RC Sproul and Stephen C. Meyer discuss evolution

RC Sproul Interviews Stephen Meyer, Part 1 of 5

Uploaded by on Mar 2, 2010

RC Sproul sits down with Stephen Meyer, author of the book, “Signature in the Cell”, and they discuss philosophy, evolution, education, Intelligent Design, and more.

Below is more on the bio of Stephen C. Meyer:

Dr. Stephen C. Meyer

Dr. Stephen C. Meyer

Stephen C. Meyer is director of the Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture (CSC) and a founder both of the intelligent design movement and of the CSC, intelligent design’s primary intellectual and scientific headquarters. Dr. Meyer is a Cambridge University-trained philosopher of science, the author of peer-reviewed publications in technical, scientific, philosophical and other books and journals. His signal contribution to ID theory is given most fully in Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design, published by HarperOne in June 2009.

[…]Graduating from Whitworth College in Spokane, Washington, in 1981 with a degree in physics and earth science, he later became a geophysicist with Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) in Dallas, Texas. From 1981 to 1985, he worked for ARCO in digital signal processing and seismic survey interpretation. As a Rotary International Scholar, he received his training in the history and philosophy of science at Cambridge University, earning a PhD in 1991. His thesis offered a methodological interpretation of origin-of-life research.

[…]Prior to the publication of Signature in the Cell, the piece of writing for which Meyer was best known was an August 2004 review essay in the Smithsonian Institution-affiliated peer-reviewed biology journal Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. The article laid out the evidential case for intelligent design, that certain features of living organisms–such as the miniature machines and complex circuits within cells–are better explained by an unspecified designing intelligence than by an undirected natural process like random mutation and natural selection.

[…]Meyer’s many other publications include a contribution to, and the editing of, the peer-reviewed volume Darwinism, Design and Public Education (Michigan State University Press, 2004) and the innovative textbook Explore Evolution (Hill House Publishers, 2007).

Meyer has been widely featured in media appearance on CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, Fox News, PBS, and the BBC. In 2008, he appeared with Ben Stein in Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed.  He’s also featured prominently in two other science documentaries, Icons of Evolution and Unlocking The Mystery of Life.

R.C. Sproul Interviews Author of “Darwin’s Doubt” on Evolution, Intelligent Design

( [email protected] ) Aug 05, 2013 03:41 AM EDT

Renowned theologian, author, and pastor R. C. Sproul interviewed Stephen Meyers, author of “Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design,” about his research on neo-Darwinian evolution and evidence for Intelligent Design. Sproul says that Meyer’s book is the most detailed analysis on the inconsistencies in evolution that he has ever seen.

Believers in neo-Darwinism think that creation was a result of natural selection acting on random genetic mutations; that all of life adapted from one “kind” to another, although there are no observable evidences of this. In his book, Meyers explains how Charles Darwin left one large question unanswered: he was puzzled by the abrupt appearance of animals in the fossil record known as the “Cambrian explosion” as opposed to small, incremental changes over a long period of time. “Within the ranks of evolutionary biology itself, there is now a tremendous skepticism being expressed about the creative power of the mutation-selection mechanism – the standard mechanism that is part of modern neo-Darwinian theory,” he said.

In “The Origin of Species,” Darwin himself admitted that the Cambrian explosion proposed “a valid objection to the views here entertained.” Meyers argues that it could not have been simply a “burst” of physical matter, but would also have had to produce reams of intricate genetic information that would be the basis of creation. What’s more, he believes that modern study of DNA reveals its intricate complexities and create much doubt – even among non-believers – that the evolutionary process could have formed something as complex as an animal.

Sproul had predicted that the theory of Darwinian Evolution would eventually be deconstructed by secular scientists because of its vast inconsistencies, and attested that neo-Darwinian macro-evolution presents “wild violations of the fundamental principles of the laws of immediate inference” in science. He argues that creating something out of nothing is “absolute absurdity … everything [coming from] nothing is the great magic [trick] –it’s the rabbit out of the hat, without a hat, without a rabbit, and without a magician.”

Intelligent Design is the concept that there is purposive intelligence behind all of creation – that a mind has intricately shaped all of the matter and genetic code that exists. It is based on the scientific method, and Meyers believes that it has significant theistic implications. While one does not have to be a Christian in order to agree with Intelligent Design, it presents a “powerful evidence of the activity of purposive intelligence acting in the history of life,” says Meyers. Macro-evolutionists may conclude that species have a common ancestor because of commonalities in the way their structures are designed, but Meyers argues that commonalities are instead evidence for a common Creator.

Many scientists feel as though they must limit their scientific conclusions to the material realm. Meyers called this pre-conceived idea a closed circle that by which some feel bound, “excluding from consideration the very explanation that makes most sense in light of our cause-and-effect experience of the world.” Excluding the immaterial from the possible set of solutions for the existence of the universe creates a “sub-rational historical biology” by refusing to consider one possible true answer, he said.

Meyers wants to encourage Christians to not be intimidated by the “alleged ‘indisputable body of facts’” that evolutionists present, because there is so much scientific evidence now that supports the idea of a Creator. He agreed with Sproul that Intelligent Design is consistent with God’s word, and quoted Psalm 104:24:

“O LORD, how manifold are Your works! In wisdom have You made them all; the earth is full of Your creatures” (English Standard Version).

Ligonier Ministries is currently offering “Darwin’s Doubt” for a donation of any amount.

Related posts:

Carl Sagan versus RC Sproul

At the end of this post is a message by RC Sproul in which he discusses Sagan. Over the years I have confronted many atheists. Here is one story below: I really believe Hebrews 4:12 when it asserts: For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the […]

Review of Carl Sagan book (Part 4 of series on Evolution)jh68

Review of Carl Sagan book (Part 4 of series on Evolution) The Long War against God-Henry Morris, part 5 of 6 Uploaded by FLIPWORLDUPSIDEDOWN3 on Aug 30, 2010 http://www.icr.org/ http://store.icr.org/prodinfo.asp?number=BLOWA2 http://store.icr.org/prodinfo.asp?number=BLOWASG http://www.fliptheworldupsidedown.com/blog _______________________ This is a review I did a few years ago. THE DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD: Science as a Candle in the Dark by Carl […]

Review of Carl Sagan book (Part 3 of series on Evolution)

Review of Carl Sagan book (Part 3 of series on Evolution) The Long War against God-Henry Morris, part 4 of 6 Uploaded by FLIPWORLDUPSIDEDOWN3 on Aug 30, 2010 http://www.icr.org/ http://store.icr.org/prodinfo.asp?number=BLOWA2 http://store.icr.org/prodinfo.asp?number=BLOWASG http://www.fliptheworldupsidedown.com/blog ______________________________________ I was really enjoyed this review of Carl Sagan’s book “Pale Blue Dot.” Carl Sagan’s Pale Blue Dot by Larry Vardiman, Ph.D. […]

Arkansas Times Blogger says Communists were not atheistic, but they were and they believed “might made right” jh48

Paul Kurtz pictured above. Norma Bates noted on the Arkansas Times Blog yesterday The most common justification throughout history – the elephant in everybody’s living room – is religion. “God is on our side.” “We are the chosen people.” “God gave us this land.” “God said to — .” Judaism, Christianity, or that relative Johnny-come-lately […]

Atheists confronted: How I confronted Carl Sagan the year before he died jh47

In today’s news you will read about Kirk Cameron taking on the atheist Stephen Hawking over some recent assertions he made concerning the existence of heaven. Back in December of 1995 I had the opportunity to correspond with Carl Sagan about a year before his untimely death. Sarah Anne Hughes in her article,”Kirk Cameron criticizes […]

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: