Yearly Archives: 2011

Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 53 (Freedom is not the sole prerogative of a lucky few, but the inalienable and universal right of all human beings)

https://i0.wp.com/www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/photographs/large/C44909-16.jpg

President Reagan meeting with William F. Buckley in the Oval Office. 1/21/88.

I really thought that John Pelphrey would be allowed to coach the fine recruits that he signed. In fact, I thought that since all these recruits signed early that they had been given assurances from Jeff Long concerning that. I guess I was wrong.

In a prophetic speech concerning the Soviet Union, Ronald Reagan predicted that “the march of freedom and democracy will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash-heap of history.” I am posting in the coming days excerpts from one of Reagan best speeches ever.  He addressed the members of the British Parliament on June 8, 1982.

Freedom is not the sole prerogative of a lucky few, but the inalienable and universal right of all human beings.

 
In the Communist world as well, man’s instinctive desire for freedom and self-determination surfaces again and again. To be sure, there are grim reminders of how brutally the police state attempts to snuff out this quest for self-rule — 1953 in East Germany, 1956 in Hungary, 1968 in Czechoslovakia, 1981 in Poland. But the struggle continues in Poland. And we know that there are even those who strive and suffer for freedom within the confines of the Soviet Union itself. How we conduct ourselves here in the Western democracies will determine whether this trend continues.

No, democracy is not a fragile flower. Still it needs cultivating. If the rest of this century is to witness the gradual growth of freedom and democratic ideals, we must take actions to assist the campaign for democracy.

Some argue that we should encourage democratic change in right-wing dictatorships, but not in Communist regimes. Well, to accept this preposterous notion — as some well-meaning people have — is to invite the argument that once countries achieve a nuclear capability, they should be allowed an undisturbed reign of terror over their own citizens.

We reject this course.
As for the Soviet view, Chairman Brezhnev repeatedly has stressed that the competition of ideas and systems must continue and that this is entirely consistent with relaxation of tensions and peace.

Well, we ask only that these systems begin by living up to their own constitutions, abiding by their own laws, and complying with the international obligations they have undertaken. We ask only for a process, a direction, a basic code of decency, not for an instant transformation.
We cannot ignore the fact that even without our encouragement there has been and will continue to be repeated explosions against repression and dictatorships. The Soviet Union itself is not immune to this reality. Any system is inherently unstable that has no peaceful means to legitimize its leaders. In such cases, the very repressiveness of the state ultimately drives people to resist it, if necessary, by force.

While we must be cautious about forcing the pace of change, we must not hesitate to declare our ultimate objectives and to take concrete actions to move toward them. We must be staunch in our conviction that freedom is not the sole prerogative of a lucky few, but the inalienable and universal right of all human beings. So states the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which, among other things, guarantees free elections.

Ed Reinke / Associated Press

National championship, April 4, 1994 — Nothing fazed Scotty Thurman. Never mind that Hawg fan Bill Clinton was watching. Never mind that Arkansas was tied 70-70 with 51 seconds remaining against Duke, playing in its fourth title game in the last five years. Never mind that Antonio Lang, 6-8 and long-limbed, was flying at Thurman. The junior swingman simply added a little more arc to his shot, which eventually gave Arkansas its only NCAA crown.

No. 30: Scotty Thurman’s

_________________________________________

Little known presidential facts:

  1. George H. W. Bush (1924-) was the first vice president to be elected president since Martin Van Buren.k
  2. William Jefferson “Bill” Clinton (1946-) was the first U.S. Democratic president to win re-election since FDR.k

 


FRIEDMAN FRIDAY “The Failure of Socialism” episode of Free to Choose in 1990 by Milton Friedman (Part 2)

Milton Friedman: Free To Choose – The Failure Of Socialism With Ronald Reagan (Full)

Published on Mar 19, 2012 by

Milton Friedman’s writings affected me greatly when I first discovered them and I wanted to share with you.

Ronald Reagan introduces this program, and traces a line from Adam Smith’s “The Wealth of Nations” to Milton Friedman’s work, describing Free to Choose as “a survival kit for you, for our nation and for freedom.” Dr. Friedman travels to Hungary and Czechoslovakia to learn how Eastern Europeans are rebuilding their collapsed economies. His conclusion: they must accept the verdict of history that governments create no wealth. Economic freedom is the only source of prosperity. That means free, private markets. Attempts to find a “third way” between socialism and free markets are doomed from the start. If the people of Eastern Europe are given the chance to make their own choices they will achieve a high level of prosperity. Friedman tells us individual stories about how small businesses struggle to survive against the remains of extensive government control. Friedman says, “Everybody knows what needs to be done. The property that is now in the hands of the state, needs to be gotten into the hands of private people who can use it in accordance with their own interests and values.” Eastern Europe has observed the history of free markets in the United States and wants to copy our success. After the documentary, Dr. Friedman talks further about government and the economy with Gary Becker of the University of Chicago and Samuel Bowles of the University of Massachusetts. In a wide-ranging discussion, they disagree about the results of economic controls in countries around the world, with Friedman defending his thesis that the best government role is the smallest one.
___________
Below is a portion of the transcript of the program and above you will find the complete video of the program:

Here is another real success story, this time in Czechoslovakia. Martin was a rock musician. Today he makes documentary films. Some years ago, he did a concert tour of the United States and brought back secondhand recording equipment. The communist government let him bring it back, after paying a hefty import tax, because he said he wanted to record folk music __ something the government was not doing and did not plan to do.

In the past year, since things have opened up, his business has exploded. Along with music and films, he now duplicates video cassettes. He also makes audio cassettes for other Czech producers and has devised his own English language course on tape. He is on his way and many more will follow if the government just gets out of their way. You just can’t keep good people like that down.

The guests at this party aren’t much interested in self-driving entrepreneurs like Martin. High powered business executives from North America and West Europe __ they are interested in bigger game. They are here to do business and make good profits for their firms. They’ll do it by arranging joint ventures between their western companies and government enterprises. To succeed, they have to get on the right side of the politicians and the bureaucrats who are in charge. It is large scale lobbying, very much in the western manner. The danger is that in the process, local government bureaucrats and big foreign business will end up freezing out local entrepreneurs.

Friedman: The assets of Hungary belong to the people of Hungary. I do not believe they should be sold. You are a citizen of Hungary, who owns the state enterprises?

Unknown: Okay, the society as a whole.

Friedman: Not the society, the people.

Unknown: Well, give it to the people.

Friedman: In finance ministries all over Eastern Europe, the talk is all about privatization, but rhetoric is one thing __ action sometimes very different.

One example is in Prague where Vacla Klouse, the finance minister, is desperately trying to free the Czech economy.

Vacla Klouse: The people who were the reformers at that time were done after the Russian invasion, they were fired from their jobs and they return to politics with their own extremely obsolete ideas, and now they are trying . . .

Friedman: But he is up against political planners that aren’t ready to give up control. They are all anticommunists, all in favor of markets, but many are still beguiled by the idea of market socialism. A third way between capitalism and socialism, Klouse and I believe that is a mirage __ that a third way will take Czechoslovakia straight to the third world. It must either move directly to a pure free market, or it will get stuck just as Yugoslavia has.

Klouse: . . . I think intellectuals tend to underestimate the intelligence of the ordinary people . . .

Friedman: Poland and Hungary have exactly the same problem. Some, like Klouse, want to move to free markets right away. Others still hanker after socialist control of the markets.

Klouse: . . . use the word naive citizens. They are the interventionist economies and the other, so this is my speech in the parliament . . . . . .

Friedman: Political power is limited, but economic power is not limited and you can have, if you have one millionaire, you can have another millionaire, another millionaire, without anybody else being worse off. In fact, everybody else will be better off. It seems to me again, the people understand that. I can’t believe that your ordinary people here don’t. They know overnight you can make a change if you could only get the government off the back of the people.

Where are we headed __ we are heading all the way up here __ we’ll get there. Let’s not get any more gas than we need to. What is it? It is about $1.00 a liter which makes it about $4.00 a gallon of gas.

In these countries, the hardest problem is to transform their heavy industries. This is Novahoota, a vast collection of steel mills in Poland and a disaster in every sense. It is inefficient, costly, and above all, a major polluter. The best thing to do with places like this would be to bulldoze them, but that is almost impossible. They are too well shielded by special interests: the unions, the bureaucrats, and all the other political interests on the fringes.

The communists socialize the means of production. They tried to run everything from the center. It didn’t work. It was a mess and a failure. We in the United States, on the other hand, have been socializing the fruits of production. That is, the government has been taking money from some people, the people who produce the goods and services, and giving it to other people who do not produce goods and services. The end result is likely to be the same loss of incentive and organization if we carry it too far. That is one lesson we should learn from these countries.

A year ago, the cornucopia of fruits and vegetables and other things in this street market were simply not obtainable. It is one of the first signs of the flowering of enterprise under the new regime. This market is in Krakow, Poland. Goods are readily available now, only because the government eliminated price controls allowing the market to set the prices. Like a miracle, overnight the stalls had goods for sale. This gentleman sells bulbs and seeds. He is happy in the market, but many traders would like to set up in stores and develop on a larger scale. At the moment, they can’t. The stores are all owned by the state. The traders are stymied unless and until the stores become private property. When they do, the market will get another boost.

This youngster is 16. He is still in high school, but this is Saturday and he is in the market selling jeans from Thailand, making a little money for himself. He is studying to be a gardener. But when I asked him what he was going to do when he left school, he had no hesitation __ he was going to be a businessman. There is the hope of Poland.

Everybody knows what needs to be done. The property that is now in the hands of the state need to be gotten into the hands of the private people who can use it in accordance with their own interests and values. The problem is how to do it. Now that you have some degree of political freedom, there is an awful fight going on about who is going to get what share of the total pie. Everybody wants a little bigger piece. It is a political mine field, but unless that mine field can be gotten through, the game is up. It will be a failure. If it can be gotten through, then you will have an opportunity for these resources to be used the right way for the right things.

We in the West know only too well how hard it is to get the government out of something once they have been in it. Here in Poland they have been in it for 50 years and in a much bigger way than the United States. So they have a real job on their hands.

It would be silly of us, on the basis of a brief trip, to try to judge how successful these countries will be in doing what no country has yet been able to do __ transform a totalitarian state into a prosperous, free society. If this experiment is successful, it will not only transform Eastern Europe __ it will also offer an invaluable blueprint for the economic development of many poor countries.

You know, nothing is more striking than the wide differences in the standard of life of people who live in different parts of the world. Why? Not because of race or religion or culture or natural resources. After all, the Chinese who live in Hong Kong and in Taiwan are of the same race and background as those who live in Red China, yet their standards of living are vastly different. The same thing is true of East Germany and West Germany; of South Korea and North Korea; of Japan before the major restoration and Japan after the major restoration. The real explanation are the economic institutions that they adopt __free private markets versus central planning.

The countries of Eastern Europe have finally overthrown their communist masters who foisted central control on them. They have the rare opportunity to write on a clean slate; to create the institutions of private property and free markets that are the only ones that have ever achieved widespread prosperity and human freedom. We in the United States, on the basis of our experience of the last 10 years, know how hard it is to cut a government down to size. We hope they succeed better than we did. If they do, we will learn as much from them as they have learned from our example.

Just like 1986 can miracle happen to Univ of Ark Little Rock in NCAA Playoffs?

This story ran in Saline Courier today

Could Lightening strike twice for UALR Trojans?

Coach Mike Newell in the 1986 NCAA Basketball Tournament led his 14th seededUniversity of Arkansas at Little Rock (UALR) Trojans to a 90-83 victory over the 3rd seededNotre Dame Fighting Irish coached by Digger Phelps, now a college basketball analyst for ESPN. Next the Trojans took the North Carolina State Wolfpack, coached by Jim Valvano, to double overtime before being eliminated from the tournament.

Again like 1986 both Notre Dame and UALR will be in the NCAA Tournament, and it appears they both have a good chance of being paired up again according to various websites. Could lightening strike twice?

There are two reasons I have been having fun with this bit of speculation. I am fan of UALR, my hometown team, and I have several good friends who are longtime Fighting Irish fans.

My son Wilson (14 yr old), and his friend Kahry Wright attended the Sunbelt Championship game with me in Hot Springs on Tuesday night. My son Rett (24 yr old) warned us about the potential for storms and lightening in the area, but we were determined to make it to Hot Springs. Actually we know personally one of the basketball players for UALR.

Logan Quinn is a red-shirted freshman guard who led the Arkansas Baptist High School Eagles to a Basketball State Championship in 2009 in Hot Springs. Logan has many brothers and sisters that have played ball over the years at Arkansas Baptist. My son Rett played both football and basketball with his brother Lancer in 2004-2005.

Quinn’s former coach at Arkansas Baptist, Steve Miller, congratulated him by phone after the game on Tuesday night. Miller noted that now Logan can say he was a member of two teams that won championships on that same floor. Miller is now head basketball coach and athletic director at Trinity Christian Academy in Wichita, Kansas, and he watched the game on ESPN 2. He said he got a kick out of seeing a former player in the huddles on the sideline.

Let me now tell you about my longtime Notre Dame Fighting Irish friends. Tim, Pat and Jim Monahan are brothers, and have been running Monahan Inc of Arcola, Illinois for many years. They sell handles and broomcorn, and since at Little Rock Broom Works we need those items to make brooms, we have been a customer of theirs for many years.

Two of Tim’s sons have actually played football for Notre Dame. Both fit the “Rudy” description. Out of high school they received many offers to play at the small college level, but they chose to walk-on at Notre Dame. Tom Monahan got some playing time his senior year as a blocking back in 1986, and Mark Monahan did the same as a defensive back in 1995. Former Arkansas Coach Lou Holtz coached both players.

Why did they walk on at Notre Dame? Probably it had something to do with how far back the Monahan family goes with the Fighting Irish. These boys’ grandfather Tom Monahan played for Knute Rockne from 1928 to 1931.

The Monahan’s still have in their possession a letter dated August 2, 1929 from Rockne encouraging Monahan to put on 10 to 15 lbs. He went on to write, “I think you have the potentialities to make a good center with a little more experience, and you will get that this fall.” Unfortunately,  Rockne’s life was cut short at age 43 in a plane crash in 1931.

Tuesday night it looked bad for my UALR Trojans when we trailed North Texas by 7 points with less than 90 seconds left in the game. However, after stealing the ball a few times and making our foul shots, we were able to cut the lead to one point with 48 seconds left.

Then Josh White seemed to close the door for good when he hit a three point shot with 25 seconds left to give North Texas a 4 point lead. I don’t know if lightening ever struck outside the building, but it did inside! In the final seconds UALR’s Matt Mouzy and Solomon Bozeman each made three point shots to steal the win from the Mean Green of North Texas.

The next day I heard UALR assistant coach and former NBA player Joe Kleine on the radio. Kleine said that the coaches have been telling the players all year long to keep focused on what the prize is. Kleine said he went to four NCAA tournaments as a college player and “there is nothing like it. We just kept selling the dream to these players. We told them that they will never forget their experience in the NCAA tournament.”

UALR head coach Steve Shields and assistant coach Kleine are men of unusual size. Shields is a short guy and Kleine is a 7 ft tall former NBA center. In 1998 KIeine played for the NBA Champion Chicago Bulls.

.

In 1986 the Monahan brothers saw me at a convention,  and they all three had the same basic thought: “We took the Arkansas Little Rock game for granted and they just beat us.” Can lightening strike again in 2011? We will just have to wait and see.

________________________________

Everette Hatcher is the president of Little Rock Broom Works which has been manufacturing brooms since 1900, and his political blog iswww.HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth.com. Everette and his wife, Jill, live in Alexander and  have four children and two grandchildren..

Kahry Wright of Little Rock and Wilson Hatcher of Bryant attended the Sunbelt Championship game in Hot Springs on Tuesday night despite the stormy weather.
___________________________________________________
 

Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 52 (Free Elections are loved by the people)

https://i0.wp.com/www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/photographs/large/C43963-15.jpg

President Reagan posing with Bette Davis at the Kennedy Center Honors for Lifetime Achievement at the John F. Kennedy Center for Performing Arts. 12/6/1987

I remember in 1981 when I heard the song “Bette Davis Eyes” sung by Kim Carnes,and I personally did not like the song, but it got played over and over. In fact, it spent 9 weeks as a #1 song on U.S.Billboard Hot 100, and was Billboard’s number one single of 1981.  The song won the Grammy Awards for Song of the Year and Record of the Year. The song was also a number one hit is 31 countries. Bette Davis admitted to being a fan of the song and approached Carnes and the songwriters to thank them for making her “a part of modern times.”

That just proves that the music I do not like will probably go on to be the music that everyone else in the world loves. I have never figured out what is so special about Bette Davis eyes. You can look at the picture above and figure it out yourself.

Music video by Kim Carnes performing Bette Davis Eyes.

In a prophetic speech concerning the Soviet Union, Ronald Reagan predicted that “the march of freedom and democracy will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash-heap of history.” I am posting in the coming days excerpts from one of Reagan best speeches ever.  He addressed the members of the British Parliament on June 8, 1982.

Free Elections are loved by the people

The hard evidence of totalitarian rule has caused in mankind an uprising of the intellect and will. Whether it is the growth of the new schools of economics in America or England or the appearance of the so-called new philosophers in France, there is one unifying thread running through the intellectual work of these groups — rejection of the arbitrary power of the state, the refusal to subordinate the rights of the individual to the superstate, the realization that collectivism stifles all the best human impulses.

Since the exodus from Egypt, historians have written of those who sacrificed and struggled for freedom — the stand at Thermopylae, the revolt of Spartacus, the storming of the Bastille, the Warsaw uprising in World War II. More recently we’ve seen evidence of this same human impulse in one of the developing nations in Central America. For months and months the world news media covered the fighting in El Salvador. Day after day we were treated to stories and film slanted toward the brave freedom-fighters battling oppressive government forces in behalf of the silent, suffering people of that tortured country.

And then one day those silent, suffering people were offered a chance to vote, to choose the kind of government they wanted. Suddenly the freedom-fighters in the hills were exposed for what they really are — Cuban-backed guerrillas who want power for themselves, and their backers, not democracy for the people. They threatened death to any who voted, and destroyed hundreds of buses and trucks to keep the people from getting to the polling places. But on election day, the people of El Salvador, an unprecedented 1.4 million of them, braved ambush and gunfire, and trudged for miles to vote for freedom.

They stood for hours in the hot sun waiting for their turn to vote. Members of our Congress who went there as observers told me of a women who was wounded by rifle fire on the way to the polls, who refused to leave the line to have her wound treated until after she had voted. A grandmother, who had been told by the guerrillas she would be killed when she returned from the polls, and she told the guerrillas, “You can kill me, you can kill my family, kill my neighbors, but you can’t kill us all.” The real freedom-fighters of El Salvador turned out to be the people of that country — the young, the old, the in-between.

Strange, but in my own country there’s been little if any news coverage of that war since the election. Now, perhaps they’ll say it’s — well, because there are newer struggles now.

On distant islands in the South Atlantic young men are fighting for Britain. And, yes, voices have been raised protesting their sacrifice for lumps of rock and earth so far away. But those young men aren’t fighting for mere real estate. They fight for a cause — for the belief that armed aggression must not be allowed to succeed, and the people must participate in the decisions of government — [applause] — the decisions of government under the rule of law. If there had been firmer support for that principle some 45 years ago, perhaps our generation wouldn’t have suffered the bloodletting of World War II.

In the Middle East now the guns sound once more, this time in Lebanon, a country that for too long has had to endure the tragedy of civil war, terrorism, and foreign intervention and occupation. The fighting in Lebanon on the part of all parties must stop, and Israel should bring its forces home. But this is not enough. We must all work to stamp out the scourge of terrorism that in the Middle East makes war an ever-present threat.

But beyond the troublespots lies a deeper, more positive pattern. Around the world today, the democratic revolution is gathering new strength. In India a critical test has been passed with the peaceful change of governing political parties. In Africa, Nigeria is moving into remarkable and unmistakable ways to build and strengthen its democratic institutions. In the Caribbean and Central America, 16 of 24 countries have freely elected governments. And in the United Nations, 8 of the 10 developing nations which have joined that body in the past 5 years are democracies.

_________________________________________

Little known presidential facts:

  1. President Dwight David Eisenhower (1890-1969) was the only president to serve in both WWI and WWII.h
  2. Richard Milhous Nixon (1913-1994) was the first president to visit all 50 states and the first to visit China. He is the only president to resign.j

Madison, WI Union Debate (part 2)

Teachers’ unions and representatives of every liberal interest group in the country may have taken over the streets of Madison for demonstrations, marches and speeches, but inside the Wisconsin governor’s mansion its chief tenant remains calm and resolute.

Tennessee loses to Florida and Vandy beats Miss St. Kentucky slips by Ole Miss and Alabama beats Georgia. What do I care? The hogs are out already!!!

Max Brantley (Arkansas Times Blog, March 8, 2011) asserted:

Town hall meetings in Wisconsin suddenly aren’t so comfortable for Republican politicians. They’re having to explain the police state underway at the Capitol. Congressman James Sensenbrenner shut down his meeting prematurely rather than letting the people speak.

Dump him in the harbor.

_________________________________

That is strange talk coming from a liberal like Max since all the liberals were critical of Palin for all this mean spirited rhetoric.

Chris Edwards wrote an excellent article “Madison Protest: Unions are Angry– but Wisconsin Should Go Even Further,” Feb 18, 2011, Cato Institute and I will posted portions of that article the next few days.

In 2010, 36 percent of state and local workers were members of unions, which is five times the union share in the US private sector. Yet prior to the 1960s, unions represented less than 15 percent of the state and local workforce. At the time, courts generally held that public-sector workers did not have the same union privileges that private workers had under the 1935 Wagner Act, such as collective bargaining.

The rise of public-sector unions
That changed during the 1960s and 1970s, as a flood of pro-union laws in dozens of states triggered a dramatic rise in public-sector unionism. Many states passed laws that encouraged collective bargaining in the public sector, as well as laws that imposed compulsory union dues.

Today, the union shares in government workforces vary widely by state. About 26 states have collective bargaining for essentially all state and local workers. A further 12 or so states have collective bargaining for a portion of their state and local workers, and the remaining 12 states do not have public sector collective bargaining. At the same time, 22 states have “right-to-work” laws, which free workers from being forced to join a union or pay union dues.

These differences in unionization between the states affect fiscal policy. Statistical studies find that unionized public sector workers earn a wage premium of about 10 percent over non-unionized public sector workers. This is important because employee compensation represents half of all state and local government spending.

Aside from inflated wages, public sector unions have pushed for excessive pension benefit levels, which are creating a fiscal crisis for many governments. That’s another reason unions are so angry in Wisconsin: Governor Walker is demanding that state workers carry more of the burden for their health and pension plans.

Ronald Wilson Reagan Pt 51 B (The Day Reagan was shot)

U.S. President Ronald Reagan assassination attempt.

I remember exactly where I was when I heard that President Reagan had been shot. I had just got out of a freshman class at college and turned on my car. The radio immediately went into a news story saying that President Reagan had been shot.

Today, some more details came out about that day 30 years ago:

Secret Service tape from Reagan attack is released

AP //

  • Email
  • Print
  • Reagan AP – ** FILE ** In this March 30, 1981 file photo, President Reagan waves, then looks up before being shoved …

    WASHINGTON – A Secret Service audiotape 30 years old sheds light on the chaotic aftermath of Ronald Reagan’s shooting when neither the president nor his guardians realized he’d been shot, and an agent’s snap decision to get him to a hospital might have saved his life.

    “Let’s hustle,” agent Jerry Parr is heard barking as Reagan’s limousine suddenly changed course, the sight of the president’s blood signaling there was more wrong with him than a bruised rib or two, as everyone thought right after the March 30, 1981, attack. The car, which had been spiriting Reagan back to the security of the White House after the spray of gunfire, sped to George Washington University Hospital instead. Reagan lost about half his blood and came closer to death that day than Americans realized for years later.

    The Secret Service released the tape Friday in response to a public-records request from Del Wilber, a Washington Post reporter whose book, “Rawhide Down: The Near Assassination of Ronald Reagan,” comes out next week.

    Just over 10 minutes, the tape captures the urgent, confused yet coolly methodical radio communications among agents on the scene and the Secret Service command post, starting when the president and his entourage walked out of the Washington Hilton while John Hinckley Jr., with a pistol, stood waiting.

    Hinckley opened fire, wounding press secretary James Brady in the head, police officer Thomas Delahanty in the back of the neck and Secret Service agent Timothy McCarthy in the abdomen before his last bullet ricocheted off the limousine, grazing Reagan’s rib and lodging in his lung. As has been known, Reagan and his protectors at first thought he’d merely hurt his ribs from being shoved into the vehicle by Parr.

    At 2:27 p.m., 19 seconds into the tape, agent Ray Shaddick radios: “Advise, we’ve had shots fired. Shots fired. There are some injuries, uh, lay one on.”

    Sixteen seconds later, Parr radios assurance about a president whose Secret Service code name was drawn from the Westerns he loved: “Rawhide is OK. Follow-up. Rawhide is OK.”

    “You wanna go to the hospital or back to the White House?” Shaddick asks.

    “We’re going right. we’re going to Crown,” Parr says, using a code word for the White House.

    “Back to the White House,” Shaddick repeats. “Rawhide is OK.”

    Twenty-four seconds later, a voice asserts again: “Rawhide’s alright.”

    But 25 seconds after that, the plan abruptly changes: “We want to go to the emergency room of George Washington.”

    Nowhere in the tape does anyone state that the president is hurt.

    Inside the car, however, as participants have told it, Reagan was worsening. Parr had quickly checked Reagan as they sped away and finding nothing terribly amiss, preferred the safety and medical facilities of the White House to an unsecured hospital. And when Reagan found blood in his mouth, the president told his men he must have cut his lip. But Reagan was becoming more ashen, complained of trouble breathing and the bleeding did not appear to be from a mere cut. Parr ordered the diversion to the hospital.

    “Go to George Washington fast,” agent Drew Unrue is heard saying, at 01:57 minutes into the tape.

    “Get an ambulance,” Parr tells the command post, known as Horsepower. “I mean get the, um, stretcher out there.” He wants the hospital to be ready to wheel the president in.

    “We’ve made the call,” Horsepower replies.

    “Let’s hustle,” Parr says.

    Sirens are heard, and a voice confirms that authorities have captured a suspect. Hinckley was piled on and arrested at the scene.

    Less than four minutes after Reagan left the Hilton, the car carrying the stricken president arrives at the hospital. Moments later, “Rainbow” — Nancy Reagan — is on her way.

    Reagan had suffered extensive internal bleeding, but his gunshot wound was not discovered until doctors examined him. As it turned out, he did not enter on a stretcher but got out of the car, walked in with the help of agents and began to collapse before those around him picked him up and carried him to the emergency room. Doctors were able to stabilize his blood pressure in short order before removing the bullet in surgery.

    Reagan’s wisecracks at the hospital that day testified to his resilience while masking the gravity of the struggle to save him. “Honey, I forgot to duck,” he told his wife. He told his doctors he hoped they were all Republicans, prompting this comeback from the liberal who led the trauma team, Dr. Joseph Giordano: “Today, Mr. President, we are all Republicans.” Reagan was in the hospital for nearly two weeks; recovery took months, but did not prevent a robust presidency.

    Brady was permanently disabled, which did not inhibit him from becoming an advocate for gun control. Delahanty was sent into retirement with enduring pain. McCarthy, who had turned himself into a human target, standing with his arms up and legs spread between Reagan and the gunman, recovered. Hinckley was found not guilty by reason of insanity and has been confined at a psychiatric hospital, granted increasing time outside in recent years.

    Tolbert: The Democrats claim Bush Tax Cuts are to blame for everything wrong in economy (Real Cause of Deficit Pt 2)

     

    Brian Riedl Heritage Foundation on Freedom and Prosperity Radio 8-28-10.wmv

    Washed away: Where there was once a coastline populated with homes and factories, powerful waves triggered by the tsunami devour anything in their path. Only a scattering trees remainWashed away: Where there was once a coastline populated with homes and factories, powerful waves triggered by the tsunami devour anything in their path. Only a scattering trees remain
    This morning I woke up to horrible news of the earthquake in Japan.

    March 11 (Bloomberg) — Japan was struck by its strongest earthquake in at least a century, an 8.9-magnitude temblor that shook buildings across Tokyo and unleashed a tsunami as high as 10 meters, engulfing towns along the northern coast. At least 26 people were killed by the 33-foot wave and many are missing, according to state broadcaster NHK Television. Bloomberg’s Mike Firn reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

    I remember back in December of 2004 when the huge tsunami hit Thailand, and I read about it in the newspaper. Little did I know that the Chinise supplier that provides us with Mopbuckets was vacationing there at the time. He had gone down to the beach and the day looked so nice that decided to rent a boat. Therefore, he went back to his hotel room to get the money and make the phone call. Then he heard a crashing sound and water started to flow through his hotel window, and he was on the 4th floor. Communications were cut off and his factory assumed he had been killed.

    __________________________________________

    Jason Tolbert in his article “Analyzing the Bush tax cuts,” (Arkansas News Bureau, August 8, 2010), rightly notes:

    The Democrats’ talking points center on framing the tax cuts as the “Bush tax cuts.” In their world anything associated with former President George W. Bush is automatically bad. Suddenly these “Bush tax cuts” are to blame for all things wrong with the economy, particularly the deficit. They claim that “extending the Bush tax cuts” will skyrocket the deficit and would be fiscally irresponsible.

    Riedl is the author of the article “The Three Biggest Myths About Tax Cuts and the Budget Deficit,” (Heritage Foundation, June 21, 2010), and the next few days I will be sharing portions of his article.

    Before coming to Heritage in 2001, Riedl worked for then-Gov. Tommy Thompson, former Rep. Mark Green (R-WI)., and the Speaker of the Wisconsin Assembly. Riedl holds a bachelor’s degree in economics and political science from the University of Wisconsin, and a master’s degree in public affairs from Princeton University.

    The surging budget deficit will likely dominate the national economic debate for years to come. Even after the recession ends, persistent trillion-dollar deficits are projected to double the national debt by the end of the decade. In the absence of reform, the financial markets will eventually respond by withdrawing capital, pushing up interest rates, and demanding immediate budget reforms—much like Greece is currently experiencing.

    Putting the federal budget on a sustainable path will require drastic reforms. Balancing the budget by 2020 would require either eliminating one-third of all spending, raising taxes by 50 percent, or a combination of the two. This enormous budget constraint will set the framework for all budgeting decisions—from taxes to health care, from education to Social Security.

    Finding a solution to growing deficits requires first correctly diagnosing their cause. Both recent and future budget deficits have been blamed largely on the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, and to a lesser extent on the war on terrorism, but the data contradict these myths. In reality, spending is almost exclusively the problem:

    • The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts were responsible for just 14 percent of the swing from the projected cumulative $5.6 trillion surplus for 2002–2011 to an actual $6.1 trillion deficit. The vast majority of the shift was due to higher spending and slower-than-projected economic growth.
    • President Barack Obama’s assertion that most future deficits will result from the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the Medicare drug entitlement is based on faulty methodology, but is still wrong even using that methodology.
    • Above-average spending, not below-average revenues, accounts for 92 percent of rising budget deficits by 2014 and 100 percent by 2017.
    • Nearly all rising spending will occur in Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and net interest payments.

    Deficit reduction efforts should focus on the source of the problem: rising entitlement spending. Any attempt to split the difference between broad-based tax hikes and spending cuts should be rejected outright as a false solution.

    Ronald Wilson Reagan Part 51 (Reagan talks about the Soviet Economy crumbling because of Soviet Communism in 1982 speech)

    The Palace of Westminster more commonly known as the Houses of Parliament is situated on the banks of the Thames in Westminster London. It is the home of the House of Commons and the House of Lords. It began life as a royal residence in 1042 under Edward the Confessor. The current mock gothic building design was result of a national competition. The plan of the building was the work of Charles Barry, with the gothic details designed by Augustus Pugin. The building has approximately 1,000 rooms, 100 staircases, and 3 km of passageways.

    TRENDING NOW:

    y

    Peyton Hillis - Cleveland Browns

    • Rush Yds1177
    • Yds/Game73.6
    • TD11

    Cleveland Browns

    • Height: 6-2
    • Weight: 250
    • Born: Jan 21, 1986 – Conway, AR


    I heard Peyton Hillis will be giving autographs on Sunday from 1pm to 3pm at Dillards at Park Plaze in Little Rock. Peyton was on 103.7 the buzz today and he said he hopes to go another 4 or 5 years in the NFL. He always gives 100% on every play and he hates to go out of bounds when he can still get another yard.  That is tough on a body. I wish him well. I remember seeing him play against Bryant. Also a friend in Conway told me that Peyton used to be in his Sunday School class in the 7th grade and Peyton beat him arm wrestling even then.

    In a prophetic speech concerning the Soviet Union, Ronald Reagan predicted that “the march of freedom and democracy will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash-heap of history.” I am posting in the coming days excerpts from one of Reagan best speeches ever.  He addressed the members of the British Parliament on June 8, 1982.

    Sir Winston Churchill refused to accept the inevitability of war or even that it was imminent. He said, “I do not believe that Soviet Russia desires war. What they desire is the fruits of war and the indefinite expansion of their power and doctrines. But what we have to consider here today while time remains is the permanent prevention of war and the establishment of conditions of freedom and democracy as rapidly as possible in all countries.”
    Well, this is precisely our mission today: to preserve freedom as well as peace. It may not be easy to see; but I believe we live now at a turning point.In an ironic sense Karl Marx was right. We are witnessing today a great revolutionary crisis, a crisis where the demands of the economic order are conflicting directly with those of the political order. But the crisis is happening not in the free, non-Marxist West, but in the home of Marxist-Leninism, the Soviet Union. It is the Soviet Union that runs against the tide of history by denying human freedom and human dignity to its citizens. It also is in deep economic difficulty. The rate of growth in the national product has been steadily declining since the fifties and is less than half of what it was then.
    The dimensions of this failure are astounding: A country which employs one-fifth of its population in agriculture is unable to feed its own people. Were it not for the private sector, the tiny private sector tolerated in Soviet agriculture, the country might be on the brink of famine. These private plots occupy a bare 3 percent of the arable land but account for nearly one-quarter of Soviet farm output and nearly one-third of meat products and vegetables. Overcentralized, with little or no incentives, year after year the Soviet system pours its best resource into the making of instruments of destruction. The constant shrinkage of economic growth combined with the growth of military production is putting a heavy strain on the Soviet people. What we see here is a political structure that no longer corresponds to its economic base, a society where productive forces are hampered by political ones.
    The decay of the Soviet experiment should come as no surprise to us. Wherever the comparisons have been made between free and closed societies — West Germany and East Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia, Malaysia and Vietnam — it is the democratic countries what are prosperous and responsive to the needs of their people. And one of the simple but overwhelming facts of our time is this: Of all the millions of refugees we’ve seen in the modern world, their flight is always away from, not toward the Communist world. Today on the NATO line, our military forces face east to prevent a possible invasion. On the other side of the line, the Soviet forces also face east to prevent their people from leaving.

    _______________________________________

    Little known presidential facts:

    1. The term “O.K.” derives from President Martin Van Buren (1782-1862) who was known as “Old Kinderhook” because he was raised in Kinderhook, New York. “O.K.” clubs were created to support Van Buren’s campaigns.k
    2. President Grover Cleveland (1837-1908) is the only president to be elected to two nonconsecutive terms. He was the 22nd and 24th president.j


    Madison, WI Union Debate (part 1)

    The Heritage Foundation sent a team to Madison, WI, to cover the union-backed protest against Gov. Scott Walker’s budget proposal.

    3,746
    450

    //

    Scott Walker

    I want to say “Hi” to my friend Pete from Wisconsin. Since you emailed this morning, I have decided to start posting my series on Wisconsin and the Union debate. By the way, way to go Packers. I told you about the time a few years ago with former Greenbay Packer Keith Jackson brought his son to the movies and sat next to my son Wilson and I. Actually I have several friends that knew him from Parkview High School where he was a standout in both basketball and football. I also got to hear his testimony at Paul Jackson’s church. Reggie White stayed after him until he shaped up!!!

    A tribute to Reggie White, a great part of Packer’s history and an even greater person.

    Gene Lyons asserts in his article, “Wisconsin government: In cash we trust, but unions we bust,” (Feb 25, 2011) :

    Negotiating, however, wasn’t what Gov. Walker had in mind. His goal was union-busting. Refusing to meet with union representatives, he proposed a bill basically abolishing the collective-bargaining rights of public employees first established in 1959.

    He pre-emptively threatened to call out the National Guard if union members didn’t like it. There would be no compromises and no negotiation.

    “He campaigned on this,” wrote Washington Post columnist George Will. His little heart going pitty-pat for this latest right-wing heartthrob, Will compared Walker to such conservative foes of organized labor as Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher.

    Except, no, Walker didn’t run on decertifying public employee unions during his 2010 campaign. Moreover, he’d probably never have been elected governor if he had.

    A poll commissioned by the AFL-CIO found that even with partisan passions fully engaged, less than one-third of Wisconsinites favor abolishing public employees’ right to collective bargaining — particularly not, one imagines, in so peremptory and dishonest a manner.

    _____________________________

    My observation is that who would believe a poll by the AFL-CIO anyway?

    Chris Edwards wrote an excellent article “Madison Protest: Unions are Angry– but Wisconsin Should Go Even Further,” Feb 18, 2011, Cato Institute and I will posted portions of that article the next few days.

    Chaos in government. Tens of thousands of angry protesters in the streets. Schools closed. Yes, Wisconsin looks a lot like Egypt this week. But while Arabs are fighting to end extraordinary overreach by government, Wisconsin union protesters are fighting to preserve it.

    At the heart of the dispute is a bold plan by Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) to curtail collective bargaining by most but not all of his state’s public-sector workers, including teachers. That is a long overdue reform — but the governor’s plan doesn’t go far enough! A dozen or so states, including Virginia, where I live, do not allow collective bargaining in the public sector at all, and these states are doing just fine without it.

    The government union issue is coming to the forefront because states, facing huge deficits, are desperate to reform their budgets and cut pensions. Wisconsin is just one of several states where legislatures, empowered by Republican victories last fall, are finally tackling one of the root causes: the ability of public-sector unions to squeeze taxpayers for exorbitant benefits. In states that have unionized workforces, needed reforms are facing huge and aggressive anti-reform lobbying campaigns by the unions.

    I remember like yesterday the summer of 1978 when the Memphis City Police went on strike for 8 days. There was a curfew every night and basically many upstanding police acted like criminals themselves. It was a sad time. There are reasons that many public sector unions do not have the right to strike. More on that in my next post.

    Response to Elwood: Deficit does matter, time to worry.

    The video clip is really an answer to Elwood from the Arkansas Times comment section that answers his statement that deficits don’t matter and we should not be worried about our continued out of control spending. Here are Elwood’s own words:

    If you’ve heard enough “THE SKY IS FALLING” here’s some sensible writing on the subject
    “We’re broke! We’re broke!” Speaker John Boehner said on Sunday. “We’re broke in this state,” Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin said a few days ago. “New Jersey’s broke,” Gov. Chris Christie has said repeatedly. The United States faces a “looming bankruptcy,” Charles Koch, the billionaire industrialist, wrote in The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday.
    It’s all obfuscating nonsense, of course, a scare tactic employed for political ends. A country with a deficit is not necessarily any more “broke” than a family with a mortgage or a college loan.

    I have started a new series today called “The Real Cause of the Debt.” Below is an excellent article by Heritage Senior Fellow J.D. Foster:

    January 4th, 2010
    Interest. Or to be more precise, interest payments. That, Heritage Senior Fellow J.D. Foster explains, is the biggest reason why Americans should be very concerned with the trillions of dollars in debt our federal government is piling up in Washington. Watch:And the situation is only going to get worse under President Barack Obamas budget. Heritage Foundation fellow Brian Riedl reports: Federal spending (which has remained around 20 percent of economy since the 1950s) would surpass 28 percent of economy by 2019. Federal spending per household would rise from $25,000 per household in 2008 to more than $37,000 per household by 2019. This spending would drive a permanent, unprecedented increase in the national debt. After borrowing just under $6 trillion from 1789 through 2008 (plus nearly $2 trillion in 2009), Washington would borrow $13 trillion over the next decadenearly $100,000 for every household. By 2019, annual budget deficits would approach $2 trillion and push the public debt to nearly 100 percent of the economy. Merely paying the interest on this debt would soon cost taxpayers $1 trillion annually, and spending and deficits would continue to rise.