I have a lot of respect for Max Brantley of the Arkansas Times Blog and Dan Mitchell of the Cato Institute for their political analysis. They both have picked Obama to win today. I parted company and chose Romney to win 301 to 237.
Knowing how Dan Mitchell thinks leads me to believe that he would have a liberal Obama in office who he can be critical of instead of a lukewarm conservative like Romney who will spend like Bush did. I do agree with Mitchell’s writings that are critical of the growing federal government and I hope we can somehow turn it back to the good ole days when Newt was proposing welfare reform to President Clinton and we had a balanced budget. (Clinton made some bad decisions socially for the country and himself too during that time though.)
I am sticking with my prediction and will talk it again tomorrow.
Below is Mitchell’s final prediction.
The Final 2012 Election Prediction: Everything from the Electoral College Map to Which Party Controls the House and Senate
November 6, 2012 by Dan Mitchell
If readers of this blog were the only ones voting, Mitt Romney would win in a landslide with 70 percent of the vote and Gary Johnson would edge out Barack Obama for second place.
But I have a sneaking suspicion that readers of International Liberty are not quite representative of the overall population (I need more looters and moochers in my audience, sort of like what you see in this cartoon).
Yes, I’m going to be bold and say that Obama will get more than 12.5 percent of the vote.
Indeed, I’m guessing he’ll get at least a plurality of the vote. And I’m specifically predicting he’ll get a majority of the electoral college.
I’ve been predicting that Obama would win re-election for the past six months, and I see no reason to change my mind now that it’s election day. I’m even moving two more states – New Hampshire and Virginia – into Obama’s column, which will be enough to give him a 294-244 margin in the electoral college.
As you can see from the large number of states in the “leaning” category, I don’t have a high level of confidence in my prediction. And plenty of my Republican friends have made strong arguments that the polls are flawed because of “turnout” assumptions.
But I have no competence to judge the veracity of these claims, so I’m going with my gut instinct and calling it for the Spender-in-Chief.
If my guess of an Obama victory turns out to be correct, I suppose I could claim special insight because of my January 1 prediction that Obama would win if the unemployment rate fell under 8 percent. But as you can see from this graph, I’ve always shown Obama ahead, even when the joblessness rate was higher.
For what it’s worth, I don’t think there’s anything terribly unusual or unconventional about my predictions for the electoral college. But I am going to be a non-conformist in my guesses about the partisan breakdown of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate.
Republicans began the year with high hopes of taking control of the Senate, but a series of mis-steps have hurt the GOP and some people even predict they will lose seats. That’s possible, but I’m going out on a limb and predicting a two-seat gain for Republicans.
I’m also going to be a non-conformist in my predictions for the lower chamber, guessing a one-seat pick-up for the GOP.
I’ll also make two final predictions. First, drawing from my post yesterday about key ballot initiatives, I predict that California voters will reject all the proposed tax increases. This will prove that left-wingers are capable of being right-wingers when their own money is on the table.
Second, I’ll offer a prediction that’s about as controversial as asserting that the sun will rise in the east and set in the west. I predict that government will get even bigger over the next four years, which will mean more corruption and weaker economic performance.
P.S. My predictions for the U.S. Senate assume that the independent candidate will win in Maine and will ally himself with the Democrats.