The War on Poverty has been a miserable failure!!

_________

Debate: What To Do About Poverty | Learn Liberty

Published on Jan 22, 2014

“Debate: What To Do About Poverty” by @LearnLiberty
► Get Learn Liberty updates in your inbox!
http://LearnLiberty.org/subscribe

This Learn Liberty debate presents arguments for and against more government assistance to help the poor in the United States. Prof. Steven Horwitz argues that the government has created too many problems and that lifting government-imposed barriers to the poor will go a long way toward solving the problems of inequality in the United States. Prof. Jeffrey Reiman takes the view that government, while not perfect, will have a key role to play in creating better programs to help the poor. What do you think?

* This debate was filmed in front of a live audience at the 2013 International Students for Liberty Conference in Washington, DC

► Learn More

http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/… [article]: Steve Horwitz breaks down the economic condition of the poor and whether markets work to benefit the least advantaged

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/… [article]: Stephen Rose of the Washington Post presents a variety of evidence to show that the declining numbers of middle class Americans is mostly due to many of them getting richer

http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail… [article]: Walter E. Williams of The Foundation for Economic Education explains what poverty is and why there is poverty in the first place

http://mises.org/daily/2526 [article]: Henry Hazlitt questions whether the government can truly reduce poverty

http://www.ted.com/playlists/67/the_q… : TED combines eight of their videos on different ideas of how to end poverty

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders…
out-extreme-poverty-20-years-world-shoul­d-aim [article]: Jon Berkeley of The Economist explains that we are towards the end of poverty and explains what factors played out in this reduction

► For more resources, transcripts, videos, and more visit:
http://learnliberty.org/videos/debate…

► Like us on Facebook! http://facebook.com/LearnLiberty
► Follow us on Twitter! http://twitter.com/LearnLiberty
► Follow us again on Google+! http://bit.ly/1dwr50F
► Watch more videos: http://LearnLiberty.org

___________________________________________________________

The War on Poverty has been a miserable failure!!

We’ve Spent $22 Trillion on War on Poverty. What Have We Achieved?

10356397_372089532957005_5913199099176411959_n

It’s been 50 years now since the federal government launched its “War on Poverty.” But the numbers just released by the Census Bureau suggest we’re in a losing battle.

The poverty rate now stands at 14.5 percent. That’s a drop from the previous rate of 15 percent. But don’t celebrate too quickly. The new rate is almost exactly the poverty rate we had in 1967, only three years after President Lyndon Johnson announced his war.

To put it in further perspective: The poverty rate in 1950 was 32.2 percent. It dropped steadily throughout the ’50s, and had been nearly cut in half before the War on Poverty began. After that, the rate declined slightly, then leveled out.

More than 100 million — about one third of the U.S. population — receives aid from at least one welfare program.

That was $22 trillion ago. That’s right, trillion with a “t.” A 22 with 12 zeros behind it. To understand how much that is, if you laid a trillion $1 bills end to end, they would reach the sun. Now multiply that by 22. That’s enough for 11 round trips.

In short, it’s a lot of money. Yet the poverty rate is essentially the same as it was 50 years ago.

The federal government runs more than 80 means-tested welfare programs that provide cash, food, housing and medical care to low-income Americans. Federal and state spending on these programs last year was $943 billion (not counting Social Security, Medicare or unemployment insurance).

This money is going to a lot of people. More than 100 million — about one third of the U.S. population — receives aid from at least one welfare program. The average cost per recipient in 2013? $9,000. If converted into cash, current means-tested spending is five times what’s needed to eliminate all poverty in the United States.

So how can the poverty rate be practically the same? You have to understand two things.

Infographic by Kelsey Harris/The Daily Signal

One is that, incredibly, the Census Bureau counts almost none of the $943 billion in yearly welfare spending as family “income.” It acts as though that money doesn’t exist. And because the government counts a family as poor if its income falls below specified thresholds, a lot of people are being, in essence, mislabeled as poor.

That leads to the second thing we have to understand. When most people hear that a family is living in poverty, they naturally picture people suffering from significant material deprivation. They imagine people without enough food or clothing, or without a decent roof over their heads.

Sadly, of course, such conditions do exist for some Americans. But government surveys show that many of those officially designated as poor are surprisingly well-off.

Less than 2 percent are homeless, and only one in 10 live in mobile homes. The typical house or apartment of the poor is in good repair and uncrowded. Indeed, the typical “poor” family has air conditioning, cable or satellite TV, and a computer in the home. Forty percent have a wide-screen HDTV. Another 40 percent have Internet access.

So should we consider War on Poverty to be a success? Hardly. It was designed, according to Johnson, to increase self-sufficiency. Individuals and families who needed a hand up would get it, but the ultimate goal was to shrink the welfare rolls and transform the poor, Johnson said, from “tax-eaters” to “taxpayers.”

“Judged by that standard, the War on Poverty has been a colossal flop,” writes poverty expert Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation. “The welfare state has undermined self-sufficiency by discouraging work and penalizing marriage.”

Fifty years ago, only 7 percent of children were born outside of marriage, which remains the single greatest weapon against child poverty. Today, it’s 41 percent.

Yet President Obama plans to spend $13 trillion over the next decade on welfare programs that discourage work and marriage.

It’s time to turn this around. According to Mr. Rector, able-bodied recipients of cash, food and housing should be required to work or prepare for work as condition of receiving aid. Welfare’s penalties against marriage should be reduced.

In short, it’s time to return to Johnson’s original vision to “replace their despair with opportunity.”

Originally appeared in the Washington Times.

Related posts:

Open letter to President Obama (Part 677) Welfare State hurts the Poor

Open letter to President Obama (Part 677) (Emailed to White House on July 29, 2013) President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying […]

The Welfare State in USA has slowed the progress of the poor!!!!

___ The Welfare State in USA has slowed the progress of the poor!!!! Robert Rector noted, “Johnson’s aim was to make poor families self-sufficient — able to rise above poverty through their own earnings without dependence on welfare. The exact opposite happened. For a decade-and-a-half before the War on Poverty began, self-sufficiency in America improved […]

Liberals tell us that 1/3 of the U.S. population received aid from at least one welfare program at an average cost of $9,000 per recipient in 2013 but that is not enough!!!!

_____ Liberals tell us that 1/3 of the U.S. population received aid from at least one welfare program at an average cost of $9,000 per recipient in 2013 but that is not enough!!!! _________ Societycommentary The War on Poverty Has Been a Colossal Flop Robert Rector / September 16, 2014 / 0 comments Today, the […]

“Friedman Friday” FREE TO CHOOSE “Who protects the worker?” Video and Transcript Part 5 of 7 “With a welfare system of the kind we have, you have the problem that people immigrate in order to get welfare, not in order to get employment”

FREE TO CHOOSE “Who protects the worker?” Video and Transcript Part In 1980 I read the book FREE TO CHOOSE by Milton Friedman and it really enlightened me a tremendous amount.  I suggest checking out these episodes and transcripts of Milton Friedman’s film series FREE TO CHOOSE: “The Failure of Socialism” and “What is wrong […]

Open letter to President Obama (Part 648) The human cost of the Welfare State

Open letter to President Obama (Part 648) (Emailed to White House on 6-10-13.) President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get […]

Open letter to President Obama (Part 618) FREE TO CHOOSE “Who protects the worker?” Video and Transcript Part 5 of 7 “With a welfare system of the kind we have, you have the problem that people immigrate in order to get welfare, not in order to get employment”

Open letter to President Obama (Part 618) (Emailed to White House on July 22, 2013) President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you […]

“Friedman Friday” Milton Friedman had a solution to the welfare state!!!

I have written about the tremendous increase in the food stamp program the last 9 years before and that means that both President Obama and Bush were guilty of not trying to slow down it’s growth. Furthermore, Republicans have been some of the biggest supporters of the food stamp program. Milton Friedman had a good […]

Open letter to President Obama (Part 536) If America does not get welfare reform under control, it will bankrupt America

Open letter to President Obama (Part 536) (Emailed to White House on 6-6-13.) President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get […]

The Founders desired to limit government power and constrain politicians and they knew where the welfare state would lead!!!!

  Welfare Can And Must Be Reformed             Uploaded on Jun 29, 2010 If America does not get welfare reform under control, it will bankrupt America. But the Heritage Foundation’s Robert Rector has a five-step plan to reform welfare while protecting our most vulnerable. __________________________ The Founders desired to limit government power and constrain politicians and […]

Open letter to President Obama (Part 516) (Welfare state erodes social capital)

Open letter to President Obama (Part 516) (Emailed to White House on 5-3-13.) President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get […]

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: