Open letter to President Obama (Part 298)

Obamanomics: A Legacy of Wasteful Spending

Published on Aug 12, 2012 by

This mini-documentary from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation highlights egregious examples of wasteful spending from the so-called stimulus legislation and explains why government spending hurts economic performance.

**Links to additional reading material**

Thomas Sowell, “Stimulus or Sedative?”…

Veronique de Rugy, “Green Energy Loans: Beyond the Solyndra Drama,”…

CF&P Economic Lessons Video, “Keynesian Economics is Wrong: Bigger Gov’t Is Not Stimulus,”…

Doug Bandow, “Federal Spending: Killing the Economy with Government Stimulus,”…

Dan Mitchell, “Spending Is Not Stimulus: Bigger Government Did Not Work for bush, and It Will Not Work for Obama,”

CF&P Economic Lessons Video, “Obamas So-Called Stimulus: Good For Government, Bad For the Economy,”…

Nicolas Loris, “Department of Energy Budget Cuts: Time to End the Hidden Green Stimulus,”…

Jim Powell, “How Obama’s Last Stimulus Bill Became a Comedy of Errors,”…



President Obama c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here.

I am afraid that you messed up when you bailed out the auto industry.

The Truth about the GM and Chrysler Bailouts

Posted by Randal O’Toole

Vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan has been accused of lying when he claimed that Obama broke a promise by letting a Wisconsin auto factory close, when in fact the factory closed before Obama took office. Although that isn’t precisely what Ryan said, there is some validity to the accusation that his statement was deceptive.

But numerous Obama supporters are playing just as loose with the facts when they say that, if Obama hadn’t rescued GM and Chrysler, far more factories would have closed permanently. That is simply untrue. While news agencies have fact-checked some of the things being said at the Democratic convention, I haven’t seen any challenges of this claim.

Both GM and Chrysler were headed for bankruptcy. If they had gone bankrupt under chapter 11, most of their factories would have stayed open and they would have continued making and selling cars. Bankruptcy would have allowed the companies to avoid interest and dividend payments for a time, and to renegotiate union contracts. Under bankruptcy laws, stockholders would have lost the value of their stocks, but bond owners–who have first claim to company assets and profits–would have been paid off, if not in whole than at least in part.

Instead of letting the companies declare bankruptcy, Obama decided to “bail them out” by taking them over. Once the administration had control of the companies, it had them file for bankruptcy, just as they would have done without the government takeover. Stockholders still lost everything, but so did Chrysler’s bond holders. Instead of renegotiating union contracts, the administration gave the unions greater say over the companies. In other words, the administration didn’t bail out the companies; it bailed out the unions at the expense of (in Chrysler’s case) the bondholders.

In doing so, the administration created uncertainty in the bond market. Bonds were supposed to be safer investments than stocks. But who would want to invest in long-term bonds if the government could step in at any time and void the legal rights of the bond owners? The result is that bond sellers must be willing to pay more interest to attract buyers.

In short, the Obama auto bailout probably didn’t save many jobs (though it probably did keep worker pay uncompetitively high). Instead, it is more likely that the Obama administration’s action prolonged the recession by discouraging private investment in American industry.


Thank you so much for your time. I know how valuable it is. I also appreciate the fine family that you have and your commitment as a father and a husband.


Everette Hatcher III, 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002, ph 501-920-5733,

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • David Lloyd-Jones  On April 15, 2013 at 10:26 am

    Stimulus spending is often wasteful, no doubt.

    One must remember what Keynes said, humorously but seriously, during the Depression, roughly and from memory, “If it makes sense to mine gold, then at a tme like this we ought to fight unemployment by having some men at work burying million pound notes, and other men at work digging them up.”

    In the present case the waste around the edges of TAP is no doubt genuine — but it is as nothing compared with two other kinds of waste: that caused by the semi-legal and altogether stupid false economics of the Bush era, which brought us to this sorry pass; and 2.) the daily, grinding waste of being unemployed, and particularly of being unemployed when there are unsafe dams, rusting bridges, and third rate schools in need of rebuilding.

    Active waste is visible, and a pity. The waste of inactivity is less visible — but more harmful by far.


    (Incidentally, Everette, for someone who proclaims a lack of interest in economics, you show an odd propensity for hunting down economic cranks and loons and republishing their ignorant yawp. -d.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: