Monthly Archives: September 2012

Arkansas born Bear Bryant had some wise words that USC’s Kiffin should heed

Southern California head coach Lane Kiffin gestures during NCAA college football practice in Los Angeles, Friday, Aug. 17, 2012.

Grant Hindsley, Associated Press

________________________

When I opened my newspaper recently I saw this headline, “USC brushes off sanctions to be No. 1 in AP Top 25.” My first thought was Kiffin has brushed off nothing yet. USC was able to recruit 15 players in 2012, but actually the Trojans were able to get two more in January since they only had 23 come in 2011. Everyone else was allowed to recruit 25 players in 2012 to USC’s 17. How does being short 8 freshman hurt USC in 2012?

Lane Kiffin knows full well that he deliberately had USC appeal the severe recruiting sanctions for two years which allowed him to put off the 15 recruiting limit for two years. However, now USC has to pay the piper in 2012, 2013 and 2014 with only 15 recruits per year. Furthermore, they are allowed  to have only 75 scholarship football players total during this three-year period. Since they finished last year with 80 players the Trojans should not have too much difficulty getting down to 75.

The real sanctions will kick in when USC’s 2012-2014 classes are the upper classmen on the football team. Watch for USC to start dropping off the map in 2014 at the earliest.

That brings me to my second point. Can Lane Kiffin learn anything from history? Listen to what he told the AP after hearing that USC was ranked #1 in the preseason college football poll. “To be handed down what they said could be a death penalty, could take USC 10 years to come back from, then to have this recognition and be preseason No. 1 is very exciting for our fans because a lot people thought two years ago that this would not be possible for USC.”

Did USC already win the national title in 2012? This reminds me of the time Kiffin said he was looking forward to singing “Rocky Top” after beating Florida in the upcoming game in 2009. Unfortunately, Florida pulled out that victory, and Kiffin was left saying that he was just trying to get attention to the Tennessee program with his comments. Arkansas native Bear Bryant once said, “I have tried to teach them to show class, to have pride, and to display character. I think football, winning games, takes care of itself if you do that.”

When I was growing up in Memphis I used to listen to Bear Bryant’s radio show and at the beginning of each year he would get lots of calls asking how good the team was going to be. Bear always answered the same way. He moaned and groaned about the whole team graduating the year before and only untested players were left.

The truth was very different. Bryant averaged playing 66 players per game at Alabama in the 197o’s, and he had lots of players with experience coming back almost every year. William F. Reed of Sports Illustrated noted in 1994, “Bryant didn’t invent poor-mouthing, but he elevated it to such an art that listeners would wink and smile at his dire pregame evaluations.”

Kiffin needs to take a page out of the Bear’s book and show some class and win the games on the field before you brag about your high preseason ranking.

___________

Picture of Bear Bryant below.

Bear Bryant Alabama Football Quotes Winning Losing

Howard Schnellenberger speaks at Little Rock Touchdown Club Part 1

I got to hear Howard Schnellenberger speak on 9-4-12 at the Little Rock Touchdown Club. I enjoyed hearing his stories about Bear Bryant and what he learned from the Bear. Here is a story by Jim Harris that discusses these too things.

<!–

23

–>

9/4/2012 at 3:30pm

Howard Schnellenberger leaned on mentor Bear Bryant in building three college football programs.
Image by Florida Atlantic University

Howard Schnellenberger leaned on mentor Bear Bryant in building three college football programs.

Howard Schnellenberger, now enjoying retirement in Boca Raton, Fla., after his last college football building job ended last season, reveres Paul “Bear” Bryant. The respect is easy to detect simply by listening – the way he goes on, stops, and adds yet another tidbit about the legendary coach.

Bryant’s staff at Alabama included Schnellenberger in the rip-roaring 1960s, when Bryant returned Alabama to college football dominance. Schnellenberger was also recruited by Bryant to Kentucky in 1952, and he was among the 40 Wildcats to survive Millersburg — the precursor to “Junction” for Bryant’s first Texas A&M team. Schnellenberger says the legend of Junction’s toughness was “bull****”. Junction was eight days, he said, while Millersburg training camp lasted six weeks.

Either way, Bryant weeded out the guys who weren’t committed to winning, and obviously Schnellenberger was. So was a guy named Frank Namath, whose little brother Joe would be recruited to Alabama by Schnellenberger in 1961.

Bear Bryant took over struggling programs at Kentucky, Texas A&M and Alabama and made them champions.

Schellenberger didn’t have the same luxury of assuming programs with a strong booster base with high expectations of winning. Instead, he took over a Miami of Florida whose board was ready to give up big-time football aspirations in the late 1970s, or a Louisville football program in the late 1980s that lived in the shadow of a national basketball powerhouse, or a Florida Atlantic football team that didn’t exist until he arrived in 2002.

He leaned on what he’d learned from Bryant, as well as his time spent as offensive coordinator for Miami Dolphins Coach Don Shula, including one of his most cherished seasons in football: the undefeated 1972 Dolphins team.

Schnellenberger is 78 now, still working for FAU as it builds an athletic war chest to pay its way into a conference such as the Big East, and he’s out on the speaking circuit, which brought him here Tuesday for a Little Rock Touchdown Club luncheon.

He enlightened a few local members of the media afterward as to how he built the Miami, Louisville and FAU programs literally from scratch.

“You’ve got to have the dream. You’ve got to believe in that dream. You’ve got to first of all tell somebody and shout it from the mountaintop, and tell every writer that you can find what your dream is,” he said.

“Now, if you tell somebody, it becomes a goal. And if it’s a goal you can get everybody to buy in to that goal, then you’ve got a chance to win the national championship. If you don’t do those three things, you have no chance. There is nobody that ever won a championship that didn’t believe in it and work like hell to do it. But if it’s not your ultimate goal, then you’re cheating your employer, the university, the mothers and fathers of the players, and the players, the student body and everybody.

“And if you aren’t man enough to stand up and say you’re going to win the national championship in five years then you don’t have a right to coach.”

Heady stuff, but Schnellenberger did just that: promise a national championship at Miami in five years and pull it off with a team led by Bernie Kosar that knocked off Nebraska in the 1984 Orange Bowl 31-30.

Then, he followed a terrific recruiting class with another in 1984 — “nobody ever brought in 60 players over two years like those players,” he said Tuesday — before suddenly taking a job to coach in the fledgling United States Football League. Miami would continue its rise under Jimmy Johnson and then Dennis Erickson, winning five more national titles for a total of six in a 15-year period.

Of course, that was Bryant-like dominance — Alabama won six national titles from 1961-79.

Schnellenberger was enticed by part-ownership of a USFL franchise, but the league folded quickly. He wasn’t out of work long.

But, along with the successes at Louisville (which coincidentally gained national acclaim and major fan support after beating Alabama and Bryant disciple Gene Stallings 34-7 in a bowl game) and FAU, Schnellenberger made a couple of missteps. He lasted just one season at Oklahoma, and he reminded us he was fired on national TV by late Indianapolis Colts owner Bob Irsay too. In both cases, had he heeded Bear Bryant’s words, he wouldn’t have been in those situations, he said.

“I broke one of Coach Bryant’s cardinal rules,” Schnellenberger said. “Coach Bryant said, when you’re taking a job always make sure you’re hired by the highest man who can hire you or the professional owner.”

Then Colts general manager Jim Thomas hired Schnellenberger, rather than Irsay, who later wanted to tell the coach which quarterback to play in a game. Schnellenberger disagreed and lost his job that day. At OU, then Sooners athletic director Donnie Duncan hired Schnellenberger before the new OU president, former U.S. Sen. David Boren, had arrived. Schnellenberger soon realized Boren had someone else in mind to run the program.

That wasn’t the case at Miami, or Louisville, or FAU. And college football fans have heard about the programs chiefly through Schnellenberger’s almost fatherly love of raising a child into a young man and warrior.

Email: jharris@abpg.com. Also follow Jim on Twitter @jimharris360

 

The book “After the Welfare State”

Dan Mitchell Commenting on Obama’s Failure to Propose a Fiscal Plan

Published on Aug 16, 2012 by

No description available.

___________

After the Welfare State

Posted by David Boaz

Cato senior fellow Tom G. Palmer, who is lecturing about freedom in Slovenia and Tbilisi this week, asked me to post this announcement of his new book, After the Welfare State, published through the efforts of Students for Liberty and the Atlas Economic Research Foundation. Check out this 57-second video introduction:

The book is directed at young people, and Students for Liberty is distributing 125,000 copies on college campuses. Tom’s introduction begins:

Young people today are being robbed. Of their rights.  Of their freedom.  Of their dignity.  Of their futures.  The culprits?  My generation and our predecessors, who either created or failed to stop the world-straddling engine of theft, degradation, manipulation, and social control we call the welfare state.

Contributors to the volume include experts from Great Britain, Sweden, Italy, and Greece, as well as Cato’s own Palmer and Michael Tanner.

Learn more about After the Welfare State—and download a free PDF immediately–here.

“Woody Wednesday” Biography of Woody Allen

Here is a great link on Woody Allen.

With at least four distinct phases throughout his long career, writer-director-actor Woody Allen was one of the few American filmmakers rightly labeled an auteur. From the irreverent absurdity of his early satires like “Bananas” (1971) and “Sleepers” (1973) to his chronicles of neurotic New Yorkers in “Annie Hall” (1977), “Manhattan” (1979) and “Hannah and Her Sisters” (1986), Allen’s obsessions with beauty, psychiatry, intellect and relationships existed in all his work. Unique among filmmakers, Allen made highly personal films with mainstream money while managing to exert creative control over the product – all the while earning a high-level of critical respect and numerous Academy Awards. By keeping budgets low, the prolific filmmaker reached his mostly urban audience on a regular basis, churning out one movie practically each year. His creative fires never extinguished, as he directed dramas like “Interiors” (1978), morally ambiguous tragicomedies like “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (1989) and period comedies like “Bullets Over Broadway” (1994). Even when stepping outside of his comfort zone with “Everyone Says I Love You” (1996) and “Sweet and Lowdown” (1999), Allen had the creative acumen to pull it off. Though he suffered personal scandal over his romantic involvement with adopted daughter, Soon Yi Previn, as well as a professional nadir with “Small Time Crooks” (2000) and “The Curse of the Jade Scorpion” (2001), Allen regained his critical stature with “Match Point” (2005), “Vicky Christina Barcelona” (2008) and “Midnight In Paris” (2011), which cemented his place in cinema history as one of its finest directors.

Allen Stewart Konigsberg was born on Dec. 1, 1935, in Brooklyn, NY. He was the only son of Orthodox Jewish parents Nettie, a bookkeeper, and Martin, who held a series of odd jobs, including waiter and jewelry engraver. Growing up in the middle class neighborhood of Midwood, Allen spent his free time at the local movie theaters where he was drawn into the worlds of the Marx Brothers and Humphrey Bogart. In stark contrast to Allen’s screen persona as an awkward outsider, he was well-liked in school, playing on the baseball team and entertaining students with card tricks and jokes. When he was still a teenager, he began selling his jokes to newspaper columnists and officially adopted the pen name Woody Allen. He was contributing material to such programs as “The Colgate Comedy Hour” (NBC, 1950-55) and Sid Caesar’s “Your Show of Shows” (NBC, 1950-54) before he even graduated from Midwood High School in 1953. After a brief stint at New York University where he purportedly failed a film course, Allen wrote for Caesar’s “Caesar’s Hour” (NBC, 1954-57) while writing jokes for comics and nightclub performers including Carol Channing, Art Carney and Buddy Hackett. He eventually took the stage and became a stand-up comedian himself, honing the intellectual “schnook” persona that would become his trademark.

Allen’s stage act was uniquely New York – Jewish, intellectual, guilt-ridden and anxious, with an insecure, halting stammer. His monologues poked fun at everything from sex and marriage to religion and politics and his refreshing personal style proved popular in liberal Greenwich Village cabarets and on college campuses. During the early 1960s, Allen found more and more outlets for his imagination and humor, publishing short stories in the New Yorker, co-writing a musical comedy revue called “A to Z” and writing his first feature film, the farcical “What’s New, Pussycatfi” (1965), directed by Clive Donner. Allen also starred in the film that served as an introduction to career-long recurring themes of romantic complications and a reliance on psychotherapy. He married Broadway actress and singer Louise Lasser in 1966 (an earlier teenage marriage had ended in 1962) and debuted as a filmmaker of sorts when he re-dubbed a minor Japanese spy thriller with his own irreverent dialogue and plot, releasing it as “What’s Up Tiger Lilyfi” (1966). That, along with the James Bond spoof “Casino Royale” (1967), which he co-wrote and acted in, launched one of the most successful and unusual careers in American filmmaking history.

Following the production of two more stage plays – “Don’t Drink the Water,” about a New Jersey family spying in an Iron Curtain country, and “Play It Again, Sam” (1969) about a film critic who invokes the spirit of Humphrey Bogart to guide him through life – Allen wrote, directed and starred in “Take the Money and Run” (1969). The unceasingly funny parody of both gangster films and cinema verite documentaries starred Allen as an unlikely escaped convict. The loose structure, lack of technical polish, and indebtedness to his nightclub one-liners was also evident in “Bananas” (1971), a satire lambasting both politics and mass media that starred Lasser as an idealistic leftie with a groupie-like admiration for a South American rebel leader who turns out to be her ex-boyfriend (Allen) in disguise. Another madcap satire, “Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex (But Were Afraid to Ask)” (1972), consisted of a series of loosely related shorts debunking various sexual myths while poking fun at the era’s self-help craze. The already prolific filmmaker followed up with a screen adaptation of his stage production “Play it Again Sam” (1972), which established Allen’s indebtedness to classic films and began his long association with actress Diane Keaton. Allen’s marriage to Lasser had ended several years earlier and Keaton took over the role of Allen’s girlfriend, muse and star of his films.

As the 1970s progressed, Allen began to find his voice as a filmmaker, rounding out his “slapstick” period with “Sleeper” (1973), about a health food store owner cryogenically frozen and thawed out after 200 years. “Love and Death” (1975) marked a leap forward for Allen, raising philosophical questions and showcasing a love of great literature and arts with its spoof of Russian culture. Allen’s aspirations to be considered a “serious” moviemaker were acutely evident in “Annie Hall” (1977), the first of his films to achieve widespread critical and box office popularity. While still anchored in comedy, it clearly tackled themes that reflected his own concerns in life and he utilized sophisticated narrative devices such as breaking the fourth wall, and relied less on slapstick and sight gags. In the lead role as Alvy Singer, the writer-director-actor solidified his screen persona as the urban, Jewish intellectual outsider; this time pursuing the love of a quirky but ethereal WASPY beauty (Keaton). Often considered the quintessential Allen movie – personal and thoughtful yet satiric and entertaining – “Annie Hall” earned four Academy Awards including beating out “Star Wars” for Best Picture, Best Actress (Diane Keaton), Best Director (Allen) and Best Original Screenplay (Allen and Marshall Brickman).

As a surprising follow-up, Allen shifted to more dramatic material and focused on the starchy, repressed WASP milieu in “Interiors” (1978). Owing more than a passing debt to Ingmar Bergman, Shakespeare and Eugene O’Neill, “Interiors” probed the angst and petty betrayals of an upper-class family with three daughters. Many critics and audience members were confounded by the deadly earnest tone, but inarguably the film was beautifully shot by cinematographer Gordon Willis and strongly acted by a cast that included Geraldine Page, E.G. Marshall, Diane Keaton and Maureen Stapleton. “Interiors” earned a surprising five Oscar nominations, including nods to Allen for direction and writing. The following year, he re-teamed with Marshall Brickman to write his most profitable (and arguably best) film, “Manhattan” (1979). With its lush Gershwin score, gorgeous black-and-white photography (again by Willis) and brilliant ensemble cast, the film marked a return to comedy peppered with autobiographical and romantic elements. It was also notable as Allen’s last film with Diane Keaton for many years, as their off-screen relationship was ending around the same time. The film engendered mild controversy over Allen’s onscreen love interest, a teenaged Mariel Hemingway.

In “Stardust Memories” (1980), Allen’s character of a film director is exhorted to “make funny movies,” something the character is adamant about no longer doing. Allen was sorry that audiences largely interpreted this as autobiographical, though he did follow it up with a return to slapstick in “A Midsummer Night’s Sex Comedy” (1982), where he also found a new on- and off-screen leading lady in Mia Farrow. The period mockumentary “Zelig” (1983) melded Allen’s fascination with celebrity with his growing grasp of cinematic methods. A marvel of technical wizardry, Allen intercut and merged new footage with old to recreate vintage newsreels and sound recordings. “Broadway Danny Rose” (1984) was primarily dismissed by critics as a minor outing, yet it centered on a marvelous performance from Farrow who was virtually unrecognizable as the Brooklyn-accented former mistress of a gangster. Farrow gave another outstanding lead performance as the timid, Depression-era wife of an abusive husband who finds refuge at the movie theater in the “The Purple Rose of Cairo” (1985). Another technical tour de force, the delightful fantasy took a turn when a matinee idol (Jeff Daniels) stepped off the screen to woo the unhappy woman. Tying together several of Allen’s major themes – fame, romance, fantasy and art – the film earned Best Screenplay and Best Director Oscar nominations for Allen.

For much of the decade, Allen concentrated on drama with the exception of “Radio Days” (1987), a charming memoir of life in World War II Brooklyn, threaded together by a wonderful soundtrack of the era’s hits. He was nominated for a Best Screenplay Oscar, an award he had won the previous year for his Chekhovian “Hannah and Her Sisters” (1986), a chronicle of New York family relationships and a set of very different sisters. The bloodless “September” (1987) and the Bergman-esque “Another Woman” (1988), featuring a virtuoso leading turn from Gena Rowlands, were further examinations of the emotionally bereft worlds of WASPy New Yorkers. With the outstanding “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (1989), Allen closed the decade with a pessimistic examination of the morality of murder and earned more Oscar nominations for his screenplay and direction. In a lighter mode, 1990’s “Alice,” a riff on Lewis Carroll’s Alice and Wonderland, cast Farrow as a wealthy but shallow uptown woman who receives a new perspective on life thanks to a Chinatown herbalogist. Allen had a rare starring role in a film not of his own making, playing Bette Midler’s husband in Paul Mazursky’s seriocomic look at contemporary marriage, “Scenes from a Mall” (1991) – a film which tanked miserably. Back behind the camera, his critically reviled “Shadows and Fog” (1992) was an allegory about anti-Semitism that combined homages to 1930s German expressionism and 1950s European art films but was plagued by one-note characterizations.

Though not without humor, “Husbands and Wives” (1992) marked one of Allen’s most emotionally violent films. Highlighted by jittery, hand-held cinema verite camerawork and a pessimistic view of enduring love, the film was released early by its distributor in part to capitalize on its uncanny parallels with the real-life turmoil between Allen and Farrow. Their very public break-up, spurred by Allen’s romantic involvement with Farrow’s adopted daughter, Soon Yi, was followed by Farrow’s public accusations that Allen had molested their adopted daughter, Dylan (now Malone). In the midst of all the Sturm und Drang, Allen made the frothy but fun “Manhattan Murder Mystery” (1993), which reunited him with Marshall Brickman and ex-flame, Diane Keaton. The comic thriller attempted to recreate the banter and urbanity of such seminal films as “The Thin Man,” though it proved to be a financial disappointment, overshadowed by Allen’s personal troubles – which by this time, were monumental, when Soon Yi left her family to be with Allen. By the time “Bullets Over Broadway” was released in 1994, Allen was out of the headlines and audiences were ready to embrace his work anew. The hilarious period comedy about a 1930s New York playwright (John Cusack as Allen’s screen alter ego) banked on a lush, dramatic portrayal of the era’s theater world and benefited from an outstanding ensemble cast, including Oscar-winning performances from Dianne Wiest as a past-her-prime stage diva and a nomination for Chazz Palminteri as a thug-turned-ghost writer. Under it all, the film was a successful meditation on the definition of an artist.

Allen returned to TV to adapt, direct and co-star in a small screen remake of his 1968 stage play “Don’t Drink the Water” (ABC, 1994). On the big screen, “Mighty Aphrodite” (1995) was an uneven attempt that baldly proclaimed its indebtedness to Greek theater with the use of a chorus. Allen played a middle-aged sportswriter searching for the birth mother of his adopted child, who turns out not to be the cultured woman he imagined but a prostitute. With “Everyone Says I Love You” (1996), he combined frothy 1930s musical sensibilities with his familiar themes, resulting in a mixed response that divided audiences and critics. “Deconstructing Harry” (1997) was an Oscar-nominated screenplay – a scatological and complex look at a writer’s life employing black comedy and dramatizations of his works to comment on the function of the artist in society. “Celebrity” (1998) with Kenneth Branagh doing a mannered Allen impersonation in the leading role, was considered a misbegotten, poorly cast take on the contemporary obsession with fame. Paying his own price for fame, Allen was in the tabloids again for his 1997 marriage to Soon Yi Previn, 35 years his junior. The marriage reminded all of the sordid story from only six years prior, but the couple seemed in love. The following year, documentarian Barbara Kopple released “Wild Man Blues” (1998). Rather than focusing on Allen the filmmaker, Allen the amateur clarinet player was the central character, from the Monday evening club engagement he held for decades to a European tour.

Allen the filmmaker continued to put out one movie per year for the next five years. Still dabbling in different genres and new techniques, 1999’s clever mockumentary/dramedy hybrid “Sweet and Lowdown” cast Sean Penn in one of his finest performances as a fictional 1930s jazz guitarist and hothead. He followed up with the surprisingly mainstream but highly comic heist picture, “Small Time Crooks” (2000) and the disappointing period faux noir “Curse of the Jade Scorpion” (2001). “Hollywood Ending” (2002), where Allen played a film director who goes blind, was poorly received. The target of much criticism for his series of disappointing films, Allen mined familiar territory in 2003 with “Anything Else,” which did little groundbreaking besides casting Jason Biggs in the Allen-esque lead as a young writer bedeviled by his torturous relationship with a neurotic actress (Christina Ricci), with Allen playing the role of Biggs’ conspiracy-minded mentor. He rebounded with the novel “Melinda and Melinda” (2005), which offered two parallel interpretations of the romantic troubles of a neurotic, self-destructive woman (Radha Mitchell); one tragic and one comic. The film’s intriguing structure and fresh cast, including Will Ferrell, Amanda Peet, Chl Sevigny, Chiwetel Ejiofor and Mitchell as two widely differing Melindas, made the film one of the more satisfying efforts from Allen in recent years.

Even better was his next project, “Match Point” (2005), an entirely serious, morality-minded effort featuring Jonathan Rhys Myers as a social climbing tennis pro who believes he would rather “be lucky than good,” who finds himself torn between his comfortable, practical, status-confirming union with a loving wife (Emily Mortimer) and his torrid affair with a sensual but ultimately demanding American actress (Scarlett Johansson). Allen did not appear as an actor in the film, and even more significantly, neither did New York City: the film was shot entirely in London. “Match Point” demonstrated that Allen still had considerable power as a filmmaker and fresh subject matter to explore as a screenwriter. His continued significance as a writer was validated with an Academy Award nomination for Best Original Screenplay. “Scoop” (2006), a comedy about an American journalism student in London, and “Cassandra’s Dream” (2007), a morality tale about a pair of brothers also set in London, earned lukewarm reviews but his fourth European outing, “Vicky Cristina Barcelona” (2008) was a critical pick. An evocative new locale and a well-matched cast including Allen’s latest muse, Scarlett Johansson, as well as Penelope Cruz and Javier Bardem, spelled a return to Allen’s strength with intelligent and thoughtful romantic comedies. The filmmaker’s next project was “Whatever Works” (2009), starring Larry David. After writing and directing his fourth London film, “You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger” (2010), Allen returned to prominence with “Midnight in Paris” (2011), an engrossing comedy-drama where a despondent Hollywood hack (Owen Wilson) dreams of writing his novel and is mysteriously transported to the past where he meets his artistic heroes Ernest Hemingway (Corey Stoll), F. Scott Fitzgerald (Tom Hiddleston) and Salvador Dali (Adrien Brody). The film received widespread acclaim – including a Golden Globe for Allen for Best Screenplay – and became his highest-grosser at the box office, surpassing “Hannah and Her Sisters.” Meanwhile, Allen earned his 22nd and 23rd career Academy Award nominations with nods for Best Director and Best Original Screenplay for “Midnight in Paris.”

midnight-in-paris-movie-image-slice-01

Great website discusses the influences on Woody Allen:

Open letter to Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney on our pro-life views (Part 8)

Superbowl commercial with Tim Tebow and Mom.

To Mitt Romney, Box 96994, Washington, DC 20077-7556  From Everette Hatcher of www.thedailyhatch.org 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002

Did we forgive George Bush in 1988 for being pro-choice originally in 1980? We sure did. In fact, my former pastor, Adrian Rogers, had a chance to visit with Bush several times. He told him that the Religious Right did not have enough votes to get him elected on their own, but if he ever went against the pro-life view then they could definately derail his election bid.

Today I am writing you to remind you of the same thing. We in the pro-life movement are firmly behind you but we want to know some of the reasons are passionately pro-life.

I have often wondered why we got to this point in our country’s life and we allow abortion. The answer is found in the words of Schaffer.
Philosopher and Theologian, Francis A. Schaeffer has argued, “If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer, How Shall We Then Live? (Old Tappan NJ: Fleming H Revell Company, 1976), p. 224.

The Arkansas Times article, “Putting the fetus first: Pro-lifers keep up attack on access, but pro-choice advocates fend off the end to abortion right” by Leslie Newell Peacock is very lengthy but I want to deal with all of it in this new series.

 
click to enlarge ROSE MIMMS: Arkansas Right to Life director unswayed by fears of return of illegal abortion.
  • ROSE MIMMS: Arkansas Right to Life director unswayed by fears of return of illegal abortion.

Rita Sklar, director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, said,”Women’s bodies are used as a political football and it’s time that stopped.”

___________________________

Is this debate really about the woman’s body? Does the woman even have the same blood type as the unborn baby? Or is this about a life being snuffed out? Take a look at this moving story that Arkansas abortionist Dr. William Harrison told below about the lady that will soon “finish her doctorate at the University of California at San Francisco.”

I used to write letters to the editor a whole lot back in the 1990’s.  I am pro-life and many times my letters would discuss current political debates, and I got to know several names of people that would often write in response letters to my published letters. One of those individuals was a Dr. William F. Harrison from Fayetteville. Later I found out from reading an article by David Sanders that Dr. Harrison was an abortionist. Dr Harrison died from leukemia on September 24, 2010. Here is a post from Jason Tolbert from July of 2010:

KFSM in Fayetteville is reporting that abortist William Harrison is closing the doors to his abortion clinic in nothwest Arkansas for health reasons. In an ABC News story a few year ago, Harrison said he had performed over 10,000 abortions and was comfortable with the taking of life.

I now write a column for Stephen Media in a spot once held by conservative David J. Sanders who is currently running for the Arkansas House of Representatives.  Sanders shadowed Harrison in his abortion clinic and wrote of series of columns on the experience.  I think these are prehaps Sanders’ best work…

Harrison is sure that what he does is right, but he confessed to the enormous costs that come in his line of work. There were threats against his wife and children and staff. He commented that if he “had known” everything – the threats, the risks – that would take place over the years, he might not have decided to provide abortions.

Some years ago, a 16-year-old daughter of a close friend of the family had gotten pregnant. “Their Baptist minister had advised her parents that she shouldn’t have an abortion and that (if she did) she would regret it the rest of her life. But had I had the choice, at the time, I would have advised (the mother of the teenager) to have that child aborted,” he said as he stared at his desktop.

“Well, she had her baby. She’s as smart as a whip,” he said. Now, years later, that baby is grown and about to finish her doctorate at the University of California at San Francisco.

I asked him if that sent chills up his spine. His response: “Absolutely.”

If you would like to know my the #1 abortionist in the world changed to a pro-life advocate then check out these posts:

Abortionist Bernard Nathanson turned pro-life activist (part 11)

ABORTION – THE SILENT SCREAM 1 / Extended, High-Resolution Version (with permission from APF). Republished with Permission from Roy Tidwell of American Portrait Films as long as the following credits are shown: VHS/DVDs Available American Portrait Films Call 1-800-736-4567 http://www.amport.com The Hand of God-Selected Quotes from Bernard N. Nathanson, M.D., Unjust laws exist. Shall we […]

Abortionist Bernard Nathanson turned pro-life activist (part 10)

Dr. Bernard N. Nathanson, a leading pro-life advocate and convert to Catholicism, died at the age of 84 on Monday a week ago in his New York home, after a long struggle with cancer. The Hand of God-Selected Quotes from Bernard N. Nathanson, M.D., Chapter 12 is titled To The Thanatoriums, an allusion the Walker […]

On eve of Shutdown Republicans cave on demand concerning eliminating Planned Parenthood Funding

The pro-life position is very important to a great many of the freshmen members of the House of Representatives. As you can see above in the clip from the film series Whatever Happened to the Human Race? by Francis Schaeffer and C. Everett Koop, the unborn baby is a child, but we are treating many […]

Abortionist Bernard Nathanson turned pro-life activist (part 9)(Donald Trump changes to pro-life view)

When I think of the things that make me sad concerning this country, the first thing that pops into my mind is our treatment of unborn children. Donald Trump is probably going to run for president of the United States. Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council recently had a conversation with him concerning the […]

Abortionist Bernard Nathanson turned pro-life activist (part 8)

My sons Wilson (on left) and Hunter (on right) went to California and visited Yosemite National Park with our friend Sherwood Haisty Jr. March 21-27. Here they are standing in front of the tallest waterfall in North America. The only surviving founding member of NARAL, Dr. Bernard Nathanson gives his testimony of NARAL’s foundation of […]

Abortionist Bernard Nathanson turned pro-life activist (part 7) Have you wondered why we have abortion in the USA?

“Jane Roe” or Roe v Wade is now a prolife Christian. She’s recently has done a commercial about it.   _______________________________ I have often wondered why we got to this point in our country’s life and we allow abortion. The answer is found in the words of Schaffer. Philosopher and Theologian, Francis A. Schaeffer has […]

Abortionist Bernard Nathanson turned pro-life activist (part 6)

Modern man’s humanist thought has brought us to the point now that many people realize that they could not find final answers and that would lead to despair. Many people then took leaps into the area of non-reason to find some kind of meaning in life. Some people actually tried to look at communism and […]

Abortionist Bernard Nathanson turned pro-life activist (part 5)

Modern man’s humanist thought has brought us to the point now that many people realize that they could not find final answers and that would lead to despair. Many people then turned to trying to find answers in the area of non-reason. There were no fixed values and they just held on to the two […]

Abortionist Bernard Nathanson turned pro-life activist (part 4)

Richard Land on Abortion part 3 On the Arkansas Times Blog this morning I posted a short pro-life piece and it received this response: We have been over this time and again SalineRepublican, and I think we all know the issue: when does the right of a woman to control her own body yield to […]

Abortionist Bernard Nathanson turned pro-life activist (part 3)

Vice Admiral C. Everett Koop, USPHS Surgeon General of the United States Francis Schaeffer Main page Francis Schaeffer and Dr. C. Everett Koop put together this wonderful film series “Whatever happened to the human race?” and my senior class teacher Mark Brink taught us a semester long course on it in 1979. I was so

Abortionist Bernard Nathanson turned pro-life activist (part 2)

This is such a great video series “The Silent Scream.” I have never seen it until now and I wish I had seen it 30 years ago.  Take a look at the video clip below. I wanted to pass along a portion of the excellent article “Bernard Nathanson: A Life Transformed by the Truth about […]

Abortionist Bernard Nathanson turned pro-life activist (part 1)

Sherwood Haisty is taking my sons Hunter and Wilson to Grace Community Church in the Los Angeles area this morning where Dr. John MacArthur is pastor. They will be attending both Sunday School and Worship. I wanted to pass along a portion of the excellent article “Bernard Nathanson: A Life Transformed by the Truth about

 

T. Kurt Jaros book review of Free to Choose (Part 2)

I have enjoyed reading this series of reviews by T. Kurt Jaros on Milton and Rose Friedman’s book “Free to Choose.” I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.

I have posted several transcripts and videos of the FREE TO CHOOSE film series on my blog. My favorite episodes are the “Failure of Socialism” and  “Power of the Market.” (This is the 1990 version but the 1980 version is good too.) Today with the increase of the welfare state maybe people should take a long look again at the episode “From Cradle to Grave.” 

Milton Friedman’s  view on vouchers for the schools needs to be heeded now more than ever too. “Created Equal” is probably the episode that I want  President Obama to see the most and I wrote several letters to him suggesting that.

T. Kurt Jaros is currently a Master’s student studying Systematic Theology at King’s College in London.  He holds a B.A. in Philosophy and Political Science cum laude and an M.A. in Christian Apologetics high honors from Biola University, an evangelical Christian university outside of Los Angeles.

He enjoys learning and thinking about theology, specifically historical theology, philosophical theology and philosophy of religion, and issues pertaining to monergism and synergism.  Additionally, he enjoys learning and thinking about political philosophy, economics, American political history, and campaigns.

Cradle to Grave: Part 2

T. Kurt Jaros on Economics

This is part of a series on Milton Friedman’s “Free to Choose.”

In my previous post I began to discuss the shift of public perception about the role of government in America from one that merely protects the individuals to one that also provides for the individuals.

Although he does not use the term, Friedman considers Social Security to be a Ponzi scheme. He writes that if Social Security were a private company “that engaged in such labeling and advertising would doubtless be severely castigated by the Federal Trade Commission.” It is “Orwellian doublethink” to actually believe that people receive the “benefits” from their own labor during their time in the workforce. The fact that, today, we speak of the “trust fund” running out by the 2030s illustrates this truth. If Social Security was what it advertised itself to be, it would mean that the trust fund is continually replenished from people’s own labor for their own retirement. There would never actually be even the talk of it running out. Yet here we are, having to address that issue.

Three other topics that Friedman picks apart are the public assistance programs, housing subsidies and medical care. All three are instances where the government is ultimately doing more harm than good. So why have all of these well-intentioned programs been failures? Friedman points to four ways you can spend money. You can A) spend your own money on yourself, B) spend your money on someone else, C) spend someone else’s money on yourself, and D) spend someone else’s money on someone else. The order of efficiency is A, B, C and D. Watch this clip for Friedman’s explanation:

Francis Schaeffer’s film series “How should we then live?” (The Middle Ages) can be seen on the www.thedailyhatch.org

 

        Francis Schaeffer and his wife Edith are remembered for their ministry L’Abri

You got to check out Francis Schaeffer’s film series below. It is amazing. Here is a portion from the episode “The Middle Ages.”

How Should We Then Live 2-1

I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970’s and I wanted to share it with you. Schaeffer points out that during this time period unfortunately we have the “Church’s deviation from early church’s teaching in regard to authority and the approach to God.” In my view we see a move from more conservative evangelicalism of the early church to the Catholic Church.

E P I S O D E 2

T h e

MIDDLE AGES 

I. Introduction: The Post-Roman World

A. Social, political, and intellectual uncertainty.

B. General decline in learning, but monasteries were a depository for classical and Christian documents.

C. The original pristine Christianity of the New Testament gradually became distorted.

D. Decline of vital naturalism in art parallels decline of vital Christianity: positive and negative aspects of Byzantine art.

E. Music at time of Ambrose, later Gregorian chants.

II. The Church in the World: Economic, Social, Political.

How to be in the world but not of it.

A. Generosity of early church.

B. Ambivalence in Middle Ages about material goods; asceticism and luxury.

C. Economic controls to protect the weak.

D. Emphasis on work well done.

E. Care for social needs: e.g. hospitals.

F. Meaning of Christendom; attendant problems. Lorenzetti’s Allegory of Good and Bad Government.

III. Artistic Achievements

A. Close relation between church and society in art and life: e.g. reign of Charlemagne.

B. Basis of unified European culture laid by Charlemagne.

C. Birth and flowering of Romanesque architecture.

D. Birth and flowering of Gothic architecture.

IV. Links Between Philosophical, Theological, and Spiritual Developments on Eve of Renaissance

A. Aquinas’ emphasis on Aristotle.

1. Negative aspect: individual things, the particulars, tended to be made independent, autonomous.

2. With this came the loss of adequate meaning for the individual things, including Man, morals, values, and law.

B. Church’s deviation from early church’s teaching in regard to authority and the approach to God.

C. Reaction of Wycliffe and Hus to theological distortions is prophetic of Reformation.

Other segments:

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 10 “Final Choices” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 1 0 How Should We Then Live 10#1 FINAL CHOICES I. Authoritarianism the Only Humanistic Social Option One man or an elite giving authoritative arbitrary absolutes. A. Society is sole absolute in absence of other absolutes. B. But society has to be led by an elite: John Kenneth […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 9 “The Age of Personal Peace and Affluence” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 9 How Should We Then Live 9#1 T h e Age of Personal Peace and Afflunce I. By the Early 1960s People Were Bombarded From Every Side by Modern Man’s Humanistic Thought II. Modern Form of Humanistic Thought Leads to Pessimism Regarding a Meaning for Life and for Fixed […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 8 “The Age of Fragmentation” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 8 How Should We Then Live 8#1 I saw this film series in 1979 and it had a major impact on me. T h e Age of FRAGMENTATION I. Art As a Vehicle Of Modern Thought A. Impressionism (Monet, Renoir, Pissarro, Sisley, Degas) and Post-Impressionism (Cézanne, Van Gogh, Gauguin, […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 7 “The Age of Non-Reason” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 7 How Should We Then Live 7#1 I am thrilled to get this film series with you. I saw it first in 1979 and it had such a big impact on me. Today’s episode is where we see modern humanist man act on his belief that we live […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 6 “The Scientific Age” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 6 How Should We Then Live 6#1 I am sharing with you a film series that I saw in 1979. In this film Francis Schaeffer asserted that was a shift in Modern Science. A. Change in conviction from earlier modern scientists.B. From an open to a closed natural system: […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 5 “The Revolutionary Age” (Schaeffer Sundays)

E P I S O D E 5 How Should We Then Live 5-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Francis Schaeffer noted, “Reformation Did Not Bring Perfection. But gradually on basis of biblical teaching there was a unique improvement. A. […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 4 “The Reformation” (Schaeffer Sundays)

How Should We Then Live 4-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Schaeffer makes three key points concerning the Reformation: “1. Erasmian Christian humanism rejected by Farel. 2. Bible gives needed answers not only as to how to be right with […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 3 “The Renaissance”

How Should We Then Live 3-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Schaeffer really shows why we have so many problems today with this excellent episode. He noted, “Could have gone either way—with emphasis on real people living in […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 2 “The Middle Ages” (Schaeffer Sundays)

How Should We Then Live 2-1 I was impacted by this film series by Francis Schaeffer back in the 1970′s and I wanted to share it with you. Schaeffer points out that during this time period unfortunately we have the “Church’s deviation from early church’s teaching in regard to authority and the approach to God.” […]

Francis Schaeffer’s “How should we then live?” Video and outline of episode 1 “The Roman Age” (Schaeffer Sundays)

How Should We Then Live 1-1 Today I am starting a series that really had a big impact on my life back in the 1970′s when I first saw it. There are ten parts and today is the first. Francis Schaeffer takes a look at Rome and why it fell. It fell because of inward […]

Andy Roddick retires at US Open “Tennis Tuesday”

Published on Aug 30, 2012 by

Andy Roddick holds press conference to announce his retirement from professional tennis at the age of 30.

Roddick is a former world #1 and won the 2003 US Open.

____________

Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Andy Roddick Final US Open 2003 Highlights Pt. 1

Andy has some impressive stats:

Serve records:

  • Fastest serve in Australian open: 148 mph .
  • Fastest serve in Dubai: 150 mph.
  • Fastest average in first serve: 134 mph.
  • Fastest serve in Beijing: 148 mph.
  • Fastest serve in San Jose: 150 mph.
  • Fastest serve in Madrid: 151 mph.
  • Fastest serve in Washington: 151 mph.
  • Fastest serve in Queens :153 mph.
  • Fastest serve in Lyon: 142 mph.
  • Fastest serve in Roland Garros: 144 mph (2006–2010).
  • Fastest serve in Wimbledon: 143 mph (2011)

[edit] Records and achievements

Tournament 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 SR W–L
Grand Slam tournaments
Australian Open A A 2R SF QF SF 4R SF 3R SF QF 4R 2R 0 / 11 38–11
French Open A 3R 1R 1R 2R 2R 1R 1R A 4R 3R A   0 / 9 9–9
Wimbledon A 3R 3R SF F F 3R QF 2R F 4R 3R   0 / 11 39–11
US Open 1R QF QF W QF 1R F QF QF 3R 2R QF   1 / 12 40–11
SR 0 / 1 0 / 3 0 / 4 1 / 4 0 / 4 0 / 4 0 / 4 0 / 4 0 / 3 0 / 4 0 / 4 0 / 3 0 / 1 1 / 43  
Win–Loss 0–1 8–3 7–4 17–3 15–4 12–4 11–4 13–4 7–3 16–4 10–4 9–3 1–1   126–42
  • These records were attained in Open Era of tennis.
Championship Years Record accomplished Player tied
Wimbledon 2009 39 games won in a Grand Slam final Stands alone
ATP World Tour 2000–12 176 tiebreaks lost[46] Stands alone
ATP World Tour 2000–12 469 tiebreaks played[46] Stands alone
ATP World Tour 2007 18 consecutive tie-breaks won Stands alone
US Open 2004 Fastest serve in a Grand Slam tournament (152 mph) Stands alone

[edit] Major finals

[edit] Grand Slam finals

[edit] Singles: 5 (1–4)

Outcome Year Championship Surface Opponent in the final Score in the final
Winner 2003 US Open Hard Spain Juan Carlos Ferrero 6–3, 7–6(7–2), 6–3
Runner-up 2004 Wimbledon Grass Switzerland Roger Federer 6–4, 5–7, 6–7(3–7), 4–6
Runner-up 2005 Wimbledon Grass Switzerland Roger Federer 2–6, 6–7(2–7), 4–6
Runner-up 2006 US Open Hard Switzerland Roger Federer 2–6, 6–4, 5–7, 1–6
Runner-up 2009 Wimbledon Grass Switzerland Roger Federer 7–5, 6–7(6–8), 6–7(5–7), 6–3, 14–16

[edit]

Tour around SEC from week one

North Carolina State linebacker Rickey Dowdy (34) is unable to stop Tennessee wide receiver Cordarrelle Patterson (84) as he runs the ball for a touchdown during the Chick-Fil-A Kick Off Game at the Georgia Dome in Atlanta on Friday, Aug. 31, 2012. (AMY SMOTHERMAN BURGESS/NEWS SENTINEL STAFF)<br />

Photo by Amy Smotherman Burgess

North Carolina State linebacker Rickey Dowdy (34) is unable to stop Tennessee wide receiver Cordarrelle Patterson (84) as he runs the ball for a touchdown during the Chick-Fil-A Kick Off Game at the Georgia Dome in Atlanta on Friday, Aug. 31, 2012. (AMY SMOTHERMAN BURGESS/NEWS SENTINEL STAFF)

_____________

How did the SEC teams do in the first week of football in 2012?

Georgia             win –  Buffalo  45-23
Auburn            loss- Clemson 26 –  19
Florida              win-  Bowling Green 27-14
Alabama          win-  Michigan 41-14
LSU                      win-  North Texas 41-14
Vanderbilt      loss- South Carolina 17-14
Missouri           win- Southeastern Louisiana 62-10
Kentucky         no game
Miss St.             win- Jackson State  56-9
Ole Miss            win- Central Arkansas 27 – Ole Miss 49
Tennessee        win- North Carolina State 35-21
Texas A&M-   -postponed til Oct 13
So. Carolina   win- Vanderbilt 17-14
Arkansas         win- Jacksonville State 49-24

Arkansas had some question marks on defense and Davis did not impress going on 18 runs with less than 4 yards a carry. In the West the result is the same with Alabama still on top. Barrett Jones did a great job at center and looks to me like he may be heading to a Outland Trophy. Auburn played a good game against a tough Clemson team but came up short and there are lots of question marks about an Ole Miss team that trailed the University of Central Arkansas at halftime.

For a rundown of the SEC East here is an article by John Adams:

Let’s back up for a few paragraphs.

Let’s back up to Sept. 17 of last year. That’s when Tennessee lost star wide receiver Justin Hunter to a knee injury in the first quarter against Florida.

That’s also when the course of the season changed drastically for the worse from a UT perspective.

The statute of limitations has long since expired on excuses. And excuses are best dismissed anyway, particularly when you conduct yourfootball business in the SEC, where everyone loses players to injury. How well you replace them often determines your success or failure in this league.

But you couldn’t help but notice how different UT’s offense looked last Friday night in a 35-21 victory over North Carolina State when it had two big-play threats at wide receiver in Hunter and junior college transfer Cordarrelle Patterson.

Offensive playmakers are a big deal anywhere.

 

They’re a bigger deal in the SEC, because the defenses are so unyielding.

So I was looking for playmakers the first week of the college season, which included a challenging stretch of games from noon Saturday to 2 a.m. Sunday during which I suffered a right-thumb sprain while overworking my remote switch. My conclusion: UT might have more playmakers than any one else in the SEC East south of Missouri (the only team in the division I didn’t see).

No one else in the conference threw the ball better than UT quarterbackTyler Bray did against the Wolfpack. And it’s questionable whether anyone else outside of Southern California can match the pitch-and-catch combination of Bray to Hunter and Patterson.

South Carolina could use either one of them, as evidenced by its 17-13 victory over Vanderbilt last Thursday. In fact, it could have used Vanderbilt wide receiver Jordan Matthews, who had eight catches for 147 yards. South Carolina wide receivers had a grand total of three catches.

I’m already questioning my pick of the Gamecocks to win the East. They’re too reliant on the running of quarterback Connor Shaw, who couldn’t get through the first game without bruising his throwing shoulder. And there’s no semblance of an adequate backup behind him.

 

Running back Marcus Lattimore rushed for more than 100 yards and looked as good as he did last year when his season was cut short by a knee injury. But he didn’t consistently break tackles as he did as a freshman in 2010.

The running back headliner in the East had an Athens, Ga., dateline. Freshman Todd Gurley rushed for 100 yards on eight carries and returned a kickoff for one of his three touchdowns. He’s just what Georgia needed after dismissing Isaiah Crowell from the team in preseason. Crowell led the Bulldogs in rushing last season as a freshman but never turned heads the way Gurley did in a 45-23 victory over Buffalo.

Georgia quarterback Aaron Murray also was on his game in the season opener. He had three touchdown passes and no interceptions, the latter of which too often sullied his 2011 performances.

Murray doesn’t have Bray’s receivers, though. Tavarres King, who had six catches for 117 yards, has speed and experience but still drops too many passes.

Florida could live with a few drops if its receivers could get open. The Gators established their running game and little else in a 27-14 victory over Bowling Green.

Senior Mike Gillislee ran hard and showed more speed than expected in rushing for 148 yards. But other than Kentucky, whom else can Florida beat in the East without a more productive passing game?

The Gators just don’t have enough playmakers. And based on the first weekend, Georgia and South Carolina — the two highest ranked teams in the East — don’t have as many as the Vols.

John Adams is a senior columnist. He may be reached at 865-342-6284 or adamsj@knoxnews.com. Follow him at http://twitter.com/johnadamskns.

Open letter to President Obama (Part 135)

President Obama c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here.

We have spent over 19 trillion on welfare since LBJ started the war on poverty and it has only brought us several generations who are dependent on the government.

Rachel Sheffield

April 20, 2012 at 2:45 pm

Multiple reports of welfare abuse have hit the headlines in recent weeks, from a million-dollar lottery winner receiving food stamps to a Massachusetts drug dealer attempting to use welfare cash to post bail and an Alabama nightclub advertising a “Food Stamp Friday” party.

These examples highlight the need to reform a welfare system that is contributing to a culture of entitlement. A crucial element of reform is tackling the ballooning costs of the welfare state, which has become the fastest growing part of government spending.

In a hearing on Tuesday headed by House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R–WI), Heritage senior fellow Robert Rector discussed the major growth in welfare costs and how to get spending under control.

First, Rector dispelled the myth that the 1996 welfare reforms ended “welfare as we know it.” In fact, he noted, since 1996 the U.S “spends 50 percent more on means-tested cash, food and housing than it did when Bill Clinton entered office on a promise to ‘end welfare as we know it.’”

The reforms have been significantly watered down over the last several years, and as Rector explained on Tuesday, they touched only one of dozens of federal welfare programs:

The public is almost totally unaware of the size and scope of government spending on the poor. This is because Congress and the mainstream media always discuss welfare in a fragmented, piecemeal basis. Each of the 79 programs is debated in isolation as if it were the only program affecting the poor. This piecemeal approach to welfare spending perpetuates the myth that spending on the poor is meager and grows little, if at all.

In reality, welfare programs are costing taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars each year. In fiscal year 2011, total welfare costs equaled $927 billion ($717 billion from the federal government and $210 billion from states).

From a historical perspective, since the War on Poverty began in the 1960s, the government has spent $19.8 trillion (inflation-adjusted) to fund a growing list of welfare programs. As Rector points out, this is nearly three times “the cost of all military wars in U.S. history from the Revolutionary War through the current war in Afghanistan.”

Yet, despite current annual welfare costs already twice the amount necessary “to lift all Americans out of poverty,” as Rector noted, President Obama plans to increase welfare spending. Welfare costs have already grown by a third since he came to office in 2009. And this isn’t temporary spending due to the recession. President Obama plans to grow welfare such that by 2022 costs will reach $1.56 trillion. Based on President Obama’s plan, in the next decade U.S. taxpayers will fork out roughly $12.7 trillion on welfare.

To control the burgeoning costs, Rector explained that Congress must put a cap on aggregate welfare spending. Once the current recession ends or by 2013 at the latest, welfare funding should be rolled back to pre-recession levels (adjusted for inflation) and then allowed to grow thereafter only at the rate of inflation. This would save U.S. taxpayers more than $2.7 trillion over 10 years. In addition to the spending cap, Congress should tackle the causes of poverty by promoting self-reliance through work requirements and time limits as well as efforts to strengthen marriage in low-income communities.

Pouring more federal dollars into welfare is creating a burden on taxpayers and promoting a system of government dependence. Reforming welfare by getting costs under control and promoting personal responsibility is an approach that not only respects American taxpayers but also benefits individuals in need.

_____________

Thank you so much for your time. I know how valuable it is. I also appreciate the fine family that you have and your commitment as a father and a husband.

Sincerely,

Everette Hatcher III, 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002, ph 501-920-5733, lowcostsqueegees@yahoo.com