Monthly Archives: October 2011

Senator Pryor asks for Spending Cut Suggestions! Here are a few!(Part 116)

Senator Mark Pryor wants our ideas on how to cut federal spending. Take a look at this video clip below:

Senator Pryor has asked us to send our ideas to him at cutspending@pryor.senate.gov and I have done so in the past and will continue to do so in the future.

On May 11, 2011,  I emailed to this above address and I got this email back from Senator Pryor’s office:

Please note, this is not a monitored email account. Due to the sheer volume of correspondence I receive, I ask that constituents please contact me via my website with any responses or additional concerns. If you would like a specific reply to your message, please visit http://pryor.senate.gov/contact. This system ensures that I will continue to keep Arkansas First by allowing me to better organize the thousands of emails I get from Arkansans each week and ensuring that I have all the information I need to respond to your particular communication in timely manner.  I appreciate you writing. I always welcome your input and suggestions. Please do not hesitate to contact me on any issue of concern to you in the future.

Therefore, I went to the website and sent this email below:

Here are a few more I  emailed to him myself.

Senator Rand Paul on Feb 7, 2011 wrote the article “A Modest $500 Billion Proposal: My spending cuts would keep 85% of government funding and not touch Social Security,” Wall Street Journal and he observed:

Here are some of his specific suggestions:

Agency/Program Funding Level Savings % Decrease
Misc ——- $43.481 B ——-
Collection of Delinquent Taxes: Saves $3 billion
Page 36 of 37
Every year, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) publishes the Federal Employee/Retiree Delinquency Initiative
(FERDI). This summary report shows the amount of civilian, military, and retired federal employees who are
delinquent in their federal income taxes.
In 2008, the FERDI showed $3.04 billion in back taxes owed. The amount has grown to $3.31 billion in 2009.
Federal Pay Freeze: Saves $2 billion
During this recession, while most Americans have been forced to cut back, the amount of spending by the federal
government has drastically increased. Many Americans are without jobs and many more are not receiving pay raises.
Federal employees already receive generous pay and benefits, and President Obama has recently endorsed this
proposal.

“Music Monday”:Coldplay’s best songs of all time (Part 5)

Coldplay

“Music Monday”:Coldplay’s best songs of all time (Part 5)

This is “Music Monday” and I always look at a band with some of their best music. I am currently looking at Coldplay’s best songs. Here are a few followed by another person’s preference:

Hunter picked “Don’t Panic,” as his number 16 pick of Coldplay’s best songs. Hunter commented, “The beginning to garden state plays this song. good movie and the lyrics are great.”

Coldplay – Cemeteries of London ( FULL VIDEO)

I would have to go with the song “Cemeteries of London for my 16th best Coldplay Song of all-time.

God reveals Himself in two Ways 

Lets take a look at the lyrics from the song “Cemeteries of London:”

God is in the houses
And God is in my head
And all the cemeteries of London
I see God come in my garden
But I don’t know what He said
For my heart, it wasn’t open
Not open

Romans chapter one clearly points out that God has revealed Himself through both the created world around us  and also in a God-given conscience that testifies to each person that God exists.
Notice in this song that the song writer notes, “I see God come in my garden” and “God is in my head.” These are the exact two places mentioned by the scripture.  Romans 1:18-20 (Amplified version)

18For God’s [holy] wrath and indignation are revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who in their wickedness repress and hinder the truth and make it inoperative.

19For that which is known about God is evident to them and made plain in their inner consciousness, because God [Himself] has shown it to them.

20For ever since the creation of the world His invisible nature and attributes, that is, His eternal power and divinity, have been made intelligible and clearly discernible in and through the things that have been made (His handiworks). So [men] are without excuse [altogether without any defense or justification],(B)

_________________________

1Viva la Vida

+34when I listen to viva la vida I feel like I’m the king. All the sensations and emotions in this song make you directly enter the song as if you are the king

+15it is absolutely brilliant! I am completely in love with this song. It is so powerful and has so much meaning to it. Cold play definitely is the best band out there! It can’t get any better!

+13I feel like voting ALL their songs, but it wont allow me. coldplay’s one of the best bands that we have today! Can’t wait for more new material

More comments about Viva la VidaListen to sample

Fix You

2Fix You

+24come on no. 2 is not enough what the heck man vote for this song and listen to it you will not regret it I promise you all

+13one of the best songs from Coldplay! I love this song! full of meaning, and it makes me cry! they sang the song like they have something to say, something to prove.. and absolutely love the endung.. especially at the music video… where everybody sang the chorus… it really made me cry!

+12This is a wonderful song. It’s perfect. Every single person can relate to this song. Really listen, listen to what they are trying to say. Viva la Vida is a great song, but for me this is the best of Coldplay’s.

More comments about Fix YouListen to sample

The Scientist

3The Scientist

+12above and beonde amazing this song reaches to yu and makes want to go to sleep and tough the sky and also if you are a guy that really likes to listen to songs that make you calm this is by far the one for you.

+10The emotion in this song is raw and uncensored, it tells an amazing and beautiful story. It’s original and calming ; yet there’s something in the lyrics that stirs up emotions and memories.

+9Fix you is great too, but you can’t beat The Scientist

More comments about The ScientistListen to sample

Clocks

4Clocks

+13
i like how the sang the song. They had a nice and loving tune that almost make me cry. They are my best singers and I will never forget tem.

+8a song which has a powerful start and a great ending as well… piano used in a rock song… simply amazing..!

+7Awesome tune and nice and relaxing ! good Lyrics too

More comments about ClocksListen to sample

Yellow

5Yellow

+14. . . its so emotional, really heart-felt, you can really tell Martin cares more about this song more than any of the others, and most importantly, it kickstarted COLDPLAY – it set the platform for all the other coldplay songs. . .!

+7oh god, I just dont understand how I lived me life up to now without this song just on in the background ❤ today me and my friends shared the love and walked around the school singing this and wow I was in heaven. let’s be honest here, whoever true song was to was lucky as to have a song like that – it is the themetune to my life ❤

+5by far the best song by coldplay… it needs to be at the top…
i bet anyone who listens to it once can leave it… he/she will have to listen it again and again…

More comments about YellowListen to sample

Speed of Sound

6Speed of Sound

+5Piano absolutely blows you away in the introduction. Oppose to the other songs made by Coldplay, this song excels at build-up and keeps climax until a dramatic end.

+2Great song.. with amazing lyrics… m lovin it.. it shoulkd be no.1 according to me..

+1omg how come this song is on number 6 cmon people this song deserve in top 2 atleat vote got itt

More comments about Speed of SoundListen to sample

Violet Hill

7Violet Hill

+8The lyrics in this song are so amazing and deep. “If you love me then won’t you let me know” is so powerful.

+3awesome, unique, addictible. this is the best listen and listen hundreds times

+3This is coldplays best song because it so different when compared to their usual songs.

More comments about Violet HillListen to sample

Every Teardrop Is a Waterfall

8Every Teardrop Is a Waterfall

this should be number one.
it just makes your mood better.
best ever made for sure.

nice video
great lyris and musics
Without a doubt one of the best song they made… Everything is so perfect in this song! listen to it to understand

the song is awesum in all respects… great music lovely vocals.. I love coldplay.. listen and appreciate..

More comments about Every Teardrop Is a WaterfallListen to sample

In My Place

9In My Place

+6This song made me cry with joy the first time I listened to it. One of the highlights of “A Rush Of Blood To The Head”

+4I don’t think many real fans voted here. They just simply went with the popualair ones.
This song is just amazing.

+3this is one of those songs I go straight to when I feel like I’m stuck in life and have nowhere to go, as if I really were “in my place”. the melody and the “oh’s” in the chorus are enough to make anyone feel how much the band sympathizes

More comments about In My PlaceListen to sample

Trouble

10Trouble

+8words can’t explain. it deserves to be in the top 5 cmon people vote!

+7Simple piano playing equals a brilliant chorus or bridge? (great song in other words)

+6I don’t want to cause ‘trouble’, but this song deserves to be higher than tenth position…

Related posts:

“Music Monday”:Coldplay’s best songs of all time (Part 4)

Dave Hogan/ Getty Images This is “Music Monday” and I always look at a band with some of their best music. I am currently looking at Coldplay’s best songs. Here are a few followed by another person’s preference: For the 17th best Coldplay song of all-time, Hunter picks “42.” He notes, “You thought you might […]

Documentary on Coldplay (Part 2)

The best band in the world. Below I have linked some articles I have earlier about the search for meaning in life the band seems to involved in. Chris Martin, Jonny Buckland, Guy Berryman, and Will Champion formed Coldplay in 1996 while going to University in London. The young band quickly established themselves in the […]

Review of New Coldplay song with video clip

I am presently involved in the counting down of the best Coldplay songs of all time, but I am also in a series here reviewing the upcoming songs on Coldplay’s new cd that will be released soon. Here is a review from Rolling Stone: Coldplay Debut new song ‘Charlie Brown’ June 6, 2011 Coldplay debuted […]

Documentary on Coldplay (Part 1, the song “Yellow” featured)

Great documentary on Coldplay. I have written a lot on Coldplay the last few years and I see something spiritually happening with the group as they continue to search for a deeping meaning in life. Coldplay Max Masters – Part 1 of 7 Uploaded by thepostbox on May 6, 2009 The ASTRA Award winning music documentary […]

“Woody Wednesday” Will Allen and Martin follow same path as Kansas to Christ?

Several members of the 70′s band Kansas became committed Christians after they realized that the world had nothing but meaningless to offer. It seems through the writings of both Woody Allen and Chris Martin of Coldplay that they both are wrestling with the issue of death and what meaning does life bring. Kansas went through […]

“Music Monday”:Coldplay’s best songs of all time (Part 3)

 This is “Music Monday” and I always look at a band with some of their best music. I am currently looking at Coldplay’s best songs. Here are a few followed by another person’s preference:   Hunter has chosen the song “Viva La Vida” as his number 18 pick. Hunter noted, “The violin synth is a […]

Review of New Coldplay songs (video clip too)

Coldplay – Every Teardrop Is A Waterfall Published on Jun 28, 2011 by ColdplayVEVO The new single, taken from Every Teardrop Is A Waterfall EP (featuring two more new tracks). Download it from http://cldp.ly/itunescp Music video by Coldplay performing Every Teardrop Is A Waterfall. (P) 2011 The copyright in this audiovisual recording is owned by […]

 

Former Weezer band member Mickey Welsh dead

CHICAGO (AP) — Former Weezer bass player Mikey Welsh, who also found success in his second career as an artist, died in aChicago hotel room, police said Sunday.

Chicago police spokeswoman Laura Kubiak said Welsh was supposed to check out of the Raffaello Hotel at 1 p.m. Saturday. When he didn’t, hotel staff went to his room, entered it and found him unconscious and not breathing, Kubiak said.

The cause of death was undetermined pending toxicology tests, according to an autopsy performed Sunday by the Cook County Medical Examiner’s Office. Test results could take up to six weeks, authorities said. Kubiak said there’s nothing to indicate foul play.

Welsh, 40, of Burlington, Vt., performed with Weezer from 1998 to 2001, leaving after suffering a nervous breakdown, according to the band’s website. He eventually established himself in a second career as a painter.

“I’m taking a break from music,” he told MetroWest Daily News in 2002. “I really feel the need to reinvent myself and move on, and I couldn’t be happier painting. Music is still an important part of my life, but I really have no desire to actually play it.”

Weezer posted a message on its website, saying Welsh’s time with the band was “vital, essential, wild, and amazing.”

“A unique talent, a deeply loving friend and father, and a great artist is gone, but we will never forget him,” the band said.

Welsh planned to attend Weezer’s Sunday performance at Riot Fest in Chicago.

“i’m excited to see the boys, hang out and have some fun,” he wrote on his Facebook page earlier this month.

Related posts:

Ron “Pigpen” McKernan of the Grateful Dead is a member of “27 Club” because of alcohol (Part 8)

cc ‘Janis Joplin’ 2/5 from True Hollywood Story (Janis was having affair with Pigpen) Jerry Garcia (guitar, vocals), Ron “Pigpen” McKernan (vocals, harmonica), Bob Weir (guitar, vocals), Phil Lesh (bass), Mickey Hart (drums), Bill Kreutzman (drums). Grateful Dead “Don’t Ease Me In” Live @ Canadian National Exhibition Hall Toronto, CA June 27th, 1970 Grateful Dead […]

Janis Joplin joins “27 Club” three weeks after Jimi Hendrix (Part 6)

Recently Amy Winehouse joined the “27 Club” when she died of a drug overdose. The “27 Club” is a group of rockers that died at age 27. Unfortunately Jimi Hendrix died at age 27 in 1970 and Janis Joplin did the same three weeks later. Today we are going to look at her life and […]

Jimi Hendrix one of first members of the “27 club” (Part 5)

JIMI HENDRIX : FINAL INTERVIEW . The other day when Amy Winehouse died she joined the “27 Club” which includes other famous rockers who died at age 27. Most of them died because of drugs. Unfortunately Jimi Hendrix joined the club for the same reason. Something special for all music and Beat Club-Lovers on YouTube: […]

Brian Jones’ futile search for satisfaction (Part 3 of series on 27 Club)

Brian’s Blues, Brian Jones on guitar in the early stones years. unreleased track Brian Jones died at age 27 just like Amy Winehouse did. I remember like yesterday when I first heard the song “I can’t get no satisfaction” by the Rolling Stones. I immediately thought about Solomon’s search for satisfaction in the Book of […]

Kurt Cobain’s spiritual search started in a Christian home but ended in Buddhism (Club 27 series part 2)

The Rise And Rise Of Kurt Cobain part 1/3 Amy Winehouse joined the “Club 27 the other day with her early death. I am going through the others one by one. Today is Kurt Cobain.   7. Kurt Cobain very rarely does an artist come along and not just upset the “apple cart” but drops […]

Jim Morrison spiritual search comes up empty (Part 1 of series on “27 Club”)

Jim Morrison – Feast Of Friends – (The Doors Documentary) (1969) (Paul Ferrara) 1/4 I was saddened by the recent death of Amy Winehouse and her inclusion into the “27 Club.” This series I am starting today looks at the search that each one of these entertainers were on during their lives. Today I look […]

Andy Kaufman, Jerry Lawler, David Letterman, Lance Russell Recap

Andy Kaufman, Jerry Lawler, David Letterman, Lance Russell Recap

I grew up in Memphis and used to visit my grandfather Hatcher on Saturday mornings and he always seemed to have the tv tuned to the Saturday morning wrestling show with Lance Russell. My grandfather always would make the same comment. “That is the station we always keep our tv on, but I am not watching that show.” Then my grandfather would comment later, “I can’t believe that a classy guy like the weatherman Dave Brown would be part of such a silly show as this.”

Here is a taste of what I used to see with him.

The Kaufman Lawler Feud: Chapter 9 – A Quick Recap

Uploaded by  on Jan 14, 2009

Lance Russell intros a video package recapping the Kaufman Lawler feud so far. This segment includes the angle on the David Letterman show. It’s all part of a build up to Kaufman’s May 2, 1983 bout against Lawler in a “handicap piledriver” match where Andy will team with The Colossus of Death.

________________

In the Memphis Flyer in 1997 this article was written:

Fifteen years ago, Jerry Lawler and Andy Kaufman blurred the line between reality and pretend with their strange wrestling feud. What really happened is still anybody’s guess.

by Jim Hanas

t’s one of those crazy things you always hope will happen on television, although, given the precautions and general uneventfulness of the medium, it almost never does.

Fifteen years ago this week, professional wrestler Jerry “The King” Lawler slapped comedian Andy Kaufman out of his chair on Late Night with David Letterman, striking — if only for a moment — through the plastic predictability of the small screen with a flash of spontaneity that seemed to surprise everyone involved — Kaufman, Letterman, and even Lawler. “I promise you,” he says today, “I was in a dilemma right up until the last second.”

NBC was inundated with phone calls from people who wanted to know if the altercation had been staged. Network lawyers interviewed the parties involved and determined that the producers had no part in planning what eventually happened in the segment.

There had been a plan, but Kaufman getting smacked wasn’t part of it. They were supposed to show footage of Lawler injuring Kaufman with an apparently vicious piledriver move at the Mid-South Coliseum three months earlier; Kaufman was supposed to apologize for making fun of wrestling; Lawler was to apologize for the injury; and then Kaufman was to burst into a rendition of “What The World Needs Now Is Love Sweet Love.”

“You can see it in Andy’s eyes and you can see it in Letterman’s eyes,” says Lawler. “It’s like, what’s wrong with this guy? Why ain’t he doing what we all said we were going to do?”

And then he hit him. Unplanned, unpremeditated, unknown to Kaufman, Lawler just smacked him, out of his chair, right there on national television. That’s the story.

IT ALL STARTED WITH A NIGHTCLUB act. Kaufman, who was in 1982 starring in TV’s Taxi as the indeterminately foreign Latka Gravas, had been wrestling women from the audience in clubs and on Saturday Night Live and had dubbed himself the World Intergender Wrestling Champion, belt and all. It was a controversial act, done with a seriousness that inspired shock and moral outrage. And if there was laughter, it was nervous laughter, the kind Kaufman seemed to like best.

But it wasn’t enough for Kauf-man. He went looking for a way to bring his bit to real live wrestling fans, and after being turned down by other organizations, he approached Eddie Marlin, promoter of matches at the Mid-South Coliseum, which eventually led him to Memphis

“Andy, I guess, was a big wrestling fan as a kid or something,” Lawler says, as he reminisces about the Kaufman feud over lunch at the Half Shell. “He idolized Nature Boy Buddy Rogers, who was a big flamboyant bad guy. And so I think that this was an opportunity for Andy to live out a childhood dream, and from the time he got the go-ahead, he took on the personality of this Nature Boy Buddy Rogers. He sent some video interviews in, saying that he was going to come to Memphis and challenge some of the women of Memphis. But of course it wasn’t a Latka interview or an Andy Kaufman interview, it was a bad-guy wrestler interview.”

Kaufman’s taunting challenges were hugely successful by the only standard that matters in the world of professional wrestling: The fans hated him. “They came out in droves,” says Lawler, “not only to see Andy, but they also wanted to see him get his butt beat.”

The deal was this: The audience picked the women he would wrestle and $1,000 went to the one who could pin him. In the course of four matches at the Mid-South Coliseum, none of them could, although one came close.

Foxy was a big girl who looked to outweigh Kaufman by at least a hundred pounds. As Kaufman was strutting around the ring, bragging about how easily he had pinned the earlier challengers, the bell rang and she was all over him.

“He hit on the mat, and you would have thought the roof was coming off the coliseum,” Lawler remembers. “This was the first time anybody had done anything to Andy so far. She grabbed him, and I mean she was tearing him up. She was throwing him everywhere.”

Kaufman finally prevailed, but it had been close enough to warrant a rematch, this time with Lawler coaching Foxy from the corner.

When Kaufman pinned her again in the rematch, he apparently got a little carried away, rubbing her face into the mat and refusing to let up. The fans went wild, yelling at Lawler to do something. So he did. He got in the ring and pushed Kaufman off her, which sent the comedian into a rage, screaming into the microphone that he was going to sue everyone, punctuating the threats with his trademark refrain, “I’m from Hollywood.”

He was a big star. You couldn’t do that to him.

WHETHER KAUFMAN WAS serious then or ever during his ensuing feud with Lawler is anybody’s guess, which is what makes the whole chain of events so inscrutable.

Even I’m From Hollywood — a documentary film made after Kaufman’s 1984 death that chronicles his wrestling exploits — doesn’t help. Compiled from footage of matches, interviews, and television appearances, it includes Kaufman’s friends and colleagues talking about his obsession with wrestling. Robin Williams, Tony Danza, and Marilu Henner offer conflicting testimony as to whether Kaufman was truly mad or just playing a joke that no one else was in on. He wore his World Intergender Champion belt and the thermal underwear he wrestled in under his clothes, says Williams, giving at least the impression that he had somehow slipped into wrestling’s fantasy world.

Uploaded by  on Feb 12, 2009

Not sure of the date on this one but its likely from January or February 1984. Jimmy Hart talks about tabloid headlines on Andy Kaufman’s health. As someone who works for a not-for-profit dedicated to fighting cancer, I can tell you – without reservation – that piledrivers DO NOT cause cancer. By the way, anyone who thinks wrestling only got tasteless in the last decade, should watch this interview.

_________________________

On the other hand, Kaufman’s friend and confidant Bob Zmuda says at one point, “Andy was quite sane.”

Watching Kaufman rail against women, Lawler, and Memphis in the taped, wrestling-style interviews, it’s hard to decide if he’s a madman or a comic genius. You just can’t tell.

LAWLER COULDN’T EIther. Even as Kaufman stood outside the ring threatening to sue everyone in sight. “I didn’t know what the deal was,” Lawler says. “He wouldn’t let anybody in on what he was doing, and you never knew if what he was doing was real or if it was a put-on.”

After Kaufman threatened to sue, Lawler challenged him to a match to settle their differences. What really happened next is unclear, although Kaufman’s statements and Lawler’s recollection agree that the two never got a chance to plan out the match. “I sort of think that Andy thought that once he accepted the challenge that we might meet somewhere and talk over what we were going to do. But he never asked to do that. I never could understand why he would accept that or agree to that if he didn’t think there was going to be some kind of meeting between he and I, something mutually agreed upon where he wouldn’t get hurt. [Instead] he just showed up, like he was showing up for a match.”

Kaufman, on the other hand, told reporters before the match that he was scared he was going to get hurt and that he couldn’t understand why Lawler hadn’t answered his requests to meet and work up a plan.

With neither one knowing what the other was thinking, Lawler says he saw no choice but to wrestle — and wrestle for real.

“I think, I have to hurt him,” Lawler remembers telling people who asked if he intended to injure Kaufman. “For the credibility of the way I make my living. You know, if I can let a little 150-pound comedian come in there and have a match with the Southern Heavyweight Wrestling Champion and walk out unscathed, I think the people would just think we were a joke.”

In other words, things had gotten out of hand. It was one of those times when the integrity of wrestling was on the line and only a burst of true violence could vouch for it.

Uploaded by  on Feb 12, 2009

May 19, 1984 on Memphis Wrestling. Jerry Lawler is asked about Andy Kaufman’s death from a few days earlier. Out of respect for Andy’s love of the business and to keep the idea of the feud being real alive, Lawler has no kind words for the late comedian. He doesn’t really bad mouth Kaufman but you’re meant to get the idea the King really didn’t like Andy.

______________________________________

ALTHOUGH ITS DETRACTORS claim to be certain, the subject of whether wrestling is “real” or not somehow remains a matter for debate. Wrestlers are like magicians, but instead of refusing to explain their tricks, they refuse to admit that there’s any trickery at all. And that’s why claims that the sport is fake always come with a question attached: “Wrestling is fake. Right?”

You won’t get an answer to that question, and even when you do — as when Lawler told the Mississippi Gaming Commission wrestling wasn’t real last year in order to avoid paying a fee to promote matches at Lady Luck Casino — the motivation for the confession is sufficiently opportunistic to keep the question open.

If the question gets too serious and evidence becomes necessary, it can be provided. Just ask John Stossel, who as a reporter for the television news magazine 20/20 asked pro wrestler Dr. D if the sport was fake in 1984 and was answered with a pair of boxed ears. He was eventually awarded a $425,000 settlement.

The rivalry between Lawler and Kaufman that climaxed on the Letterman show looks like that: an instance of a wrestler defending his sport by providing brutal proof of its reality.

ON APRIL 5, 1982, KAUFMAN evaded Lawler’s grip for a while, mocking him from across the ring and stepping over the ropes every time he got too close. Finally, an exasperated Lawler allowed the comedian to put him in a headlock in the middle of the ring. That was the end. Lawler picked Kaufman off his feet and threw him to the mat and proceeded to slam his head into the canvas with two successive piledrivers. Kaufman lay on the mat for 15 minutes before he was taken by ambulance to St. Francis hospital, where he spent three days in traction.

The news accounts of the days following the match — local, national, and wire — are filled with modifiers like “apparently” and “alleged” as reporters guarded themselves against an eventual revelation that the whole thing was a hoax. Such a revelation never came. Officials at St. Francis assured the press that Kaufman was truly injured, that they were at full occupancy and couldn’t afford to waste time or space on a gag.

George Lapides, who was and is outspoken about wrestling being phony, entered into a strange paradox by devoting his column in the Press-Scimitar to expressing his outrage at Lawler’s real barbarity. Wrestling was bad because it was fake, but somehow became even worse when it appeared, for a moment, to be real. Sportwriters everywhere who were loath to dignify pro wrestling with ink, puzzled over the anomaly of a real injury in a world everyone knew was bogus through and through.

Lawler was brazen, spouting off to the press about how he’d meant to injure Kaufman, about how he was glad he had, and about how the comedian deserved it for mocking wrestling.

Kaufman was sheepish. “Before the match, I thought wrestling was phony,” he told a reporter, “I guess I learned different.” He vowed to never enter the ring again, and on Saturday Night Live shortly after the incident, footage of the bout was shown as Kaufman — still wearing a neck brace — offered a watery-eyed apology to those he had offended with his wrestling exploits.

No one laughed. Not even nervously.

THREE MONTHS LATER, THE TWO combatants were sitting there, watching the tape again, talking to David Letterman. Kaufman was still wearing his neck brace as Lawler mulled over what he should do. “I’m thinking if I just go up there and apologize,” Lawler says, “everybody down here’s going to think less of me, and I’m doing all this stuff that’s helping Andy, but then I’m thinking what can I do?”

We all know the answer he came up with. Before the segment faded to commercial, Lawler stood up and slapped Kaufman clear out of his chair. Kaufman responded after the break by tossing a cup of coffee in Lawler’s lap and pronouncing a stream of profanities, pounding on Letterman’s desk as the host fiddled with papers like he was trying to mind his own business.

Lawler says he received telegrams from wrestling promoters across the country, thanking him for taking care of Andy Kaufman.

KAUFMAN DIED OF LUNG CANcer May 16, 1984, at the age of 35, just two years after his feud with Lawler. Between the bout at the Mid-South Coliseum and the Letterman episode, the rivalry stands as the ultimate chapter in the persisting legend of the late-comedian. Often said to be “ahead of his time,” it may be that his time is approaching. I’m From HollywoodTaxi, and his SNL appearances can be found all over the cable dial, and a biopic of his life to be directed by Milos Forman and written by Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski — the trio behind The People vs. Larry Flynt — is in the early stages of production and could be out by the end of 1998. Some even believe that Kaufman isn’t dead at all, just pulling the ultimate joke.

There is no more wrestling at the Mid-South Coliseum, where more than 8,000 fans came to see the Kaufman/Lawler match. The King now plies his trade on weekly USWA broadcasts and on the USA Network’s Monday Night Raw, as well as at the Big One Expo Center on North Hollywood and Lady Luck Casino in Mississippi. “It was a legendary event,” he says of his feud with Kaufman. “It really changed the direction of the professional wrestling industry.”

KAUFMAN WAS MADE FOR WREStling. As a comedian whose bits included reading The Great Gatsby aloud until the crowd grew tired and left, he understood the value of wrestling’s central tenant: If you don’t let anyone in on it, no one will ever know for sure what to make of it. People might think you’re kidding, but if you refuse to drop character and simply ask them what they think is so funny, they’ll have no choice but to laugh, nervously.

Even beyond their connections to Elvis — Kaufman was known for an uncanny impersonation that continues even after his death in the Elvis-like rumors that he is still alive; Lawler’s nickname, of course, is “The King” — the two had that tenant in common.

“He wouldn’t let anybody in on what he was doing and you never knew if what he was doing was real or if it was a put.” Lawler’s description of Kaufman sounds like a description of Lawler himself. If the comedian needed a conspirator who would never give up the secret, who better than Lawler?

The partnership between the two actually continued well after their appearance on Letterman, and Kaufman did not give up wrestling as he promised. The rivalry continued in arenas around the county with plots and plans and double-crosses, and the two met in many rematches. One such match, held in Louisville a year later, garnered only a brief article in the local paper. The outcome was the same. Lawler finished Kaufman off with a pile-driver.

As a result of that first match, however, both got what they wanted. Kaufman is still hailed as a comic genius, and Lawler has a tape or two to serve as a warning to those who would claim that his sport is phony. Whatever really happened, it blurred the line between reality and pretend, leaving everyone wondering about the difference.

If the truth could ever be found out, we might discover that the whole thing was staged and call it a big hoax. But Kaufman picked his partner well. Lawler knows how to ride the thin line between truth and fiction and makes a living by not separating the two.

In other words, we’ll never know, and even if one assumes the whole thing was staged, the Kaufman/Lawler feud will continue to come with a question attached.

Because it was all just a big joke. Right?

Will the Republicans embrace an agenda that will get our country back on tract?

Will the Republicans embrace an agenda that will get our country back on tract?

Republicans need to cut spending as the video above says. I wish the Republican candidates for president will embrace these policy positions:

A Republican Agenda for Real Change

by Doug Bandow

This article appeared in Forbes on October 3, 2011

The desperate search for an acceptable Republican Party presidential candidate continues. Republican leaders apparently are pushing New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who previously said no, to jump into the race.

The GOP’s frustration is palpable. Mitt Romney has been running for four years but generates little enthusiasm. Rick Perry was an instant front-runner before losing much of his support after unimpressive debate performances. Michelle Bachmann briefly streaked across the political firmament but now barely registers in the polls. Newt Gingrich committed political seppuku shortly after announcing his candidacy. Ron Paul’s support is fervent but limited.

However, the real Republican problem is positions, not candidates.

Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. A former special assistant to Ronald Reagan, he is the author of Foreign Follies: America’s New Global Empire(Xulon).

More by Doug Bandow

The Republican Party cheerfully ran up the national debt before surrendering the keys to Capitol Hill and the White House. President George W. Bush’s promiscuous war-making cost the U.S. thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars, while making Americans less secure. The GOP centralized more power in Washington. Republican lawmakers managed to turn laudable opposition to tax hikes into a deplorable defense of the status quo.

Most of the GOP presidential candidates offer little new. Mitt Romney, the ultimate political weathervane, implemented ObamaCare in Massachusetts before there was ObamaCare. He now fervently defends Social Security, despite its design as a public Ponzi scheme. Gov. Perry talks of domestic budget cuts but on foreign policy appears to be Bush-lite, yet another hawk disconnected from reality. The sharpest dissent from big government conservatism comes from the candidates least likely to win the nomination: Rep. Paul, former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, and former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson, who has been excluded from most of the debates.

President Barack Obama obviously is vulnerable, as well he should be. The problem is not that he is responsible for all of America’s economic woes — no president “runs” the $15 trillion U.S. economy. But this president has no solution for slow growth and high unemployment other than spending more money, increasing the deficit, and running up the debt.

Unfortunately for the Republicans, simply denouncing President Obama for every ill known to man may not lead to victory. Voters dislike much current GOP orthodoxy. President Obama could win an election which turns into competitive political demonization and personal destruction.

Republicans should offer a positive agenda while addressing the party’s past failings. First, they should explain that current budget policy is unsustainable on both a short- and a long-term basis. Economist Larry Kotlikoff figures that America’s real public debt is $211 trillion, 15 times the nominal national debt. Public finance in states like California already looks a lot like that in Greece.

Unless Americans want to turn their entire incomes over to government, public spending must be cut, and cut sharply. And it must be cut across-the-board.

However, to regain lost credibility GOP politicians should lead with proposals to cut spending benefiting “their” interest groups. Corporate welfare should top any Republican Party list of budget cuts. Too often Republican apparatchiks have been pro-business rather than pro-free market, attacking financial transfers to the poor while endorsing subsidies for corporate America.

The GOP also needs to support significant reductions in military outlays. There is no more important responsibility for the U.S. government than protecting America. However, most of the Pentagon’s current activities have little to do with protecting America.

Instead, most U.S. forces currently defend prosperous, populous allies around the world. Europe has a larger GDP and population than America, yet continues to rely on Washington to provide most of NATO’s combat capability. Japan long had the world’s second largest economy but nevertheless relied on America for its protection. South Korea has 40 times the GDP of its northern adversary, but nearly 30,000 U.S. military personnel remain in the South, creating a “tripwire” for war.

Equally wasteful and far more costly in human terms have been nation-building exercises in Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, and more. Going to war in 2001 to punish the Taliban for hosting terrorist training camps made sense. Staying at war a decade later in an attempt to create a competent, honest centralized government in Kabul is foolish.

Also required is an honest discussion of Social Security’s and Medicare’s funding crises. Neither is financially sustainable and both risk triggering generational conflict. The longer Congress puts off addressing these issues the costlier will be any solution.

The GOP should reaffirm its opposition to tax hikes, but emphasize that taxes can be kept low only if outlays are reduced. Endless borrowing threatens a financial death spiral of increased debt, higher interest payments, slower economic growth, and lower investor confidence. The U.S. now is on the road to fiscal ruin.

Moreover, Republicans should endorse President Obama’s attack on special interest tax breaks. Not all tax preferences are equally bad, but the narrower the tax break the more it approaches a special interest subsidy. The GOP should push legislation that simultaneously kills dubious tax “loopholes” and reduces overall marginal tax rates. Republicans should similarly respond to tax proposals from President Obama or congressional Democrats. Rather than defend the undefendable, the GOP should challenge yet another form of corporate welfare.

With job creation at issue, Republicans should develop a list of regulations and taxes which interfere with a growing economy. Political candidates enjoy denouncing “over-regulation” in the abstract, but they would be more convincing if they targeted specific policies costing real jobs. The House GOP should follow the example of its earlier majority which held hearings on regulatory abuses.

Republicans should challenge politically popular public agencies. For instance, the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were at the epicenter of the housing and financial crises. The GOP rightly criticized Democrats for not including the two GSEs in last year’s financial “reform” bill. But so far House Republicans have done nothing to close Fannie and Freddie, which continue to lose money.

Deregulation should include proposals to make more market friendly controls which are necessary even in a free society. After all, few Americans want to breathe dirty air or swim in dirty water. And there is no simple market solution to such problems. But people don’t want to needlessly waste money and destroy jobs when cleaning up the environment.

The Republicans also should offer a more restrained foreign policy. Doing so is necessary to curtail military outlays — in effect, the defense budget is the price of a nation’s foreign policy, since the more Washington seeks to do in the world, the more military force it requires. So long as the U.S. government is determined to dominate every region of the globe against every power, it will have to spend as much on the military as the rest of the world combined. Indeed, real, inflation-adjusted military outlays have doubled over the last decade, and today are higher than at any point during the Cold War, Korean War, and Vietnam War.

But a more humble foreign policy also would be a better foreign policy. Rather than engage in social engineering abroad, Republican politicians should leave friendly states with responsibility for international problems. If there is a problem in the Balkans or North Africa, Europe should address it. Japan, South Korea, Australia, and other democratic nations should cooperate to restrain potential Chinese aggressiveness. Only the Afghans can create a sustainable political order, of whatever form, in Afghanistan.

The GOP should simultaneously support a globally engaged America and Americans. For instance, international cooperation can help meet humanitarian, environmental, and other problems which transcend national boundaries. Whatever U.S. policy toward illegal aliens, Americans should expand the legal immigration of entrepreneurial professionals.

Trade benefits Americans. Washington’s failure to ratify the free trade agreement with South Korea is beyond foolish. A commercial war with China would hurt Americans while poisoning the most important bilateral relationship of the 21st century.

Other issues also deserve attention — such as expanding educational opportunities for children stuck in poorly performing public schools. Even here, however, the GOP needs to break with recent Republican Party orthodoxy. President Bush and the Republican Congress centralized even more authority in Washington with the “No Child Left Behind” legislation.

Perhaps Chris Christie or some other late electoral entrant will revolutionize the GOP presidential sweepstakes. But without good ideas well-expressed, the GOP could still end up outside the White House looking in. The Republican Party deserves to win in 2012 only if it recognizes that it deserved to lose in 2008.

A Christian Manifesto by Francis Schaeffer (Part 6) (Schaeffer Sundays)

Part 1

Part 2

Below is a summary of “A Christian Manifesto” which is a very important book written by Francis Schaeffer just a couple of years before his death in 1984.

A Christian Manifesto
by Dr. Francis A. Schaeffer

This address was delivered by the late Dr. Schaeffer in 1982 at the Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. It is based on one of his books, which bears the same title.

And what about our schools? I think I should stress again! By law, you are no more allowed to teach religious values and religious views in our public schools than you are in the schools of Russia tonight. We don’t teach Marxism over here in most of our schools, but as far as all religious teaching (except the religion of Humanism, which is a different kind of a thing) it is just as banned by law from our schools, and our schools are just as secular as the schools in Soviet Russia — just exactly! Not ten years from now. Tonight!

Congress opens with prayer. Why? Because Congress always is opened with prayer. Back there, the founding fathers didn’t consider the 13 provincial congresses that sent representatives to form our country in Philadelphia really open until there was prayer. The Congress in Washington, where Edith and I have just been, speaking to various men in political areas and circles — that Congress is not open until there is prayer. It’s illegal, in many places, for youngsters to merely meet and pray on the geographical location of the public schools. I would repeat, we are not only immoral, we’re stupid. I mean that. I don’t know which is the worst: being immoral or stupid on such an issue. We are not only immoral, we are stupid for the place we have allowed ourselves to come to without noticing.

I would now repeat again the word I used before. There is no other word we can use for our present situation that I have just been describing, except the word TYRANNY! TYRANNY! That’s what we face! We face a world view which never would have given us our freedoms. It has been forced upon us by the courts and the government — the men holding this other world view, whether we want it or not, even though it’s destroying the very freedoms which give the freedoms for the excesses and for the things which are wrong.

We, who are Christians, and others who love liberty, should be acting in our day as the founding fathers acted in their day. Those who founded this country believed that they were facing tyranny. All you have to do is read their writings. That’s why the war was fought. That’s why this country was founded. They believed that God never, never, never wanted people to be under tyrannical governments. They did it not as a pragmatic or economic thing, though that was involved too, I guess, but for principle. They were against tyranny, and if the founding fathers stood against tyranny, we ought to recognize, in this year 1982, if they were back here and one of them was standing right here, he would say the same thing — what you are facing is tyranny. The very kind of tyranny we fought, he would say, in order that we might escape.

And we face a very hidden censorship. Every once in a while, as soon as we begin to talk about the need of re-entering Christian values into the discussion, someone shouts “Khomeni.” Someone says that what you are after is theocracy. Absolutely not! We must make absolutely plain, we are not in favor of theocracy, in name or in fact. But, having said that, nevertheless, we must realize that we already face a hidden censorship — a hidden censorship in which it is impossible to get the other world view presented in something like public television. It’s absolutely impossible.

I could give you a couple of examples. I’ll give you one because it’s so close to me. And that is, that after we made Whatever Happened to the Human Race, Franky made an 80 minute cutting for TV of the first 3 episodes (and people who know television say that it’s one of the best television films they have ever seen technically, so that’s not a problem). Their representative presented it to a director of public television, and as soon as she heard (It happened to be a woman. I’m sure that’s incidental.) that it was against abortion, she said, “We can’t show that. We only shoe things that give both sides.” And, at exactly the same time, they were showing that abominable Hard Choices, which is just straight propaganda for abortion. As I point out, the study guide that went with it (as I quote it in Christian Manifesto[the book] with a long quote) was even worse. It was saying that the only possible view of reality was this material thing — this material reality. They spelled it out in that study guide more clearly than I have tonight as to what the issue is. They said, “that’s it!” What do you call that? That’s hidden censorship.

Dr. Koop, one of the great surgeons of the world, when he was nominated as Surgeon General, much of the press (printed) great swelling things against him — a lot of them not true, a lot of them twisted. Certainly though, lots of space was made for trying to not get his nomination accepted. When it was accepted though, I looked like mad in some of the papers, and in most of them what I found was about one inch on the third page that said that Dr. Koop had been accepted. What do you call that? Just one thing: hidden censorship.

You must realize that this other view is totally intolerant. It is totally intolerant. I do not think we are going to get another opportunity if we do not take it now in this country. I would repeat, we are a long way down the road. I do not think we are going to get another opportunity. If the Christians, specifically, but others also, who love liberty, do not do something about it now, I don’t believe your grandchildren are going to get a chance. In the present so-called conservative swing in the last election, we have an opportunity, but we must remember this, and I would really brand this into your thinking: A conservative Humanism is no better than a liberal Humanism. It’s the Humanism that is wrong, not merely the coloration. And therefore, at the present moment, what we must insist on, to people in our government who represent us, is that we do not just end with words. We must see, at the present opportunity, if it continues, a real change. We mustn’t allow it to just drift off into mere words.

Steve Jobs depicted at pearly gates with Saint Peter

It is strange that the New Yorker Magazine did no research.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs  (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

(If you want to check out other posts I have done about about Steve Jobs:Some say Steve Jobs was an atheist , Steve Jobs and Adoption , What is the eternal impact of Steve Jobs’ life? ,Steve Jobs versus President Obama: Who created more jobs? ,Steve Jobs’ view of death and what the Bible has to say about it ,8 things you might not know about Steve Jobs ,Steve Jobs was a Buddhist: What is Buddhism? ,Did Steve Jobs help people even though he did not give away a lot of money? )

The New Yorker Disrespects Steve Jobs, Religion

Posted by  | 10/08/2011 | 10 Comments and 6 Reactions

The New Yorker released its tribute cover of Steve Jobs, which will grace the October 17 edition of the magazine. In a blog post, The New Yorker shows that the cover will depict Steve Jobs meeting Saint Peter at the pearly gates. Saint Peter is using an iPad, apparently using it to do a little research before deciding if Jobs will be admitted to heaven or sent to a place with a warmer climate.

There’s only one problem here: Steve Jobs was a Buddhist.

The New Yorker’s Cover: Apple Co-Founder Meets St. Peter

I’m sure New York means well by devoting a cover to Apple’s co-founder, but this illustration smacks of ignorance. Yes, the New Yorker’s known for satire, but is this really the right way to approach it before his family’s even heldservices for him? How about showing Steve Jobs a little respect by at least depicting him with a religious idol he’s believed in?

Anil Dash, a writer and entrepreneur tweeted the following in reaction to The New Yorker:

Always annoys me when non-Christians are portrayed as reaching a Christian heaven when they die. It’s not a compliment.

Jonah Peretti, replied by tweeting:

@anildash also the depiction is inaccurate since non-Christians go to hell when they die

Each religion has its own theory of what happens to us in the afterlife. Whatever your beliefs (or lack of religios beliefs) are, it’s an ultimate sign of disrespect to be memorialized in a manner which doesn’t reflect how you lived. You wouldn’t place a a cross over a Jew’s grave or hold a Catholic mass for an atheist, would you?  The New Yorker most certainly wouldn’t dare depicting a deceased celebrity in any stage of Islmaic rites unless its editors were 1000% sure he was a Muslim.

It’s wrong for The New Yorker to either assume Steve Jobs was Catholic or simply ignore his religious beliefs and depict him in front of the pearly gates. Why couldn’t The New Yorker do just a little bit of research and maybe depict him interacting with Buddha under a Bodhi tree?

What do you think about The New Yorker’s tribute to Steve Jobs? I think there’s a bit of ignorance on The New Yorker’s part here. The magazine’s publishers should illustrate a more fitting cover if it they hope to honor Steve Jobs.

Apple co-founder Steve Jobs died Wednesday, just a day after his colleagues introduced the iPhone 4S. He resigned from his role as Apple’s CEO just six weeks ago.

Author Archive: Xavier Lanier

Xavier Lanier is a mobile technology enthusiast and avid photographer. Based in San Francisco, Xavier is the publisher of GottaBeMobile.com and Notebooks.com

“Soccer Saturday” USA defeats Honduras

Uploaded by  on Oct 8, 2011

The U.S. Men’s National Team earned a 1-0 win against Honduras at Sun Life Stadium in Miami, Fla. Clint Dempsey’s first half goal and a strong performance from Tim Howard were enough to give Jurgen Klinsmann his first win as U.S. MNT head coach.

___________________________

ESPN reported:

MIAMI — The United States got Jurgen Klinsmann a victory in his fourth try as American coach.

Clint Dempsey scored in the 36th minute and goalkeeper Tim Howard made several key saves in a 1-0 exhibition victory over Honduras on Saturday night.

“It’s huge for all of us. You don’t ever want to go a long period of time without winning,” Howard said. “We performed well, I think, and we’re trying to set a foundation, but ultimately you have to win. That was the focus coming in.”

Since Klinsmann replaced Bob Bradley on July 29 after the CONCACAF Gold Cup, the Americans had tied Mexico, and lost to Costa Rica and Belgium.

When Klinsmann took over as coach of Germany’s national team seven years ago, Die Mannschaft beat Austria in his debut.

“This team is hungry for success,” Klinsmann said. “They want to do well and get the results right.”

Eight days after acquiring a U.S. passport, Danny Williams started in his national team debut. The 22-year-old midfielder, the son of a U.S. serviceman and a German mother, joined Hoffenheim from Freiburg at the end of August and only made his first start for Hoffenheim against Bayern Munich last weekend.

“It was great — I had goose bumps,” Williams said. “When I heard the national anthem played I said, ‘Wow! This is the first time playing for the U.S. national team.”

He is among four German-Americans in the U.S. program. Schalke midfielder Jermaine Jonesmade his debut last October, and Nuremberg defender Timmy Chandler debuted in March. Hoffenheim midfielder Fabian Johnson, sidelined by a neck injury, was been approved by FIFA last month for a switch from Germany to the U.S.

On a rainy night in south Florida, a frog could be seen on the field. The game was the first of a pair for the U.S. during the international fixture period. The Americans host Ecuador on Tuesday night in Harrison, N.J.

The U.S. used a 4-1-3-2 formation and Howard made up for a few defensive lapses.

“I think it took us a little bit to get into a higher pace,” Klinsmann said. “The first 20 minutes were a bit too static. And then we took over, created a lot more chances.”

Dempsey put the U.S. ahead with his 23rd international goal. Brek Shea‘s centering pass got past several players and touched Michael Orozco Fiscal before Dempsey gained control at the top of the penalty area, He moved the ball from his right foot to his left and shot high past goalkeeper Donis Escobar .

“I didn’t know if the ball was going to come through, I got a little lucky,” Dempsey said. “I took my time. I was going to take it with my right foot but saw it was going to be blocked, so I pulled it back to my left and couldn’t have hit it any sweeter.”

Dempsey also appeared to score on a header in the 84th minute, but the Americans were called for offside.

With the U.S. using most top players other than Landon Donovan (strained right quadriceps) and midfielder Stuart Holden (knee surgery), the Americans seemed to better adapt to the system employed by Klinsmann.

In the 18th minute, Honduras’ Jerry Bengston broke in alone on Howard and let go a shot from the top of the box. Then in the 26th minute, Howard made a diving save of a straight-on, left-footed shot by Carlos Costly from well beyond the box.

Howard also stopped a shot from Boniek Garcia, who fired from the left corner in the 52nd minute. With his 37th win, Howard tied Tony Meola for second among U.S. goalkeepers behind Kasey Keller‘s 53.

“Tim is getting to a time in his career where he realizes these are the golden years for him ahead,” Klinsmann said. “We really enjoy what he brings to the table.”

Oguchi Onyewu, appearing for the first time under Klinsmann, squandered a scoring chance in the 66th minute when he volleyed a rebound over the crossbar. Escobar had made a save on Dempsey and the ball landed at Onyewu’s feet.

NOTES: Carlos Bocanegra and Howard are the only players to start all four games under Klinsmann. … Williams was the first player to make his debut under Klinsmann. DaMarcus Beasley replaced Williams in the 65th minute, his first international appearance since last year’s World Cup game against Algeria. … Jonathan Spector made his first appearance under Klinsmann, replacing Chandler in the 76th.
Copyright 2011 by The Associated Press

Steve Jobs: Great Entrepreneur

Apple CEO Steve Jobs  (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

(If you want to check out other posts I have done about about Steve Jobs:Some say Steve Jobs was an atheist , Steve Jobs and Adoption , What is the eternal impact of Steve Jobs’ life? ,Steve Jobs versus President Obama: Who created more jobs? ,Steve Jobs’ view of death and what the Bible has to say about it ,8 things you might not know about Steve Jobs ,Steve Jobs was a Buddhist: What is Buddhism? ,Did Steve Jobs help people even though he did not give away a lot of money?

Steve Jobs: Exemplary Entrepreneur

PrintWith the sad passing of Steve Jobs, everyone is talking about what an awesome entrepreneur he was. But what exactly do entrepreneurs like Jobs do for the economy?I’ve studied the stories of dozens of America’s pioneering business leaders from Samuel Morse and Thomas Edison to Bill Gates and Fred Smith. What I’ve found is that while Steve Jobs was great, the rise of his Apple Computer was far from unique in our history.

Historians Nathan Rosenberg and L.E. Birdzell found that “new enterprises, specializing in new technologies, were instrumental in the introduction of electricity, the internal-combustion engine, automobiles, aircraft, electronics, aluminum, petroleum, plastic materials, and many other advances.” At the start of nearly every industry, a few gutsy people have taken huge risks to challenge old ways, to undermine dominant firms, and often to battle against government barriers that stood in their way.

Looking at Jobs and other great entrepreneurs, I’ve found five key roles they play in generating growth:

  • Entrepreneurs are Radical Innovators. Their inventions are usually unexpected and very disruptive to exiting businesses. Rosenberg and Birdzell note that Apple’s pioneering early products were not thought of “by any of the leading American computer manufacturers, nor by the Soviet Union, nor by the French Commissariat du Plan, nor by MITI in Japan.” Another radical innovator of the 1970s was Fred Smith of Federal Express. Today, we take overnight delivery for granted, but it was up to Smith to battle regulatory roadblocks and to show that there was a huge demand for the service.
  • Entrepreneurs Grow Niches into Big Industries. Bill Gates began his career in the 1970s writing code for an obscure hobbyist computer called the MITS Altair. That would not have seemed like the path to the top at the time — it was a niche market (software) within a niche market (microcomputers). But leaders of the giant mini and mainframe computer firms overlooked the microcomputer that outsiders like Gates and Jobs were developing. Just last year, Apple’s iPad looked like a niche product, but tablet computing has exploded.
  • Entrepreneurs Generate Competition. Apple Computer has played a crucial role in providing an alternative to giant Microsoft by always staying one step ahead. American history is full of agile and upstart firms providing a crucial competitive check to dominant firms. One great story is the rise of William McGowan’s MCI Corporation in the 1970s and 1980s. MCI helped destroy the AT&T monopoly, thus paving the way for Jobs and other entrepreneurs to marry computers with telecommunications technology.
  • Entrepreneurs are Guinea Pigs. The modern economy is steeped in uncertainty. No one can accurately predict the future, not even the best entrepreneurs. Instead, what makes entrepreneurs unique is that they act in the face of uncertainty. Steve Jobs was a great high-tech guinea pig, and he had plenty of product failures. But good entrepreneurs learn from their mistakes and try again. Ransom Olds, the father of the U.S. automobile industry, failed numerous times with steam-powered cars and other technologies before he succeeded with the first mass-produced gasoline car in 1901. Even by 1910, Thomas Edison was still insisting that “the nickel-iron battery will put the gasoline buggy … out of existence in no time.”
  • Entrepreneurs Turn Inventions into Innovations. America’s rise to prosperity is often portrayed as a steady process of accumulating new inventions. That “science push” understanding of history is often implicit in calls for government funding of science. But that view is wrong. Economies grow because of innovations, which are inventions that entrepreneurs package and test in the marketplace. The Chinese invented paper, but it was in pluralistic Europe where printing exploded after Gutenberg’s advances. Apple Computer has been brilliant at both making technological breakthroughs and guessing the demands of the marketplace.

What are the policy lessons from America’s great entrepreneurial history? One lesson is that the politicians who steer subsidies to solar firms, fast trains, and other schemes are ignorant of the real sources of economic growth. Because market uncertainties are pervasive, government agencies and dominant companies cannot be relied upon to secure our economic future.

Instead, we can spur growth by encouraging a culture of entrepreneurship, repealing barriers to entry, reducing taxes on risky investments, and simply getting out of the way of the next generation of Steve Jobses.

This article appeared on The Daily Caller on October 6, 2011.

The Sixty Six who resisted “Sugar-coated Satan Sandwich” Debt Deal (Part 10)

The Sixty Six who resisted “Sugar-coated Satan Sandwich” Debt Deal (Part 10)

 

This post today is a part of a series I am doing on the 66 Republican Tea Party favorites that resisted eating the “Sugar-coated Satan Sandwich” Debt Deal. Actually that name did not originate from a representative who agrees with the Tea Party, but from a liberal.

Rep. Emanuel Clever (D-Mo.) called the newly agreed-upon bipartisan compromise deal to raise the  debt limit “a sugar-coated satan sandwich.”

“This deal is a sugar-coated satan sandwich. If you lift the bun, you will not like what you see,” Clever tweeted on August 1, 2011.

Tipton Calls for Common Sense, Balanced Approach to the Debt Ceiling

 
 
 

 

 “The American people can’t call their banks and arbitrarily raise their spending limits; they have to cut back and tighten their budgets to live within their means, and they expect Washington to play by the same rules.”—Rep. Scott Tipton

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Stressing that Washington needs to start spending within its means like American families and businesses, Rep. Scott Tipton (CO-R) called for a common sense, balanced approach to the debt ceiling and spending problem.

“This is not a Democrat or Republican issue, but an American issue.  It is my hope that we can come together to reach a solution that embraces the common sense principles of living within our means and acting responsibly,” Tipton said.  “We have an opportunity to cut, cap and balance, and chart a sustainable course in this country, rather than just cut and run.  This is the balanced approach that the president has been asking for.”

The Cut, Cap and Balance Act of 2011 seeks to cut $111 billion in spending in FY2012 and $5.8 trillion over ten years, cap federal spending to under 20% of GDP by 2017, and pass a balanced budget amendment for passage by the states.  Tipton plans to vote in favor of the Act later today.

Click here to see Tipton’s House floor speech on the Cut, Cap and Balance Act.

Click here to see Tipton’s House floor speech on the debt ceiling.

“Forty-nine of our fifty states have some form of a balanced budget requirement.  The President’s comment that a balanced budget is unrealistic for the federal government is out of touch,” Tipton said.  “American families and small businesses balance their budgets every day; the states do it every day; it’s time that Washington does the same. With unemployment above 8 percent for 29 consecutive months, American families know all too well what it’s like to face a real debt ceiling.  The American people can’t call their banks and arbitrarily raise their limits; they have to cut back and tighten their budgets to live within their means, and they expect Washington to play by the same rules.”

While House Republicans have passed a budget, and put forward solutions to curb Washington’s runaway spending and prevent Medicare and Social Security from going bankrupt, the President and Senate Democrats have yet to propose any plan.

“We are still waiting to see a plan from the President, and the silence has been deafening,” Tipton said.  “The President cannot continue to punt on this issue.  The time to act is now, and that’s what Republicans are doing by passing this plan to Cut, Cap, and Balance.”

What business owners are saying about the debt ceiling in the Third District:

“I’ve operated a small business for 25 years– meeting payrolls, keeping a balanced budget and never taking on more debt than we were able to payoff quickly.  It’s time Washington politicians take off their political hats, start thinking like business owners and start living within their means.  The American people and the business community want to see fundamental changes in the way Washington does business.  That means standing on principle to cut spending and putting a stop to our country’s unsustainable debt before raising the debt ceiling.”—Tom Abbott, Owner, Montrose Ford-Nissan

“If Washington can raise the debt ceiling every time they decide to spend beyond their ability to pay, then what is the point?  In my business, I can’t call the bank and tell them that I need more money if I decided to spend beyond my ability to pay.  It should be no different for Washington. Washington needs to get serious and find a solution that fixes the root of the spending problem and pay down our debt before it’s too late to reverse the course.”—Doug Simons, Owner, Enstrom Candies, Grand Junction.

“It’s time we draw a line in the sand.  We cannot continue to live off of future promises from Washington that fade away with every new spending increase.  We don’t need more lip-service from Washington promising to fix things eventually, we need them to act now and get spending under control now.  Our children’s future is at stake.”—Dean Matthews, Independent Electrical Contractor, Cortez