We need real spending cuts now!!!BUDGET DEAL OF DEC 2013: Representative Raul Labrador noted that the deal is nothing but “empty promises”

House, Senate Budget chairs reach deal to preempt another gov t shutdown

Paul Ryan has been fighting for sequestration for years(1 yr ago)

_____________________________

We need real spending cuts now!!!BUDGET DEAL OF DEC 2013: Representative Raul Labrador noted that the deal is nothing but “empty promises.”

Conservatives Express Disdain for Budget Deal That Kicks Spending Cuts Years Down the Road

December 11, 2013 at 4:06 pm

Conversations with Conservatives (Credit: Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call/Newscom)

Conversations with Conservatives (Credit: Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call/Newscom)

House conservatives expressed disagreement and disappointment with the Senate-House budget deal at today’s “Conversations with Conservatives” hosted by The Foundry on Capitol Hill.

The deal, brokered by Senate Budget Committee Chairman Patty Murray (D-WA) and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI), was a bipartisan compromise.

One of the most outspoken members on today’s panel, Representative Raul Labrador (R-ID), said of the budget deal, “I haven’t decided if I’m going to be a really strong no or just a no.”

The two-year budget deal, which was released Tuesday night, calls for $1 trillion in federal spending in 2014 while replacing some sequestration cuts. While it promises savings later, it calls for more spending now—something many conservatives have a big problem with.

One reason some are so vehemently opposed is because it doesn’t just delay savings, it pushes it nine or 10 years down the road.

The only person on the panel dedicated to voting “yes” on the deal was Representative Vicky Hartzler (R-MO), who still expressed skepticism about the direction of the deal, saying it was not “preferable” but “does achieve some…goals without raising taxes.”

Many on the panel disagreed with Hartzler’s position, and as Heritage pointed out today, “raising revenue to spend more is simply taxing and spending.”

Labrador noted that the deal is nothing but “empty promises.”

Most Members on the panel are outspoken on reducing Washington’s out-of-control spending, and this budget deal does not rein that in.  Additionally, it raises Transportation and Security Administration fees—yet another burden on the American people.

“Since August 2011, the debt ceiling was raised to the tune of $3 trillion,” said Representative Tim Huelskamp (R-KS). “What have conservatives gotten in exchange for that?”

Washington has a spending problem, yet this budget deal is another step towards more spending. Representative Mick Mulvaney (R-SC) summed it up:

The debate about the debt ceiling needs to be about whether or not the we solve the problems that give rise to the debt ceiling issue in the first place…Now we’ve raised the debt ceiling over $1 trillion this year without a single penny of spending reductions….we’re not doing anything at all about the underlying problem.

While the deal was cut seemingly to avoid gridlock again, it’s clear that those in opposition have no plans to remain silent.

________

Related posts:

Letter to Senator John Boozman about Sequester Negotiations (PLEASE KEEP SEQUESTER!!!!)

________________________ Senator John Boozman, 320 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-4843 Fax: (202) 228-1371 Dear Senator Boozman, I want to thank you for taking the time out of your busy day to respond to my earlier letter to you on this same subject. I have always TRIED TO CONTACT THE REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATORS ABOUT THEIR RESPONSIBILITY […]

Open letter to Senator Boozman: Copy of my letter to President Obama on Socialism (Part 116.7)

Senator John Boozman, 320 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-4843 Fax: (202) 228-1371 Dear Senator Boozman, I want to thank you for taking the time out of your busy day to respond to my earlier letter to you on this same subject. It is obvious to me that if President Obama […]

Senator Boozman’s response to my letter on fiscal cliff and possible debt ceiling increase

It is obvious to me that if President Obama gets his hands on more money then he will continue to spend away our children’s future. He has already taken the national debt from 11 trillion to 16 trillion in just 4 years. Over, and over, and over, and over, and over and over I have written […]

Boozman says Obama should cut spending

___ Corker Says President’s 2012 Budget Proposal Shows “Lack of Urgency” on Spending Uploaded by senatorcorker on Feb 14, 2011 In remarks on the Senate floor today, U.S. Senator Bob Corker, R-Tenn., expressed disappointment in President Obama’s 2012 budget proposal, saying it displayed a “lack of urgency” to get federal spending under control. Corker has introduced the […]

Balanced Budget Amendment the answer? Boozman says yes, Pryor no, Part 36 (Input from Dan Mitchell of the Cato Institute Part 8)

From a lecture given by Dr. Milton Friedman in Erie, Pennsylvania (1978). Steve Brawner in his article “Safer roads and balanced budgets,” Arkansas News Bureau, April 13, 2011, noted: The disagreement is over the solutions — on what spending to cut; what taxes to raise (basically none ever, according to Boozman); whether or not to […]

By Everette Hatcher III | Posted in Cato Institute, Mark Pryor, Milton Friedman | Edit | Comments (0)

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: