Yearly Archives: 2012

Bobby Petrino’s actions and the fallout from them

Arkansas coach Bobby Petrino

Sometimes we lose perspective on what is really important and I thought I would share this below.

Will Davis Jr. is a Christian pastor and here are his thoughts:

The Sad Case of Bobby Petrino

11 Apr

Bobby Petrino, the three-year football coach of the Arkansas Razorbacks, has been relieved of his duties. The dismissal followed a series of events in which Petrino wrecked his motorcycle and failed to tell the university that he had a 25-year-old female rider at the time of the accident. The former UA athlete was recently hired by Petrino and he has since admitted to having an inappropriate relationship with her. The university announced its decision yesterday.

The situation is tragic on multiple levels.

First, the Petrino family must deal with the fallout of a public scandal and subsequent firing, not to mention the damage Petrino has done to his marriage.

Second, Petrino must face the issues within himself that would lead him, a 51-year-old, very well-known figure, to engage in such irresponsible behavior.

Third, the 25-year-old woman must deal with the reputation of being the “other woman.”

Fourth, the student athletes at UA have lost their leader and must now deal with the duplicity of their former coach, friend and role model.

Each of these situations is quite tragic and deserves our prayers. But there’s one more that, at least in my mind, defies understanding. It’s the pressure placed on the university leaders to not fire Petrino. The reason? He won games. He made Arkansas a contender in the SEC, the toughest football conference in America. He brought pride to the program. Ticket sales were up, recruiting was up, and early odds-makers have Arkansas making a run at the national championship in 2013.

And to many, you just can’t fire a guy like that, no matter what his indiscretions may be. Too much is at stake.

That’s the saddest part for me in this whole story: that serious discussions went on between UA officials and big-time donors, boosters and alumni because so many were lobbying to keep the man, even though his reputation is shot.

Football is just a game. Or at least it used to be.

Friends, integrity is everything. No matter how successful you are–in business, sports, the entertainment industry–if you lose the value of your name, if you lose your family, if you don’t take care of what God has given you to manage, then you really don’t have anything.

The UA officials made the right call, and the school will benefit from it.

_____________

Here is some more info about Will Davis:

About Will

Contact Information

Hi, My name is Will Davis Jr. I was born in Austin January 6, 1962 (you can do the math). I have been a serious follower of Christ since 1978 and have been in Christian ministry since 1980.

This is my lovely bride Susie.

I was married to Susie on June 1, 1985 (Susie was 6 at the time. It was an arranged marriage). Susie and I have three awesome kids—Will 3, Emily and Sara.

Here are Susie and the kids backstage at a Hillsong United event.

Besides my faith and family, I’m passionate about .

Related posts:

Bobby Petrino’s actions and the fallout from them April 19, 2012 – 6:31 am

 
 

Bobby Petrino’s phone records come out April 12, 2012 – 6:50 am

Jessica Dorrell and Bobby Petrino on ESPN together in 2011 April 12, 2012 – 6:38 am

 

How about a coach swap? :Charlie Strong to Arkansas and Bobby Petrino to Louisville April 11, 2012 – 7:37 am

 

Bobby Petrino statement April 11, 2012 – 6:51 am

 

Bobby Petrino fired, but now seeking forgiveness April 11, 2012 – 6:20 am

 

Video and transcript of Jeff Long’s press conference announcing firing of Bobby Petrino April 11, 2012 – 5:53 am

 

Bobby Petrino’s arrogance led to his downfall April 10, 2012 – 3:46 pm

 

 

Petrino 911 Call – Jessica Dorrell And Bobby Petrino Refuse Help April 9, 2012 – 7:03 am

 

Earlier concerns about Petrino’s character are coming back up again April 9, 2012 – 6:24 am

 

Bobby Petrino has achieved the American Dream, but still is looking for something more April 8, 2012 – 1:46 pm

Rex Nelson speculates that Petrino may be fired because “…trust has been so broken…” April 8, 2012 – 12:06 pm

Lying about Jessica Dorrell may get Bobby Petrino in a lot of trouble April 7, 2012 – 1:38 pm

Can Bobby Petrino, Tom Brady and Coldplay all find the satisfaction they are seeking? April 6, 2012 – 2:15 pm 

Bobby Petrino to survive this wreck? April 6, 2012 – 11:08 am

Pictures of Bobby Petrino April 6, 2012 – 9:11 am

Who is Jessica Dorrell? (with pictures) April 6, 2012 – 9:06 am

Major coverage of Bobby Petrino mistake April 6, 2012 – 6:51 am

What will be Jeff Long’s decision on Bobby Petrino? April 6, 2012 – 5:36 am

Bobby Petrino admits to an affair April 6, 2012 – 4:41 am

What impact will breaking trust with Bobby Petrino’s family have? April 6, 2012 – 4:24 am

Two choices now for Bobby Petrino: Follow the path of purity or impurity

If Bobby thinks he is bruised now, then he needs to read about the guy in Proverbs 7:10-27 and what happened to him. I really am hoping that Bobby Petrino can put his marriage back together. He has a clear choice between two paths. In the sermon at Fellowship Bible Church at July 24, 2011, […]

Jessica Dorrell was taking a long ride with Bobby Petrino April 5, 2012 – 4:52 pm

Bobby Petrino hurt in wreck (picture included) April 2, 2012 – 9:31 am

Adrian Rogers’ sermon on Clinton in 98 applies to Newt in 2012

It pays to remember history. Today I am going to go through some of it and give an outline and quotes from the great Southern Baptist leader Adrian Rogers (1931-2005). Max Brantley of the Arkansas Times started this morning off with some comedy: From pro golfer John Daly’s Twitter account following last night’s Republican debate, […]

Dr. Adrian Rogers – Steadfast Loyalty To Your Wife

Uploaded by on Jan 18, 2009

A Powerful comparison to Christ loving the church and the husband never walking out on the wife.

 

Pat Summitt resigns, pictures from her time as coach

I have always admired Pat Summitt’s coaching ability.

See larger University of Tennessee head coach Pat Summitt celebrates after the Lady Vols won the Women’s NCAA National Championship 67-44 against Louisiana Tech on March 29, 1987, in Austin, Texas. The victory earned the Lady Vols their first national championship. (New Sentinel Photo)

J.MIles Cary/News Sentinel

University of Tennessee head coach Pat Summitt celebrates after the Lady Vols won the Women’s NCAA National Championship 67-44 against Louisiana Tech on March 29, 1987, in Austin, Texas. The victory earned the Lady Vols their first national championship. (New Sentinel Photo)

 

Pat Summitt steps down

Court Adjourned: Pat Summitt steps down after illustrious career

By Dan Fleser

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

In stepping down as Tennessee women’s basketball coach, Pat Summitt’s new role as head coach emeritus at least helps soften the transition for her.

“I think it’s real safe landing place for her,” said former UT assistant Mickie DeMoss, who left the staff earlier this month to become an assistant with the WNBA’s Indiana Fever. “It’s a position where she still can stay involved but it lets her manage her time better. I think that’s something she probably needed to start doing.”

After a season of coaching while also battling early onset dementia, Alzheimer’s type, Summitt thought about her future and the program’s stability in reaching her decision. Former associate head coach Holly Warlick completed the historic transition on Wednesday by becoming the new coach — UT’s first since Summitt took over in 1974-75 and amassed 1,098 victories and eight national championships in the ensuing 38 years.

Pat Summitt stepped down as head coach of the Tennessee women's basketball program on Wednesday, becoming coach emeritus. Summitt, who joined the program in 1974 said, “I feel really good about my decision.”

Photo by Saul Young

Pat Summitt stepped down as head coach of the Tennessee women’s basketball program on Wednesday, becoming coach emeritus. Summitt, who joined the program in 1974 said, “I feel really good about my decision.”

_________

“I feel really good about my decision,” the 59-year-old Summitt told the News Sentinel in a phone interview. “Holly and I will work really well together.”

No contract information was available in conjunction with Wednesday’s announcement. Warlick’s annual salary was $204,000 while Summitt’s total compensation package for the 2011-12 season was $1.5 million. She had two years left on her contract that included a $1 million bonus if she completed 40 seasons with the Lady Vols.

Warlick was unavailable for comment. A press conference is scheduled for this afternoon at Thompson-Boling Arena in which Summitt and Warlick will appear together.

Coach Pat Summitt orates during during a celebration of Tennessee's NCAA national championship with President George Bush on April 20, 1989 at the White House.

Photo by Michael Patrick

Coach Pat Summitt orates during during a celebration of Tennessee’s NCAA national championship with President George Bush on April 20, 1989 at the White House.

______________

Tennessee athletic director Dave Hart lauded Summitt’s legacy as “well-defined and everlasting.”

“Just like there will never be another John Wooden, there will never be another Pat Summitt,” Hart said in a school release. “I look forward to continuing to work with her in her new role. She is an inspiration to everyone.”

After announcing her diagnosis last August, Summitt continued to coach with the blessing of university officials. In the wake of her announcement, Warlick assumed a bigger role, taking on many of the responsibilities normally reserved for the head coach.

Tennessee's coach Pat Summitt, left, reacts with her team as they pull ahead in the final minutes against Connecticut to win 68-67, in Hartford, Conn., Saturday, January, 8, 2005.

Photo by Steve Miller, Associated Press

Tennessee’s coach Pat Summitt, left, reacts with her team as they pull ahead in the final minutes against Connecticut to win 68-67, in Hartford, Conn., Saturday, January, 8, 2005.

______________

“I feel like Holly’s been doing the bulk of it,” Summitt said. “She deserves to be the head coach. I’m going to support her. No doubt, I’ll be there for her.”

Warlick will be making her head coaching debut after spending the past 27 seasons as a UT assistant, a tenure that began with the 1985-86 season. While acknowledging the difficulties of her revised role during the season, Warlick, a former Lady Vols point guard, seemed more comfortable in her role late in the season. If so, Summitt was a big reason why.

“She was very complimentary of me and so that to me means so much and to these kids because I’m doing something in front of the best coach in the world,” Warlick said before the NCAA tournament. “And I’m not trying to be Pat Summitt. I’m trying to take what she’s given me and carry on with this team.”

Tennessee coach Pat Summitt, left, shakes hand with Connecticut coach Geno Auriemma before an NCAA college basketball game in Knoxville, Tenn., on Jan. 7, 2006. Tennessee won, 89-80.

Photo by Wade Payne

Tennessee coach Pat Summitt, left, shakes hand with Connecticut coach Geno Auriemma before an NCAA college basketball game in Knoxville, Tenn., on Jan. 7, 2006. Tennessee won, 89-80.

_________________

Hart said that Warlick has earned her opportunity.

“I watched Holly grow tremendously as a coach throughout this past season,” he said. “Under unique circumstances, the job she did away from the glare of the lights and crowds was as impressive as the job she did during game action.”

Tennessee’s season ended with a 77-58 loss to eventual national champion Baylor in the final of the Des Moines (Iowa) Regional.

Since reaching 1,000 victories in 2009, Summitt has stood alone at that victory plateau among all NCAA coaches. Gene Bess, the men’s coach at Three Rivers Community College in Poplar Bluff, Mo., has 1,152 victories at the junior college level.

Tennessee head coach Pat Summitt raises her arm in celebration, after Tennessee defeated Stanford 64-48 for the NCAA National Championship at the St. Pete Time's Forum in Tampa, FL on April 8, 2008.

Photo by Saul Young

Tennessee head coach Pat Summitt raises her arm in celebration, after Tennessee defeated Stanford 64-48 for the NCAA National Championship at the St. Pete Time’s Forum in Tampa, FL on April 8, 2008.

_________________

Earlier this month, senior Glory Johnson became the 21st player coached by Summitt to be named an All-American. These players accounted for 36 total All-America honors under Summitt’s tutelage.

Summitt has two basketball courts named after her — one at Thompson-Boling Arena and the other at her alma mater, UT Martin. She also has a street named after her on both campuses.

Saul Young/News Sentinel

Tennessee women’s basketball coach Pat Summitt monitors practice at Thompson-Boling Arena on March 19, 2010, on the basketball court named after her.

University of Tennessee women's basketball coach Pat Summitt and her son, Tyler, discuss her medical condition during an interview Monday at their home in Blount County. Summitt, diagnosed with early-onset dementia after undergoing a series of tests at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., says  she is determined to continue coaching and is planning for her 38th season at UT.

Photo by Debby Jennings

University of Tennessee women’s basketball coach Pat Summitt and her son, Tyler, discuss her medical condition during an interview Monday at their home in Blount County. Summitt, diagnosed with early-onset dementia after undergoing a series of tests at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., says she is determined to continue coaching and is planning for her 38th season at UT.

Senator Mark Pryor running for re-election in 2014, Open letter to Pryor

Today while reading the Arkansas Times Blog I discovered that Senator Pryor was going to run for re-election. I was quite surprised that he was doing so because he knows how much his support of President Obama’s agenda has hurt him in the state (Jason Tolbert did a great post on that on 4-10-12).

I have been writing Senator Pryor every Monday and Thursday for almost a year now. Every Monday I email a letter to him with suggested spending cut ideas (which he requested) and then I post my suggestions on my blog. Every Thursday I write a “Thirsty Thursday” post where I argue in open letters to Senator Pryor that we must pass a Balanced Budget Amendment.

The fact of the matter is that I have probably written more about Senator Pryor than any other elected official (except the president) and my blog has flourished. My blog www.thedailyhatch.org has  had over 300,000 hits over the last 17 months of being online. I think it is because people know that this reckless spending must be stopped.

Perhaps Thomas Jefferson put it best:

“To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us down with perpetual debt.”

Today is Thursday and I continue with my “Thirsty Thursday” series below.

Dear Senator Pryor,

Why not pass the Balanced  Budget Amendment? As you know that federal deficit is at all time high (1.6 trillion deficit with revenues of 2.2 trillion and spending at 3.8 trillion).

On my blog www.HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth.com I took you at your word and sent you over 100 emails with specific spending cut ideas. However, I did not see any of them in the recent debt deal that Congress adopted. Now I am trying another approach. Every week from now on I will send you an email explaining different reasons why we need the Balanced Budget Amendment. It will appear on my blog on “Thirsty Thursday” because the government is always thirsty for more money to spend.

There’s nothing nutty about a balanced-budget amendment
In fact, it makes a lot of sense
Thursday, July 21, 2011
By Dick Thornburgh

A late entry in the budget deficit-debt ceiling talkathon in Washington is increasing support for a constitutional requirement that the federal budget be balanced each and every year.

Doctrinaire liberals will no doubt characterize this proposal as a nutty one, but careful scrutiny of such an amendment to our Constitution demonstrates its potential to prevent future train wrecks in the budgeting process.

Coupled with a presidential line-item veto and separate capital budgeting (which differentiates investments from current outlays), a constitutional budget-balancing requirement makes sense. These tools already are available to most governors and state legislatures. And they work.

The current debate in the Congress will likely include the following arguments usually raised against a balanced-budget amendment.

First, it will be argued that the amendment would “clutter up” our basic document in a way contrary to the intention of the founding fathers.

This is clearly wrong. The framers of the Constitution contemplated that amendments would be necessary to keep it abreast of the times. It already has been amended on 27 occasions.

Moreover, at the time of the Constitutional Convention, one of the major preoccupations was how to liquidate the Revolutionary War debts of the states. Certainly, it would have been unthinkable to the framers that the federal government itself would systematically run at a deficit, decade after decade. Indeed, the Treasury did not begin to follow such a practice until the mid-1930s.

Second, critics will argue that the adoption of a balanced-budget amendment would not solve the deficit problem overnight.

This is correct, but begs the issue. Serious supporters of the amendment recognize that a phasing-in period of five or 10 years would be required to reach a zero deficit. During this interim period, however, budget makers would be disciplined to meet declining deficit targets in order to reach a balanced budget by the established deadline.

As pointed out by former Commerce Secretary Peter G. Peterson, such “steady progress toward eliminating the deficit will maintain investor confidence, keep long-term interest rates headed down and keep our economy growing.”

Third, it will be argued that such an amendment would require vast cuts in social services and entitlements or defense expenditures.

Not necessarily. True, these programs would have to be paid for on a current basis rather than heaped on the backs of upcoming generations. Certainly, difficult choices would have to be made about priorities and levels of program funding. But the very purpose of the amendment is to discipline the executive and legislative branches actually to debate these choices and not to propose or perpetuate vast spending programs without providing the revenues to fund them.

The amendment would, in effect, make the president and Congress fully accountable for their spending and taxing decisions, as they should be.

Fourth, critics will say that a balanced-budget amendment would prevent or hinder our capacity to respond to national defense or economic emergencies.

This concern is easy to counter. Any sensible amendment proposal would feature a “safety valve” to exempt deficits incurred in response to such emergencies, requiring, for example, a three-fifths “super majority” in both houses of Congress. Such action should, of course, be based on a finding that such an emergency actually exists.

Fifth, it will be said that a balanced-budget amendment would be “more loophole than law” and might be easily circumvented.

The experience of the states suggests otherwise. Balanced-budget requirements are now in effect in all but one of the 50 states and have served them well.

Moreover, the line-item veto, available to 43 governors, would assure that any specific congressional overruns (or loophole end-runs) could be dealt with by the president. The public’s outcry, the elective process and the courts would also provide backup restraint on any tendency to simply ignore a constitutional directive.

In the final analysis, most of the excuses raised for not enacting a constitutional mandate to balance the budget rest on a stated or implied preference for solving our deficit dilemma through the “political process” — that is to say, through responsible action by the president and Congress.

But that has been tried and found wanting, again and again.

Surely, this country is ready for a simple, clear and supreme directive that its elected officials fulfill their fiscal responsibilities. A constitutional amendment is the only instrument that will meet this need effectively. Years of experience at the state level argue persuasively in favor of such a step. Years of debate have produced no persuasive arguments against it.

Perhaps Thomas Jefferson put it best:

“To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us down with perpetual debt.”

That is the aim of a balanced-budget amendment. Reform-minded members of Congress should choose to support such an amendment to our Constitution as a means of resolving future legislative crises and ending “credit card” government once and for all.

A nutty idea? Not by a long shot.

Dick Thornburgh, of counsel to the Pittsburgh law firm K&L Gates, is a former U.S. attorney general and governor of Pennsylvania.
First published on July 21, 2011 at 12:00 am

“People sitting on the couch waiting for their next government check”

Milton Friedman – The Welfare Establishment

Uploaded by on Apr 22, 2011

Professor Friedman looks at the dynamics of the welfare state.
http://www.LibertyPen.com

Source: Milton Friedman Speaks
Buy it: http://www.freetochoose.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=152

_______________

Are we heading to Greece? It seems that a lot of people in Greece just sit around and wait for their government check to come in.

Christie the Prophet

by Michael D. Tanner

Michael Tanner is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and author of Leviathan on the Right: How Big-Government Conservatism Brought Down the Republican Revolution.

Added to cato.org on April 18, 2012

This article appeared in National Review (Online) on April 18, 2012.

New Jersey governor Chris Christie recently warned that America is in danger of becoming a country of “people sitting on the couch waiting for their next government check.” Predictably, the Left was outraged, but Governor Christie wasn’t far off the mark.

During the 2011 debate over raising the debt ceiling, President Obama reminded Americans that the federal government sends out 70 million checks every month. That is probably an underestimate. According to the Washington Post, the president’s number included Social Security, veterans’ benefits, and spending on non-defense contractors and vendors, but not reimbursements to Medicare providers and vendors or electronic transfers to the 21 million households receiving food stamps. (Nor did he include most spending by the Defense Department, which has a payroll of 6.4 million active and retired employees and, on average, cuts checks for nearly 1 million invoices and 660,000 travel-expense claims per month.) The actual number might be closer to 200 million checks every month.

Of course it would be unfair to lump everyone who receives a check from the government in with the people Governor Christie was talking about (though it does say something about the size of government) but, nonetheless, we are becoming a society that relies on government to care for us.

[T]oday, every problem in society prompts calls for government action, response, or funding.

In 1965, just 22 percent of all federal spending was transfer payments. Today it has doubled to 44 percent. That means that nearly half of all federal spending is simply government taking money from one person and giving it to another.

Or look at it another way: In 1965, transfer payments from the federal government made up less than 10 percent of wages and salaries. As recently as 2000, that percentage was just 21 percent. Today, transfer payments are more than a third of salary and wages. Worse, if one includes salaries from government employment, more than half of Americans receive a substantial portion of their income from the government.

Conservatives often criticize transfer payments to the poor, and for good reason. At the federal and state levels combined, we spend nearly $1 trillion per year on anti-poverty or means-tested programs that do more to promote a permanent underclass than to eliminate poverty. But the modern welfare state is much more than programs for the poor. It includes middle-class welfare, such as Social Security and Medicare, which are the real drivers of our future national insolvency. We think of Medicaid as health care for the poor, but as much as two-thirds of Medicaid spending goes to pay for long-term care such as nursing homes for the elderly, much of it for middle-class people sheltering assets. And the modern welfare state also includes corporate welfare, the military-industrial complex, and others living off the taxpayer’s dime. The Export-Import Bank is as much welfare as TANF.

This is the road we are now on. The welfare state started with small programs targeted toward a small number of genuinely needy people. But as politicians figured out the electoral benefits of expanding programs and people realized they could let others work on their behalf, those programs grew until the point at which, today, every problem in society prompts calls for government action, response, or funding.

At the same time, as Governor Christie also noted, this implicitly tells people, “stop dreaming, stop striving.” We demonize those who do succeed, damning them as part of the evil “1 percent.”

This is the real danger of the welfare state. It’s not that it will bankrupt us — though it will. It is that it slowly and insidiously destroys our national character, saps our will to be great, and makes us content with the way things are rather than how they could be. We have seen where this road ends. As Governor Christie warns, it “will not just bankrupt us financially, it will bankrupt us morally.”

Biblical exegesis tells us that the Israelites needed to wander for 40 years in the desert after being released from bondage in Egypt because they couldn’t begin to build a new nation until a new generation grew up that hadn’t been raised in bondage. Those raised in slavery were not trained to think for themselves; they had become dependent on their masters to provide for them. Indeed, when they encountered hardships, many cried for a return to bondage.

Just look to Europe today. The welfare states of Europe are imploding, collapsing under the weight of promises that can no longer be met. Their citizens riot in the streets at the prospect that their government benefits might be reduced.

If anyone wants to know what this next election is really about, Governor Christie just told us.

Is a lack of money the problem for our public schools?

Is a lack of money the problem for our public schools?

Everything You Need to Know About Public School Spending in Less Than 2½ Minutes

Posted by Adam Schaeffer

Neal McCluskey gutted the President’s new “Save the Teachers” American Jobs Act sales pitch a good while back, as did Andrew Coulson here. Thankfully, it seems a lot of senators agree it’s a bad idea.

Last week, a $35 Billion piece of the president’s new “stimulus” plan, which included $30 Billion to bail out government schools—againwent down in the Senate:

Our public education problem is huge; we’re spending far too much and getting way too little. But most people don’t know the basic details. They still think we need to spend more on education.

So, for all of you who want to get the details but don’t have much time, or have family and friends who need to be introduced to reality, I present to you . . . Everything you need to know about public school spending in less than 2½ minutes.

Watch it, “like” it, post it on Facebook, email it around, comment, and generally get the word out . . . because we really do need to get the word out.

Public School Spending in Less than 2½ Minutes

Uploaded by on Oct 21, 2011

Everything you need to know about public school spending in less than 2½ minutes.

______________________

Adam Schaeffer • October 25, 2011 @ 10:54 am
Filed under: Education and Child Policy; Government and Politics; Tax and Budget Policy
Tags: , ,

Dick Clark video clips from the past

Dick Clark passed away today and I wanted to remember him.

 

American Bandstand 30 Year Special – 1982 (5/11)

Uploaded by on Aug 8, 2011

When ABC picked up the game show Do You Trust Your Wife? from CBS in November 1957, they re-named the program as Who Do You Trust? and scheduled the program at 3:30PM ET—almost in the middle of Bandstand. Instead of shortening or moving Bandstand, ABC opted to just begin Bandstand at 3PM, cut away to Who Do You Trust? at 3:30PM, then rejoin Bandstand at 4PM. In Philadelphia, however, WFIL-TV opted to tape-delay the game show for later broadcast in another time slot, and to continue on with Bandstand, though only for the local audience.

A half-hour evening version of American Bandstand aired on Monday nights from 7:30 p.m.–8:00 p.m. (ET), beginning on October 7, 1957. It preceded The Guy Mitchell Show. Both were ratings disasters. Dick Clark later stated that he knew the prime-time edition would fail because its core audience—teenagers and housewives—was occupied with other interests in the evenings. The Monday-night version aired its last program in December 1957, but ABC gave Clark a Saturday-night time slot for The Dick Clark Saturday Night Beech-Nut Show, which originated from the Little Theatre in Manhattan, beginning on February 15, 1958.

The program was broadcast live, weekday afternoons. In the fall of 1961, ABC-TV truncated American Bandstand’s airtime from 90 to 60 minutes (4:005:00pm ET), then even further as a daily half-hour (4:004:30pm ET) program in September 1962; beginning in early 1963, all five shows for the upcoming week were videotaped the preceding Saturday. The use of videotape allowed Clark to tour with the singers and to pursue other broadcast interests. On September 7, 1963, the program was moved from its weekday slots and began airing weekly every Saturday afternoon until 1989.

(extract from Wikipedia 2011)

Related posts:

“Music Monday” Countdown of Coldplay’s best albums (part 1)

I like this CD a lot mainly because of it rhythm and how it is the most relaxing of Coldplay’s albums. “YELLOW” “SHIVER” “DON’T PANIC” “TROUBLE” “SPARKS” are all great songs. I would have to say that Parachutes was a good song but it was too short. Altogether I would give this album a 9/10! However, this […]

 

Amy Winehouse:Can someone die from drinking too much at one time?

A curve ball in the Amy Winehouse case.   Troubled Brit singer Amy Winehouse was found dead at her London home in July. / AP FILE PHOTO Written by JILL LAWLESS, | Associated Press FILED UNDER Entertainment LONDON — The coroner who oversaw the inquest into the death of singer Amy Winehouse has resigned after her […]

Whitney Houston dead at 48, long history of drugs and alcohol

Sad news about Whitney Houston’s death tonight. I have included some earlier posts about drugs and alcohol and rock stars. LOS ANGELES (AP) — Whitney Houston, who ruled as pop music’s queen until her majestic voice and regal image were ravaged by drug use, erratic behavior and a tumultuous marriage to singer Bobby Brown, has […]

27 club (Complete list)

It was so sad to lose these people so soon. The Curse of 27 This page is in response to my most frequently asked questions – is there really a Curse of 27, how many musicians actually died at that age, and who are they. When legendary Blues man, Robert Johnson, was killed at the age […]

Pete de Freitas of Echo and the Bunnymen is a member of the “27 club” (Part 9)

Amy Winehouse died last week and she joined the “27 club.” Pete de Freitas of Echo and the Bunnymen is also a member of the “27 Club.” This is group of rockers that have died at age 27. A tribute to the amazing drummer of one of our biggest influences, Echo & The Bunnymen. We […]

Ron “Pigpen” McKernan of the Grateful Dead is a member of “27 Club” because of alcohol (Part 8)

cc ‘Janis Joplin’ 2/5 from True Hollywood Story (Janis was having affair with Pigpen) Jerry Garcia (guitar, vocals), Ron “Pigpen” McKernan (vocals, harmonica), Bob Weir (guitar, vocals), Phil Lesh (bass), Mickey Hart (drums), Bill Kreutzman (drums). Grateful Dead “Don’t Ease Me In” Live @ Canadian National Exhibition Hall Toronto, CA June 27th, 1970 Grateful Dead […]

Gary Thain of Uriah Heep is a member of the “27 Club” (Part 7)

Amy Winehouse died last week and joined the “27 club” which is a group of rockers that died at age 27. Gary Thain also joined that same group long ago and I wanted to look at his life today. Uriah Heep – Wizard bb By Sean Nelson, Special to MSN Music , July 23, 2011 […]

Janis Joplin joins “27 Club” three weeks after Jimi Hendrix (Part 6)

Recently Amy Winehouse joined the “27 Club” when she died of a drug overdose. The “27 Club” is a group of rockers that died at age 27. Unfortunately Jimi Hendrix died at age 27 in 1970 and Janis Joplin did the same three weeks later. Today we are going to look at her life and […]

Jimi Hendrix one of first members of the “27 club” (Part 5)

JIMI HENDRIX : FINAL INTERVIEW . The other day when Amy Winehouse died she joined the “27 Club” which includes other famous rockers who died at age 27. Most of them died because of drugs. Unfortunately Jimi Hendrix joined the club for the same reason. Something special for all music and Beat Club-Lovers on YouTube: […]

Pete Ham of Bad Finger (Part 4 of series on “27 Club”)

Amy Winehouse died at age 27 and unfornately joined the “27 club” which is made of famous rockers that died at age 27. Pete Ham was a member of Bad Finger which was one of my favorite groups that I followed. “Come and get it” was my favorite song of theirs. ___________________________________ Badfinger perform a […]

Brian Jones’ futile search for satisfaction (Part 3 of series on 27 Club)

Brian’s Blues, Brian Jones on guitar in the early stones years. unreleased track Brian Jones died at age 27 just like Amy Winehouse did. I remember like yesterday when I first heard the song “I can’t get no satisfaction” by the Rolling Stones. I immediately thought about Solomon’s search for satisfaction in the Book of […]

Kurt Cobain’s spiritual search started in a Christian home but ended in Buddhism (Club 27 series part 2)jh41

The Rise And Rise Of Kurt Cobain part 1/3 Amy Winehouse joined the “Club 27 the other day with her early death. I am going through the others one by one. Today is Kurt Cobain.   7. Kurt Cobain very rarely does an artist come along and not just upset the “apple cart” but drops […]

Jim Morrison spiritual search comes up empty (Part 1 of series on “27 Club”)

Jim Morrison – Feast Of Friends – (The Doors Documentary) (1969) (Paul Ferrara) 1/4 I was saddened by the recent death of Amy Winehouse and her inclusion into the “27 Club.” This series I am starting today looks at the search that each one of these entertainers were on during their lives. Today I look […]

Jeff Long has integrity

Bobby Petrino and Jessica Dorrell

Bobby Petrino and Jessica Dorrell

The Arkansas Times Blog reported that the Arkansas Football Program got a large gift today from some people who appreciated Jeff Long’s Integrity. Here is an blog post from Shannon Blosser of Kentucky concerning integrity.

Integrity is More Important than Sports Victories

Posted: April 11, 2012 in Christian Leadership, Christianity, Devotion, Encouragement, Faith, Life, Sports
Tags: , , , ,

Jeff Long was in a no-win situation.

Placed in a difficult place by Bobby Petrino’s personal life (an affair) that had begun to impact his duties as Arkansas’ football coach (hiring his mistress for an administrative position with the football team), Long had two choices: Fire Petrino for cause and upset a fan base that expected the team to be ranked in the preseason top 10 or ignore the situation and allow Petrino to do damage to the school’s public image while, likely, placating fans and supporters.

Long should be applauded for doing the right thing. When many expected that Petrino would not be held to any moral standards as a football coach, Long said otherwise. By doing so, Long set a precedent that, hopefully, many schools will follow.

That is integrity is more important any amount of athletic accomplishments.

Integrity and Petrino are not words that often go together. Throughout his successful football career, Petrino has burnt bridges and acted as though he believed he was above reproach. This could be seen during his time in Louisville where Petrino was always looking for a better job. It was on display when Petrino left the Atlanta Falcons midway through a disastrous 2007 in order to take the Arkansas job.

It was certainly on display when Petrino entered into a relationship with a 25-year-old, paid her $20,000, and then, essentially, helped her to get an administrative job with the football team. This is manipulative behavior. It also behavior that will have an impact on his relationship with his wife, his children, and others in his life. It also will likely impact his future employment possibilities. By focusing only on himself and his own desires, Petrino caused a pathway of damage that will take months and years to repair.

Petrino is a broken man. He is someone who needs help and, if he would seek it, counseling.

We should applaud Long for his decision to fire Petrino. Many would suspect, and rightfully so, that Long would protect his successful coach. Petrino had built a program that was to be ranked in the top 10 and a contender for BCS births. Some would suspect that an athletics director would separate on-field performance from personal indiscretions.

However, Long chose the more difficult path. In making his decisions, Long said that leaders should be held to a higher standard. Whether Petrino recognizes it or not, but as a coach of college athletes his actions off the field are as important as his guidance on the field. Leadership is more often about our actions than our words and, it appears, Petrino lost sight of that as a college coach.

Long is not the first to fire a coach for personal indiscretions. Pittsburgh fired Michael Haywood, before ever coaching a game, in December 2010 after his was arrested in a domestic violence incident. But, Long’s decision is the first in recent memory of a coach of a top 25 team being fired for a moral failing and not as a result of a NCAA investigation. What Long and Arkansas showed is that integrity is an important aspect of leadership. No amount of sports victories can replace the lack of integrity in a leadership position.

In a generation of athletics where scandals seem to happen more than an athletic contest, let us hope that this is a decision that will inspire others. For coaches, let it be a moment to reflect on their personal lives and a reminder that they are called to be leaders by both their words and actions. As well, may it be a moment of strength for athletics directors to maintain a level of integrity in the world of professional college athletics.

In this undated image released by the University of Arkansas, Razorback Foundation assistant director Jessica Dorrell is shown. Dorrell was a passenger of Arkansas football coach Bobby Petrino during a weekend motorcycle ride that ended with a crash that sent him to the hospital, according to a police report released Thursday, April 5, 2012. (AP Photo/University of Arkansas, Wesley Hitt)

________-

Related posts:

Jeff Long has integrity April 18, 2012 – 6:42 am

 

Bobby Petrino’s phone records come out April 12, 2012 – 6:50 am

Jessica Dorrell and Bobby Petrino on ESPN together in 2011 April 12, 2012 – 6:38 am

 

How about a coach swap? :Charlie Strong to Arkansas and Bobby Petrino to Louisville April 11, 2012 – 7:37 am

 

Bobby Petrino statement April 11, 2012 – 6:51 am

 

Bobby Petrino fired, but now seeking forgiveness April 11, 2012 – 6:20 am

 

Video and transcript of Jeff Long’s press conference announcing firing of Bobby Petrino April 11, 2012 – 5:53 am

 

Bobby Petrino’s arrogance led to his downfall April 10, 2012 – 3:46 pm

 

 

Petrino 911 Call – Jessica Dorrell And Bobby Petrino Refuse Help April 9, 2012 – 7:03 am

 

Earlier concerns about Petrino’s character are coming back up again April 9, 2012 – 6:24 am

 

Bobby Petrino has achieved the American Dream, but still is looking for something more April 8, 2012 – 1:46 pm

Rex Nelson speculates that Petrino may be fired because “…trust has been so broken…” April 8, 2012 – 12:06 pm

Lying about Jessica Dorrell may get Bobby Petrino in a lot of trouble April 7, 2012 – 1:38 pm

Can Bobby Petrino, Tom Brady and Coldplay all find the satisfaction they are seeking? April 6, 2012 – 2:15 pm 

Bobby Petrino to survive this wreck? April 6, 2012 – 11:08 am

Pictures of Bobby Petrino April 6, 2012 – 9:11 am

Who is Jessica Dorrell? (with pictures) April 6, 2012 – 9:06 am

Major coverage of Bobby Petrino mistake April 6, 2012 – 6:51 am

What will be Jeff Long’s decision on Bobby Petrino? April 6, 2012 – 5:36 am

Bobby Petrino admits to an affair April 6, 2012 – 4:41 am

What impact will breaking trust with Bobby Petrino’s family have? April 6, 2012 – 4:24 am

Two choices now for Bobby Petrino: Follow the path of purity or impurity

If Bobby thinks he is bruised now, then he needs to read about the guy in Proverbs 7:10-27 and what happened to him. I really am hoping that Bobby Petrino can put his marriage back together. He has a clear choice between two paths. In the sermon at Fellowship Bible Church at July 24, 2011, […]

Jessica Dorrell was taking a long ride with Bobby Petrino April 5, 2012 – 4:52 pm

Bobby Petrino hurt in wreck (picture included) April 2, 2012 – 9:31 am

Adrian Rogers’ sermon on Clinton in 98 applies to Newt in 2012

It pays to remember history. Today I am going to go through some of it and give an outline and quotes from the great Southern Baptist leader Adrian Rogers (1931-2005). Max Brantley of the Arkansas Times started this morning off with some comedy: From pro golfer John Daly’s Twitter account following last night’s Republican debate, […]

Dr. Adrian Rogers – Steadfast Loyalty To Your Wife

Uploaded by on Jan 18, 2009

A Powerful comparison to Christ loving the church and the husband never walking out on the wife.

 

Who is this Fred W. Smith? (Not the Fed Ex Guy)

I read today on Arkansas Sports 360 about the $250,000.00 contribution to the Razorback building fund from Fred W. Smith and I wondered if it was the Fed Ex guy and the answer is no. Here is a profile of him from the Las Vegas  Review Journal:

FRED W. SMITH
(1934- )

Firm Foundation

As a young newspaper advertising executive, he took a gamble on a place called Las Vegas and a man named Don Reynolds, and helped that man build a media empire.

BY ED VOGEL
Review-Journal


Fred Smith looks back at his years with the Donrey Media Group and his future with the Donrey Foundation at his home in Incline Village.
(Cathleen Allison/Review-Journal)


Fred Smith, center, and media king Don Reynolds, at right in a pressman’s paper hat, tour the Review-Journal’s new pressroom about 1985 with John Pellegren, left, an architect involved with the building’s construction.
(Review-Journal files)

     INCLINE VILLAGE — As a 27-year-old newspaper advertising executive in Fort Smith, Ark., Fred W. Smith was not sure what to do when he received a call asking him to become general manager of the Review-Journal.
      Las Vegas in that year of 1961 was not the most glittering place in the world. It was Sin City in the eyes of many people from America’s Bible Belt.
      What Smith really wanted was the managership of the much bigger Southwest Times-Record in his hometown of Fort Smith. And he was thinking about tying the knot with a local girl. They’d even bought a lot for home.
      Las Vegas was a longshot, but Smith took the gamble.
      “It certainly was different than Arkansas,” says Smith about his journey into the netherworld of Las Vegas. “I don’t know if I looked at it as Sin City. But I knew if I didn’t take the job, then I wouldn’t get another opportunity.”
      Now 65, Smith figures he made the right decision. Largely because of Smith’s business acumen, the Donrey Media Group became a billion-dollar enterprise with 52 daily newspapers and five cable companies at its peak in the late 1980s, along with television and radio stations and outdoor advertising companies.
      After his arrival in Las Vegas, Smith did not remain general manager for long. By 1966, he was vice president of Donrey’s western operations. Then in 1973, he became executive vice president and chief operating officer. In 1987 he was appointed president of the company and then in 1990 he became chairman.
      The Review-Journal remains the largest newspaper in that chain. Smith’s work made his boss, Donald W. Reynolds, the richest man in Nevada before his death in 1993.
      And to the day Reynolds died, Smith called him “Mister,” rather than by his first name.
      “It was all I ever called him,” Smith said. “It wasn’t anything he demanded. It was just a respect thing. Don Reynolds was an awesome person. He came up from nothing. He had built a very strong base and because of timing I happened to be there when the growth took place.”
      That Reynolds found a Nevada niche also was a matter of luck. Oklahoma-reared, Reynolds owned a couple of newspapers in his home state and Arkansas when he made a trip to Pasadena, Calif., and the Rose Bowl game on New Year’s Day 1949.
      While on his football excursion, he intended to look for a paper or two in California. Reynolds secured a complimentary ticket to the game from The Associated Press and happened to take a seat next to Al Cahlan, editor of the Review-Journal. Cahlan also was an AP guest at the game.
      “They got to talking,” Smith said. “Al Cahlan said, ‘Have you considered Nevada?'”
      Within a few months, Reynolds bought controlling interest in the Review-Journal, circulation 7,000, from the Frank Garside family. He bought out the remaining partner, Cahlan, in 1960.
      That was the start of Reynolds’ Silver State empire that eventually consisted of four newspapers, two television stations, two outdoor advertising companies and several radio stations.
      Today Smith and wife, Mary, look out at the smoky skies over Lake Tahoe from their summer home along Incline Village’s exclusive Lakeshore Boulevard. A series of late summer wildland fires across the West have turned the normal crystal clear skies into a color that looks like Los Angeles smog.
      But there is a putting green in the yard for Smith to tinker at golf and a boat down at the dock.
      Their primary home remains in Las Vegas, where two of their three children live. The other child is their Incline Village neighbor. Fort Smith is a place they sometimes visit.
      He retired from Donrey completely three years ago. Arkansas businessman Jackson Stephens, a Smith friend, bought Donrey after Reynolds’ death.
      And $804 million of the purchase price went into the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation. The foundation is fully separate and not in any part related to the Donrey Media Group and the Review-Journal. Smith chairs the foundation board. He has the pleasant job of spending the money Reynolds accumulated. The worthy causes include the likes of $5 million for Shade Tree, a shelter for homeless women and children in Las Vegas, and $9.7 million for the Children’s Center, a facility for brain-damaged children in Bethany, Okla.
      “I went back there for the dedication,” he said. “You come away feeling you did something good.”
      With a twinkle in his eye, he points out the foundation has a tough task in future years. The foundation has $1.3 billion in assets. Based on current fund growth rates, Smith expects the directors will have to give away $100 million a year for the next 45 years before the foundation is drained.
      In the last four years, the foundation has doled out $193 million in grants, much of it in Nevada.
      Its money built the journalism school at the University of Nevada, Reno and is building facilities at Great Basin College in Elko. A $10.4 million grant to Catholic Charities of Southern Nevada will construct a center for homeless programs in downtown Las Vegas.
      “I spent 45 years of my life making money, and now in this point I’m giving it away,” he said. “I hope I can direct giving it away intelligently. Frankly, it is easier making money than giving it away intelligently. We could give the whole billion dollars away today.”
      In his foundation post, Smith may achieve his greatest individual recognition.
      “Fred Smith speaks with his pocketbook, not with his mouth,” former Gov. Bob Miller said.
      Miller went to Smith and the foundation two years ago for $1.5 million when he needed to finish work on a renovation at the Governor’s Mansion in Carson City.
      Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., also praises Smith for his good work. Reid disliked Reynolds intensely, but he has only admiration for Smith.
      “Fred has always been a gentleman,” Reid said. “He reached out to make the Don Reynolds empire Nevada-based. The operation was always well-run because of Fred.”
      Joe Crowley, president of the University of Nevada, Reno, has similar words of praise for Smith.
      “We have benefited from his stature in the organization and his appreciation for his adopted state,” he said. “I have always felt that Fred played a significant part in the generous assistance we have received from the Reynolds Foundation.”
      The foundation made a $4 million grant for an addition to the National Judicial College on the UNR campus. Crowley said the addition will include a model courtroom where judges and journalists can get together and learn to understand each other’s positions.
      In all his years of building a media empire, Smith insists he never wanted the limelight.
      “I had no interest in it,” he said. “In Las Vegas, we wanted the Review-Journal to be the entity. Unlike at the Sun where Hank Greenspun was the entity. I don’t mean to criticize him, but he was bigger than the Sun. It wasn’t my job to promote myself.”
      Despite the often humorous battles between the Sun and the Review-Journal that delight local readers to this day, Smith contends he had a somewhat friendly relationship with Greenspun.
      “I knew how well we were doing and I had a pretty good idea of how badly he was doing,” he said. “We talked. People weren’t aware of our relationship.”
      Consequently in 1989, Smith and current Sun editor Brian Greenspun hammered out the joint operating agreement between the newspapers. Advertising, circulation and printing functions of the two newspapers since then have been joint operations, while editorial functions remain separate.
      “Hank was aware the deal was made before he died,” Smith said. “Of course, it saved the Sun. We called him. He had been wanting to do it for 25 years.”
      Despite their control of much of the Nevada media, Smith insists he and Reynolds exerted no editorial control over their newspapers. The exception was 1964 when Reynolds decreed his chain endorse Lyndon B. Johnson, a personal friend, for president.
      “We believed in local control,” Smith said. “The editorial decisions in the Southwest Times-Record in Fort Smith, Arkansas, the newspaper in Minot, North Dakota, were made by people on the local scene. When Wallace ran, some of our papers endorsed him, some of our other papers supported Nixon. There was never any edict for a blanket endorsement except for Johnson.”
      In the case of the powerful Las Vegas Review-Journal, however, Smith was one of the locals who controlled its political stances and endorsements. “Because of my association with the Review-Journal and the fact I lived in Las Vegas I had more input than Bill Wright or Sherman Frederick (former publisher and current publisher of the Review-Journal) wished I would have, but I simply had no control. They didn’t always accept my views.”
      He readily admits it has been uncomfortable for him to work with politicians.
      “There is an adversarial relationship between politicians and journalists,” he said. “We walk a tight rope.”
      But he called on Reid about 10 years ago for his help in killing a bill that could have taken away the company’s 12,000 billboards without compensation.
      “It was uncomfortable for me,” he said. “I have a lot of personal respect for Harry Reid, but the newspaper hasn’t always supported him.”
      Reid remembers that time with a laugh.
      “I became king of the billboards,” he recalled. “I became the lead guy and we beat them. They were just going to strip billboards from highways and the people who owned them would get nothing.”
      Rather than influencing the politics of the state, Smith said he always campaigned for growth.
      “Growth has been positive,” he said. “It has allowed people like you and me to work. It is good for the community. It is good for our business.”
      And it has been good for him personally. Smith remembers about two months after he became the general manager of the Review-Journal he received a call from Fort Smith. It seems the newspaper’s general manager had resigned.”
      “I was furious at him,” Smith said. “I asked him, ‘Why didn’t you tell me? I wanted the job.’ But he said, ‘Fred, 10 years from now you will look back and thank me.'”
      “Of course, he was 100 percent right,” Smith said. “Fort Smith continues to be a nice town, but nothing is as exciting as Nevada has been.”

Francis Schaeffer’s film series “How should we then live?” (The Scientific Age) can be seen on the www.thedailyhatch.org

Photo: of Francis and Edith Schaeffer.

Edith and Francis Schaeffer

This is one of the most insightful episodes and here is a portion of it with links to complete episodes below:

E P I S O D E 6

How Should We Then Live 6#1

I am sharing with you a film series that I saw in 1979. In this film Francis Schaeffer asserted that was a shift in Modern Science. A. Change in conviction from earlier modern scientists.B. From an open to a closed natural system: elimination of belief in a Creator.1. Closed system derives not from the findings of science but from philosophy.2. Now there is no place for the significance of Man, for morals, or for love.C. Darwin taught that all life evolved through the survival of the fittest.1. Serious problems inherent in Darwinism and Neo-Darwinism.

This is probably one of the most important episodes in the series.

T h e

SCIENTIFIC AGE

I. Church Attacks on Copernican Science Were Philosophical

Galileo’s and Copernicus’ works did not contradict the Bible but the elements of Aristotle’s teaching which had entered the Church.

II. Examples of Biblical Influence

A. Pascal’s work.

1. First successful barometer; great writing of French prose.

2. Understood Man’s uniqueness: Man could contemplate, and Man had value to God.

B. Newton

1. Speed of sound and gravity.

2. For Newton and the other early scientists, no problem concerning the why, because they began with the existence of a personal God who had created the universe.

C. Francis Bacon

1. Stressed careful observation and systematic collection of information.

2. Bacon and the other early scientists took the Bible seriously, including its teaching concerning history and the cosmos.

D. Faraday

1. Crowning discovery was the induction of the electric current.

2. As a Christian, believed God’s Creation is for all men to understand and enjoy, not just for a scientific elite.

III. Scientific Aspects of Biblical Influence

A. Oppenheimer and Whitehead: biblical foundations of scientific revolution.

B. Not all early scientists individually Christian, but all lived within Christian thought forms. This gave a base for science to continue and develop.

C. The contrast between Christian-based science and Chinese and Arab science.

D. Christian emphasis on an ordered Creation reflects nature of reality and is therefore acted upon in all cultures, regardless of what they say their world view is.

1. Einstein’s theory of relativity does not imply relative universe.

2. Man acts on assumption of order, whether he likes it or not.

3. Master idea of biblical science.

a) Uniformity of natural causes in an open system: cause and effect works, but God and Man not trapped in a process.

b) All that exists is not a total cosmic machine.

c) Human choices therefore have meaning and effect.

d) The cosmic machine and the machines people make therefore not a threat.

Other segments:

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 10 “Final Choices” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 1 0 How Should We Then Live 10#1 FINAL CHOICES I. Authoritarianism the Only Humanistic Social Option One man or an elite giving authoritative arbitrary absolutes. A. Society is sole absolute in absence of other absolutes. B. But society has to be led by an elite: John Kenneth […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 9 “The Age of Personal Peace and Affluence” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 9 How Should We Then Live 9#1 T h e Age of Personal Peace and Afflunce I. By the Early 1960s People Were Bombarded From Every Side by Modern Man’s Humanistic Thought II. Modern Form of Humanistic Thought Leads to Pessimism Regarding a Meaning for Life and for Fixed […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 8 “The Age of Fragmentation” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 8 How Should We Then Live 8#1 I saw this film series in 1979 and it had a major impact on me. T h e Age of FRAGMENTATION I. Art As a Vehicle Of Modern Thought A. Impressionism (Monet, Renoir, Pissarro, Sisley, Degas) and Post-Impressionism (Cézanne, Van Gogh, Gauguin, […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 7 “The Age of Non-Reason” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 7 How Should We Then Live 7#1 I am thrilled to get this film series with you. I saw it first in 1979 and it had such a big impact on me. Today’s episode is where we see modern humanist man act on his belief that we live […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 6 “The Scientific Age” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 6 How Should We Then Live 6#1 I am sharing with you a film series that I saw in 1979. In this film Francis Schaeffer asserted that was a shift in Modern Science. A. Change in conviction from earlier modern scientists.B. From an open to a closed natural system: […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 5 “The Revolutionary Age” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 5 How Should We Then Live 5-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Francis Schaeffer noted, “Reformation Did Not Bring Perfection. But gradually on basis of biblical teaching there was a unique improvement. A. […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 4 “The Reformation” (Schaeffer Sundays)

How Should We Then Live 4-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Schaeffer makes three key points concerning the Reformation: “1. Erasmian Christian humanism rejected by Farel. 2. Bible gives needed answers not only as to how to be right with […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 3 “The Renaissance”

How Should We Then Live 3-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Schaeffer really shows why we have so many problems today with this excellent episode. He noted, “Could have gone either way—with emphasis on real people living in […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 2 “The Middle Ages” (Schaeffer Sundays)

How Should We Then Live 2-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Schaeffer points out that during this time period unfortunately we have the “Church’s deviation from early church’s teaching in regard to authority and the approach to God.” […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 1 “The Roman Age” (Schaeffer Sundays)

How Should We Then Live 1-1 Today I am starting a series that really had a big impact on my life back in the 1970′s when I first saw it. There are ten parts and today is the first. Francis Schaeffer takes a look at Rome and why it fell. It fell because of inward […]

An open letter to President Obama (Part 61)

Rep. James Lankford Responds to President Obama’s $3.8 Trillion Budget

Uploaded by  on Feb 13, 2012

Rep. James Lankford (R-OK) responded to President Obama’s FY 2013 budget proposal that fails to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term as promised. The budget also delayed the tough decisions to cut spending and reform entitlements that are needed to avoid a debt crisis.

_______________________

President Obama c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here.

I really am offended when I hear that you claim that your budget cuts 4 trillion in the next 10 years but it really adds to the deficit many trillions of dollars. What kind of funny math is that? Take a look at this article below:

Feb 13 2012

Boozman Comments on President Obama’s Budget Proposal

WASHINGTON D.C. – U.S. Senator John Boozman (R-AR) issued the following statement on the release of President Obama’s budget proposal:

“America deserves better than a collection of tax hikes, phony savings and additional debt.  The President’s budget proposal is bad for seniors as it takes no steps to protect and strengthen Medicare and Social Security, will hurt chances of an economic recovery through tax hikes and will add $11 trillion more to our already staggering national debt in a 10-year period.”

“This is clearly an election year proposal.  Rather than a serious attempt to outline a direction for our economic future, the President is trying to be all for everyone with this plan.  Just as the President’s previous proposals have been voted down, I would not expect this one to pass should it come up for a vote in the Senate.”

“This budget proposal from the White House is stark reminder that we need to pass the Honest Budget Act that I have cosponsored.  The President’s budget is loaded with gimmicks and accounting tricks that our bill would put an end to so that the American people would have an opportunity to weigh in on a real budget that would get our fiscal house in order.”

“When it comes to our country’s budget, Americans have a right to expect accountability, honesty and responsibility.  This proposal has none of those.”

Thank you so much for your time. I know how valuable it is. I also appreciate the fine family that you have and your committment as a father and a husband.Sincerely,Everette Hatcher III, 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002, ph 501-920-5733, lowcostsqueegees@yahoo.com