Monthly Archives: May 2012

John Isner “Tennis Tuesday”

Uploaded by on Jul 9, 2010

John Isner sits down with Houston Gaines (houstongaines.com) to discuss his tennis, including his historic Wimbledon match. Part I of II.

__________

In ATP World Tour Uncovered

_____________________

Nicolas Mahut vs John Isner 59-59 – Wimbledon 2010 (1st Round) – 11 hours of match (1/2)

John is a fine player. Here is the info from wikipedia:

John Isner

Isner at the 2009 US Open
Country United States United States
Residence Tampa, Florida, U.S.
Born April 26, 1985 (1985-04-26) (age 26)
Greensboro, North Carolina, U.S.
Height 6 ft 9 in (2.06 m)[1]
Weight 245 lb (111 kg)
College University of Georgia
Turned pro 2007
Plays Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Career prize money $3,114,711
Official web site www.johnisner.com
Singles
Career record 122–89
Career titles 3
Highest ranking No. 13 (February 20, 2012)
Current ranking No. 13 (February 20, 2012)
Grand Slam results
Australian Open 4R (2010)
French Open 3R (2010)
Wimbledon 2R (2010, 2011)
US Open QF (2011)
Doubles
Career record 61–48
Career titles 3
Highest ranking No. 27 (May 17, 2010)
Current ranking No. 32 (August 30, 2010)
Grand Slam Doubles results
Australian Open QF (2009)
French Open 3R (2008)
US Open 2R (2009)
Last updated on: January 10, 2011[2].

John Robert Isner (born April 26, 1985) is an American professional tennis player. He achieved his career-high rank of no. 14 on February 13, 2012, and has been as high as the second-ranked American tennis player behind Andy Roddick or Mardy Fish.[4] His most famous victories were against Roger Federer in the Davis Cup encounter in February 2012, Roddick in the 2009 US Open, and against Nicolas Mahut at the 2010 Wimbledon Championships where he played the longest ever professional tennis match, which lasted 11 hours and 5 minutes over the course of three days.

Video Clip:Milton Friedman – The Robber Baron Myth

Milton Friedman – The Robber Baron Myth

Uploaded by on Mar 15, 2010

Professor Friedman explodes the myth that America’s 19th century industrialists exploited the ordinary man

An open letter to President Obama (Part 67)

President Obama c/o The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I know that you receive 20,000 letters a day and that you actually read 10 of them every day. I really do respect you for trying to get a pulse on what is going on out here.

In this article below you will see that the American people do not want Obamacare but yet it is being crammed down their throats and all the regulations that go with that too.

Sickening Regulation

by Michael D. Tanner

Michael Tanner is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and author of Leviathan on the Right: How Big-Government Conservatism Brought Down the Republican Revolution.

Added to cato.org on February 29, 2012

This article appeared in National Review (Online) on February 29, 2012.

Never underestimate the brilliance of our federal bureaucracy.

The Department of Health and Human Services has announced that it must delay implementation of new reimbursement codes for Medicare. Those new regulations would have increased the total number of reimbursement codes from the current 18,000 to more than 140,000 separate codes. The delay will undoubtedly come as a relief for physicians who will have additional time to try to understand the bureaucratic complexity of rules that, for example, apply 36 different codes for treating a snake bite, depending on the type of snake, its geographical region, and whether the incident was accidental, intentional self-harm, assault, or undetermined. The new codes also thoroughly differentiate between nine different types of hang-gliding injuries, four different types of alligator attacks, and the important difference between injuries sustained by walking into a wall and those resulting from walking into a lamppost.

And Democrats wonder why Americans still resist having the government control our health care?

Less than a month before the Supreme Court hears arguments on the constitutionality of Obamacare, the American people have already reached their judgment. According to the latest USA Today poll, fully 75 percent of Americans believe the new health-care law’s individual mandate is unconstitutional. And if the Court doesn’t throw Obamacare out, Americans want Congress to do so: Half of voters want the law repealed, compared to 44 percent who want it retained. Moreover, those who want it repealed feel much more intensely about it. Fully 32 percent “strongly support” repeal, compared to just 18 percent who “strongly oppose” it. This is consistent with other polls — for example, the latest Rasmussen poll has 53 percent of likely voters supporting repeal, with just 38 percent opposed — and virtually unchanged since the law passed.

[F]ully 75 percent of Americans believe the new health-care law’s individual mandate is unconstitutional.

Despite constant predictions by the media and the laws supporters, Obamacare is not becoming more popular.

The public seems to understand that government intervention does not generally make things less expensive. And there are good reasons for the public’s skepticism. For example, the Congressional Budget Office reported in December that at least six programs that were supposed to save money under Obamacare not only don’t, but some actually are increasing costs. And Jonathan Gruber, one of the architects of both Obamacare and its precursor Romneycare, now says that premiums are likely to rise under the new health-care law. In fact, Gruber warns that, even after receiving government subsidies, some individuals will end up paying more than they would have without the reform. Gee, thanks, Mr. President.

And the public understands that imposing new taxes, mandates, and regulations will do nothing to create jobs in a struggling economy. In fact, a poll released last month by the Chamber of Commerce showed that for 74 percent of small businesses they’re “causing an impediment to job creation.”

At the same time, the controversy over the administration’s contraception mandate has brought home to voters just how coercive the health-care law really is.

Most of all, Americans understand that, from the beginning, the debate over health-care reform has been about control. The Obama administration believes that decisions about health care are simply too important and too complex for the average American and his doctor to make for themselves. Only the experts in Washington can get those decisions right. After all, only Washington can understand the difference between a burn from a hot toaster (Code No. X15.1) and a burn from an electronic-game keyboard (Code No. Y93.C1).

Unfortunately for the Obama administration, the American people just don’t believe them.

__________-

Thank you so much for your time. I know how valuable it is. I also appreciate the fine family that you have and your committment as a father and a husband.

Sincerely,

Everette Hatcher III, 13900 Cottontail Lane, Alexander, AR 72002, ph 501-920-5733, lowcostsqueegees@yahoo.com