Madison, WI Union Debate (part 2)

Teachers’ unions and representatives of every liberal interest group in the country may have taken over the streets of Madison for demonstrations, marches and speeches, but inside the Wisconsin governor’s mansion its chief tenant remains calm and resolute.

Tennessee loses to Florida and Vandy beats Miss St. Kentucky slips by Ole Miss and Alabama beats Georgia. What do I care? The hogs are out already!!!

Max Brantley (Arkansas Times Blog, March 8, 2011) asserted:

Town hall meetings in Wisconsin suddenly aren’t so comfortable for Republican politicians. They’re having to explain the police state underway at the Capitol. Congressman James Sensenbrenner shut down his meeting prematurely rather than letting the people speak.

Dump him in the harbor.

_________________________________

That is strange talk coming from a liberal like Max since all the liberals were critical of Palin for all this mean spirited rhetoric.

Chris Edwards wrote an excellent article “Madison Protest: Unions are Angry– but Wisconsin Should Go Even Further,” Feb 18, 2011, Cato Institute and I will posted portions of that article the next few days.

In 2010, 36 percent of state and local workers were members of unions, which is five times the union share in the US private sector. Yet prior to the 1960s, unions represented less than 15 percent of the state and local workforce. At the time, courts generally held that public-sector workers did not have the same union privileges that private workers had under the 1935 Wagner Act, such as collective bargaining.

The rise of public-sector unions
That changed during the 1960s and 1970s, as a flood of pro-union laws in dozens of states triggered a dramatic rise in public-sector unionism. Many states passed laws that encouraged collective bargaining in the public sector, as well as laws that imposed compulsory union dues.

Today, the union shares in government workforces vary widely by state. About 26 states have collective bargaining for essentially all state and local workers. A further 12 or so states have collective bargaining for a portion of their state and local workers, and the remaining 12 states do not have public sector collective bargaining. At the same time, 22 states have “right-to-work” laws, which free workers from being forced to join a union or pay union dues.

These differences in unionization between the states affect fiscal policy. Statistical studies find that unionized public sector workers earn a wage premium of about 10 percent over non-unionized public sector workers. This is important because employee compensation represents half of all state and local government spending.

Aside from inflated wages, public sector unions have pushed for excessive pension benefit levels, which are creating a fiscal crisis for many governments. That’s another reason unions are so angry in Wisconsin: Governor Walker is demanding that state workers carry more of the burden for their health and pension plans.

Ronald Wilson Reagan Pt 51 B (The Day Reagan was shot)

U.S. President Ronald Reagan assassination attempt.

I remember exactly where I was when I heard that President Reagan had been shot. I had just got out of a freshman class at college and turned on my car. The radio immediately went into a news story saying that President Reagan had been shot.

Today, some more details came out about that day 30 years ago:

Secret Service tape from Reagan attack is released

AP //

  • Email
  • Print
  • Reagan AP – ** FILE ** In this March 30, 1981 file photo, President Reagan waves, then looks up before being shoved …

    WASHINGTON – A Secret Service audiotape 30 years old sheds light on the chaotic aftermath of Ronald Reagan’s shooting when neither the president nor his guardians realized he’d been shot, and an agent’s snap decision to get him to a hospital might have saved his life.

    “Let’s hustle,” agent Jerry Parr is heard barking as Reagan’s limousine suddenly changed course, the sight of the president’s blood signaling there was more wrong with him than a bruised rib or two, as everyone thought right after the March 30, 1981, attack. The car, which had been spiriting Reagan back to the security of the White House after the spray of gunfire, sped to George Washington University Hospital instead. Reagan lost about half his blood and came closer to death that day than Americans realized for years later.

    The Secret Service released the tape Friday in response to a public-records request from Del Wilber, a Washington Post reporter whose book, “Rawhide Down: The Near Assassination of Ronald Reagan,” comes out next week.

    Just over 10 minutes, the tape captures the urgent, confused yet coolly methodical radio communications among agents on the scene and the Secret Service command post, starting when the president and his entourage walked out of the Washington Hilton while John Hinckley Jr., with a pistol, stood waiting.

    Hinckley opened fire, wounding press secretary James Brady in the head, police officer Thomas Delahanty in the back of the neck and Secret Service agent Timothy McCarthy in the abdomen before his last bullet ricocheted off the limousine, grazing Reagan’s rib and lodging in his lung. As has been known, Reagan and his protectors at first thought he’d merely hurt his ribs from being shoved into the vehicle by Parr.

    At 2:27 p.m., 19 seconds into the tape, agent Ray Shaddick radios: “Advise, we’ve had shots fired. Shots fired. There are some injuries, uh, lay one on.”

    Sixteen seconds later, Parr radios assurance about a president whose Secret Service code name was drawn from the Westerns he loved: “Rawhide is OK. Follow-up. Rawhide is OK.”

    “You wanna go to the hospital or back to the White House?” Shaddick asks.

    “We’re going right. we’re going to Crown,” Parr says, using a code word for the White House.

    “Back to the White House,” Shaddick repeats. “Rawhide is OK.”

    Twenty-four seconds later, a voice asserts again: “Rawhide’s alright.”

    But 25 seconds after that, the plan abruptly changes: “We want to go to the emergency room of George Washington.”

    Nowhere in the tape does anyone state that the president is hurt.

    Inside the car, however, as participants have told it, Reagan was worsening. Parr had quickly checked Reagan as they sped away and finding nothing terribly amiss, preferred the safety and medical facilities of the White House to an unsecured hospital. And when Reagan found blood in his mouth, the president told his men he must have cut his lip. But Reagan was becoming more ashen, complained of trouble breathing and the bleeding did not appear to be from a mere cut. Parr ordered the diversion to the hospital.

    “Go to George Washington fast,” agent Drew Unrue is heard saying, at 01:57 minutes into the tape.

    “Get an ambulance,” Parr tells the command post, known as Horsepower. “I mean get the, um, stretcher out there.” He wants the hospital to be ready to wheel the president in.

    “We’ve made the call,” Horsepower replies.

    “Let’s hustle,” Parr says.

    Sirens are heard, and a voice confirms that authorities have captured a suspect. Hinckley was piled on and arrested at the scene.

    Less than four minutes after Reagan left the Hilton, the car carrying the stricken president arrives at the hospital. Moments later, “Rainbow” — Nancy Reagan — is on her way.

    Reagan had suffered extensive internal bleeding, but his gunshot wound was not discovered until doctors examined him. As it turned out, he did not enter on a stretcher but got out of the car, walked in with the help of agents and began to collapse before those around him picked him up and carried him to the emergency room. Doctors were able to stabilize his blood pressure in short order before removing the bullet in surgery.

    Reagan’s wisecracks at the hospital that day testified to his resilience while masking the gravity of the struggle to save him. “Honey, I forgot to duck,” he told his wife. He told his doctors he hoped they were all Republicans, prompting this comeback from the liberal who led the trauma team, Dr. Joseph Giordano: “Today, Mr. President, we are all Republicans.” Reagan was in the hospital for nearly two weeks; recovery took months, but did not prevent a robust presidency.

    Brady was permanently disabled, which did not inhibit him from becoming an advocate for gun control. Delahanty was sent into retirement with enduring pain. McCarthy, who had turned himself into a human target, standing with his arms up and legs spread between Reagan and the gunman, recovered. Hinckley was found not guilty by reason of insanity and has been confined at a psychiatric hospital, granted increasing time outside in recent years.

    Tolbert: The Democrats claim Bush Tax Cuts are to blame for everything wrong in economy (Real Cause of Deficit Pt 2)

     

    Brian Riedl Heritage Foundation on Freedom and Prosperity Radio 8-28-10.wmv

    Washed away: Where there was once a coastline populated with homes and factories, powerful waves triggered by the tsunami devour anything in their path. Only a scattering trees remainWashed away: Where there was once a coastline populated with homes and factories, powerful waves triggered by the tsunami devour anything in their path. Only a scattering trees remain
    This morning I woke up to horrible news of the earthquake in Japan.

    March 11 (Bloomberg) — Japan was struck by its strongest earthquake in at least a century, an 8.9-magnitude temblor that shook buildings across Tokyo and unleashed a tsunami as high as 10 meters, engulfing towns along the northern coast. At least 26 people were killed by the 33-foot wave and many are missing, according to state broadcaster NHK Television. Bloomberg’s Mike Firn reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

    I remember back in December of 2004 when the huge tsunami hit Thailand, and I read about it in the newspaper. Little did I know that the Chinise supplier that provides us with Mopbuckets was vacationing there at the time. He had gone down to the beach and the day looked so nice that decided to rent a boat. Therefore, he went back to his hotel room to get the money and make the phone call. Then he heard a crashing sound and water started to flow through his hotel window, and he was on the 4th floor. Communications were cut off and his factory assumed he had been killed.

    __________________________________________

    Jason Tolbert in his article “Analyzing the Bush tax cuts,” (Arkansas News Bureau, August 8, 2010), rightly notes:

    The Democrats’ talking points center on framing the tax cuts as the “Bush tax cuts.” In their world anything associated with former President George W. Bush is automatically bad. Suddenly these “Bush tax cuts” are to blame for all things wrong with the economy, particularly the deficit. They claim that “extending the Bush tax cuts” will skyrocket the deficit and would be fiscally irresponsible.

    Riedl is the author of the article “The Three Biggest Myths About Tax Cuts and the Budget Deficit,” (Heritage Foundation, June 21, 2010), and the next few days I will be sharing portions of his article.

    Before coming to Heritage in 2001, Riedl worked for then-Gov. Tommy Thompson, former Rep. Mark Green (R-WI)., and the Speaker of the Wisconsin Assembly. Riedl holds a bachelor’s degree in economics and political science from the University of Wisconsin, and a master’s degree in public affairs from Princeton University.

    The surging budget deficit will likely dominate the national economic debate for years to come. Even after the recession ends, persistent trillion-dollar deficits are projected to double the national debt by the end of the decade. In the absence of reform, the financial markets will eventually respond by withdrawing capital, pushing up interest rates, and demanding immediate budget reforms—much like Greece is currently experiencing.

    Putting the federal budget on a sustainable path will require drastic reforms. Balancing the budget by 2020 would require either eliminating one-third of all spending, raising taxes by 50 percent, or a combination of the two. This enormous budget constraint will set the framework for all budgeting decisions—from taxes to health care, from education to Social Security.

    Finding a solution to growing deficits requires first correctly diagnosing their cause. Both recent and future budget deficits have been blamed largely on the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, and to a lesser extent on the war on terrorism, but the data contradict these myths. In reality, spending is almost exclusively the problem:

    • The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts were responsible for just 14 percent of the swing from the projected cumulative $5.6 trillion surplus for 2002–2011 to an actual $6.1 trillion deficit. The vast majority of the shift was due to higher spending and slower-than-projected economic growth.
    • President Barack Obama’s assertion that most future deficits will result from the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the Medicare drug entitlement is based on faulty methodology, but is still wrong even using that methodology.
    • Above-average spending, not below-average revenues, accounts for 92 percent of rising budget deficits by 2014 and 100 percent by 2017.
    • Nearly all rising spending will occur in Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and net interest payments.

    Deficit reduction efforts should focus on the source of the problem: rising entitlement spending. Any attempt to split the difference between broad-based tax hikes and spending cuts should be rejected outright as a false solution.

    Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 51 (Reagan talks about the Soviet Economy crumbling because of Soviet Communism in 1982 speech)

    The Palace of Westminster more commonly known as the Houses of Parliament is situated on the banks of the Thames in Westminster London. It is the home of the House of Commons and the House of Lords. It began life as a royal residence in 1042 under Edward the Confessor. The current mock gothic building design was result of a national competition. The plan of the building was the work of Charles Barry, with the gothic details designed by Augustus Pugin. The building has approximately 1,000 rooms, 100 staircases, and 3 km of passageways.

    TRENDING NOW:

    y

    Peyton Hillis - Cleveland Browns

    • Rush Yds1177
    • Yds/Game73.6
    • TD11

    Cleveland Browns

    • Height: 6-2
    • Weight: 250
    • Born: Jan 21, 1986 – Conway, AR


    I heard Peyton Hillis will be giving autographs on Sunday from 1pm to 3pm at Dillards at Park Plaze in Little Rock. Peyton was on 103.7 the buzz today and he said he hopes to go another 4 or 5 years in the NFL. He always gives 100% on every play and he hates to go out of bounds when he can still get another yard.  That is tough on a body. I wish him well. I remember seeing him play against Bryant. Also a friend in Conway told me that Peyton used to be in his Sunday School class in the 7th grade and Peyton beat him arm wrestling even then.

    In a prophetic speech concerning the Soviet Union, Ronald Reagan predicted that “the march of freedom and democracy will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash-heap of history.” I am posting in the coming days excerpts from one of Reagan best speeches ever.  He addressed the members of the British Parliament on June 8, 1982.

    Sir Winston Churchill refused to accept the inevitability of war or even that it was imminent. He said, “I do not believe that Soviet Russia desires war. What they desire is the fruits of war and the indefinite expansion of their power and doctrines. But what we have to consider here today while time remains is the permanent prevention of war and the establishment of conditions of freedom and democracy as rapidly as possible in all countries.”
    Well, this is precisely our mission today: to preserve freedom as well as peace. It may not be easy to see; but I believe we live now at a turning point.In an ironic sense Karl Marx was right. We are witnessing today a great revolutionary crisis, a crisis where the demands of the economic order are conflicting directly with those of the political order. But the crisis is happening not in the free, non-Marxist West, but in the home of Marxist-Leninism, the Soviet Union. It is the Soviet Union that runs against the tide of history by denying human freedom and human dignity to its citizens. It also is in deep economic difficulty. The rate of growth in the national product has been steadily declining since the fifties and is less than half of what it was then.
    The dimensions of this failure are astounding: A country which employs one-fifth of its population in agriculture is unable to feed its own people. Were it not for the private sector, the tiny private sector tolerated in Soviet agriculture, the country might be on the brink of famine. These private plots occupy a bare 3 percent of the arable land but account for nearly one-quarter of Soviet farm output and nearly one-third of meat products and vegetables. Overcentralized, with little or no incentives, year after year the Soviet system pours its best resource into the making of instruments of destruction. The constant shrinkage of economic growth combined with the growth of military production is putting a heavy strain on the Soviet people. What we see here is a political structure that no longer corresponds to its economic base, a society where productive forces are hampered by political ones.
    The decay of the Soviet experiment should come as no surprise to us. Wherever the comparisons have been made between free and closed societies — West Germany and East Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia, Malaysia and Vietnam — it is the democratic countries what are prosperous and responsive to the needs of their people. And one of the simple but overwhelming facts of our time is this: Of all the millions of refugees we’ve seen in the modern world, their flight is always away from, not toward the Communist world. Today on the NATO line, our military forces face east to prevent a possible invasion. On the other side of the line, the Soviet forces also face east to prevent their people from leaving.

    _______________________________________

    Little known presidential facts:

    1. The term “O.K.” derives from President Martin Van Buren (1782-1862) who was known as “Old Kinderhook” because he was raised in Kinderhook, New York. “O.K.” clubs were created to support Van Buren’s campaigns.k
    2. President Grover Cleveland (1837-1908) is the only president to be elected to two nonconsecutive terms. He was the 22nd and 24th president.j


    Madison, WI Union Debate (part 1)

    The Heritage Foundation sent a team to Madison, WI, to cover the union-backed protest against Gov. Scott Walker’s budget proposal.

    3,746
    450

    //

    Scott Walker

    I want to say “Hi” to my friend Pete from Wisconsin. Since you emailed this morning, I have decided to start posting my series on Wisconsin and the Union debate. By the way, way to go Packers. I told you about the time a few years ago with former Greenbay Packer Keith Jackson brought his son to the movies and sat next to my son Wilson and I. Actually I have several friends that knew him from Parkview High School where he was a standout in both basketball and football. I also got to hear his testimony at Paul Jackson’s church. Reggie White stayed after him until he shaped up!!!

    A tribute to Reggie White, a great part of Packer’s history and an even greater person.

    Gene Lyons asserts in his article, “Wisconsin government: In cash we trust, but unions we bust,” (Feb 25, 2011) :

    Negotiating, however, wasn’t what Gov. Walker had in mind. His goal was union-busting. Refusing to meet with union representatives, he proposed a bill basically abolishing the collective-bargaining rights of public employees first established in 1959.

    He pre-emptively threatened to call out the National Guard if union members didn’t like it. There would be no compromises and no negotiation.

    “He campaigned on this,” wrote Washington Post columnist George Will. His little heart going pitty-pat for this latest right-wing heartthrob, Will compared Walker to such conservative foes of organized labor as Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher.

    Except, no, Walker didn’t run on decertifying public employee unions during his 2010 campaign. Moreover, he’d probably never have been elected governor if he had.

    A poll commissioned by the AFL-CIO found that even with partisan passions fully engaged, less than one-third of Wisconsinites favor abolishing public employees’ right to collective bargaining — particularly not, one imagines, in so peremptory and dishonest a manner.

    _____________________________

    My observation is that who would believe a poll by the AFL-CIO anyway?

    Chris Edwards wrote an excellent article “Madison Protest: Unions are Angry– but Wisconsin Should Go Even Further,” Feb 18, 2011, Cato Institute and I will posted portions of that article the next few days.

    Chaos in government. Tens of thousands of angry protesters in the streets. Schools closed. Yes, Wisconsin looks a lot like Egypt this week. But while Arabs are fighting to end extraordinary overreach by government, Wisconsin union protesters are fighting to preserve it.

    At the heart of the dispute is a bold plan by Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) to curtail collective bargaining by most but not all of his state’s public-sector workers, including teachers. That is a long overdue reform — but the governor’s plan doesn’t go far enough! A dozen or so states, including Virginia, where I live, do not allow collective bargaining in the public sector at all, and these states are doing just fine without it.

    The government union issue is coming to the forefront because states, facing huge deficits, are desperate to reform their budgets and cut pensions. Wisconsin is just one of several states where legislatures, empowered by Republican victories last fall, are finally tackling one of the root causes: the ability of public-sector unions to squeeze taxpayers for exorbitant benefits. In states that have unionized workforces, needed reforms are facing huge and aggressive anti-reform lobbying campaigns by the unions.

    I remember like yesterday the summer of 1978 when the Memphis City Police went on strike for 8 days. There was a curfew every night and basically many upstanding police acted like criminals themselves. It was a sad time. There are reasons that many public sector unions do not have the right to strike. More on that in my next post.

    Response to Elwood: Deficit does matter, time to worry.

    The video clip is really an answer to Elwood from the Arkansas Times comment section that answers his statement that deficits don’t matter and we should not be worried about our continued out of control spending. Here are Elwood’s own words:

    If you’ve heard enough “THE SKY IS FALLING” here’s some sensible writing on the subject
    “We’re broke! We’re broke!” Speaker John Boehner said on Sunday. “We’re broke in this state,” Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin said a few days ago. “New Jersey’s broke,” Gov. Chris Christie has said repeatedly. The United States faces a “looming bankruptcy,” Charles Koch, the billionaire industrialist, wrote in The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday.
    It’s all obfuscating nonsense, of course, a scare tactic employed for political ends. A country with a deficit is not necessarily any more “broke” than a family with a mortgage or a college loan.

    I have started a new series today called “The Real Cause of the Debt.” Below is an excellent article by Heritage Senior Fellow J.D. Foster:

    January 4th, 2010
    Interest. Or to be more precise, interest payments. That, Heritage Senior Fellow J.D. Foster explains, is the biggest reason why Americans should be very concerned with the trillions of dollars in debt our federal government is piling up in Washington. Watch:And the situation is only going to get worse under President Barack Obamas budget. Heritage Foundation fellow Brian Riedl reports: Federal spending (which has remained around 20 percent of economy since the 1950s) would surpass 28 percent of economy by 2019. Federal spending per household would rise from $25,000 per household in 2008 to more than $37,000 per household by 2019. This spending would drive a permanent, unprecedented increase in the national debt. After borrowing just under $6 trillion from 1789 through 2008 (plus nearly $2 trillion in 2009), Washington would borrow $13 trillion over the next decadenearly $100,000 for every household. By 2019, annual budget deficits would approach $2 trillion and push the public debt to nearly 100 percent of the economy. Merely paying the interest on this debt would soon cost taxpayers $1 trillion annually, and spending and deficits would continue to rise.

    Dumas: “Spending…not the cause of …deficits…it is…tax cuts”(Real Cause of Deficit Pt 1)

    Brian Riedl of Heritage on Averting National Bankruptcy.wmv

    This whole series shows that rising entitlement spending will bankrupt us and the Bush Tax Cuts are not to blame.

    Ernest Dumas in his article “What accounts for the revolutionary spending binge in Washington and state capitals?,” (Arkansas Times, Feb 16, 2011) asserted:

    Runaway government spending on social programs or even on banks and General Motors is not the cause of the federal or state deficits. Mainly, it is a dramatic decline in government revenues, owing to tax cuts and the deepest, longest recession in 70 years engendered by these conservatives.

    We have heard the liberals say for years that Bush put us into this horrible position of deficits because of his tax cuts of 2001 and 2003. However, if Bush was responsible for taking the 236 billion surplus he inherited in 2000 and turning everything downward because of the tax cuts, then why did we only have a budget deficit of 161 billion in 2007?

    Brian Riedl is the author of the article “The Three Biggest Myths About Tax Cuts and the Budget Deficit,” (Heritage Foundation, June 21, 2010), and the next few days I will be sharing portions of his article

    Brian Riedl is The Heritage Foundation’s lead budget analyst and has built a solid reputation for interpreting, explaining and reforming the often arcane realm of federal budget policy.

    Indeed, much of the current backlash against runaway federal spending can be attributed to Riedl’s work. As far back as 2002 and 2003, his writings exposed the beginnings of a federal spending spree that was pushing real federal spending to more than $20,000 per household for the first time since World War II.

    Abstract: The annual federal budget deficit is projected to reach 8.3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2020—more than three times the historical average of 2.3 percent. This dramatic increase in the federal deficit will be exclusively the result of increasing spending, not declining revenues (or the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts). Rapid growth in Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid costs and interest payments on the national debt will cause virtually all of this new spending. Any sustainable fix must therefore address the source of the problem—rapidly rising entitlement spending.

    Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 50 (Self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly)

    https://i0.wp.com/www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/photographs/large/c41841-9.jpg

    President Reagan speaking at a Take Pride in America event with actors Clint Eastwood and Louis Gossett Jr. in the Rose Garden. 7/21/87.

    Former President George W. Bush delivers a eulogy for Ronald Reagan. part 2

    On Tuesday night I went to the University of Arkansas at Little Rock  Trojans v. N. Texas Mean Green game. UALR won a thriller at the buzzer. In fact, they were down by four points with 25 seconds left. That was one of the most amazing comebacks I have ever seen.

    March 10th at 6:30pm will be the last game for John Pelphry possibly. If Tennessee eliminates the Razorbacks from the SEC Tournament then many believe Pelphry will be gone. I personally think that Jeff Long will give him one more year to coach these fine recruits he signed. We will see.

    In a prophetic speech concerning the Soviet Union, Ronald Reagan predicted that “the march of freedom and democracy will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash-heap of history.” I am posting in the coming days excerpts from one of Reagan best speeches ever.  He addressed the members of the British Parliament on June 8, 1982.
    We have not inherited an easy world. If developments like the Industrial Revolution, which began here in England, and the gifts of science and technology have made life much easier for us, they have also made it more dangerous. There are threats now to our freedom, indeed to our very existence, that other generations could never even have imagined.

    There is first the threat of global war. No President, no Congress, no Prime Minister, no Parliament can spend a day entirely free of this threat. And I don’t have to tell you that in today’s world the existence of nuclear weapons could mean, if not the extinction of mankind, then surely the end of civilization as we know it. That’s why negotiations on intermediate-range nuclear forces now underway in Europe and the START talks — Strategic Arms Reduction Talks — which will begin later this month, are not just critical to American or Western policy; they are critical to mankind. Our commitment to early success in these negotiations is firm and unshakable, and our purpose is clear: reducing the risk of war by reducing the means of waging war on both sides.

    At the same time there is a threat posed to human freedom by the enormous power of the modern state. History teaches the dangers of government that overreaches — political control taking precedence over free economic growth, secret police, mindless bureaucracy, all combining to stifle individual excellence and personal freedom.

    Now, I’m aware that among us here and throughout Europe there is legitimate disagreement over the extent to which the public sector should play a role in a nation’s economy and life. But on one point all of us are united — our abhorrence of dictatorship in all its forms, but most particularly totalitarianism and the terrible inhumanities it has caused in our time — the great purge, Auschwitz and Dachau, the Gulag, and Cambodia.

    Historians looking back at our time will note the consistent restraint and peaceful intentions of the West. They will note that it was the democracies who refused to use the threat of their nuclear monopoly in the forties and early fifties for territorial or imperial gain. Had that nuclear monopoly been in the hands of the Communist world, the map of Europe — indeed, the world — would look very different today. And certainly they will note it was not the democracies that invaded Afghanistan or supressed Polish Solidarity or used chemical and toxin warfare in Afghanistan and Southeast Asia.If history teaches anything it teaches self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly. We see around us today the marks of our terrible dilemma — predictions of doomsday, antinuclear demonstrations, an arms race in which the West must, for its own protection, be an unwilling participant. At the same time we see totalitarian forces in the world who seek subversion and conflict around the globe to further their barbarous assault on the human spirit. What, then, is our course? Must civilization perish in a hail of fiery atoms?Must freedom wither in a quiet, deadening accommodation with totalitarian evil?

    ________________________________________

    Little known presidential facts:

    1. Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) was the first president to be inaugurated in Washington, D.C.h
    2. After President Bush Sr. vomited on the Japanese Prime Minister, a new word entered the Japanese language.Bushusuru means “to do the Bush thing,” or to publicly vomit.k

    Will Senator Pryor be re-elected or not? (Part 3)

    Michael Tanner, a senior fellow at the CATO institute, explains that the rate of return on social security will be much lower for todays youth.

    Steve Brawner wrote in his article “Tiptoeing toward the third rail,” (Arkansas News Bureau, Jan 9,):

    Social Security has long been considered the “third rail” for American politicians, meaning it’s like the electrified third rail that powers a train and lies alongside the tracks: touch it, and you die.

    Tuesday, Sen. Mark Pryor tiptoed toward it.

    Pryor was speaking to the Little Rock Rotary Club when, according to a report by Arkansas News Bureau writer John Lyon, he said this: “We have to take a hard look at entitlement programs, including the sacred cows of Medicare and Social Security, and admit that we cannot bring our spending into balance without changes in these programs.”

    He went on to say, “The (deficit) problem is real. The solution will be painful. There is no easy way out. Everything must be on the table.”

    Thinking people in Washington, and I like to think that’s most of them, know that what Pryor said is true, but they also are afraid that telling that truth is the equivalent of stepping on that third rail. That’s because Medicare and Social Security are popular programs that directly benefit seniors, the age cohort that most often votes. And of course, most of the rest of us expect to be seniors someday.

    But you can’t balance the budget without doing something about Social Security and Medicare because those programs are becoming so big and are growing so fast. Along with Medicaid, they already take up more than 40 percent of the federal budget. That percentage will grow much, much higher as the baby boomers age. According to the recently released report of the bipartisan National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, by 2025 — that’s 15 years from now — projected government revenues will be sufficient only for Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid and interest payments on the national debt.

    That means if we want to have a military, or a border patrol, or interstate highways, we’ll have to pay much higher taxes and continue borrowing, probably extensively from China…

    Pryor knows he is fortunate not to have been on the ballot this year. Were that so, he might very well have lost despite his pragmatic record, general likability, and last name. And he knows that what he said to the Little Rock Rotary Club will be used against him when he runs for re-election in 2014.

    I have already pointed out reasons that Pryor’s re-election bid may be in trouble:

    1. He has been hypocritical about the appointment of Federal Judges.

    2. Southern states have almost completely moved away from Democrats. (Jason Tolbert actually made this observation concerning a poll in Arkansas showing that voters for the first time in history were “inclined to vote for the Republican versus the Democrat in a race when considering only party identification.”)

    3. Pryor’s statement that it must take 10 to 20 years to balance the budget is not the reality we must face. We can do it in 5 years just by freezing our current level of spending.

    4. Pryor has not listened to the people of Arkansas and the polls that indicate that they opposed Obamacare, and he teamed up with the liberal Democrats to force it through the Senate even after Scott Brown was elected.

    Now Brawner praises Pryor for saying that Social Security is on the table. I am encouraged by that too. However, we must move to privatize Social Security or it will fail. There is no way around this economic reality. Thirty countries have moved in this direction and the results have been outstanding. Chile did this in 1980 and now they are reaping the benefits.

    Will Mark Pryor get re-elected? I don’t think he will unless he thinks outside his Democratic box on issues like Social Security Reform. Brawner is right to bring up the issue of the baby boomers. The current system we have will only get worse as the baby boomers born in 1946 to 1964 continnue to apply for Social Security benefits.

    It is ironic that Max Brantley and John Brummett think the reddening of Pryor is a bad thing (“The reddening of Mark Pryor,” Arkansas Times Blog, Nov 30, 2010), but I think it will be the only way he will save his job in a state like Arkansas.

    Candidate #2, Former Arkansas Gov Mike Huckabee: Republican Presidential Hopefuls (pt 2)

    Jason Tolbert in his article “A Thousand Pardons,” Arkansas News Bureau, Feb 20) states:

    In contrast to his predecessor, Gov. Mike Huckabee, who issued over 1,000 pardons and commutations, Beebe has only commuted one sentence.

    “I am pretty liberal on pardons after people have finished their sentence and if it is a nonviolent crime, particularly kids that have been involved in drugs or something like that,” explained Beebe on his monthly call-in radio program a little over a year ago. “Commutations where you shorten somebody’s sentence and let them out early is something I have been very reluctant to do and I have done it once in three years.”

    Perhaps part of this reluctance is based on the damage — both political and otherwise — that Beebe has observed from some of the high-profile prison releases occurring under Huckabee. Most notably are Wayne Dumond, who raped and murdered a Missouri woman after being paroled under Huckabee’s watch, and Maurice Clemmons, who went on to murder four police officers in Washington years after his sentence was commuted by Huckabee.

    This is Huckabee’s biggest challenge to overcome. Can he overcome it? I think he can. If he doesn’t then we will be stuck with Mitt Romney who basically imposed Obamacare on his state when he was governor. Can Romney be forgived for that? I think he can since he has since changed his position.

    Did we forgive George Bush in 1988 for being pro-choice originally? We sure did. In fact, my former pastor, Adrian Rogers, had a chance to visit with Bush several times. He told him that the Religious Right did not have enough votes to get him elected on their own, but if he ever went against the pro-life view then they could definately derail his election bid.  

    I think that Huckabee would be willing to change his view on this prison issue, and if he does then I think he will be electable.