Yearly Archives: 2012

Pro-life posts can be seen on the www.thedailyhatch.org

Uploaded by on Jan 29, 2011

The Miracle of Life by Valley Baptist Church of Bakersfield, California.

_________

If you want to see some more great pro-life videos and articles then check out these links below:

Kathy Ireland’s argument with Planned Parenthood over abortion

  Science Matters #2: Former supermodel Kathy Ireland tells Mike Huckabee about how she became pro-life after reading what the science books have to say. Everyone remembers Kathy Ireland from her Sports Illustrated days and actually she has became a very successful business person.  However, I wanted to talk about her pro-life views. Back on […]

Richard Dawkins comments on Tim Tebow pro-life commercial. I am sad today because Susan G. Komen reversed their decision and will continue to supports Planned Parenthood which the USA’s largest abortion provider. The Arkansas Times Blog reported that the leader of Susan G. Komen apologized and explained that Planned Parenthood would be receiving funds from […]

Obama, Garry Smith, Jesus, the Republicans and Abortion (Part 1)

This is going to take two posts to cover. Jason Tolbert hit the nail on the head in his recent post: It seems Democratic Rep. Garry Smith of El Dorado stepped into a bit of a mess this week when speaking to the newly formed Union County Democratic Club. Perhaps he wasn’t aware that intrepid […]

Does human life begin at birth or conception?

On the Arkansas Times blog in the comment section the person using username “Hackett” asserted: Life begins when the fetus is viable outside the womb, prior to that it is parasitical and lives at the discretion of the host. I responded with this post today: It seems to me the real argument lies in the […]

Answering pro-abortion questions

Richard Dawkins comments on Tim Tebow pro-life commercial. _________________________ On the Arkansas Times Blog, a person with the username “November” posted: You dont have the “choice” to kill and innocent child in the womb. No one gave the child a trial before killing it. The child is innocent, and the U S Constitution says you […]

Prolife March in Little Rock has 20 to 1 ratio more than abortion march of previous day

PHOTO BY STATON BREIDENTHAL Marchers arrive at the state Capitol on Sunday after beginning the Arkansas March for Life in downtown Little Rock As in the past, the pr0-life March in Little Rock had at least twenty times the people in attendance that the pr0-abortion march did the previous day. In fact, last year Channel […]

Loretta Ross’ son: A case for pro-life position

Superbowl commercial with Tim Tebow and Mom. In Little Rock on January 21, 2012 in front of 100 pro-choice advocates met next to the Capitol to hear Loretta Ross speak. In that talk she pointed out something about her own experience. (Below is from another speech in which she recounts some of the same details.) […]

A man of pro-life convictions: Bernard Nathanson (part4)

ABORTION – THE SILENT SCREAM 1 / Extended, High-Resolution Version (with permission from APF). Republished with Permission from Roy Tidwell of American Portrait Films as long as the following credits are shown: VHS/DVDs Available American Portrait Films Call 1-800-736-4567 http://www.amport.com The Hand of God-Selected Quotes from Bernard N. Nathanson, M.D., Unjust laws exist. Shall we […]

Dr. William F. Harrison : “I would have advised her to have an abortion…Now, years later, that baby is grown and about to finish her doctorate..”

Superbowl commercial with Tim Tebow and Mom. I used to write letters to the editor a whole lot back in the 1990′s.  I am pro-life and many times my letters would discuss current political debates, and I got to know several names of people that would often write in response letters to my published letters. […]

We can befriend those who are considering abortion

Development of the Unborn Baby.  Prolife Video There are people all around you who have been affected by humanism. Abortion is one of the results of humanism. Nevertheless, we can befriend those who are considering abortion and speak into their lives with love and truth. There may be those who say hateful things to us […]

Norma McCorvey is now pro-life

“Jane Roe” or Roe v Wade is now a prolife Christian. She’s recently done a commercial about it. Around 1993 my wife Jill and I peacefully walked the streets of Little Rock with  Rev Flip Benham who was working with Operation Rescue at the time. We held pro-life signs up and heard some moving stories […]

Prolife quotes

Bill O’Reilly Interviews Jehmu Greene About Pro-Life Super Bowl Ad about Tim Tebow I got these quotes from someone off the internet that lives in England. The funny thing is the video is put to music and the song they picked won a grammy for an Arkansas band that lives in Little Rock. Here is […]

 

“Soccer Saturday” Cristiano Ronaldo vs Rafa Nadal (Nike Mercurial Vapor VIII TV Spot)

Cristiano Ronaldo vs Rafa Nadal (Nike Mercurial Vapor VIII TV Spot)

Published on Apr 7, 2012 by

I want that football shoes!!! :O

_________________

Videos by Cato Institute on failed stimulus plans

In this post I have gathered several videos from the Cato Institute concerning the subject of failed stimulus plans.

_____

Government Spending Doesn’t Create Jobs

Uploaded by on Sep 7, 2011

Share this on Facebook: http://on.fb.me/qnjkn9 Tweet it: http://tiny.cc/o9v9t

In the debate of job creation and how best to pursue it as a policy goal, one point is forgotten: Government doesn’t create jobs. Government only diverts resources from one use to another, which doesn’t create new employment.

Video produced by Caleb Brown and Austin Bragg.

___________________________

Keynesian Catastrophe: Big Money, Big Government & Big Lies

Uploaded by on Jan 19, 2012

The Cato Institute’s Dan Mitchell explains why Obama’s stimulus was a flop! With Glenn Reynolds.

See more at http://www.pjtv.com and http://www.cato.org

___________________

Keynesian Economics Is Wrong: Bigger Gov’t Is Not Stimulus

Uploaded by on Dec 15, 2008

Based on a theory known as Keynesianism, politicians are resuscitating the notion that more government spending can stimulate an economy. This mini-documentary produced by the Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation examines both theory and evidence and finds that allowing politicians to spend more money is not a recipe for better economic performance.

___________________

Obama’s So-Called Stimulus: Good For Government, Bad For the Economy

Uploaded by on Jan 26, 2009

President Obama wants Congress to dramatically expand the burden of government spending. This CF&P Foundation mini-documentary explains why such a policy, based on the discredited Keynesian theory of economics, will not be successful. Indeed, the video demonstrates that Obama is proposing – for all intents and purposes – to repeat Bush’s mistakes. Government will be bigger, even though global evidence shows that nations with small governments are more prosperous.

____________

Big Government Is Not Stimulus: Why Keynes Was Wrong (The Condensed Version)

Uploaded by on Jan 13, 2009

The CF&P Foundation has released a condensed version of our successful mini-documentary explaining why so-called stimulus schemes do not work. Based on a theory known as Keynesianism, politicians are resuscitating the notion that more government spending can stimulate an economy. This mini-documentary produced by the Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation examines both theory and evidence and finds that allowing politicians to spend more money is not a recipe for better economic performance.

_________________

Eight Reasons Why Big Government Hurts Economic Growth

Uploaded by on Aug 17, 2009

This Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation video analyzes how excessive government spending undermines economic performance. While acknowledging that a very modest level of government spending on things such as “public goods” can facilitate growth, the video outlines eight different ways that that big government hinders prosperity. This video focuses on theory and will be augmented by a second video looking at the empirical evidence favoring smaller government.

___________________

Keynesian Economics Is Wrong: Economic Growth Causes Consumer Spending, Not the Other Way

Uploaded by on Nov 29, 2010

Politicians and journalists who fixate on consumer spending are putting the cart before the horse. Consumer spending generally is a consequence of growth, not the cause of growth. This Center for Freedom and Prosperity video helps explain how to achieve more prosperity by looking at the differences between gross domestic product and gross domestic income. www.freedomandprosperity.org

_____________

Deficits, Debts and Unfunded Liabilities: The Consequences of Excessive Government Spending

Uploaded by on May 10, 2010

Huge budget deficits and record levels of national debt are getting a lot of attention, but this video explains that unfunded liabilities for entitlement programs are Americas real red-ink challenge. More important, this CF&P mini-documentary reveals that deficits and debt are symptoms of the real problem of an excessive burden of government spending. www.freedomandprosperity.org

___________

Now that I have been critical of the Democrat President, I wanted to show that I am not concerned about taking up for Republicans but looking at the facts. President Clinton did increase government spending at a slower rate than many other presidents. Here are two  videos that praise both Reagan and Clinton for both accomplished this feat.

Spending Restraint, Part I: Lessons from Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton

Uploaded by on Feb 14, 2011

Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton both reduced the relative burden of government, largely because they were able to restrain the growth of domestic spending. The mini-documentary from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity uses data from the Historical Tables of the Budget to show how Reagan and Clinton succeeded and compares their record to the fiscal profligacy of the Bush-Obama years.

______________

Spending Restraint, Part II: Lessons from Canada, Ireland, Slovakia, and New Zealand

Uploaded by on Feb 22, 2011

Nations can make remarkable fiscal progress if policy makers simply limit the growth of government spending. This video, which is Part II of a series, uses examples from recent history in Canada, Ireland, Slovakia, and New Zealand to demonstrate how it is possible to achieve rapid improvements in fiscal policy by restraining the burden of government spending. Part I of the series examined how Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton were successful in controlling government outlays — particularly the burden of domestic spending programs. www.freedomandprosperity.org

______________

It seems that liberals will never wake up. On 3-8-12 a Arkansas Times blogger pointed out that Obama’s stimulus in 2009 was not made up of just increased but also tax cuts. That is true but the real truth is that there have been about 1/2 dozen stimulus efforts by President Obama and all of them have failed.  Over and over they have tried stimulus plans but they don’t work. Take a look at this excellent article from the Cato Institute:

Keynesian Policies Have Failed

by Chris Edwards

Chris Edwards is the director of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute and the editor of Downsizing Government.org.

Added to cato.org on December 2, 2011

This article appeared on U.S. News & World Report Online on December 2, 2011

Lawmakers are considering extending temporary payroll tax cuts. But the policy is based on faulty Keynesian theories and misplaced confidence in the government’s ability to micromanage short-run growth.

In textbook Keynesian terms, federal deficits stimulate growth by goosing “aggregate demand,” or consumer spending. Since the recession began, we’ve had a lot of goosing — deficits were $459 billion in 2008, $1.4 trillion in 2009, $1.3 trillion in 2010, and $1.3 trillion in 2011. Despite that huge supposed stimulus, unemployment remains remarkably high and the recovery has been the slowest since World War II.

Policymakers should ignore the Keynesians and their faulty models, and instead focus on reforms to aid long-run growth…

Yet supporters of extending payroll tax cuts think that adding another $265 billion to the deficit next year will somehow spur growth. That “stimulus” would be on top of the $1 trillion in deficit spending that is already expected in 2012. Far from helping the economy, all this deficit spending is destabilizing financial markets, scaring businesses away from investing, and imposing crushing debt burdens on young people.

For three years, policymakers have tried to manipulate short-run economic growth, and they have failed. They have put too much trust in macroeconomists, who are frankly lousy at modeling the complex workings of the short-run economy. In early 2008, the Congressional Budget Office projected that economic growth would strengthen in subsequent years, and thus completely missed the deep recession that had already begun. And then there was the infamously bad projection by Obama’s macroeconomists that unemployment would peak at 8 percent and then fall steadily if the 2009 stimulus plan was passed.

Chris Edwards is the director of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute and the editor of Downsizing Government.org.

 

More by Chris Edwards

Some of the same Keynesian macroeconomists who got it wrong on the recession and stimulus are now claiming that a temporary payroll tax break would boost growth. But as Stanford University economist John Taylor has argued, the supposed benefits of government stimulus have been “built in” or predetermined by the underlying assumptions of the Keynesian models.

Policymakers should ignore the Keynesians and their faulty models, and instead focus on reforms to aid long-run growth, which economists know a lot more about. Cutting the corporate tax rate, for example, is an overdue reform with bipartisan support that would enhance America’s long-run productivity and competitiveness.

If Congress is intent on cutting payroll taxes, it should do so within the context of long-run fiscal reforms. One idea is to allow workers to steer a portion of their payroll taxes into personal retirement accounts, as Chile and other nations have done. That reform would feel like a tax cut to workers because they would retain ownership of the funds, and it would begin solving the long-term budget crisis that looms over the economy.

Related posts:

Stimulus plans do not work (part 2)

Dan Mitchell discusses the effectiveness of the stimulus Uploaded by catoinstitutevideo on Nov 3, 2009 11-2-09 When I think of all our hard earned money that has been wasted on stimulus programs it makes me sad. It has never worked and will not in the future too. Take a look at a few thoughts from […]

Stimulus plans do not work (Part 1)

Government Spending Doesn’t Create Jobs Uploaded by catoinstitutevideo on Sep 7, 2011 Share this on Facebook: http://on.fb.me/qnjkn9 Tweet it: http://tiny.cc/o9v9t In the debate of job creation and how best to pursue it as a policy goal, one point is forgotten: Government doesn’t create jobs. Government only diverts resources from one use to another, which doesn’t […]

Dumas thinks we don’t need Balanced Budget Amendment but should balance it on our own

In his recent article Ernie Dumas sticks to his guns that we should balance the budget without being forced to with a “Balanced Budget Amendment,” but I wonder how well that has worked so far? I have made this a key issue for this blog in the past as you can tell below: Dear Senator […]

Maybe the “Occupy Wall Street” crowd should be angry at Obama

(Picture from Arkansas Times Blog) When I think about all the anger and hate coming from the Occupy Wall Street crowd, I wonder if they have read this story below? Solyndra: Crooked Politics or Just Bad Economics? Posted by David Boaz Amy Harder has a good take on the Solyndra issue in National Journal Daily […]

Dear Senator Pryor, why not pass the Balanced Budget Amendment? (Part 13 Thirsty Thursday, Open letter to Senator Pryor)

Dear Senator Pryor, why not pass the Balanced Budget Amendment? (Part 13 Thirsty Thursday, Open letter to Senator Pryor) Office of the Majority Whip | Balanced Budget Amendment Video In 1995, Congress nearly passed a constitutional amendment mandating a balanced budget. The Balanced Budget Amendment would have forced the federal government to live within its […]

Mark Pryor not for President’s job bill even though he voted for it

Andrew Demillo pointed this out  and also Jason Tolbert noted: PRYOR OPPOSES THE OBAMA JOBS BILL THAT HE VOTED TO ADVANCE  Sen. Mark Pryor has been traveling around the state touting a six-part jobs plan that he says “includes a number of bipartisan initiatives, is aimed at creating jobs by setting the table for growth, encouraging new […]

Is a lack of money the problem for our public schools?

Is a lack of money the problem for our public schools? Everything You Need to Know About Public School Spending in Less Than 2½ Minutes Posted by Adam Schaeffer Neal McCluskey gutted the President’s new “Save the Teachers” American Jobs Act sales pitch a good while back, as did Andrew Coulson here. Thankfully, it seems […]

Switchfoot coming to Hot Springs, Arkansas on July 14th!!!!

Saturday 14 July 2012

Switchfoot

Venue

Magic Springs Theme Park 1701 E. Grand Ave. 71901 Hot Springs, AR, US

Venue info and map

Uploaded by  on Aug 20, 2007

Interview with Tim Foreman and Chad Butler airing February 26th, 2007.
Discuss: cowbell, Christianity, fan connection

_______________________________________

SwitchfootSwitchfootCourtesy of: EMI

 

Making of Stars-Switchfoot

 

Switchfoot The Documentary

 

Joe Henry Hankins, former pastor of Little Rock’s First Baptist Church was one of the most evangelistic pastors ever!!!!

_

Image result for joe henry hankins

Adrian Rogers uses an illustration by Joe Henry Hankins

Dr. Joe Hankins said that he was preaching in a revival meeting one time, and, God’s Spirit was moving
mightily and souls were being saved. And he said, ‘I looked up there in the balcony and I saw a man, a young man. He
had the hymnal in his hand, as they were singing out of the hymnal the invitation hymn. And he saw the boy close the
hymnal and start this way, like he was coming down out of the balcony to give his heart to Christ. But then he stepped
back and he opened the hymnal again and began to sing. A second time he closed it and he turned, like he was
coming forward, but he hesitated. He stopped. He turned back and opened the hymnal again and started to sing. The
third time, he closed it with a pop, laid it down, but rather than coming forward, he walked out the back door of the
balcony and out of the church. Later on, that boy was diagnoses with a fatal illness. They told Dr. Hankins about it.
And Joe Henry Hankins went to see this boy, recognized him as the same boy that had been in the balcony.
And the preacher said, “Son, have they told you how sick you are?”
He said, “Yes, sir. You don’t need to beat around the bush. I know I’m dying.”
“Well, son, I want to ask you a question. Sometime ago, when you were in church, I had my eyes on you. I thought
you were under conviction. I thought you were about to come forward and give your heart to Christ. Was that
true?”
He said, “Yes, it was true.” He said, “As a matter of fact, when you preached, I wanted to get down there so badly I
felt I could jump over the balcony railing and come down there.”
“Well, son, why didn’t you come?”
He said, “I thought of my favorite sin, and I knew if I went down there, I would have to give up my sin. And I closed
the book and walked out of the church.”
Dr. Hankins said, “Well, son, that was tragic you would do that. But you’re going to die now and you can’t keep your
sin anyway. Son, won’t you come to Jesus now?”
That boy looked at Joe Henry Hankins and said, “Preacher, there’s something you don’t understand. When I said no to
God, something died within me.” He said, “I can’t come.”
Dr. Hankins wept and prayed, but the boy died, never giving his heart to Jesus Christ because his sinned against light.
[taken from Adrian Rogers]

The following was written by John R. Rice about Dr. Hankins time in Little Rock.

Brother Hankins is one of the greatest preachers in America. When he had been pastor of the First Baptist Church of Little Rock, Arkansas, four years and eight months, I learned that the church had received 1,165 new converts as candidates for baptism in that time, and 1,667 members had been added to the church by letter or statement, a total of .832 additions in the four years and eight months. That meant a total of five new converts each week who had found CHRIST and joined the church for baptism under Dr. Hankins in five years and a total of 118 members every week of that time!

Meantime the church had been so wisely led and so prospered of GOD that the Sunday School attendance was from 1,100 to 1,300 weekly, the church had built a new auditorium seating 2,000 people. And while carrying the heavy administrative and preaching burden of that great church, Dr. Hankins had held outside services in which over 2,000 public professions of faith had taken place, altogether, in addition to those who were saved and joined his own church for baptism! Viewed from the viewpoint of success in the pastorate as a soul winner, a preacher and administrator, Dr. Hankins is a great preacher.

More than four years ago Dr. Hankins, pressed on by the fire in his bones, wooed by his love for CHRIST and for lost sinners, gave up the pastorate and has, since then, been a full-time evangelist. He has had revival campaigns in churches of many denominations. He has now become so well known and in such demand that most of his time is given in union city-wide campaigns. He has had such union campaigns with great blessings in Bellingham, Washington; Altoona, Pennsylvania; Scranton, Pennsylvania; in a number of suburbs of Los Angeles; in Pontiac, Michigan; and is scheduled, when this is written, for a great city-wide campaign in Cleveland, Ohio.

The solid Scriptural background in Dr. Hankins’ sermons, the directness of speech, his strong convictions about Heaven and Hell and CHRIST and His Blood, and salvation by faith, make Dr. Hankins a great preacher. He is distinctly a Bible preacher. He is manifestly a Spirit-filled preacher. He is a compassionate, prayerful, brotherly preacher. We pray and believe that many thousands will be blessed by his sermons in this book and trust that the volume will be scattered far and near and put in the hands of saints and sinners, preachers and lay Christians alike.

These sermons were first printed in The Sword of the Lord. A number of them appeared with a decision form and we have letters from several people who have found CHRIST as they read Dr. Hankins’ sermons. With the earnest hope that sinners will be saved as they read these messages, a decision blank is attached at the close of the book.

November, 1946

Wheaton, Illinois

Image result for joe henry hankins

Former Razorback Football Coach Ken Hatfield speaks at First Bapt Little Rock May 4, 2011

former coach of the arkansas razorbacks football team gives his speech at the 112th annual grape festival Highlights of the #17 Razorbacks 14-10 upset of the #7 Aggies in 1986. I heard Ken Hatfield speak and he told a funny story about  Steve Atwater. He said he wanted a chance to play quarterback. Coach Hatfield […]

Former Razorback Football Coach Ken Hatfield speaks at First Bapt Little Rock May 4, 2011 (Part 1, mentions Branch Rickey and Don McClanen)

This is the pregame broadcast of the Arkansas-Texas game at Razorback Stadium in 1985. It features both the Razorback and Lonhorn bands and the 1964 punt return by Ken Hatfield. I got to hear former Arkansas Razorback Football Coach Ken Hatfield speak and it was very encouraging and enjoyable. The “Zone Luncheon” is held the […]

Paul Greenberg looks back on Chuck Colson’s life

Uploaded by on Oct 27, 2011

Brit Hume describes the life of Chuck Colson

Paul Greenberg is one of the finest conservative writers I have ever read and this article below may be his best yet.

Paul Greenberg: Redemption for Charles Colson

 Posted: Thursday, May 3, 2012 4:30 am

Charles Colson died the other day at 80, a respected and even revered evangelist in the mold of Billy Graham.

By the time of his death, he may have been the country’s leading prison reformer, too, working to change men rather than just punish them.

The worldwide mission he founded and directed — Prison Fellowship — continues to inspire.

He set out to make prisons penitentiaries in the true sense — a place for penitence. And rebirth.

That was Charles Colson.

There was also a Charles Colson in an earlier life. That Charles Colson had died and been born again circa 1974-76, when he would enter prison and leave it a new man.

Chuck Colson arrived at the minimum-security federal prison on the grounds of Maxwell Air Base in Montgomery, Ala., via the White House, where he had been not just a member but a leader of the Nixon administration and gang. He’d been convicted, as Richard Nixon should have been, of obstruction of justice.

No doubt about it, Chuck Colson could obstruct with the best of them, or rather the worst. That connoisseur-in-chief of dirty tricks, Richard Mountebank Nixon himself, gave him the highest recommendation in his presidential memoirs:

Mr. Colson, the former president wrote, was his “political point man” for “imaginative dirty tricks.” Arriving at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue an ambitious young lawyer, he was determined to show that his tricks were the dirtiest of all, and he did not disappoint his boss.

Whether he was leaking confidential FBI files or compiling Nixon’s infamous enemies’ list, Colson soon became a favorite of that president’s.

In the best break of his life — and the lives of so many whose lives he helped redeem — Colson would be found out, indicted, convicted and sentenced to one-to-three for obstruction. It was while awaiting sentencing that a friend slipped him a copy of C.S. Lewis’ “Mere Christianity,” which he credited with opening his eyes. He would serve seven months of his sentence and leave proclaiming the Gospel.

When he announced the usual prison conversion, and his plans to start a prison ministry, the reaction among us usual skeptics, aka newspapermen, was that it was all a front, a way to get out of the joint and make a good thing of having gone bad.

But Colson proved us wrong.

The only force Colson’s ministry employed was soul force, and it proved enough, more than enough. It seems the Spirit exercises a compulsion of its own.

Each of us may seek redemption in our own way. So does each national culture. Consider the life of John Profumo, namesake of the Profumo Affair in England. As secretary for war in a Conservative cabinet in the early 1960s, Profumo’s name made the screaming headlines on the front page of every London tabloid. For he had done the unthinkable for an English gentleman:

No, not engage in a torrid affair with a notorious prostitute who’d shared her favors with, among others, a naval attache/spy at the Soviet embassy. No, his offense was much more serious: He’d lied about it to Parliament.

Not done, you know. Bad form. Or at least it used to be when there was still an England.

Profumo was forced to resign in disgrace. Disgraced most of all in his own eyes. He resolved to spend the rest of his life doing penance, helping the poor in anonymity. And he did.

Profumo began his new and better life as a drudge, washing dishes and cleaning toilets, at Toynbee Hall in London’s East End, a refuge for the down and out. He could identify. Eventually, he was persuaded to put down his mop and take charge of the place, but only reluctantly.

By the time he died not too long ago at 91, after devoting some 40 years of his life to good works on the quiet, Profumo had been made a CBE, commander of the Order of the British Empire. He’d been forgiven by all except possibly himself. A gentleman after all, he’d found redemption the English way, by doing the honorable thing.

I used to think only the English knew how to do these things. Colson proved that disgraced American politicians can find their way to redemption, too, just differently. Even in the eyes of those of us who raise an eyebrow whenever a politician is described as an evangelist, and whose first reaction is to think of Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker.

Charles Colson did it his way, the American Way. He made Prison Fellowship a big business, raising funds, creating franchises, holding rallies, spreading the Word worldwide.

What the Christian brings to the world is a realistic response to man’s real condition: fallen. Broken. In need of healing. Colson was just responding to the brokenness of the world, beginning with his own. And he believed others would follow. They did.

You know, there may be something to this Christianity thing after all.

Paul Greenberg writes for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette; pgreenberg@arkansasonline.com.

Christopher Hitchens honored

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 04

 

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 05

The atheist Christopher Hitchens was honored this week (from Yahoo News):

Christopher Hitchens was honored at the National Magazine Awards—the Oscars of the magazine industry—on Thursday with a posthumous prize for three columns published in Vanity Fair last year.

“He’s the bravest man I’ve ever known,” Graydon Carter, Vanity Fair editor-in-chief, said while accepting the so-called Ellie for Hitchens at a ceremony at New York’s Marriott Marquis. Hitchens, who died last December after a battle with cancer, “wrote with speed and accuracy” until the very end, Carter said.

Brian Williams—who served as the evening’s host—arrived late after anchoring Thursday’s “NBC Nightly News,” blaming cross-town traffic and the “poured-cement” hotel’s confusing elevator system.

New York magazine won three awards, edging the New Yorker, which won two. Time won magazine of the year. In all, 18 magazines were honored with Ellies.

“If you publish a magazine—even desktop publishing—you’re winning an award,” Williams joked. “If Cat Fancy wins for best commentary, be happy for them.”

Tim Rogers, the editor of Dallas-based D magazine, won the unofficial award for most awkward acceptance speech, saying his magazine’s Ellie (for a profile of the hacking group Anonymous) would help him in the bedroom. “Tonight, with a little bit of luck, a little red wine, I’m gonna get lucky,” Rogers said, pointing to his wife in the crowd.

Williams said he felt bad for “Mrs. D.”

“There’s a lot of pressure on her now,” the “Rock Center” host said.

Later, Williams professed his love for magazines.

“I am a lover of this tactile medium,” he said. “I get on a plane [with a magazine] and I pretend to bathe in it.”

Related posts:

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 11)

Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson Debate at Westminster Theological Seminary, Part 11 of 12 PART 5  5/25/2007 08:49 AM Christopher Hitchens If you insist, I shall concede that the significance of the Samaritan lies in his ethnicity. It’s not a very impressive parable to begin with, though when I was taught it first in Sunday […]

Atheists confronted: How I confronted Carl Sagan the year before he died jh47

In today’s news you will read about Kirk Cameron taking on the atheist Stephen Hawking over some recent assertions he made concerning the existence of heaven. Back in December of 1995 I had the opportunity to correspond with Carl Sagan about a year before his untimely death. Sarah Anne Hughes in her article,”Kirk Cameron criticizes […]

Is the Bible historically accurate? (Part 9A) jh46

My sons Wilson and Hunter are now climbing a mountain in the LA area. However, they will be helping Sherwood tonight at Santa Monica Promenade. Sherwood preaches and has question and answer sessions. Below  a former muslim turned atheist debates Sherwood on the issue of evolution. My sons will be attending church on Sunday at […]

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 10)

Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson Debate at Westminster Theological Seminary, Part 10 of 12 Douglas Wilson You refer to the faithful “creating a mystery where none exists.” May I get you to agree that the question “Why is there something here rather than nothing at all?” does not fall into that category? If you and […]

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 5)

Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson Debate at Westminster Theological Seminary, Part 5 of 12 PART 2  5/10/2007 08:54 AM Christopher Hitchens This is mildly amusing casuistry which—aside from its recommendation of Wodehouse—contains nothing that distinguishes it from Islam or Hinduism or indeed humanism. Were I a Christian, I would be highly unsettled by the huge number […]

War on Christmas? :Christopher Hitchens vs. Tim Wildmon of American Family Association

I am not going to offer any of my views, but I just wanted to share the following: John Brummett in his article,  ” ‘Happy holidays’ is no war on Christmas,” noted, “If someone is warring against Christmas in America, then someone is losing his war big-time.” Christopher Hitchens makes the same point (as quoted […]

Christopher Hitchens remembered

I have enjoyed reading these articles about Christopher Hitchens who sounded like a nice person. Remembering Christopher Hitchens December 16, 2011 When I was a kid, I pursued what I considered dueling obsessions. I wanted to be George F. Will. I pored over his twice-weekly syndicated columns in the Press of Atlantic City, dictionary never […]

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 1)

Collision (The Movie) – Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson 1-9 Uploaded by DrKroenen2000 on Aug 17, 2010 Collision is a documentary film. released on October 27, 2009 featuring a debate between prominent atheist Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson, Presbyterian pastor of Christ Church Moscow. Described by Hitchens as a “buddy-and-road” movie, it provides an overview […]

Christopher Hitchens comments on “Pascal’s Wager” in Nov of 2010

Uploaded by BritishNeoCon on Nov 29, 2010 As Christopher nears the end of his life, will he bargain on the possibility of a God as Pascal suggests? Watch the full interview uploaded by MuggedbyReality: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEX4jDJy5Us _________________________________ Christopher Hitchens addresses this issue in the video clip above. The last video clip below includes some comments by […]

Evangelicals react to Christopher Hitchens’ death plus video clips of Hitchens debate (part 4)

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 11 Below are some reactions of evangelical leaders to the news of Christopher Hitchens’ death: DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 12     DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 13 The Christian Post > World|Fri, Dec. […]

Christopher Hitchens’ view on abortion may surprise you

Christopher Hitchens – Against Abortion Uploaded by BritishNeoCon on Dec 2, 2010 An issue Christopher doesn’t seem to have addressed much in his life. He doesn’t explicitly say that he is against abortion in this segment, but that he does believe that the ‘unborn child’ is a real concept. ___________________________ I was suprised when I […]

Christopher Hitchens discusses Ron Paul in 3-2-11 inteview

Max Brantley in the Arkansas Times Blog reports that Ron Paul is leading in Iowa. Maybe it is time to take a closer look at his views. In the above clip you will see Chistopher Hitchens discuss Ron Paul’s views. In the clip below you will find Ron Paul’s latest commercial. Below is a short […]

Evangelicals react to Christopher Hitchens’ death plus video clips of Hitchens debate (part 3)

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 07 Below are some reactions of evangelical leaders to the news of Christopher Hitchens’ death:   Christian leaders react to Hitchens’ death Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | by Michael Foust   DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 08 Author and […]

 

Famous Arkansas murder trials

Very interesting article from AY Magazine. I got the youtube clip from the Arkansas Times Blog.

Murder Mystery: Scandalous Arkansas Trials

By Janie Jones
Detective Al Dawson escorts Orsini to jail.Detective Al Dawson escorts Orsini to jail.Photographs courtesy of Central Arkansas Library System Archives

On the morning of Sept. 26, 1974, a housekeeper discovered the body of 67-year-old Fern Rodgers, wife of Dr. Porter Rodgers, Sr., a wealthy Searcy physician. Mrs. Rodgers had been shot twice in the head.

A police investigation revealed the 70-year-old doctor had been enjoying the company of Peggy Hale, his 21-year-old receptionist. Hale was arrested and  74, and a few hours later, Dr. Rodgers was arrested; also charged in the slaying was a man named William Barry Kimbrell. The prosecution alleged that Rodgers and Hale hired Kimbrell to kill Fern.

The trial that followed was one for the books. When the murder charge was read to the packed courtroom, Rodgers stuck his fingers in his ears, and at one point, the judge called a recess due to the doctor’s uncontrollable weeping. Hale testified for the prosecution, saying she and Rodgers began a torrid love affair after she went to work for him the previous summer. Rodgers was so proud of his sexual prowess that he and Hale kept a diary of their “activities.” When the two found time to talk, the subject of marriage was raised, but Rodgers nixed the idea of divorce from his wife, saying it would be too complicated. He and Hale then began plotting to murder Fern. Kimbrell, 32, was brought into the picture, and the millionaire doctor paid Kimbrell the grand sum of $3,000 to commit the crime.

In a statement read to the jury, Rodgers said, “The only reason I can explain Fern’s killing was because I was hungry for Peggy Hale.”
According to James Scudder, an Arkansas Gazette reporter known for his colorful narratives, Rodgers’ own lawyer, Ed Bethune, said, “Rodgers was out of it, his brain rattling in his head like a dried walnut.”

Hale pled guilty and got a 21-year prison sentence. Kimbrell and Rodgers were both convicted and got life in prison. Rodgers died in 1980. The epitaph inscribed on his tombstone reads, “An Exceptional Man.”
 

 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

The most sensational Arkansas trial of the 1980s, and perhaps of the last century, concerned the Orsini/McArthur case, which was actually a series of court proceedings that all revolved around the alluring, yet sinister Mary Lee Orsini, who was accused of murdering her husband, Ron, in March 1981.

Lee, as she preferred to be called, faced a grand jury for Ron’s death. During the hearings, she became infatuated with her Little Rock attorney, Bill McArthur. He, however, did not reciprocate because he loved his wife, Alice. Lee was not indicted, but her obsession with McArthur continued, and she made every excuse to visit his office.

The other men in Orsini’s life were not as immune to her feminine wiles as McArthur was; she manipulated them into believing her far-out fantasies about mobsters and hit men who were out to get her. Among those duped were Pulaski County Sheriff Tommy Robinson and an ex-con, Eugene “Yankee” Hall.

On May 21, 1982, Alice McArthur was the intended victim of a car bomb. She survived, but was not as lucky a few weeks later, when two men gained entry into her home by pretending to be deliverymen for a florist. Alice’s body was found in an upstairs closet. The killers left a bouquet, and fingerprints on the vase led the Little Rock Police Department to Yankee Hall and his accomplice Larry Darnell McClendon. Hall identified Orsini as the person who had hired them, but said she had told them Bill McArthur was in on it, too.

Orsini was so narcissistic, she didn’t seem to care that her freedom was on the line, as long as the TV cameras and newspaper photographers showed up. Her craving for attention was equaled only by that of Tommy Robinson. His supporters thought of him as Dirty Harry. His detractors saw him as a bombastic self-promoter. He once called Prosecuting Attorney Dub Bentley a “bubblebutt.”
Orsini couldn’t flirt her way out of a guilty verdict for her part in the McArthur murder and got life in prison. A subsequent conviction for killing her husband was overturned. In 2003, she died of a heart attack in prison at the age of 53 — shortly after confessing to both the Alice McArthur and Ron Orsini murders.

Though Robinson tried his best to destroy Bill McArthur, the attorney was cleared and resumed his law practice. He died of natural causes in 2009. Tommy Robinson was elected to the U.S. Congress. After serving only one term, he faded into obscurity.
 

 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

The Orsini/McArthur case was mentioned during court testimony about another famous Arkansas murder. Scharmel Bolling Burnett was accused of killing her estranged husband Johnny Burnett. Friends went to the wealthy businessman’s swank Little Rock home July 21, 1992 and found his nude body with a .22 caliber bullet in his back.

Johnny, owner of Burnett Pools and Spas, had filed for divorce after only 72 days of marriage and had moved out. Scharmel threw a party July 17 after sending invitations that listed house rules Johnny had set down. They included: “Wives should be thin, tan, well-dressed and quiet,” and “Husbands may be fat, sloppy, drunk, and obnoxious.” A similar list drawn up by Scharmel documented her complaints about Johnny: “He farts out loud and never apologizes … uses incorrect English … is a quitter, is an inconsiderate lousy, lover but thinks he’s great.”

After a seven-month investigation, police arrested Scharmel for the murder. She stood trial twice, because the first hearing ended in a hung jury. During both proceedings, the state acknowledged their evidence was all circumstantial, and they could not establish a motive — Scharmel would receive no part of Burnett’s estate. The prosecution alleged Scharmel killed Johnny July 19, 1992, a day after he had sneaked in and photographed her in bed with another man John Merck. The pictures failed to develop, but the next morning Scharmel agreed to a divorce and vacated the Little Rock house. According to friends, Johnny danced a jig and went back home.

The defense contended Johnny’s death did not occur until the morning of July 20,1992, and Scharmel had an alibi for that time period. Her attorneys conceded she had owned a .22 caliber pistol but had lost track of it. They added that millions of people owned .22 caliber guns, including Diane King, who had been romantically involved with Johnny Burnett for several years. She had given him an ultimatum to marry her or end the relationship. A few days later he proposed to Scharmel. The defense team named King and Merck as alternative suspects. Another was Carl Wilson, who had worked at the pool and spa business until July 2, when Burnett fired him. Since 1974, Wilson had shot three people in three separate incidents, fatally wounding one victim. In 1982, he testified in Lee Orsini’s trial that he had supplied the explosives used in the bombing of Alice McArthur’s car. Wilson died in a 2001 shootout with federal authorities who raided his Mayflower home in search of illegal firearms.

The trial, which showed just how nasty a divorce can be, ended with an acquittal for Scharmel Bolling Burnett. Johnny Burnett’s murder remains unsolved.
 

This article appears in the June 2011 issue of AY Magazine

Obama is out to outgive Romney in the big government game!!!

Real Time with Bill Maher March 16 2012 – Alexandra Pelosi Interviews Welfare Recipients in NYC

Published on Mar 18, 2012 by

Real Time with Bill Maher March 16 2012 – Alexandra Pelosi Interviews Welfare Recipients

_________________________

Alexandra Pelosi (Nancy’s daughter) did a great job of showing in this clip on Bill Maher’s show on how many people who receive welfare benefits are really able bodied people who have no desire to get a job. Some of them have mutiple children with several women and many of them feel that they are owed their benefits by Obama because they voted for him. Dan Mitchell does a great job below showing the mentality of Obama’s re-election campaign which encourages people to add up all the benefits people can get from big government and how they can outgive Romney!!!

Back in 2010, I declared that Olga Stefou was a symbol of everything that’s wrong with the Greek welfare state.

She was one of the protesters and – if the story captured her thoughts accurately – she displayed an unlimited entitlement mentality. Sort of helps one understand why this cartoon is so accurate.

Now we have an American version of Olga. Her name is Julia, and she is just as much of a moocher.

The good news, though, is that Julia is only a make-believe leech. She’s been created by the Obama campaign to show how big government can provide cradle-to-grave handouts.

The full series can be found at this link, and here’s a screenshot of the handouts that Julia might take at age 31.

Poor Julia is getting mercilessly mocked as everything from a deadbeat to a New Soviet Woman. But I realize my circle of friends, acquaintances, and contacts are not a representative sample.

So I do wonder whether this new gimmick from the Obama campaign will be successful. If it does work, it will show that this Chuck Asay cartoon was depressingly prescient. Heck, this cartoon about government as Santa Claus also will be accurate.

Open letter to President Obama (Part 71)

Rick Santorum’s (entire) Speech at Chattanooga Tea Party’s Liberty Forum

Uploaded by on Feb 25, 2012

http://www.tinshipproductions.com Chattanooga Tea Party’s Liberty Forum Saturday, February 25, 2012
This speech is unedited and shown in it’s entire 55 minutes.

__________________

President Obama c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here.

When you look at the details concerning GM then they tell a different story than you have presented in your speeches recently.

GM’s Profits Don’t Mean Taxpayers Will Be Off the Hook

The company’s cash cushion might go to unions, not investors.

| February 22, 2012

Three years after being rescued by a taxpayer bailout, General Motors recently announced some rather ambitious profit targets for 2012. But even if it meets these targets—a big if—taxpayers should not wait on one foot to recover their remaining “investment” in the company.

There is no doubt that GM has returned from the brink. It made $8 billion last year, a record high, and regained enough global market share to once again become the world’s biggest automaker, a title it had lost to Toyota. More impressive, it is planning to bump its profit margins from 6 percent last year to 10 percent this year, on par with its best-in-class rivals such as Hyundai and BMW. This, it hopes, will allow it to post $10 billion in profits this year, something that only 17 public companies managed to do in 2010.

How did investors react to all this hope and cheer? With a giant yawn: GM’s stock price, which has been hovering around $25 for months, barely budged. That’s $8 below GM’s IPO price. And it’s $30 below what’s needed for taxpayers to recover the $30 billion they still have stuck in the company.

If investors aren’t buying GM’s rosy scenarios, it’s for some good reasons. Peter De Lorenzo, editor of Auto Extremist, notes that GM is facing the most competitive market in history and investors are dubious that it can deliver. GM’s $8 billion in profits last year resulted partly from the tsunami in Japa that disrupted Toyota and Honda’s global supply chain.

Both are back this year and more formidable than ever. While GM reported a 6 percent drop in January sales in North America from a year earlier, its foreign competitors posted impressive gains. GM will have a hard time matching last year’s performance, let alone upping it if it has even one more month like January, De Lorenzo notes.

Tougher competition in North America is not GM’s only worry. Its sales in China are slowing. Also, Europe will probably remain a trouble spot. GM suffered $2 billion in losses in Europe last year, thanks to Opel, its hopelessly bloated German brand. But GM has been unable to obtain permission from the German government to restructure its labor costs, even as European sales plummet in an economic meltdown.

Toyota and Honda don’t have the same exposure in Europe and hence have less to worry about. What’s more, GM’s global pension obligations are underfunded to the tune of $22 billion, about $10 billion in the United States alone.

If GM manages to address all these issues, notes Sean McAlinden of the Center for Automotive Research, its share price might go up $40 to $45, leaving taxpayers still $5 billion to $8 billion in the red. But that’s under the best scenario. If stock prices remain at the current $25 level, the losses could mount up to $15 billion. That’s not counting the $15 billion in tax write-offs that GM got as part of the bankruptcy deal. All in all, taxpayers are facing somewhere from $20 billion to $30 billion in losses.

That’s not all the exposure that taxpayers will have going forward. The GM bailout has distorted the playing field so badly that its competitors are demanding their own handouts to even things out.

For example, McAlinden notes, the administration gave GM about $10 billion more than was strictly necessary to finance its bankruptcy. The money contributed to GM’s nice $33 billion cash cushion right now. GM could use this money to buy its own stock and bid up prices, mitigating taxpayer losses—or pay dividends. But McAlinden doesn’t believe that’s what GM will do. It could use the money to pay off its obligations to the union health-care trust fund, making this a direct infusion of cash from taxpayers to unions.

Or it will use the money toward product development, putting its competitors at a disadvantage. Moreover, because all but $10 billion of the bailout money GM got was in the form of equity, the company has no debt service costs. Ford by contrast, is still servicing the $23 billion in debt it took to avoid a bailout.

This is unfair, and the Obama administration knows it, which is perhaps one reason it quickly approved a $5.6 billion retooling loan for Ford. That, in turn, elicited howls of protest from Chrysler’s Sergio Marchionne. The administration gave Marchionne’s parent company, Fiat, the majority stake in Chrysler without asking Fiat to contribute a single euro of its own.

Yet Marchionne complains that the administration hasn’t been generous enough. In contrast with GM, it forced Chrysler to service the bailout loan. Now it’s dragging its feet in approving Chrysler’s new retooling loans, he claims.

Bailout supporters maintain that it was a one-time deal necessary to shore up companies in acute economic times. In reality, the rush for the bailout’s spoils has produced ripple effects that may well haunt the economy for a long time.

As President Barack Obama campaigns to keep his job, he will spin the bailout as a success story that saved millions of American jobs. But taxpayers should bear in mind that the hit to their wallets will be substantial and will probably grow in years to come.

Shikha Dalmia is a senior analyst at Reason Foundation and a columnist at The Daily. This colum originally appeared in Bloomberg news.

____________

Thank you so much for your time. I know how valuable it is. I also appreciate the fine family that you have and your committment as a father and a husband.

Sincerely,

Everette Hatcher III, 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002, ph 501-920-5733, lowcostsqueegees@yahoo.com