Monthly Archives: May 2012

Paul Greenberg looks back on Chuck Colson’s life

Uploaded by on Oct 27, 2011

Brit Hume describes the life of Chuck Colson

Paul Greenberg is one of the finest conservative writers I have ever read and this article below may be his best yet.

Paul Greenberg: Redemption for Charles Colson

 Posted: Thursday, May 3, 2012 4:30 am

Charles Colson died the other day at 80, a respected and even revered evangelist in the mold of Billy Graham.

By the time of his death, he may have been the country’s leading prison reformer, too, working to change men rather than just punish them.

The worldwide mission he founded and directed — Prison Fellowship — continues to inspire.

He set out to make prisons penitentiaries in the true sense — a place for penitence. And rebirth.

That was Charles Colson.

There was also a Charles Colson in an earlier life. That Charles Colson had died and been born again circa 1974-76, when he would enter prison and leave it a new man.

Chuck Colson arrived at the minimum-security federal prison on the grounds of Maxwell Air Base in Montgomery, Ala., via the White House, where he had been not just a member but a leader of the Nixon administration and gang. He’d been convicted, as Richard Nixon should have been, of obstruction of justice.

No doubt about it, Chuck Colson could obstruct with the best of them, or rather the worst. That connoisseur-in-chief of dirty tricks, Richard Mountebank Nixon himself, gave him the highest recommendation in his presidential memoirs:

Mr. Colson, the former president wrote, was his “political point man” for “imaginative dirty tricks.” Arriving at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue an ambitious young lawyer, he was determined to show that his tricks were the dirtiest of all, and he did not disappoint his boss.

Whether he was leaking confidential FBI files or compiling Nixon’s infamous enemies’ list, Colson soon became a favorite of that president’s.

In the best break of his life — and the lives of so many whose lives he helped redeem — Colson would be found out, indicted, convicted and sentenced to one-to-three for obstruction. It was while awaiting sentencing that a friend slipped him a copy of C.S. Lewis’ “Mere Christianity,” which he credited with opening his eyes. He would serve seven months of his sentence and leave proclaiming the Gospel.

When he announced the usual prison conversion, and his plans to start a prison ministry, the reaction among us usual skeptics, aka newspapermen, was that it was all a front, a way to get out of the joint and make a good thing of having gone bad.

But Colson proved us wrong.

The only force Colson’s ministry employed was soul force, and it proved enough, more than enough. It seems the Spirit exercises a compulsion of its own.

Each of us may seek redemption in our own way. So does each national culture. Consider the life of John Profumo, namesake of the Profumo Affair in England. As secretary for war in a Conservative cabinet in the early 1960s, Profumo’s name made the screaming headlines on the front page of every London tabloid. For he had done the unthinkable for an English gentleman:

No, not engage in a torrid affair with a notorious prostitute who’d shared her favors with, among others, a naval attache/spy at the Soviet embassy. No, his offense was much more serious: He’d lied about it to Parliament.

Not done, you know. Bad form. Or at least it used to be when there was still an England.

Profumo was forced to resign in disgrace. Disgraced most of all in his own eyes. He resolved to spend the rest of his life doing penance, helping the poor in anonymity. And he did.

Profumo began his new and better life as a drudge, washing dishes and cleaning toilets, at Toynbee Hall in London’s East End, a refuge for the down and out. He could identify. Eventually, he was persuaded to put down his mop and take charge of the place, but only reluctantly.

By the time he died not too long ago at 91, after devoting some 40 years of his life to good works on the quiet, Profumo had been made a CBE, commander of the Order of the British Empire. He’d been forgiven by all except possibly himself. A gentleman after all, he’d found redemption the English way, by doing the honorable thing.

I used to think only the English knew how to do these things. Colson proved that disgraced American politicians can find their way to redemption, too, just differently. Even in the eyes of those of us who raise an eyebrow whenever a politician is described as an evangelist, and whose first reaction is to think of Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker.

Charles Colson did it his way, the American Way. He made Prison Fellowship a big business, raising funds, creating franchises, holding rallies, spreading the Word worldwide.

What the Christian brings to the world is a realistic response to man’s real condition: fallen. Broken. In need of healing. Colson was just responding to the brokenness of the world, beginning with his own. And he believed others would follow. They did.

You know, there may be something to this Christianity thing after all.

Paul Greenberg writes for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette; pgreenberg@arkansasonline.com.

Christopher Hitchens honored

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 04

 

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 05

The atheist Christopher Hitchens was honored this week (from Yahoo News):

Christopher Hitchens was honored at the National Magazine Awards—the Oscars of the magazine industry—on Thursday with a posthumous prize for three columns published in Vanity Fair last year.

“He’s the bravest man I’ve ever known,” Graydon Carter, Vanity Fair editor-in-chief, said while accepting the so-called Ellie for Hitchens at a ceremony at New York’s Marriott Marquis. Hitchens, who died last December after a battle with cancer, “wrote with speed and accuracy” until the very end, Carter said.

Brian Williams—who served as the evening’s host—arrived late after anchoring Thursday’s “NBC Nightly News,” blaming cross-town traffic and the “poured-cement” hotel’s confusing elevator system.

New York magazine won three awards, edging the New Yorker, which won two. Time won magazine of the year. In all, 18 magazines were honored with Ellies.

“If you publish a magazine—even desktop publishing—you’re winning an award,” Williams joked. “If Cat Fancy wins for best commentary, be happy for them.”

Tim Rogers, the editor of Dallas-based D magazine, won the unofficial award for most awkward acceptance speech, saying his magazine’s Ellie (for a profile of the hacking group Anonymous) would help him in the bedroom. “Tonight, with a little bit of luck, a little red wine, I’m gonna get lucky,” Rogers said, pointing to his wife in the crowd.

Williams said he felt bad for “Mrs. D.”

“There’s a lot of pressure on her now,” the “Rock Center” host said.

Later, Williams professed his love for magazines.

“I am a lover of this tactile medium,” he said. “I get on a plane [with a magazine] and I pretend to bathe in it.”

Related posts:

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 11)

Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson Debate at Westminster Theological Seminary, Part 11 of 12 PART 5  5/25/2007 08:49 AM Christopher Hitchens If you insist, I shall concede that the significance of the Samaritan lies in his ethnicity. It’s not a very impressive parable to begin with, though when I was taught it first in Sunday […]

Atheists confronted: How I confronted Carl Sagan the year before he died jh47

In today’s news you will read about Kirk Cameron taking on the atheist Stephen Hawking over some recent assertions he made concerning the existence of heaven. Back in December of 1995 I had the opportunity to correspond with Carl Sagan about a year before his untimely death. Sarah Anne Hughes in her article,”Kirk Cameron criticizes […]

Is the Bible historically accurate? (Part 9A) jh46

My sons Wilson and Hunter are now climbing a mountain in the LA area. However, they will be helping Sherwood tonight at Santa Monica Promenade. Sherwood preaches and has question and answer sessions. Below  a former muslim turned atheist debates Sherwood on the issue of evolution. My sons will be attending church on Sunday at […]

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 10)

Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson Debate at Westminster Theological Seminary, Part 10 of 12 Douglas Wilson You refer to the faithful “creating a mystery where none exists.” May I get you to agree that the question “Why is there something here rather than nothing at all?” does not fall into that category? If you and […]

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 5)

Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson Debate at Westminster Theological Seminary, Part 5 of 12 PART 2  5/10/2007 08:54 AM Christopher Hitchens This is mildly amusing casuistry which—aside from its recommendation of Wodehouse—contains nothing that distinguishes it from Islam or Hinduism or indeed humanism. Were I a Christian, I would be highly unsettled by the huge number […]

War on Christmas? :Christopher Hitchens vs. Tim Wildmon of American Family Association

I am not going to offer any of my views, but I just wanted to share the following: John Brummett in his article,  ” ‘Happy holidays’ is no war on Christmas,” noted, “If someone is warring against Christmas in America, then someone is losing his war big-time.” Christopher Hitchens makes the same point (as quoted […]

Christopher Hitchens remembered

I have enjoyed reading these articles about Christopher Hitchens who sounded like a nice person. Remembering Christopher Hitchens December 16, 2011 When I was a kid, I pursued what I considered dueling obsessions. I wanted to be George F. Will. I pored over his twice-weekly syndicated columns in the Press of Atlantic City, dictionary never […]

Christopher Hitchens’ debate with Douglas Wilson (Part 1)

Collision (The Movie) – Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson 1-9 Uploaded by DrKroenen2000 on Aug 17, 2010 Collision is a documentary film. released on October 27, 2009 featuring a debate between prominent atheist Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson, Presbyterian pastor of Christ Church Moscow. Described by Hitchens as a “buddy-and-road” movie, it provides an overview […]

Christopher Hitchens comments on “Pascal’s Wager” in Nov of 2010

Uploaded by BritishNeoCon on Nov 29, 2010 As Christopher nears the end of his life, will he bargain on the possibility of a God as Pascal suggests? Watch the full interview uploaded by MuggedbyReality: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEX4jDJy5Us _________________________________ Christopher Hitchens addresses this issue in the video clip above. The last video clip below includes some comments by […]

Evangelicals react to Christopher Hitchens’ death plus video clips of Hitchens debate (part 4)

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 11 Below are some reactions of evangelical leaders to the news of Christopher Hitchens’ death: DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 12     DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 13 The Christian Post > World|Fri, Dec. […]

Christopher Hitchens’ view on abortion may surprise you

Christopher Hitchens – Against Abortion Uploaded by BritishNeoCon on Dec 2, 2010 An issue Christopher doesn’t seem to have addressed much in his life. He doesn’t explicitly say that he is against abortion in this segment, but that he does believe that the ‘unborn child’ is a real concept. ___________________________ I was suprised when I […]

Christopher Hitchens discusses Ron Paul in 3-2-11 inteview

Max Brantley in the Arkansas Times Blog reports that Ron Paul is leading in Iowa. Maybe it is time to take a closer look at his views. In the above clip you will see Chistopher Hitchens discuss Ron Paul’s views. In the clip below you will find Ron Paul’s latest commercial. Below is a short […]

Evangelicals react to Christopher Hitchens’ death plus video clips of Hitchens debate (part 3)

DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 07 Below are some reactions of evangelical leaders to the news of Christopher Hitchens’ death:   Christian leaders react to Hitchens’ death Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | by Michael Foust   DEBATE William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens Does God Exist 08 Author and […]

 

Famous Arkansas murder trials

Very interesting article from AY Magazine. I got the youtube clip from the Arkansas Times Blog.

Murder Mystery: Scandalous Arkansas Trials

By Janie Jones
Detective Al Dawson escorts Orsini to jail.Detective Al Dawson escorts Orsini to jail.Photographs courtesy of Central Arkansas Library System Archives

On the morning of Sept. 26, 1974, a housekeeper discovered the body of 67-year-old Fern Rodgers, wife of Dr. Porter Rodgers, Sr., a wealthy Searcy physician. Mrs. Rodgers had been shot twice in the head.

A police investigation revealed the 70-year-old doctor had been enjoying the company of Peggy Hale, his 21-year-old receptionist. Hale was arrested and  74, and a few hours later, Dr. Rodgers was arrested; also charged in the slaying was a man named William Barry Kimbrell. The prosecution alleged that Rodgers and Hale hired Kimbrell to kill Fern.

The trial that followed was one for the books. When the murder charge was read to the packed courtroom, Rodgers stuck his fingers in his ears, and at one point, the judge called a recess due to the doctor’s uncontrollable weeping. Hale testified for the prosecution, saying she and Rodgers began a torrid love affair after she went to work for him the previous summer. Rodgers was so proud of his sexual prowess that he and Hale kept a diary of their “activities.” When the two found time to talk, the subject of marriage was raised, but Rodgers nixed the idea of divorce from his wife, saying it would be too complicated. He and Hale then began plotting to murder Fern. Kimbrell, 32, was brought into the picture, and the millionaire doctor paid Kimbrell the grand sum of $3,000 to commit the crime.

In a statement read to the jury, Rodgers said, “The only reason I can explain Fern’s killing was because I was hungry for Peggy Hale.”
According to James Scudder, an Arkansas Gazette reporter known for his colorful narratives, Rodgers’ own lawyer, Ed Bethune, said, “Rodgers was out of it, his brain rattling in his head like a dried walnut.”

Hale pled guilty and got a 21-year prison sentence. Kimbrell and Rodgers were both convicted and got life in prison. Rodgers died in 1980. The epitaph inscribed on his tombstone reads, “An Exceptional Man.”
 

 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

The most sensational Arkansas trial of the 1980s, and perhaps of the last century, concerned the Orsini/McArthur case, which was actually a series of court proceedings that all revolved around the alluring, yet sinister Mary Lee Orsini, who was accused of murdering her husband, Ron, in March 1981.

Lee, as she preferred to be called, faced a grand jury for Ron’s death. During the hearings, she became infatuated with her Little Rock attorney, Bill McArthur. He, however, did not reciprocate because he loved his wife, Alice. Lee was not indicted, but her obsession with McArthur continued, and she made every excuse to visit his office.

The other men in Orsini’s life were not as immune to her feminine wiles as McArthur was; she manipulated them into believing her far-out fantasies about mobsters and hit men who were out to get her. Among those duped were Pulaski County Sheriff Tommy Robinson and an ex-con, Eugene “Yankee” Hall.

On May 21, 1982, Alice McArthur was the intended victim of a car bomb. She survived, but was not as lucky a few weeks later, when two men gained entry into her home by pretending to be deliverymen for a florist. Alice’s body was found in an upstairs closet. The killers left a bouquet, and fingerprints on the vase led the Little Rock Police Department to Yankee Hall and his accomplice Larry Darnell McClendon. Hall identified Orsini as the person who had hired them, but said she had told them Bill McArthur was in on it, too.

Orsini was so narcissistic, she didn’t seem to care that her freedom was on the line, as long as the TV cameras and newspaper photographers showed up. Her craving for attention was equaled only by that of Tommy Robinson. His supporters thought of him as Dirty Harry. His detractors saw him as a bombastic self-promoter. He once called Prosecuting Attorney Dub Bentley a “bubblebutt.”
Orsini couldn’t flirt her way out of a guilty verdict for her part in the McArthur murder and got life in prison. A subsequent conviction for killing her husband was overturned. In 2003, she died of a heart attack in prison at the age of 53 — shortly after confessing to both the Alice McArthur and Ron Orsini murders.

Though Robinson tried his best to destroy Bill McArthur, the attorney was cleared and resumed his law practice. He died of natural causes in 2009. Tommy Robinson was elected to the U.S. Congress. After serving only one term, he faded into obscurity.
 

 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

The Orsini/McArthur case was mentioned during court testimony about another famous Arkansas murder. Scharmel Bolling Burnett was accused of killing her estranged husband Johnny Burnett. Friends went to the wealthy businessman’s swank Little Rock home July 21, 1992 and found his nude body with a .22 caliber bullet in his back.

Johnny, owner of Burnett Pools and Spas, had filed for divorce after only 72 days of marriage and had moved out. Scharmel threw a party July 17 after sending invitations that listed house rules Johnny had set down. They included: “Wives should be thin, tan, well-dressed and quiet,” and “Husbands may be fat, sloppy, drunk, and obnoxious.” A similar list drawn up by Scharmel documented her complaints about Johnny: “He farts out loud and never apologizes … uses incorrect English … is a quitter, is an inconsiderate lousy, lover but thinks he’s great.”

After a seven-month investigation, police arrested Scharmel for the murder. She stood trial twice, because the first hearing ended in a hung jury. During both proceedings, the state acknowledged their evidence was all circumstantial, and they could not establish a motive — Scharmel would receive no part of Burnett’s estate. The prosecution alleged Scharmel killed Johnny July 19, 1992, a day after he had sneaked in and photographed her in bed with another man John Merck. The pictures failed to develop, but the next morning Scharmel agreed to a divorce and vacated the Little Rock house. According to friends, Johnny danced a jig and went back home.

The defense contended Johnny’s death did not occur until the morning of July 20,1992, and Scharmel had an alibi for that time period. Her attorneys conceded she had owned a .22 caliber pistol but had lost track of it. They added that millions of people owned .22 caliber guns, including Diane King, who had been romantically involved with Johnny Burnett for several years. She had given him an ultimatum to marry her or end the relationship. A few days later he proposed to Scharmel. The defense team named King and Merck as alternative suspects. Another was Carl Wilson, who had worked at the pool and spa business until July 2, when Burnett fired him. Since 1974, Wilson had shot three people in three separate incidents, fatally wounding one victim. In 1982, he testified in Lee Orsini’s trial that he had supplied the explosives used in the bombing of Alice McArthur’s car. Wilson died in a 2001 shootout with federal authorities who raided his Mayflower home in search of illegal firearms.

The trial, which showed just how nasty a divorce can be, ended with an acquittal for Scharmel Bolling Burnett. Johnny Burnett’s murder remains unsolved.
 

This article appears in the June 2011 issue of AY Magazine

Obama is out to outgive Romney in the big government game!!!

Real Time with Bill Maher March 16 2012 – Alexandra Pelosi Interviews Welfare Recipients in NYC

Published on Mar 18, 2012 by

Real Time with Bill Maher March 16 2012 – Alexandra Pelosi Interviews Welfare Recipients

_________________________

Alexandra Pelosi (Nancy’s daughter) did a great job of showing in this clip on Bill Maher’s show on how many people who receive welfare benefits are really able bodied people who have no desire to get a job. Some of them have mutiple children with several women and many of them feel that they are owed their benefits by Obama because they voted for him. Dan Mitchell does a great job below showing the mentality of Obama’s re-election campaign which encourages people to add up all the benefits people can get from big government and how they can outgive Romney!!!

Back in 2010, I declared that Olga Stefou was a symbol of everything that’s wrong with the Greek welfare state.

She was one of the protesters and – if the story captured her thoughts accurately – she displayed an unlimited entitlement mentality. Sort of helps one understand why this cartoon is so accurate.

Now we have an American version of Olga. Her name is Julia, and she is just as much of a moocher.

The good news, though, is that Julia is only a make-believe leech. She’s been created by the Obama campaign to show how big government can provide cradle-to-grave handouts.

The full series can be found at this link, and here’s a screenshot of the handouts that Julia might take at age 31.

Poor Julia is getting mercilessly mocked as everything from a deadbeat to a New Soviet Woman. But I realize my circle of friends, acquaintances, and contacts are not a representative sample.

So I do wonder whether this new gimmick from the Obama campaign will be successful. If it does work, it will show that this Chuck Asay cartoon was depressingly prescient. Heck, this cartoon about government as Santa Claus also will be accurate.

Open letter to President Obama (Part 71)

Rick Santorum’s (entire) Speech at Chattanooga Tea Party’s Liberty Forum

Uploaded by on Feb 25, 2012

http://www.tinshipproductions.com Chattanooga Tea Party’s Liberty Forum Saturday, February 25, 2012
This speech is unedited and shown in it’s entire 55 minutes.

__________________

President Obama c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here.

When you look at the details concerning GM then they tell a different story than you have presented in your speeches recently.

GM’s Profits Don’t Mean Taxpayers Will Be Off the Hook

The company’s cash cushion might go to unions, not investors.

| February 22, 2012

Three years after being rescued by a taxpayer bailout, General Motors recently announced some rather ambitious profit targets for 2012. But even if it meets these targets—a big if—taxpayers should not wait on one foot to recover their remaining “investment” in the company.

There is no doubt that GM has returned from the brink. It made $8 billion last year, a record high, and regained enough global market share to once again become the world’s biggest automaker, a title it had lost to Toyota. More impressive, it is planning to bump its profit margins from 6 percent last year to 10 percent this year, on par with its best-in-class rivals such as Hyundai and BMW. This, it hopes, will allow it to post $10 billion in profits this year, something that only 17 public companies managed to do in 2010.

How did investors react to all this hope and cheer? With a giant yawn: GM’s stock price, which has been hovering around $25 for months, barely budged. That’s $8 below GM’s IPO price. And it’s $30 below what’s needed for taxpayers to recover the $30 billion they still have stuck in the company.

If investors aren’t buying GM’s rosy scenarios, it’s for some good reasons. Peter De Lorenzo, editor of Auto Extremist, notes that GM is facing the most competitive market in history and investors are dubious that it can deliver. GM’s $8 billion in profits last year resulted partly from the tsunami in Japa that disrupted Toyota and Honda’s global supply chain.

Both are back this year and more formidable than ever. While GM reported a 6 percent drop in January sales in North America from a year earlier, its foreign competitors posted impressive gains. GM will have a hard time matching last year’s performance, let alone upping it if it has even one more month like January, De Lorenzo notes.

Tougher competition in North America is not GM’s only worry. Its sales in China are slowing. Also, Europe will probably remain a trouble spot. GM suffered $2 billion in losses in Europe last year, thanks to Opel, its hopelessly bloated German brand. But GM has been unable to obtain permission from the German government to restructure its labor costs, even as European sales plummet in an economic meltdown.

Toyota and Honda don’t have the same exposure in Europe and hence have less to worry about. What’s more, GM’s global pension obligations are underfunded to the tune of $22 billion, about $10 billion in the United States alone.

If GM manages to address all these issues, notes Sean McAlinden of the Center for Automotive Research, its share price might go up $40 to $45, leaving taxpayers still $5 billion to $8 billion in the red. But that’s under the best scenario. If stock prices remain at the current $25 level, the losses could mount up to $15 billion. That’s not counting the $15 billion in tax write-offs that GM got as part of the bankruptcy deal. All in all, taxpayers are facing somewhere from $20 billion to $30 billion in losses.

That’s not all the exposure that taxpayers will have going forward. The GM bailout has distorted the playing field so badly that its competitors are demanding their own handouts to even things out.

For example, McAlinden notes, the administration gave GM about $10 billion more than was strictly necessary to finance its bankruptcy. The money contributed to GM’s nice $33 billion cash cushion right now. GM could use this money to buy its own stock and bid up prices, mitigating taxpayer losses—or pay dividends. But McAlinden doesn’t believe that’s what GM will do. It could use the money to pay off its obligations to the union health-care trust fund, making this a direct infusion of cash from taxpayers to unions.

Or it will use the money toward product development, putting its competitors at a disadvantage. Moreover, because all but $10 billion of the bailout money GM got was in the form of equity, the company has no debt service costs. Ford by contrast, is still servicing the $23 billion in debt it took to avoid a bailout.

This is unfair, and the Obama administration knows it, which is perhaps one reason it quickly approved a $5.6 billion retooling loan for Ford. That, in turn, elicited howls of protest from Chrysler’s Sergio Marchionne. The administration gave Marchionne’s parent company, Fiat, the majority stake in Chrysler without asking Fiat to contribute a single euro of its own.

Yet Marchionne complains that the administration hasn’t been generous enough. In contrast with GM, it forced Chrysler to service the bailout loan. Now it’s dragging its feet in approving Chrysler’s new retooling loans, he claims.

Bailout supporters maintain that it was a one-time deal necessary to shore up companies in acute economic times. In reality, the rush for the bailout’s spoils has produced ripple effects that may well haunt the economy for a long time.

As President Barack Obama campaigns to keep his job, he will spin the bailout as a success story that saved millions of American jobs. But taxpayers should bear in mind that the hit to their wallets will be substantial and will probably grow in years to come.

Shikha Dalmia is a senior analyst at Reason Foundation and a columnist at The Daily. This colum originally appeared in Bloomberg news.

____________

Thank you so much for your time. I know how valuable it is. I also appreciate the fine family that you have and your committment as a father and a husband.

Sincerely,

Everette Hatcher III, 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002, ph 501-920-5733, lowcostsqueegees@yahoo.com

 

The real truth about Obamacare can be seen on the www.thedailyhatch.org

Michael Cannon on Medicare and Healthcare

You want to know the real truth about Obamacare then check out these videos and articles linked below:

American people do not want Obamacare and the regulations that go with it

In this article below you will see that the American people do not want Obamacare but yet it is being crammed down their throats and all the regulations that go with that too. Sickening Regulation by Michael D. Tanner Michael Tanner is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and author of Leviathan on the […]

Arkansas Times praises good results of Obamacare

Gerard Matthews wrote on March 21, 2012 in the Arkansas Times: Children cannot be denied coverage because of a pre-existing condition. Young people can stay on their parents’ health insurance plan until they are 26 years old. Preventive services, which will ultimately help control health care costs, have been added to some plans at no […]

Brummett is arguing over the chairs on the Titanic as Obamacare will surely bankrupt state

Michael Cannon on Medicare and Healthcare In his article, “Medicaid and the consequences,” Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, March 20, 2012, (paywall), Brummett admits, “Medicaid will break the bank of state government if we don’t do something.” However, he never gets around to saying that Obamacare is going to ruin the state financially. It will expand this failing […]

If the Democrats want to back Obamacare then let them go down with the ship

On March 19, 2012 Jason Tolbert pointed out that the Democrats in Little Rock were using Obama’s talking points concerning Obamacare, but it appears to me that they go down with the ship according to the mood in the country. Take a look at this fine article from the Cato Institute. In this article below […]

Setting Biden Straight on Obamacare’s Anti-Conscience Mandate

Setting Biden Straight on Obamacare’s Anti-Conscience Mandate Uploaded by HeritageFoundation on Mar 3, 2012 Vice President Biden didn’t get the story quite straight. As the Obama Administration reels from the backlash for Obamacare’s anti-conscience mandate that forces religious employers to provide coverage and pay for abortion-inducing drugs, Biden yesterday set out to convince America that […]

Obama’s affordable lightbulb

It seems that government was in control of the desert then we would have a shortage of sand as Milton Friedman used to quip. You Keep Using the Word ‘Affordable.’ I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means. Posted by Michael F. Cannon The federal government gave a $10 million “affordability” prize […]

Brummett misses the boat on Obamacare again

Uploaded by HarrysRetroArchive on Aug 7, 2010 The stooges join the “Women Haters” club and vow to have nothing to do with the fair sex. Larry marries a girl anyway and attempts to hide the fact from Moe and Curly as they take a train trip. Director: Archie Gottler Cast: Marjorie White, A.R. Haysel, Monte […]

Brantley is wrong about Republicans losing debate on Obamacare and conscience

Religious Liberty: Obamacare’s First Casualty Uploaded by HeritageFoundation on Feb 22, 2012 http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/22/morning-bell-religious-liberty-under-attack/ | The controversy over the Obama Administration’s anti-conscience mandate and the fight for religious liberty only serves to highlight the inherent flaws in Obamacare. This conflict is a natural result of the centralization laid out under Obamacare and will only continue until […]

“War on Women?”

Religious Liberty: Obamacare’s First Casualty Uploaded by HeritageFoundation on Feb 22, 2012 http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/22/morning-bell-religious-liberty-under-attack/ | The controversy over the Obama Administration’s anti-conscience mandate and the fight for religious liberty only serves to highlight the inherent flaws in Obamacare. This conflict is a natural result of the centralization laid out under Obamacare and will only continue until […]

Is anything “free?”: According to Obama there is

Somebody will pay. You can bet on that. Obama’s Political Prophylactic Posted by Roger Pilon “White House compromise still guarantees contraceptive coverage for women,” reads theWashington Post headline coming out of President Obama’s press conference this afternoon. Trying to tamp down the escalating political storm his administration created three weeks ago when it ruled that, under Obamacare, employers with […]

Single-Payer healthcare system work? (Free Market response, Part 2)

_____________________________________________________ I would like to respond the idea of a single payer healthcare system by quoting from David Hogberg’s article “Free Market Cure – The Myths of Single-Payer Health Care.” He notes: A single-payer health care system is one in which a single-entity — the government — collects almost all of the revenue for and pays almost all of […]

 

“Feedback Friday” Letter to White House generated form letter response (on abortion) April 16, 2012 (part 5)

I have been writing President Obama letters and have not received a personal response yet.  (He reads 10 letters a day personally and responds to each of them.) However, I did receive a form letter in the form of an email on April 16, 2011. First you will see my letter to him which was mailed around April 9th(although there are several other letters I mailed about that same time on this issue.)

KIreland.jpg 

Science Matters #2: Former supermodel Kathy Ireland tells Mike Huckabee about how she became pro-life after reading what the science books have to say.

President Obama c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here.

I wanted to talk to you today about your views on abortion. Everyone remembers Kathy Ireland from her Sports Illustrated days and actually she has became a very successful business person.  However, I wanted to talk about her pro-life views.

_____________

Back on April 27, 2009 Fox News ran a story by Hollie McKay(Supermodel Kathy Ireland Lashes Out Against Pro Choice,”) on  Ireland.

It’s no secret that the majority of Hollywood stars are strong advocates for a woman’s right to choose whether or not she wants to terminate a pregnancy, however former “Sports Illustrated” supermodel-turned-entrepreneur-turned-author Kathy Ireland has gone against the grain of the glitterati and spoken out against abortion.

“My entire life I was pro-choice — who was I to tell another woman what she could or couldn’t do with her body? But when I was 18, I became a Christian and I dove into the medical books, I dove into science,” Ireland told Tarts while promoting her insightful new book “Real Solutions for Busy Mom: Your Guide to Success and Sanity.”

“What I read was astounding and I learned that at the moment of conception a new life comes into being. The complete genetic blueprint is there, the DNA is determined, the blood type is determined, the sex is determined, the unique set of fingerprints that nobody has had or ever will have is already there.”

However Ireland admitted that she did everything she could to avoid becoming a believer in pro-life.

“I called Planned Parenthood and begged them to give me their best argument and all they could come up with that it is really just a clump of cells and if you get it early enough it doesn’t even look like a baby. Well, we’re all clumps of cells and the unborn does not look like a baby the same way the baby does not look like a teenager, a teenager does not look like a senior citizen. That unborn baby looks exactly the way human beings are supposed to look at that stage of development. It doesn’t suddenly become a human being at a certain point in time,” Ireland argued. “I’ve also asked leading scientists across our country to please show me some shred of evidence that the unborn is not a human being. I didn’t want to be pro-life, but this is not a woman’s rights issue but a human rights issue.”

My good friend Dr. Kevin R. Henke is a scientist and also an atheistic evolutionist. I had a lot of discussions with Kevin over religious views. I remember going over John 7:17 with him one day. It says:

John 7:17 (Amplified Bible)

17If any man desires to do His will (God’s pleasure), he will know (have the needed illumination to recognize, and can tell for himself) whether the teaching is from God or whether I am speaking from Myself and of My own accord and on My own authority.

I challenged Kevin to read a chapter a day of the Book of John and pray to God and ask God, “Dear God, if you are there then reveal yourself to me, and I pledge to serve you the rest of my life.”

Kevin did that and he even wrote down the thoughts that came to his mind and sent it to me and these thoughts filled a notebook.

Kevin did not become a Christian, but I am still praying for him. I do respect Kevin because he is an honest man. Interestingly enough he  told me that he was pro-life because the unborn baby has all the genetic code at  the time of conception that they will have for the rest of their life. Below are some other comments by other scientists:

Dr. Hymie Gordon (Mayo Clinic): “By all criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception.”

Dr. Micheline Matthews-Roth (Harvard University Medical School): “It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception.”

Dr. Alfred Bongioanni (University of Pennsylvania): “I have learned from my earliest medical education that human life begins at the time of conception.”

Dr. Jerome LeJeune, “the Father of Modern Genetics” (University of Descartes, Paris): “To accept the fact that after fertilization has taken place a new human has come into being is no longer a matter of taste or opinion . . . it is plain experimental evidence.”

__

Thank you so much for your time. I know how valuable it is. I also appreciate the fine family that you have and your committment as a father and a husband.

Sincerely,

Everette Hatcher III, 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002, ph 501-920-5733, lowcostsqueegees@yahoo.com

_______________

I actually mailed this to President Obama about a week ago and got this email back:

The White House, Washington
 

 

April 16, 2012

Dear Everette:

Thank you for taking the time to share your views on abortion.  This is a heart-wrenching issue, and I appreciate your input and thoughts.

I am committed to making my Administration the most open and transparent in history, and part of delivering on that promise is hearing from people like you.  I take seriously your opinions and respect your point of view on this issue.  Please know that your concerns will be on my mind in the days ahead.

Thank you, again, for writing.  I encourage you to visit www.WhiteHouse.gov to learn more about my Administration or to contact me in the future.

Sincerely,

Barack Obama

Here are some other of my letters to the White House:

Letter to White House generated form letter response April 3, 2011 (part 4)

I have been writing President Obama letters and have not received a personal response yet.  (He reads 10 letters a day personally and responds to each of them.) However, I did receive a form letter in the form of an email on April 3, 2011. I don’t know which letter of mine generated this response so I have linked […]

Open letters to President Obama displayed here on www.thedailyhatch.org

I have been writing letters to President Obama almost all of 2012. I have received several responses from the White House but none of the responses have been personal responses from the President. Below is a letter I wrote to the President and a form letter response that I got followed by links to other […]

An open letter to President Obama (Part 65)

Leader Cantor On CNN Responding To President Obama’s State of the Union Address Uploaded by EricCantor on Jan 25, 2012 ______________ President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I […]

An open letter to President Obama (Part 64)

Sen. Paul Delivers State of the Union Response – Jan. 24, 2012 Uploaded by SenatorRandPaul on Jan 24, 2012 Sen. Rand Paul delivered the following Republican response to President Barack Obama’s State of the Union Address this evening. _________________ President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, […]

An open letter to President Obama (Part 63)

Rep Michael Burgess response Uploaded by MichaelCBurgessMD on Jan 25, 2012 This week Dr. Burgess provides an update from Washington and responds to President Obama’s State of the Union address. _______________ President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day […]

An open letter to President Obama (Part 62)

Rep Michael Burgess response Uploaded by MichaelCBurgessMD on Jan 25, 2012 This week Dr. Burgess provides an update from Washington and responds to President Obama’s State of the Union address. Sen. Toomey responds to State of the Union address 2012 President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. […]

“Feedback Friday” Letter to White House generated form letter response March 7, 2011 (part 3)

I have been writing President Obama letters and have not received a personal response yet.  (He reads 10 letters a day personally and responds to each of them.) However, I did receive a form letter in the form of an email on March 7, 2011. I don’t know which letter of mine generated this response so I have […]

An open letter to President Obama (Part 61)

Rep. James Lankford Responds to President Obama’s $3.8 Trillion Budget Uploaded by RepLankford on Feb 13, 2012 Rep. James Lankford (R-OK) responded to President Obama’s FY 2013 budget proposal that fails to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term as promised. The budget also delayed the tough decisions to cut spending and […]

An open letter to President Obama (Part 60)

_________________________ Corker Says President’s 2012 Budget Proposal Shows “Lack of Urgency” on Spending Uploaded by senatorcorker on Feb 14, 2011 In remarks on the Senate floor today, U.S. Senator Bob Corker, R-Tenn., expressed disappointment in President Obama’s 2012 budget proposal, saying it displayed a “lack of urgency” to get federal spending under control. Corker has introduced the […]

An open letter to President Obama (Part 59)

  President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here. Dan Mitchell of […]

An open letter to President Obama (Part 58) “Our national debt threatens our security”

Liam Fox Issues a Warning to America Uploaded by HeritageFoundation on Feb 28, 2012 Britain’s Liam Fox has a warning for America: Fix the debt problem now or suffer the consequences of less power on the world stage. The former U.K. secretary of state for defense visited Heritage to explain why the America’s debt is […]

An open letter to President Obama and a form letter response!!!!(Part 58)

  Science Matters #2: Former supermodel Kathy Ireland tells Mike Huckabee about how she became pro-life after reading what the science books have to say. President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read […]

An open letter to President Obama (Part 57)

President Obama c/o The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here. Over the […]

“Feedback Friday” Letter to White House generated form letter response Jan 27, 2011 (part 2)

I have been writing President Obama letters and have not received a personal response yet.  (He reads 10 letters a day personally and responds to each of them.) However, I did receive a form letter in the form of an email on January 27, 2011. I don’t know which letter of mine generated this response so I have […]

“Feedback Friday” Letter to White House generated form letter response Jan 25, 2011 (part 1)

I have been writing President Obama letters and have not received a personal response yet.  (He reads 10 letters a day personally and responds to each of them.) However, I did receive a form letter in the form of an email on January 25, 2011. I don’t know which letter of mine generated this response so I have […]

 

Debate on Milton Friedman’s cure for inflation “Friedman Friday”

If you would like to see the first three episodes on inflation in Milton Friedman’s film series “Free to Choose” then go to a previous post I did.

Ep. 9 – How to Cure Inflation [4/7]. Milton Friedman’s Free to Choose (1980)

Uploaded by on Jun 16, 2010

While many people have a fairly good grasp of what inflation is, few really understand its fundamental cause. There are many popular scapegoats: labor unions, big business, spendthrift consumers, greed, and international forces. Dr. Friedman explains that the actual cause is a government that has exclusive control of the money supply.

Friedman says that the solution to inflation is well known among those who have the power to stop it: simply slow down the rate at which new money is printed. But government is one of the primary beneficiaries of inflation. By inflating the currency, tax revenues rise as families are pushed into higher income tax brackets. Thus, inflation transfers wealth and resources from the private to the public sector. In short, inflation is attractive to government because it is a way of increasing taxes without having to pass new legislation to raise tax rates. Inflation is in fact taxation without representation.

Wage and price controls are not the cure for inflation because they treat only the symptom (rising prices) and not the disease (monetary expansion). History records that such controls do not work; instead, they have perverse effects on both prices and economic growth and undermine the fundamental productivity of the economy. There is only one cure for inflation: slow the printing presses. But the cure produces the painful side effects of a temporary increase in unemployment and reduced economic growth. It takes considerable political courage to undergo the cure.

Friedman cites the example of Japan, which successfully underwent the cure in the mid-seventies but took five years to squeeze inflation out of the system. Inflation is a social disease that has the potential for destroying a free society if it is unchecked. Prolonged inflation undermines belief in the basic equity of the free market system because it tends to destroy the link between effort and reward. And it tears the social fabric because it divides society into winners and losers and sets group against group.

Below are some other posts I did about Milton Friedman’s ideas:

Who was Milton Friedman and what did he say about Social Security Reform? (Part 1)

Balanced Budget Amendment the answer? Boozman says yes, Pryor no, Part 22(Milton Friedman tells us how to stay free Part 1))

Why do people move to other states to avoid Arkansas’ high state income tax? (If you love Milton Friedman then you will love this post)

Pat Lynch: We need to bring tax rates back up for Rich (Real Cause of Deficit Pt 10)(If you love Milton Friedman then you will love this post)

Gene Lyons: Tax Cuts always reduce tax revenues (Part 2)

Balanced Budget Amendment the answer? Boozman says yes, Pryor no (Part 19, Milton Friedman’s view is yes)(Royal Wedding Part 19)

Gene Lyons: Tax Cuts always reduce tax revenues (Part 1)(The Conspirator Part 23)

John Fund’s talk in Little Rock 4-27-11(Part 2):Arkansas is a right to work state and gets new businesses because of it, Obama does not get that, but Milton Friedman does!!!(Royal Wedding Part 18)

Balanced Budget Amendment the answer? Boozman says yes, Pryor no (Part 12, Milton Friedman’s view is yes)(The Conspirator Part 15)

Creation of wealth in this country based on “self interest or greed” helps ordinary folks too..

Open letter to President Obama (Part 70)

President Obama c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here.

I fear that your corporate tax plan will backfire.

J.D. Foster, Ph.D.

February 22, 2012 at 1:03 pm

With his corporate tax reform “framework,” President Obama today added another element to his ultimately harmful economic agenda.

Previously announced anti-growth policies include massive budget deficits, a huge tax hike on individuals and small businesses in 2013, and his proposal to nearly triple the dividend tax rate.

His new proposal starts strong by reducing the federal corporate income tax rate to 28 percent from the current 35 percent. This is a good and long-overdue policy change. Regrettably, he marries rate reduction to a net corporate tax hike based in part on extending his policy to hammer and ultimately deconstruct U.S. multinational companies. The net effect is that his corporate tax reform would do more harm than good, representing yet another missed opportunity to help American workers.

The U.S. corporate tax rate is the world’s second highest—and soon to be highest in the world by far. The average of the OECD nations (nations considered to have developed economies) excluding the U.S. is just over 25 percent. The combined state and federal U.S. rate is nearly 40 percent. It is miraculous that U.S. companies can compete at all in the global economy with such a tremendous handicap.

At the same time, economists and policymakers increasingly understand that while the tax is paid almost exclusively out of profits that would otherwise go to the shareholders, the true economic burden falls primarily on workers. The reason is simply that the higher the effective corporate tax burden, the higher the hurdle rate on corporate investment. (The hurdle rate is the minimum rate a business must earn on investment to make the investment.) The higher the hurdle rate, the less investment takes place. The less investment takes place, the slower labor productivity grows, and the slower labor productivity grows, the slower wages grow.

This may seem a long chain of events, but every link in the chain is solid steel. In the end, it means the higher the corporate tax is, the lower workers’ wages are. This is why Democrats like President Obama and Senator Ron Wyden (D–OR) are now joining with Republicans anxious to see a lower corporate income tax rate. It’s certainly not to reward corporate executives or shareholders but to protect workers from further degradation of their wages.

Unfortunately, President Obama marries this extremely important policy to two very bad policies. He calls this corporate tax reform. But tax reform is revenue neutral. His policy is to expand the tax base—the measure of income subject to tax—by closing “loopholes and subsidies” so that the net effect is to increase corporate taxes substantially. That’s not tax reform. That’s just another tax hike in disguise. So Obama argues that we need corporate tax reform for economic growth and then proposes corporate tax hikes that would inhibit growth. Go figure.

There’s no doubt the corporate income tax code is laden with loopholes and subsidies, just as there is no doubt the President’s recently released budget adds to the list some of his own. His framework lists a handful of minor proposals carried over from his budget and then references three areas for reform without providing any details. Specifically, he references depreciation schedules, suggesting significantly higher taxes on business investment. He suggests paring back the deduction for interest expense, again raising the hurdle rate on business investment. And he suggests “establishing greater parity between large corporations and large non-corporate counterparts,” which is generally assumed to be code for levying a dividend tax on distributed profits of these non-corporate businesses.

Debating tax deductions is a Washington parlor game. However, suppose Obama chose wisely and that every such subsidy or loophole mentioned is a valid target for repeal. Rather than raising tax burdens, he should then cut the corporate tax rate further. Recall that the average of the OECD (excluding the U.S.) is just over 25 percent. At a 28 percent federal rate, the combined federal and state tax rate would then be nearly 33 percent, still well above that of the nation’s competitors. The U.S. federal rate needs to come down further, and Obama’s additional base broadening would permit it. But instead, Obama takes a pass on further rate reduction in favor of taking the cash for the federal government.

Raising corporate taxes is his first big mistake. Targeting U.S. multinationals specifically for higher taxes is his second. The issue is complicated, but it boils down to some simple points. U.S. multinationals compete on a global stage, earning income at home and abroad. Income earned abroad is taxed by the foreign government. The U.S. also taxes income earned abroad and employs some complex rules to prevent double taxation. In contrast, most of the rest of the world now recognizes the folly of adding domestic tax to the tax their companies pay overseas. This would just make their companies and their workers less competitive at home and abroad, as it does for U.S. companies today.

President Obama, however, wants to make an economically harmful policy worse by taxing U.S. companies’ foreign earnings even more heavily. The vision Obama outlines is to punish firms that outsource jobs and incentivize “insourcing.” The net effect, however, would be quite different. The net effect is to put a “for sale” sign on every profitable U.S. multinational company. The buyers, however, won’t be U.S. companies. The buyers will all be foreign companies.

The reason for this tax-induced fire sale is fairly simple: The reach of U.S. tax policy into income earned overseas extends only when it applies to U.S. companies. The U.S. has no taxing jurisdiction when it comes to the foreign earnings of foreign companies. For example, the U.S. taxes Toyota on what Toyota earns in the U.S. But the U.S. does not tax Toyota on what Toyota earns in Japan.

Suppose a U.S. company like HP earned all of its foreign income through a single foreign subsidiary called Globalsub. Now suppose Globalsub were taxed under Obama’s plan. Globalsub’s foreign profits would then be subject to foreign tax and an even more punitive U.S. tax.

If a foreign company like Sony were to buy HP, shifting Globalsub out of HP into its own foreign operations, then all of Globalsub’s profits would immediately be exempt from U.S. taxes. This sort of tax arbitrage would be very big business. It would also substantially reduce U.S. tax revenues.

Sound far-fetched? It isn’t. Remember when Mercedes-Benz bought Chrysler in 1998? Had Chrysler bought Mercedes instead, all of the German company’s profits would have been subject to U.S. tax, rendering the entire operation uncompetitive. This was all laid bare by John Loffredo, then the tax counsel for Chrysler, in testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee.

Another high-profile example occurred when the Belgian company InBev bought Anheuser-Busch in 2008 for $52 billion. The more U.S. tax policy in this area gets out of step with worldwide norms, the more U.S. companies become natural targets for foreign acquirers. President Obama’s tax policies would make matters much, much worse.

The right solution is to pursue a revenue-neutral corporate tax reform, reducing the corporate tax rate as far as sound base broadening will allow. At the same time, in international matters the U.S. should move in exactly the opposite direction from what President Obama proposes so that U.S. companies can compete globally and not become tax-induced targets for foreign acquirers.

________________

Thank you so much for your time. I know how valuable it is. I also appreciate the fine family that you have and your committment as a father and a husband.

Sincerely,

Everette Hatcher III, 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002, ph 501-920-5733, lowcostsqueegees@yahoo.com

The Founding Fathers views concerning Jesus, Christianity and the Bible (Part 3, Samuel Adams)

There have been many articles written by evangelicals like me who fear that our founding fathers would not recognize our country today because secular humanism has rid our nation of spiritual roots. I am deeply troubled by the secular agenda of those who are at war with religion in our public life.

Lillian Kwon quoted somebody that I respect a lot  in her article, “Christianity losing out to Secular Humanism?” :

“Most of the founding fathers of this nation … built the worldview of this nation on the authority of the Word of God,” Ken Ham said. “Because of that, there have been reminders in this culture concerning God’s Word, the God of creation.”

At the time I started this series I was in Boston, MA which was the home of John Adams. I have toured his home and found it very interesting. SO MANY FOUNDING FATHERS ARE FROM MASSACHUSETTS!!!

David Barton, 05-2008

A Few Declarations of Founding Fathers and  early Statesmen on Jesus Christianity and the Bible

Today we look at Samuel Adams

Samuel Adams 

SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE; “FATHER OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION”; RATIFIER OF THE U. S. CONSTITUTION; GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS 

I . . . [rely] upon the merits of Jesus Christ for a pardon of all my sins.10

The name of the Lord (says the Scripture) is a strong tower; thither the righteous flee and are safe [Proverbs 18:10]. Let us secure His favor and He will lead us through the journey of this life and at length receive us to a better.11

I conceive we cannot better express ourselves than by humbly supplicating the Supreme Ruler of the world . . . that the confusions that are and have been among the nations may be overruled by the promoting and speedily bringing in the holy and happy period when the kingdoms of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ may be everywhere established, and the people willingly bow to the scepter of Him who is the Prince of Peace.12

He also called on the State of Massachusetts to pray that . . .

  • the peaceful and glorious reign of our Divine Redeemer may be known and enjoyed throughout the whole family of mankind.13
  • we may with one heart and voice humbly implore His gracious and free pardon through Jesus Christ, supplicating His Divine aid . . . [and] above all to cause the religion of Jesus Christ, in its true spirit, to spread far and wide till the whole earth shall be filled with His glory.14
  • with true contrition of heart to confess their sins to God and implore forgiveness through the merits and mediation of Jesus Christ our Savior.15