Yearly Archives: 2011

Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 4 (President Obama on Reagan)

undefined
President Obama signs the Ronald Reagan Centennial Commission Act on June 2, 2009, as former first lady Nancy Reagan looks on.
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
UPON SIGNING THE RONALD REAGAN CENTENNIAL COMMISSION ACT
I am going to include in my series on Ronald Wilson Reagan a group of articles from USA Today that deal with today’s politicians and what they appreciated about Reagan.
Ronald Wilson Reagan was a believer. As a husband, a father, an entertainer, a governor and a president, he recognized that each of us has the power — as individuals and as a nation — to shape our own destiny. He had faith in the American promise; in the importance of reaffirming values like hard work and personal responsibility; and in his own unique ability to inspire others to greatness.

No matter what political disagreements you may have had with President Reagan— and I certainly had my share — there is no denying his leadership in the world, or his gift for communicating his vision for America

President Reagan recognized the American people’s hunger for accountability and change — putting our nation on a bold new path toward both. And although he knew that conflicts between parties and political adversaries were inevitable, he also knew that they would never be strong enough to break the ties that bind us together. He understood that while we may see the world differently and hold different opinions about what’s best for our country, the fact remains that we are all patriots who put the welfare of our fellow citizens above all else.

It was a philosophy that President Reagan took to heart — famously saying that he and Democratic Speaker Tip O’Neill, with whom he sparred constantly, could be friends after 6 o’clock. It’s what led him to compromise on issues as contentious as Social Security and tax cuts. And it’s what allowed him to work with leaders of all political persuasions to advance the cause of freedom, democracy and security around the world, including reducing nuclear weapons and imagining a world, ultimately, without nuclear weapons.

But perhaps even more important than any single accomplishment was the sense of confidence and optimism President Reagan never failed to communicate to the American people. It was a spirit that transcended the most heated political arguments, and one that called each of us to believe that tomorrow will be better than today. At a time when our nation was going through an extremely difficult period, with economic hardship at home and very real threats beyond our borders, it was this positive outlook, this sense of pride, that the American people needed more than anything.

When the future looked darkest and the way ahead seemed uncertain, President Reagan understood both the hardships we faced and the hopes we held for the future. He understood that it is always “Morning in America.” That was his gift, and we remain forever grateful.

President Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday anniversary

Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, then California Gov. Ronald Reagan, Bob Hope and John Wayne attend a party to benefit Reagan’s gubernatorial campaign in 1970.
Its the Master of Venom’s turn to dish out the punishment, this time its Govenor Ronald Reagan.

Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 3

HALT:HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth.com

President Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday anniversary

California Gov. Ronald Reagan laughs at something said by Vice President Gerald Ford during a luncheon on 1974

 

Ronald Reagan speaks at 1980 Republican National Convention part 2

Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 3

There are no constraints on the human mind, no walls around the human spirit, no barriers to our progress except those we ourselves erect.
Ronald Reagan 

There are no easy answers’ but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.
Ronald Reagan

There are no great limits to growth because there are no limits of human intelligence, imagination, and wonder.
Ronald Reagan

They say the world has become too complex for simple answers. They are wrong.
Ronald Reagan

Thomas Jefferson once said, ‘We should never judge a president by his age, only by his works.’ And ever since he told me that, I stopped worrying.
Ronald Reagan

To paraphrase Winston Churchill, I did not take the oath I have just taken with the intention of presiding over the dissolution of the world’s strongest economy.
Ronald Reagan

To sit back hoping that someday, some way, someone will make things right is to go on feeding the crocodile, hoping he will eat you last – but eat you he will.
Ronald Reagan

Today we did what we had to do. They counted on America to be passive. They counted wrong.
Ronald Reagan

Today, if you invent a better mousetrap, the government comes along with a better mouse.
Ronald Reagan

Trust, but verify.
Ronald Reagan

Unemployment insurance is a pre-paid vacation for freeloaders.
Ronald Reagan

Violence has been Nicaragua’s most important export to the world.
Ronald Reagan

 

President Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday anniversary

President Reagan and Nancy Reagan wave from a limousine during the Inaugural Parade on Jan. 20, 1981, in Washington. This was the warmest Inauguration Day on record, hitting 55 degrees.

 

Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 2

HALT:HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth.com

President Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday anniversary

Secret Service agents react after President Reagan is shot as he exits a side doorway of the Washington Hilton on March 30, 1981.

 

Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 2

A great moment in modern conservatism. 1980 Republican National Convention speech by Ronald Reagan.

But there are advantages to being elected President. The day after I was elected, I had my high school grades classified Top Secret.
Ronald Reagan

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.
Ronald Reagan

Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged.
Ronald Reagan

Government always finds a need for whatever money it gets.
Ronald Reagan
Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.
Ronald Reagan
Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other.
Ronald Reagan
Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan

Governments tend not to solve problems, only to rearrange them.
Ronald Reagan
How do you tell a communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
I have wondered at times what the Ten Commandments would have looked like if Moses had run them through the US Congress.
Ronald Reagan
I’ve never been able to understand why a Republican contributor is a ‘fat cat’ and a Democratic contributor of the same amount of money is a ‘public-spirited philanthropist’.
Ronald Reagan
If the Soviet Union let another political party come into existence, they would still be a one-party state, because everybody would join the other party.
Ronald Reagan

If we ever forget that we are One Nation Under God, then we will be a nation gone under.
Ronald Reagan

Reagan is pushed into his limousine after shots are fired. He would joke with doctors later, but his wound could have been deadly.

President Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday anniversary

President Reagan is pushed into his limousine after shots are fired. He would joke with doctors lat

 

Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 1 (humor of Reagan)

President Ronald Reagan and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor walk outside the Supreme Court after O'Connor was sworn in Sept. 25, 1981. O'Connor was the first woman on the Supreme Court.

President Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday anniversary

President Reagan and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor walk outside the Supreme Court after O’Connor was sworn in Sept. 25, 1981. O’Connor was the first woman on the Supreme Court.

 

Reagan humor

Ronald Wilson Reagan was born on Feb 6, 1911. I wanted to celebrate his life the next couple of weeks with some great posts about him. Today I am starting off with some funny quotes from him.

“Politics is just like show business. You have a hell of an opening, you coast for awhile, you have a hell of a closing.”

“What does an actor know about politics?” -criticizing Ed Asner for opposing American foreign policy

“What makes him think a middle-aged actor, who’s played with a chimp, could have a future in politics?” -on Clint Eastwood’s bid to become mayor of Carmel

“How can a president not be an actor?” -when asked “How could an actor become president?’

“I hope you’re all Republicans.” -speaking to surgeons as he entered the operating room following a 1981 assassination attempt.

“I have left orders to be awakened at any time in case of national emergency — even if I’m in a Cabinet meeting.”

“Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.”

“The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.'”

“I don’t know. I’ve never played a governor.” -asked by a reporter in 1966 what kind of governor he would be

“There is absolutely no circumstance whatever under which I would accept that spot. Even if they tied and gagged me, I would find a way to signal by wiggling my ears.” –on possibly being offered the vice presidency in 1968

“You can tell a lot about a fella’s character by whether he picks out all of one color or just grabs a handful.” -explaining why he liked to have a jar of jelly beans on hand for important meetings

“I want you to know that also I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth and inexperience.” -during a 1984 presidential debate with Walter Mondale

“Recession is when your neighbor loses his job. Depression is when you lose yours. And recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his.”

“As a matter of fact, Nancy never had any interest in politics or anything else when we got married.”

“I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born.”

“I’m afraid I can’t use a mule. I have several hundred up on Capitol Hill.” -refusing a gift of a mule

President Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday anniversary

President Reagan and Queen Elizabeth II pose for photographers at a formal state dinner at the M.H. de Young Museum in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park. At left are Prince Philip and first lady Nancy Reagan.

 

Brummett: Social Security Privatization “very ruination of this vital contract.”(Social Security Series Part 5)

HALT:HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth.com

George Bush discusses his plans to privatize Social Security.

Social Security Series Part 5

John Brummett in his article “Boozman: Superman or Superficial?” (Arkansas Times, Sept 30, 2010) asserted, “that to take money out of Social Security and let individuals risk blowing it with bad investments would invite the very ruination of this vital contract.”

Personal accounts are safer than the current system.

What is the solution to the Social Security problem for young people? Ron Paul addresses this in his Dec 27, 2010 radio address:

Notice that neither political party proposes letting people opt out of Social Security, which exposes the lie that your contributions are set aside and saved. After all, if your contributions are really set aside for your retirement, the money is there earning interest, right? If your money is in your account, what difference would it make if your neighbor chooses not to participate in the program?

The truth of course is that your contributions are not put aside. Social Security is a simple tax. Like all taxes, the money collected is spent immediately as general revenue to fund the federal government. But no administration will admit that Social Security is nothing more than an accounting ledger with no money. You will collect benefits only if future tax revenues remain high. The money you paid into the system is long gone.

My hope is that at least some members of the new Congress will cut through the distortions to see Social Security as it really is. The best way to fix the impending Social Security crisis is also the simplest: Allow younger individuals to opt out of the program and use their tax savings to invest privately as they see fit. This is the true private solution. Your money has never been safe in the government’s hands and it never will be.

Ron Paul has rightly noted that basically Social Security needs to be seen for what it really is. Dan Mitchell of the Cato Institute has rightly noted that Social Security is a “tax and transfer entitlement scheme.”

Below are some figures from a 1995 article by William Shipman of the Cato Institute:

Monthly Benefit Comparison of Social Security and the Capital Markets by Date of Birth, Income, and Age of Retirement (1995 Dollars)

[Bar graph omitted. Tabular presentation given.]

Year of Birth:  1930

               Retirement Age 62           Normal Retirement Age
            Low Wage      High Wage        Low Wage     High Wage
___________________________________________________________________

Social
 Security     $439          $929             $551         $1,200

Bonds         $380        $1,341             $574         $2,072

Stocks        $864        $2,614           $1,301         $3,999

Year of Birth:  1950

               Retirement Age 62           Normal Retirement Age
            Low Wage      High Wage        Low Wage     High Wage
___________________________________________________________________

Social
 Security     $468        $1,144              $631        $1,562 

Bonds         $749        $3,194            $1,069        $4,585

Stocks      $1,599        $6,380            $2,490        $9,972

Year of Birth:  1970

               Retirement Age 62           Normal Retirement Age
            Low Wage      High Wage        Low Wage     High Wage
___________________________________________________________________

Social
 Security      $529       $1,315              $769        $1,908

Bonds          $676       $3,268            $1,085        $5,243

Stocks       $1,363       $6,610            $2,419       $11,729

Source: Author’s calculations based on figures in Social Security Administration, Social Security Bulletin, Annual Statistical Supplement, 1994 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1994); Stocks, Bonds, Bills and Inflation (Chicago: Ibbotson Associates, 1995); and “IFC Investible Index,” International Finance Corporation, Washington, 1995.

Tonight big BBQ for State Republicans

I am sure that many of you recently got this email below:

Arkansas GOP Newsletter

Dear Conservative Leader,

Event Update:

Don’t forget to join us this Thursday evening for our “Paint the Town Red: Jeans, Boots & BBQ” celebration to honor our newly elected officials! The event begins at 6:30 p.m. at the Robinson Center Exhibit Hall in downtown Little Rock. Tickets are $50 per person, children 12 & under are free.

We’ll have a barbecue buffet provided by Whole Hog, live country music, and an auction for a Henry Rifle. Conservative news radio host Dave Elswick will serve as the night’s master of ceremonies.

_________________________________________________

I am looking forward to visiting with Republican State lawmakers tonight. I have in the past put in profiles of most of these fine Republicans. (I have actually done 50 so far.) Take a look at some of them below.

David Meeks

[16680_low.jpg]

Ann Clemmer

David Sanders

Andy Mayberry

flag-eps.gif

AndyMayberry.gif

Kim Hammer

Jake Files of Ft Smith.

Jeremy Hutchinson

Social Security is a bad deal for young workers today (Social Security Series Part 4)

HALT:HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth.com

Ron Paul’s radio address Dec 27, 2010 on Social Security

Social Security Series Part 4

Ron Paul in his radio address of Dec 27, 2010 noted:

But millions of Americans now realize that the status quo is an illusion that will not last even another 10 or 20 years. The federal government cannot continue to spend a trillion dollars more than it collects in revenue each year because we are running out of creditors. Fiscal reality is setting in and the consequences may be grim, even if Congress finds the courage to take decisive action now.

Courage begins with a commitment to see things as they are, rather than how we wish they were. When it comes to Social Security we must understand that the system does not represent an old age pension, an insurance program or even a forced savings program. It simply represents an enormous transfer of payment with younger workers paying taxes to benefit the other beneficiaries. There is no Social Security trust fund and you don’t have an account. Whether you win or lose the Social Security lottery is a function of when you happen to be born and how long you live to collect benefits. Of course young people today have every reason to believe they will never collect those benefits.

Social Security is a bad deal for young workers today and they are voicing their opinions.

What do you think of the nation’s Social Security system? Do you think that by the time you retire there will be enough money in the system to pay you the benefits you are entitled to, or do you think there will not be enough money left to pay you benefits?

Responses by Age Group:
  18-30 31-44 45-60 61+ All
Yes, will be enough 18% 23% 44% 61% 36%
No, will not be enough 80% 74% 52% 29% 60%
(VOL) Not covered by Social Security 0% 0% 1% 2% 1%
DK/No opinion 2% 3% 4% 7% 4%
Source: A Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted by telephone January 12 – 16, 2005 among 1,007 randomly selected adults nationwide. Margin of sampling error for overall results is plus or minus three percentage points. Fieldwork by TNS of Horsham, PA.

Another idea to help keep the Social Security system funded would let workers put some of their Social Security savings into stocks or bonds if they wanted to. That could produce higher or lower benefits depending on how the investments perform. Would you support or oppose this stock-market option for Social Security?

Responses by Age Group:
  18-30 31-44 45-60 61+ All
Support 71% 65% 47% 35% 55%
Oppose 26% 32% 50% 58% 41%
DK/No opinion 2% 4% 3% 7% 4%
Source: A Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted by telephone January 12 – 16, 2005 among 1,007 randomly selected adults nationwide. Margin of sampling error for overall results is plus or minus three percentage points. Fieldwork by TNS of Horsham, PA.  

Jeremy Hutchinson: People want accountability on spending

HALT:HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth.com

Me and Archie Manning at the Sugar Bowl. He insisted on taking this photo with me so who am I to turn down a football legend?

Saline Courier Sunday Paper front page Jan 23, 2011

E-mail

If Saline County’s state Sen. Jeremy Hutchinson has his way, the state Highway Commission, the Game and Fish Commission, the Lottery Commission and institutions of higher education would lose their autonomy under a proposed constitutional amendment Hutchinson filed this week.
Hutchinson, R-Little Rock, who recently took office, represents portions of Saline and Pulaski counties.
Under his proposal, budgets  for these agencies would be overseen and set by the Legislature for the first time.
The resolution would amend parts of the state constitution that allow these three state agencies and the state’s colleges and universities to operate independently.
“I think people want accountability, and right now these four institutions are not as accountable,” Hutchinson said.
“I don’t think there is graft or corruption, but they don’t have the accountability like the Department of Finance and Administration has or the Department of Human Services, and they’re spending a lot of taxpayers’ dollars, particularly the Highway Department,” he said.
Hutchinson’s proposal was referred to the Senate State Agencies and Governmental Affairs Committee.
The Legislature can refer up to three proposed constitutional amendments to the general election every two years, Hutchinson noted.
In Hutchinson’s proposal, the Highway Commission, created by Amendment 42, the Game and Fish Commission, created by Amendment 35, and institutions of higher education, which were granted a certain amount of independence under Amendment 33, would no longer be independent of the Legislature and would be subject to legislative appropriations.
The proposal also would amend Amendment 87, which authorized the state lottery, to say that lottery proceeds can be appropriated by the General Assembly.
The amendment currently prohibits the Legislature from controlling lottery funds.
Hutchinson contends that recent controversies within the Lottery Commission and Game and Fish Commission illustrate the need for legislative and executive branch oversight.
The state Lottery Commission was found in an audit to have operated with undocumented expenses, without checking employee backgrounds and without meeting accepted standards on awarding large vendor contracts.
The Game and Fish Commission recently considered exempting itself from the state Freedom of Information Act. It eventually backed off.
Hutchinson said his main interest, however, is the Highway Department.
“I think the Highway Department has been shortchanging Saline County and other parts of the state for 50 years,” Hutchinson said.
“I think they need to redraw the district lines to allow equal funding,” he said. “The Legislature currently has no say in the matter. My proposal would give the Legislature, who are the people’s representatives, the authority to rectify inequities.
According to Hutchinson, the Highway Department “spends more tax money that any department, except for the Department of Education, yet  there’s very little accountability or oversight.”
“As for the Game and Fish  Commission and Higher Ed being under the Legislature, I really don’t have a burning issue with them, but I think what’s fair is fair,” he said.
“In particular the Highway Department should have legislative oversight,”  he contended. “We learned during the last election that people want accountability and with our form of government, the people get that through their elected representatives.
“Currently the elected representatives can’t do anything about these agencies,” he said. “If we bring these others under legislative control, they can at least be controlled by voting the legislators out.”
Hutchinson said he believes the bill will pass “if it’s referred out” (for a public vote).
“The Legislature refers three constitutional revisions every session. If this gets referred out, it will pass. I think the people are crying out for more accountability.”
Hutchinson said he has had “very good response” in conversations with other legislators. “There may be amendments that may be filed and we may need to remove an agency or two that the Legislature doesn’t support.”
In regard to his proposal, Hutchinson noted that the “Highway Department certainly doesn’t like it.”
“That was to be expected,” he said. “I haven’t heard from Higher Ed. While I’m concerned about tuition increases, I have no particular issue with them. I don’t see anything they’re doing that’s particularly offensive.”
Hutchinson emphasized that his proposal has “just been introduced. The resolution won’t be heard until the very end of the session.”
“The Joint State Agencies Committee will meet and refer them out, and we’re just now getting feedback. We’ll tweak the legislation and a hearing will probably be held in March. There will be a lot of input and we’ll try to address needs and concerns as they arrive, but obviously still hold people accountable.”
Efforts to obtain a reaction to Hutchinson’s proposal from the state Highway Department were unsuccessful Friday.
Ralph Hall, assistant to Director Dan Flowers, referred comments to Randy Ort, the agency’s public affairs officer. Ort did not return phone calls in time to be included in this report.
Matt DeCample, spokesman for Gov. Mike Beebe, said earlier this week that the governor “is just now starting to review the language of the proposal,” but is strongly opposed to any changes to Amendment 33.
Beebe supports the independence of colleges and universities, DeCample said.
Rep. Barry Hyde, D-North Little Rock, a co-chairman of the legislative Lottery Oversight Committee, reportedly said he would oppose changing the lottery amendment. He said that when lawmakers were setting up the lottery’s structure, lottery officials in other states strongly recommended that the program be insulated from politics as much as possible.
“To put it under the direct month-to-month control of the Legislature would open the door to all kinds of political shenanigans,” Hyde said.
Hyde said he worries about the future of the lottery, which generated more than $100 million for college scholarships in its first year.

TolbertReport.com – Jeremy Hutchinson Announces for he will run as a Republican for Arkansas State Senate district 22 (Video from last year)

Brummett: Estate tax is okay because it affects few people

HALT:HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth.com

Series on Estate Tax Part 6

Milton Friedman clears up misconceptions about wealth redistribution, in general,

and inheritance tax, in particular. He shows that this tax does hurt families and

our society. The questioner suggests a 100% inheritance tax but that would

destroy a society. Likewise Brummett below tries to downplay the harmful

effects of the tax by saying it is alright since less than 1% of the USA will be

affected, so lets stick it to them despite the harm it causes to family businesses.



In this series on the Estate Tax I will be quoting portions of the article “The Economic Case Against the Death Tax,”(Heritage Foundation, July 20, 2010) by Curtis S. Dubay. Dubay is a Senior Analyst in Tax Policy in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation.

Number of Estates Paying Death Tax Not the Issue. A common argument in favor of the death tax is that it only affects a small number of estates and as such has a small impact on the economy. By that logic, a tax that only one taxpayer paid would be an ideal tax, even if that tax ground the economy to a halt. The number of taxpayers that pay a particular tax is economically irrelevant. What matters is the impact the tax has on the economy. By this more accurate metric the death tax is a poor tax because it is a large weight dragging down economic growth.


The number of estates subject to the death tax has declined steadily since passage of the 2001 tax relief. That package steadily phased out the death tax by reducing its rate and increasing the portion of estates exempt from the death tax from $1 million to $3.5 million, before doing away with the death tax entirely in 2010. In 2000, before the tax relief packages began, 52,000 estates paid the death tax. As a result of the increased exemption level, by 2008 (the latest year of available data) just over 17,000 estates paid the death tax.


Fewer estates paying the death tax has reduced the economic cost it imposes, but as long as the death tax remains in place it will continue to slow economic growth, destroy jobs, and lower wages. It is little consolation to workers that remain unemployed or see their pay stagnate because of the death tax that the impact of the tax has been slightly lessened.

Current proposals to resuscitate the death tax and set its exemption level between $3.5 million ($7 million for married couples) and $5 million ($10 million for married couples) would still subject estates that support the most jobs and generate the most economic activity to the death tax. Even though these estates are the most able to afford expensive planning measures to lower their death tax liability substantially, they often cannot escape the tax entirely and therefore still pay large tax bills. These large estates support more economic activity, generate more income, and support more jobs than the estates that would continue to fall below the threshold.


According to data from the Internal Revenue Service “smaller estates (under $3.5 million) make up the bulk of filers—more than 60 percent between 2002 and 2007. Large estates (over $10 million), however, contributed between 18 percent and 30 percent of the total revenue in the same time frame, indicating a disproportionate distribution of tax liability.” Subjecting these estates to the death tax again would continue to put a large number of workers at risk of seeing their wages idle or their jobs destroyed.

___________________________________________________

___________________________________________________

Social Security taxes have risen rapidly (Social Security Series Part 3)

HALT:HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth.com

Debate on should the cap be raised on Social Security Payroll Taxes on Fox News.

Social Security Series Part 3

Basically the social security system in the USA has been in such bad shape because of this pay as you go system that there is no way to raise taxes enough to pay all the promised benefits over the next 40 years. Is the problem that we have not raised taxes fast enough in the past. Take a look.

Pat Fleck on his blog noted:

The tax was implemented in 1937 at 1.0% of the first $3,000 of wages. It stands today at 6.20% on the first $106,800 of wages. Inflation between 1937 and 2010 was 3.76% annually, whereas the wage limit has risen at 4.95%. Hence, even if the original 1.0% tax had remained constant, the amount collected on the limit would have increased substantially more than the rate of inflation due to the more rapidly increasing wage limit. However, with increases in both the limit and the rate, the tax in dollar terms has increased on the wage limit from $30 to $6,622, a 7.57% annual increase, which is double the rate of inflation between 1937 and 2010.

The main point I want you to take away from this post is: Social Security Payroll Taxes are two high now. Raising them further kills investment in the economy. Liberals have suggested raising the payroll taxes by 50% but that still would not take care of all the future promises that Social Security has made.

Glenn Beck has observed:

In less than six years, the federal government will be paying out more in Social Security benefits than the taxes that it takes in to fund it. Our Social Security Administration is getting $788 billion in fiscal year 2011. That breaks out to $6,500 per U.S. household.

You write a check for that? Can you write a check for that? ‘Cause that’s what we’re doing