Tag Archives: social security trust fund.

Max Brantley acts as if there is money in Social Security Fund

Max Brantley brags about the Social Security fund lasting till 2033, but here are the cold hard facts:

Sometimes, Governments Lie (6th Anniversary Ed.)

Posted by Michael F. Cannon

(This blog post first appeared at Cato@Liberty following the release of the 2006 Medicare and Social Security trustees’ reports. I repost it, with updated links and “exhaustion dates” because sadly nothing else has changed.)

Sometimes, Governments Lie

Year after year, federal officials speak of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds as if they were real.  Yesterday Today, the government announced that the Social Security trust fund will be exhausted in 2040 2033 and that the Medicare hospital insurance trust fund will be exhausted in 2018 2024— projections that the media dutifully reported.

But those dates are meaningless, because there are no assets for these “trust funds” to exhaust.  The Bush administration wrote in its FY2007 budget proposal:

These balances are available to finance future benefit payments and other trust fund expenditures—but only in a bookkeeping sense. These funds…are not assets…that can be drawn down in the future to fund benefits…When trust fund holdings are redeemed to pay benefits, Treasury will have to finance the expenditure in the same way as any other Federal expenditure: out of current receipts, by borrowing from the public, or by reducing benefits or other expenditures. The existence of large trust fund balances, therefore, does not, by itself, increase the Government’s ability to pay benefits.

This is similar to language in the Clinton administration’s FY2000 budget, which noted that the size of the trust fund “does not…have any impact on the Government’s ability to pay benefits” (emphasis added).

I offer the following proposition:

If the government knows that there are no assets in the Social Security and Medicare “trust funds,” and yet projects the interest earned on those non-assets and the date on which those non-assets will be exhausted, then the government is lying.

If that’s the case, then these annual trustees reports constitute an institutionalized, ritualistic lie.  Also ritualistic is the media’s uncritical repetition of the lie.

3 myths about debt ceiling

I got the info below from ReasonTV:

Uploaded by on Jul 18, 2011

According to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, the U.S. government will reach its legal borrowing limit–the debt ceiling–on August 2. What will happen if the White House and congressional Republicans don’t reach an agreement before then? Will the U.S. be forced to default on its debt? In her latest appearance on Bloomberg TV, Reason columnist and Mercatus Center economist Veronique de Rugy explains the facts about the debt ceiling by separating economic myth from economic reality.

Myth 1: If a deal is not reached by August 2, the U.S. will default on its debt.
Fact 1: The Treasury Department can prioritize payments in order to avoid a default.

Myth 2: If the debt ceiling isn’t raised the government won’t be able to pay Social Security benefits.
Fact 2: There are approximately $2.6 trillion dollars in the Social Security Trust Fund. Those assets can be used to pay benefits. Furthermore, there is already trillions of dollars of interagency debt that counts toward the $14.29 trillion debt limit. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner could convert that interagency debt into publicly-held debt, preventing not only a technical default but also preventing any delay in government payments.

Myth 3: The Treasury cannot use the Social Security Trust Fund to delay a default past August 2.
Fact 3: While the Treasury can’t use money from the Social Security Trust Fund, it can “disinvest” from other trust funds to pay for benefits.

For additional information, see de Rugy’s article “The Facts About the Debt Ceiling.” http://reason.com/archives/2011/07/18/the-facts-about-the-debt-ceili