 0 How Should We Then Live 10#1 FINAL CHOICES I. Authoritarianism the Only Humanistic Social Option One man or an elite giving authoritative arbitrary absolutes. A. Society is sole absolute in absence of other absolutes. B. But society has to be led by an elite: John Kenneth […]

Fellow admirer of Francis Schaeffer, Michele Bachmann quits presidential race

What Ever Happened to the Human Race? Bachmann was a student of the works of Francis Schaeffer like I am and I know she was pro-life because of it. (Observe video clip above and picture of Schaeffer.) I hated to see her go.  DES MOINES, Iowa — Last night, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann vowed to […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 9 “The Age of Personal Peace and Affluence” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 9 How Should We Then Live 9#1 T h e Age of Personal Peace and Afflunce I. By the Early 1960s People Were Bombarded From Every Side by Modern Man’s Humanistic Thought II. Modern Form of Humanistic Thought Leads to Pessimism Regarding a Meaning for Life and for Fixed […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 8 “The Age of Fragmentation” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 8 How Should We Then Live 8#1 I saw this film series in 1979 and it had a major impact on me. T h e Age of FRAGMENTATION I. Art As a Vehicle Of Modern Thought A. Impressionism (Monet, Renoir, Pissarro, Sisley, Degas) and Post-Impressionism (Cézanne, Van Gogh, Gauguin, […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 7 “The Age of Non-Reason” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 7 How Should We Then Live 7#1 I am thrilled to get this film series with you. I saw it first in 1979 and it had such a big impact on me. Today’s episode is where we see modern humanist man act on his belief that we live […]

Francis Schaeffer would be 100 years old this year (Schaeffer Sunday)

Dr. Francis Schaeffer – Extra – Interview – Part 2 Francis Schaeffer had a big impact on me in the late 1970′s and I have been enjoying his books and films ever since. Here is great video clip of an interview and below is a fine article about him. Francis Schaeffer 1912-1984 Christian Theologian, Philosopher, […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 6 “The Scientific Age” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 6 How Should We Then Live 6#1 I am sharing with you a film series that I saw in 1979. In this film Francis Schaeffer asserted that was a shift in Modern Science. A. Change in conviction from earlier modern scientists.B. From an open to a closed natural system: […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 5 “The Revolutionary Age” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 5 How Should We Then Live 5-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Francis Schaeffer noted, “Reformation Did Not Bring Perfection. But gradually on basis of biblical teaching there was a unique improvement. A. […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 4 “The Reformation” (Schaeffer Sundays)

How Should We Then Live 4-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Schaeffer makes three key points concerning the Reformation: “1. Erasmian Christian humanism rejected by Farel. 2. Bible gives needed answers not only as to how to be right with […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 3 “The Renaissance”

How Should We Then Live 3-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Schaeffer really shows why we have so many problems today with this excellent episode. He noted, “Could have gone either way—with emphasis on real people living in […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 2 “The Middle Ages” (Schaeffer Sundays)

How Should We Then Live 2-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Schaeffer points out that during this time period unfortunately we have the “Church’s deviation from early church’s teaching in regard to authority and the approach to God.” […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 1 “The Roman Age” (Schaeffer Sundays)

How Should We Then Live 1-1 Today I am starting a series that really had a big impact on my life back in the 1970′s when I first saw it. There are ten parts and today is the first. Francis Schaeffer takes a look at Rome and why it fell. It fell because of inward […]

Andy Rooney was an atheist

How Now Shall We LiveClick here to purchase Chuck Colson and Nancy Pearcey’s How Now Shall We Live?, dedicated to Francis Schaeffer.


Click here for a list of Francis Schaeffer’s greatest works, from the Colson Center store!
SchaefferBooks

“Soccer Saturday” Cristiano Ronaldo vs Rafa Nadal (Nike Mercurial Vapor VIII TV Spot)

Cristiano Ronaldo vs Rafa Nadal (Nike Mercurial Vapor VIII TV Spot)

Published on Apr 7, 2012 by

I want that football shoes!!! :O

_________________

Switchfoot coming to Hot Springs, Arkansas on July 14th!!!!

Saturday 14 July 2012

Switchfoot

Venue

Magic Springs Theme Park 1701 E. Grand Ave. 71901 Hot Springs, AR, US

Venue info and map

Uploaded by  on Aug 20, 2007

Interview with Tim Foreman and Chad Butler airing February 26th, 2007.
Discuss: cowbell, Christianity, fan connection

_______________________________________

SwitchfootSwitchfootCourtesy of: EMI

 

Making of Stars-Switchfoot

 

Switchfoot The Documentary

 

Joe Henry Hankins, former pastor of Little Rock’s First Baptist Church was one of the most evangelistic pastors ever!!!!

_

Image result for joe henry hankins

Adrian Rogers uses an illustration by Joe Henry Hankins

Dr. Joe Hankins said that he was preaching in a revival meeting one time, and, God’s Spirit was moving
mightily and souls were being saved. And he said, ‘I looked up there in the balcony and I saw a man, a young man. He
had the hymnal in his hand, as they were singing out of the hymnal the invitation hymn. And he saw the boy close the
hymnal and start this way, like he was coming down out of the balcony to give his heart to Christ. But then he stepped
back and he opened the hymnal again and began to sing. A second time he closed it and he turned, like he was
coming forward, but he hesitated. He stopped. He turned back and opened the hymnal again and started to sing. The
third time, he closed it with a pop, laid it down, but rather than coming forward, he walked out the back door of the
balcony and out of the church. Later on, that boy was diagnoses with a fatal illness. They told Dr. Hankins about it.
And Joe Henry Hankins went to see this boy, recognized him as the same boy that had been in the balcony.
And the preacher said, “Son, have they told you how sick you are?”
He said, “Yes, sir. You don’t need to beat around the bush. I know I’m dying.”
“Well, son, I want to ask you a question. Sometime ago, when you were in church, I had my eyes on you. I thought
you were under conviction. I thought you were about to come forward and give your heart to Christ. Was that
true?”
He said, “Yes, it was true.” He said, “As a matter of fact, when you preached, I wanted to get down there so badly I
felt I could jump over the balcony railing and come down there.”
“Well, son, why didn’t you come?”
He said, “I thought of my favorite sin, and I knew if I went down there, I would have to give up my sin. And I closed
the book and walked out of the church.”
Dr. Hankins said, “Well, son, that was tragic you would do that. But you’re going to die now and you can’t keep your
sin anyway. Son, won’t you come to Jesus now?”
That boy looked at Joe Henry Hankins and said, “Preacher, there’s something you don’t understand. When I said no to
God, something died within me.” He said, “I can’t come.”
Dr. Hankins wept and prayed, but the boy died, never giving his heart to Jesus Christ because his sinned against light.
[taken from Adrian Rogers]

The following was written by John R. Rice about Dr. Hankins time in Little Rock.

Brother Hankins is one of the greatest preachers in America. When he had been pastor of the First Baptist Church of Little Rock, Arkansas, four years and eight months, I learned that the church had received 1,165 new converts as candidates for baptism in that time, and 1,667 members had been added to the church by letter or statement, a total of .832 additions in the four years and eight months. That meant a total of five new converts each week who had found CHRIST and joined the church for baptism under Dr. Hankins in five years and a total of 118 members every week of that time!

Meantime the church had been so wisely led and so prospered of GOD that the Sunday School attendance was from 1,100 to 1,300 weekly, the church had built a new auditorium seating 2,000 people. And while carrying the heavy administrative and preaching burden of that great church, Dr. Hankins had held outside services in which over 2,000 public professions of faith had taken place, altogether, in addition to those who were saved and joined his own church for baptism! Viewed from the viewpoint of success in the pastorate as a soul winner, a preacher and administrator, Dr. Hankins is a great preacher.

More than four years ago Dr. Hankins, pressed on by the fire in his bones, wooed by his love for CHRIST and for lost sinners, gave up the pastorate and has, since then, been a full-time evangelist. He has had revival campaigns in churches of many denominations. He has now become so well known and in such demand that most of his time is given in union city-wide campaigns. He has had such union campaigns with great blessings in Bellingham, Washington; Altoona, Pennsylvania; Scranton, Pennsylvania; in a number of suburbs of Los Angeles; in Pontiac, Michigan; and is scheduled, when this is written, for a great city-wide campaign in Cleveland, Ohio.

The solid Scriptural background in Dr. Hankins’ sermons, the directness of speech, his strong convictions about Heaven and Hell and CHRIST and His Blood, and salvation by faith, make Dr. Hankins a great preacher. He is distinctly a Bible preacher. He is manifestly a Spirit-filled preacher. He is a compassionate, prayerful, brotherly preacher. We pray and believe that many thousands will be blessed by his sermons in this book and trust that the volume will be scattered far and near and put in the hands of saints and sinners, preachers and lay Christians alike.

These sermons were first printed in The Sword of the Lord. A number of them appeared with a decision form and we have letters from several people who have found CHRIST as they read Dr. Hankins’ sermons. With the earnest hope that sinners will be saved as they read these messages, a decision blank is attached at the close of the book.

November, 1946

Wheaton, Illinois

Image result for joe henry hankins

Former Razorback Football Coach Ken Hatfield speaks at First Bapt Little Rock May 4, 2011

former coach of the arkansas razorbacks football team gives his speech at the 112th annual grape festival Highlights of the #17 Razorbacks 14-10 upset of the #7 Aggies in 1986. I heard Ken Hatfield speak and he told a funny story about  Steve Atwater. He said he wanted a chance to play quarterback. Coach Hatfield […]

Former Razorback Football Coach Ken Hatfield speaks at First Bapt Little Rock May 4, 2011 (Part 1, mentions Branch Rickey and Don McClanen)

This is the pregame broadcast of the Arkansas-Texas game at Razorback Stadium in 1985. It features both the Razorback and Lonhorn bands and the 1964 punt return by Ken Hatfield. I got to hear former Arkansas Razorback Football Coach Ken Hatfield speak and it was very encouraging and enjoyable. The “Zone Luncheon” is held the […]

Paul Greenberg looks back on Chuck Colson’s life

Uploaded by on Oct 27, 2011

Brit Hume describes the life of Chuck Colson

Paul Greenberg is one of the finest conservative writers I have ever read and this article below may be his best yet.

Paul Greenberg: Redemption for Charles Colson

 Posted: Thursday, May 3, 2012 4:30 am

Charles Colson died the other day at 80, a respected and even revered evangelist in the mold of Billy Graham.

By the time of his death, he may have been the country’s leading prison reformer, too, working to change men rather than just punish them.

The worldwide mission he founded and directed — Prison Fellowship — continues to inspire.

He set out to make prisons penitentiaries in the true sense — a place for penitence. And rebirth.

That was Charles Colson.

There was also a Charles Colson in an earlier life. That Charles Colson had died and been born again circa 1974-76, when he would enter prison and leave it a new man.

Chuck Colson arrived at the minimum-security federal prison on the grounds of Maxwell Air Base in Montgomery, Ala., via the White House, where he had been not just a member but a leader of the Nixon administration and gang. He’d been convicted, as Richard Nixon should have been, of obstruction of justice.

No doubt about it, Chuck Colson could obstruct with the best of them, or rather the worst. That connoisseur-in-chief of dirty tricks, Richard Mountebank Nixon himself, gave him the highest recommendation in his presidential memoirs:

Mr. Colson, the former president wrote, was his “political point man” for “imaginative dirty tricks.” Arriving at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue an ambitious young lawyer, he was determined to show that his tricks were the dirtiest of all, and he did not disappoint his boss.

Whether he was leaking confidential FBI files or compiling Nixon’s infamous enemies’ list, Colson soon became a favorite of that president’s.

In the best break of his life — and the lives of so many whose lives he helped redeem — Colson would be found out, indicted, convicted and sentenced to one-to-three for obstruction. It was while awaiting sentencing that a friend slipped him a copy of C.S. Lewis’ “Mere Christianity,” which he credited with opening his eyes. He would serve seven months of his sentence and leave proclaiming the Gospel.

When he announced the usual prison conversion, and his plans to start a prison ministry, the reaction among us usual skeptics, aka newspapermen, was that it was all a front, a way to get out of the joint and make a good thing of having gone bad.

But Colson proved us wrong.

The only force Colson’s ministry employed was soul force, and it proved enough, more than enough. It seems the Spirit exercises a compulsion of its own.

Each of us may seek redemption in our own way. So does each national culture. Consider the life of John Profumo, namesake of the Profumo Affair in England. As secretary for war in a Conservative cabinet in the early 1960s, Profumo’s name made the screaming headlines on the front page of every London tabloid. For he had done the unthinkable for an English gentleman:

No, not engage in a torrid affair with a notorious prostitute who’d shared her favors with, among others, a naval attache/spy at the Soviet embassy. No, his offense was much more serious: He’d lied about it to Parliament.

Not done, you know. Bad form. Or at least it used to be when there was still an England.

Profumo was forced to resign in disgrace. Disgraced most of all in his own eyes. He resolved to spend the rest of his life doing penance, helping the poor in anonymity. And he did.

Profumo began his new and better life as a drudge, washing dishes and cleaning toilets, at Toynbee Hall in London’s East End, a refuge for the down and out. He could identify. Eventually, he was persuaded to put down his mop and take charge of the place, but only reluctantly.

By the time he died not too long ago at 91, after devoting some 40 years of his life to good works on the quiet, Profumo had been made a CBE, commander of the Order of the British Empire. He’d been forgiven by all except possibly himself. A gentleman after all, he’d found redemption the English way, by doing the honorable thing.

I used to think only the English knew how to do these things. Colson proved that disgraced American politicians can find their way to redemption, too, just differently. Even in the eyes of those of us who raise an eyebrow whenever a politician is described as an evangelist, and whose first reaction is to think of Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker.

Charles Colson did it his way, the American Way. He made Prison Fellowship a big business, raising funds, creating franchises, holding rallies, spreading the Word worldwide.

What the Christian brings to the world is a realistic response to man’s real condition: fallen. Broken. In need of healing. Colson was just responding to the brokenness of the world, beginning with his own. And he believed others would follow. They did.

You know, there may be something to this Christianity thing after all.

Paul Greenberg writes for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette; pgreenberg@arkansasonline.com.

Christopher Hitchens honored

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 04

 

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 05

The atheist Christopher Hitchens was honored this week (from Yahoo News):

Christopher Hitchens was honored at the National Magazine Awards—the Oscars of the magazine industry—on Thursday with a posthumous prize for three columns published in Vanity Fair last year.

“He’s the bravest man I’ve ever known,” Graydon Carter, Vanity Fair editor-in-chief, said while accepting the so-called Ellie for Hitchens at a ceremony at New York’s Marriott Marquis. Hitchens, who died last December after a battle with cancer, “wrote with speed and accuracy” until the very end, Carter said.

Brian Williams—who served as the evening’s host—arrived late after anchoring Thursday’s “NBC Nightly News,” blaming cross-town traffic and the “poured-cement” hotel’s confusing elevator system.

New York magazine won three awards, edging the New Yorker, which won two. Time won magazine of the year. In all, 18 magazines were honored with Ellies.

“If you publish a magazine—even desktop publishing—you’re winning an award,” Williams joked. “If Cat Fancy wins for best commentary, be happy for them.”

Tim Rogers, the editor of Dallas-based D magazine, won the unofficial award for most awkward acceptance speech, saying his magazine’s Ellie (for a profile of the hacking group Anonymous) would help him in the bedroom. “Tonight, with a little bit of luck, a little red wine, I’m gonna get lucky,” Rogers said, pointing to his wife in the crowd.

Williams said he felt bad for “Mrs. D.”

“There’s a lot of pressure on her now,” the “Rock Center” host said.

Later, Williams professed his love for magazines.

“I am a lover of this tactile medium,” he said. “I get on a plane [with a magazine] and I pretend to bathe in it.”

Related posts:

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 11)

Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson Debate at Westminster Theological Seminary, Part 11 of 12 PART 5  5/25/2007 08:49 AM Christopher Hitchens If you insist, I shall concede that the significance of the Samaritan lies in his ethnicity. It’s not a very impressive parable to begin with, though when I was taught it first in Sunday […]

Atheists confronted: How I confronted Carl Sagan the year before he died jh47

In today’s news you will read about Kirk Cameron taking on the atheist Stephen Hawking over some recent assertions he made concerning the existence of heaven. Back in December of 1995 I had the opportunity to correspond with Carl Sagan about a year before his untimely death. Sarah Anne Hughes in her article,”Kirk Cameron criticizes […]

Is the Bible historically accurate? (Part 9A) jh46

My sons Wilson and Hunter are now climbing a mountain in the LA area. However, they will be helping Sherwood tonight at Santa Monica Promenade. Sherwood preaches and has question and answer sessions. Below  a former muslim turned atheist debates Sherwood on the issue of evolution. My sons will be attending church on Sunday at […]

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 10)

Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson Debate at Westminster Theological Seminary, Part 10 of 12 Douglas Wilson You refer to the faithful “creating a mystery where none exists.” May I get you to agree that the question “Why is there something here rather than nothing at all?” does not fall into that category? If you and […]

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 5)

Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson Debate at Westminster Theological Seminary, Part 5 of 12 PART 2  5/10/2007 08:54 AM Christopher Hitchens This is mildly amusing casuistry which—aside from its recommendation of Wodehouse—contains nothing that distinguishes it from Islam or Hinduism or indeed humanism. Were I a Christian, I would be highly unsettled by the huge number […]

War on Christmas? :Christopher Hitchens vs. Tim Wildmon of American Family Association

I am not going to offer any of my views, but I just wanted to share the following: John Brummett in his article,  ” ‘Happy holidays’ is no war on Christmas,” noted, “If someone is warring against Christmas in America, then someone is losing his war big-time.” Christopher Hitchens makes the same point (as quoted […]

Christopher Hitchens remembered

I have enjoyed reading these articles about Christopher Hitchens who sounded like a nice person. Remembering Christopher Hitchens December 16, 2011 When I was a kid, I pursued what I considered dueling obsessions. I wanted to be George F. Will. I pored over his twice-weekly syndicated columns in the Press of Atlantic City, dictionary never […]

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 1)

Collision (The Movie) – Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson 1-9 Uploaded by DrKroenen2000 on Aug 17, 2010 Collision is a documentary film. released on October 27, 2009 featuring a debate between prominent atheist Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson, Presbyterian pastor of Christ Church Moscow. Described by Hitchens as a “buddy-and-road” movie, it provides an overview […]

Christopher Hitchens comments on “Pascal’s Wager” in Nov of 2010

Uploaded by BritishNeoCon on Nov 29, 2010 As Christopher nears the end of his life, will he bargain on the possibility of a God as Pascal suggests? Watch the full interview uploaded by MuggedbyReality: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEX4jDJy5Us _________________________________ Christopher Hitchens addresses this issue in the video clip above. The last video clip below includes some comments by […]

Evangelicals react to Christopher Hitchens’ death plus video clips of Hitchens debate (part 4)

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 11 Below are some reactions of evangelical leaders to the news of Christopher Hitchens’ death: DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 12     DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 13 The Christian Post > World|Fri, Dec. […]

Christopher Hitchens’ view on abortion may surprise you

Christopher Hitchens – Against Abortion Uploaded by BritishNeoCon on Dec 2, 2010 An issue Christopher doesn’t seem to have addressed much in his life. He doesn’t explicitly say that he is against abortion in this segment, but that he does believe that the ‘unborn child’ is a real concept. ___________________________ I was suprised when I […]

Christopher Hitchens discusses Ron Paul in 3-2-11 inteview

Max Brantley in the Arkansas Times Blog reports that Ron Paul is leading in Iowa. Maybe it is time to take a closer look at his views. In the above clip you will see Chistopher Hitchens discuss Ron Paul’s views. In the clip below you will find Ron Paul’s latest commercial. Below is a short […]

Evangelicals react to Christopher Hitchens’ death plus video clips of Hitchens debate (part 3)

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 07 Below are some reactions of evangelical leaders to the news of Christopher Hitchens’ death:   Christian leaders react to Hitchens’ death Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | by Michael Foust   DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 08 Author and […]

 

Famous Arkansas murder trials

Very interesting article from AY Magazine. I got the youtube clip from the Arkansas Times Blog.

Murder Mystery: Scandalous Arkansas Trials

By Janie Jones
Detective Al Dawson escorts Orsini to jail.Detective Al Dawson escorts Orsini to jail.Photographs courtesy of Central Arkansas Library System Archives

On the morning of Sept. 26, 1974, a housekeeper discovered the body of 67-year-old Fern Rodgers, wife of Dr. Porter Rodgers, Sr., a wealthy Searcy physician. Mrs. Rodgers had been shot twice in the head.

A police investigation revealed the 70-year-old doctor had been enjoying the company of Peggy Hale, his 21-year-old receptionist. Hale was arrested and  74, and a few hours later, Dr. Rodgers was arrested; also charged in the slaying was a man named William Barry Kimbrell. The prosecution alleged that Rodgers and Hale hired Kimbrell to kill Fern.

The trial that followed was one for the books. When the murder charge was read to the packed courtroom, Rodgers stuck his fingers in his ears, and at one point, the judge called a recess due to the doctor’s uncontrollable weeping. Hale testified for the prosecution, saying she and Rodgers began a torrid love affair after she went to work for him the previous summer. Rodgers was so proud of his sexual prowess that he and Hale kept a diary of their “activities.” When the two found time to talk, the subject of marriage was raised, but Rodgers nixed the idea of divorce from his wife, saying it would be too complicated. He and Hale then began plotting to murder Fern. Kimbrell, 32, was brought into the picture, and the millionaire doctor paid Kimbrell the grand sum of $3,000 to commit the crime.

In a statement read to the jury, Rodgers said, “The only reason I can explain Fern’s killing was because I was hungry for Peggy Hale.”
According to James Scudder, an Arkansas Gazette reporter known for his colorful narratives, Rodgers’ own lawyer, Ed Bethune, said, “Rodgers was out of it, his brain rattling in his head like a dried walnut.”

Hale pled guilty and got a 21-year prison sentence. Kimbrell and Rodgers were both convicted and got life in prison. Rodgers died in 1980. The epitaph inscribed on his tombstone reads, “An Exceptional Man.”
 

 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

The most sensational Arkansas trial of the 1980s, and perhaps of the last century, concerned the Orsini/McArthur case, which was actually a series of court proceedings that all revolved around the alluring, yet sinister Mary Lee Orsini, who was accused of murdering her husband, Ron, in March 1981.

Lee, as she preferred to be called, faced a grand jury for Ron’s death. During the hearings, she became infatuated with her Little Rock attorney, Bill McArthur. He, however, did not reciprocate because he loved his wife, Alice. Lee was not indicted, but her obsession with McArthur continued, and she made every excuse to visit his office.

The other men in Orsini’s life were not as immune to her feminine wiles as McArthur was; she manipulated them into believing her far-out fantasies about mobsters and hit men who were out to get her. Among those duped were Pulaski County Sheriff Tommy Robinson and an ex-con, Eugene “Yankee” Hall.

On May 21, 1982, Alice McArthur was the intended victim of a car bomb. She survived, but was not as lucky a few weeks later, when two men gained entry into her home by pretending to be deliverymen for a florist. Alice’s body was found in an upstairs closet. The killers left a bouquet, and fingerprints on the vase led the Little Rock Police Department to Yankee Hall and his accomplice Larry Darnell McClendon. Hall identified Orsini as the person who had hired them, but said she had told them Bill McArthur was in on it, too.

Orsini was so narcissistic, she didn’t seem to care that her freedom was on the line, as long as the TV cameras and newspaper photographers showed up. Her craving for attention was equaled only by that of Tommy Robinson. His supporters thought of him as Dirty Harry. His detractors saw him as a bombastic self-promoter. He once called Prosecuting Attorney Dub Bentley a “bubblebutt.”
Orsini couldn’t flirt her way out of a guilty verdict for her part in the McArthur murder and got life in prison. A subsequent conviction for killing her husband was overturned. In 2003, she died of a heart attack in prison at the age of 53 — shortly after confessing to both the Alice McArthur and Ron Orsini murders.

Though Robinson tried his best to destroy Bill McArthur, the attorney was cleared and resumed his law practice. He died of natural causes in 2009. Tommy Robinson was elected to the U.S. Congress. After serving only one term, he faded into obscurity.
 

 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

The Orsini/McArthur case was mentioned during court testimony about another famous Arkansas murder. Scharmel Bolling Burnett was accused of killing her estranged husband Johnny Burnett. Friends went to the wealthy businessman’s swank Little Rock home July 21, 1992 and found his nude body with a .22 caliber bullet in his back.

Johnny, owner of Burnett Pools and Spas, had filed for divorce after only 72 days of marriage and had moved out. Scharmel threw a party July 17 after sending invitations that listed house rules Johnny had set down. They included: “Wives should be thin, tan, well-dressed and quiet,” and “Husbands may be fat, sloppy, drunk, and obnoxious.” A similar list drawn up by Scharmel documented her complaints about Johnny: “He farts out loud and never apologizes … uses incorrect English … is a quitter, is an inconsiderate lousy, lover but thinks he’s great.”

After a seven-month investigation, police arrested Scharmel for the murder. She stood trial twice, because the first hearing ended in a hung jury. During both proceedings, the state acknowledged their evidence was all circumstantial, and they could not establish a motive — Scharmel would receive no part of Burnett’s estate. The prosecution alleged Scharmel killed Johnny July 19, 1992, a day after he had sneaked in and photographed her in bed with another man John Merck. The pictures failed to develop, but the next morning Scharmel agreed to a divorce and vacated the Little Rock house. According to friends, Johnny danced a jig and went back home.

The defense contended Johnny’s death did not occur until the morning of July 20,1992, and Scharmel had an alibi for that time period. Her attorneys conceded she had owned a .22 caliber pistol but had lost track of it. They added that millions of people owned .22 caliber guns, including Diane King, who had been romantically involved with Johnny Burnett for several years. She had given him an ultimatum to marry her or end the relationship. A few days later he proposed to Scharmel. The defense team named King and Merck as alternative suspects. Another was Carl Wilson, who had worked at the pool and spa business until July 2, when Burnett fired him. Since 1974, Wilson had shot three people in three separate incidents, fatally wounding one victim. In 1982, he testified in Lee Orsini’s trial that he had supplied the explosives used in the bombing of Alice McArthur’s car. Wilson died in a 2001 shootout with federal authorities who raided his Mayflower home in search of illegal firearms.

The trial, which showed just how nasty a divorce can be, ended with an acquittal for Scharmel Bolling Burnett. Johnny Burnett’s murder remains unsolved.
 

This article appears in the June 2011 issue of AY Magazine

Debate on Milton Friedman’s cure for inflation “Friedman Friday”

If you would like to see the first three episodes on inflation in Milton Friedman’s film series “Free to Choose” then go to a previous post I did.

Ep. 9 – How to Cure Inflation [4/7]. Milton Friedman’s Free to Choose (1980)

Uploaded by on Jun 16, 2010

While many people have a fairly good grasp of what inflation is, few really understand its fundamental cause. There are many popular scapegoats: labor unions, big business, spendthrift consumers, greed, and international forces. Dr. Friedman explains that the actual cause is a government that has exclusive control of the money supply.

Friedman says that the solution to inflation is well known among those who have the power to stop it: simply slow down the rate at which new money is printed. But government is one of the primary beneficiaries of inflation. By inflating the currency, tax revenues rise as families are pushed into higher income tax brackets. Thus, inflation transfers wealth and resources from the private to the public sector. In short, inflation is attractive to government because it is a way of increasing taxes without having to pass new legislation to raise tax rates. Inflation is in fact taxation without representation.

Wage and price controls are not the cure for inflation because they treat only the symptom (rising prices) and not the disease (monetary expansion). History records that such controls do not work; instead, they have perverse effects on both prices and economic growth and undermine the fundamental productivity of the economy. There is only one cure for inflation: slow the printing presses. But the cure produces the painful side effects of a temporary increase in unemployment and reduced economic growth. It takes considerable political courage to undergo the cure.

Friedman cites the example of Japan, which successfully underwent the cure in the mid-seventies but took five years to squeeze inflation out of the system. Inflation is a social disease that has the potential for destroying a free society if it is unchecked. Prolonged inflation undermines belief in the basic equity of the free market system because it tends to destroy the link between effort and reward. And it tears the social fabric because it divides society into winners and losers and sets group against group.

Below are some other posts I did about Milton Friedman’s ideas:

Who was Milton Friedman and what did he say about Social Security Reform? (Part 1)

Balanced Budget Amendment the answer? Boozman says yes, Pryor no, Part 22(Milton Friedman tells us how to stay free Part 1))

Why do people move to other states to avoid Arkansas’ high state income tax? (If you love Milton Friedman then you will love this post)

Pat Lynch: We need to bring tax rates back up for Rich (Real Cause of Deficit Pt 10)(If you love Milton Friedman then you will love this post)

Gene Lyons: Tax Cuts always reduce tax revenues (Part 2)

Balanced Budget Amendment the answer? Boozman says yes, Pryor no (Part 19, Milton Friedman’s view is yes)(Royal Wedding Part 19)

Gene Lyons: Tax Cuts always reduce tax revenues (Part 1)(The Conspirator Part 23)

John Fund’s talk in Little Rock 4-27-11(Part 2):Arkansas is a right to work state and gets new businesses because of it, Obama does not get that, but Milton Friedman does!!!(Royal Wedding Part 18)

Balanced Budget Amendment the answer? Boozman says yes, Pryor no (Part 12, Milton Friedman’s view is yes)(The Conspirator Part 15)

Creation of wealth in this country based on “self interest or greed” helps ordinary folks too..

14 yr old robber killed by van driven by the person he robbed in Little Rock

Sad story from Little Rock today. It reminds me of the sad story last week when we lost a 13 yr old.

Channel 4 KARK in Little Rock and several other stations are reporting on this. Here is what the Arkansas Times Blog had to say:

LRPD: 14 year old dead, driver being questioned in chasing down thief

Posted by David Koon on Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:55 PM

JUMPED CURB: Neighbors say a van driver jumped this curb to chase bike rider whod taken his wallet up the small hill.

  • Brian Chilson
  • JUMPED CURB: Neighbors say a van driver jumped this curb to chase bike rider who’d taken his wallet up the small hill.
IN MEMORY: Cross was erected to Lil Flip, where Michael Stanley was fatally injured.

  • IN MEMORY: Cross was erected to “Lil Flip,” where Michael Stanley was fatally injured.

Police say a 14-year-old boyis dead after a robbery victim chased him down in a van and ran him over in a vacant lot near 24th and Oak Streets in Little Rock. 

LRPD spokesperson Sgt. Cassandra Davis said that Michael Sadler, 58, was coming out of the Asher One Stop convenience store, at Asher and Maple, just after 11:30 this morning when a 14-year-old boy identified as Michael Stanley snatched his wallet and fled on a bicycle. Davis said Sadler pursued the boy in his van, veered off the road, and struck him about two blocks south of the store.

Davis said police are investigating reports that Sadler then got out of the van and assaulted the boy as he lay on the ground. The boy was later taken to Arkansas Children’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead at 12:28 p.m. Davis said the boy’s mother lives on W. 23rd Street in Little Rock. A woman at the scene was crying, “My baby,” as neighbors erected a small cross in his memory where he fell.

Sgt. Davis said detectives are currently questioning Sadler. “I don’t know what charges, if any, he’ll have,” Davis said, “but it could be a homicide, manslaughter [or] negligent homicide. It just ranges by what the detectives feel comfortable changing him with, if anything at all.”

Davis said if the theft had occurred in Sadler’s home, he would have been within his rights to protect himself. Given that the crime happened outside, however, he may be charged in the case. “He got in his van and chased him down,” Davis said. “You can’t chase somebody down. We suggest you just get as much information as you can and notify law enforcement.”

A neighborhood resident, who spoke to our photographer Brian Chilson, described the chase. He said the boy was riding up a hill on a vacant lot near the store. The van driver jumped the curb and followed him across the lot and struck him near the top of the small hill, knocking the bike to the ground. According to him, the driver then beat the boy. He was among those placing the cross you see in the photograph above.

WHERE CHASE BEGAN: Asher One Stop.