Monthly Archives: July 2011

Senator Pryor asks for Spending Cut Suggestions! Here are a few!(Part 79)

Senator Mark Pryor wants our ideas on how to cut federal spending. Take a look at this video clip below:

Senator Pryor has asked us to send our ideas to him at cutspending@pryor.senate.gov and I have done so in the past and will continue to do so in the future.

On May 11, 2011,  I emailed to this above address and I got this email back from Senator Pryor’s office:

Please note, this is not a monitored email account. Due to the sheer volume of correspondence I receive, I ask that constituents please contact me via my website with any responses or additional concerns. If you would like a specific reply to your message, please visit http://pryor.senate.gov/contact. This system ensures that I will continue to keep Arkansas First by allowing me to better organize the thousands of emails I get from Arkansans each week and ensuring that I have all the information I need to respond to your particular communication in timely manner.  I appreciate you writing. I always welcome your input and suggestions. Please do not hesitate to contact me on any issue of concern to you in the future.

Here are a few more I just emailed to him myself:

The government’s own auditors, as well as outside watchdog groups, have recommended specific reforms to:
  • Reduce food stamp overpayments (annual net losses: $600 million, mandatory);25
  • Verify parent incomes for school lunches (up to $120 million, mandatory);
  • Improve eligibility verification and tracking of student loan recipients (at least $1 billion, mandatory);
  • Prevent states from using accounting tricks to secure extra Medicaid funds (several billion dollars, mandatory);
  • Combat fuel tax fraud ($1 billion, discretionary);
  • Stop veterans program overpayments ($800 million, mandatory/ discretionary);
  • Collect $3 billion in outstanding debt owed to the Department of Veterans Affairs;
  • Stop Medicare overpayments ($12.3 billion, mandatory);
  • Reform Medicare so that it no longer overpays for prescription drugs and medical supplies ($2,900 million, mandatory);
  • Recover the $7 billion owed by Medicare contractors; and
  • Reform the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) to stop overpayments ($9 billion, mandatory).

This is how bad it is getting:

  • Anti-poverty spending has surged 89 percent faster than inflation since 2000. Nearly half of this increase occurred in the past two years. President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP on anti-poverty programs, and President Obama has already pushed it above 4 percent of GDP. State and local governments spend an additional 2 percent of GDP on these programs.
  • Since 2000, Medicaid and Food Stamp rolls have expanded by nearly 20 million. Average benefit levels have grown faster than the inflation rate.
  • Program success should be measured by reduced government dependency, not increased spending.

Sweden’s Voucher Program Part 9

HALT:HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth.com

Excerpts from an interview with Hillsdale College President Larry Arnn on May 22, 2006 in which Milton explains the dynamics involved when parents are empowered to select the best educational option for their children.

I read an excellent article called “School Choice in Sweden: An Interview with Thomas Idergard of Timbro,” (March 8, 2010) by Dan Lips and I wanted to share some of his answers with you below:

DL: In the United States, teachers unions have been the strongest opponents to school choice and voucher programs. What has been the experience of teachers and the teachers unions in Sweden under the universal voucher programs?
TI: Yes, I know that in the U.S. the teacher unions seem to be strong advocates against reforms for free choice. To me this is really strange and even somewhat bizarre, because it is against the core interest of the unions’ members. Widened choice for parents and students, which leads to higher competition through the occurrence of new and different forms of organizing education, also means a widened choice for teachers, because they will no longer be automatically referred to one employer—i.e., the public school monolith!
The Swedish teacher unions never opposed the voucher reform. They did not publicly embrace it, but behind the scenes they had expectations that the teacher profession would gain from more alternatives, competition, and innovation in education.
This is also proven in teacher satisfaction surveys conducted since the introduction of the universal choice program. Last summer, the national and highly respected Swedish Quality Index presented an analysis that showed that the difference in teacher satisfaction with their employer, work environment, and teaching conditions between public and independent schools is “highly significant” in favor of the independent schools. Perhaps these higher satisfaction rates for teachers in independent schools can explain their lower rate of sickness leave?

What does the Heritage Foundation have to say about potential tax reform:Study released May 10, 2011 (Part 2)

Obama’s Tax Hike: The Movie

“Saving the American Dream: The Heritage Plan to Fix the Debt, Cut Spending, and Restore Prosperity,” Heritage Foundation, May 10, 2011 by  Stuart Butler, Ph.D. , Alison Acosta Fraser and William Beachis one of the finest papers I have ever read. Over the next few days I will post portions of this paper, but I will start off with the section on tax reform.

The Details

A Unified Single Tax Rate. The Heritage tax reform plan is far more
comprehensive than previous well-known tax reform proposals. Typical of many tax
reform proposals, our plan replaces today’s individual and corporate income tax
systems and eliminates the death tax. In lieu of the current motley collection
of taxes, this plan institutes a simple, single-rate tax on individuals and
businesses. It also folds today’s federal payroll taxes financing Social
Security and Medicare into the new system, establishing a single tax rate for
all taxpayers. In addition, it replaces all federal excise taxes except those
dedicated to specific trust funds, such as the gasoline tax, which would be
retained until that tax and its associated highway program are devolved to the
states.

Tax Rate. The tax system is designed to raise a permanent revenue
stream of up to 18.5 percent of the economy as measured by GDP. With the design
characteristics of this new tax system, we estimate that the statutory
individual and business tax rate will likely eventually be between 25 percent
and about 28 percent under traditional scoring methods. This is comparable to or
significantly below the typical rate facing an individual or family today. Most
working families today are subject to a 15.3 percent payroll tax rate on wages
and salaries plus a 10 percent, 15 percent, 25 percent, or 28 percent individual
income tax rate for a combined rate of 25.3 percent, 30.3 percent, 40.3 percent,
or 43.3 percent.

A Simplified System. The basic structure of this tax plan is simple.
With its single rate, it taxes uniformly all income sources that are spent on
consumption. This means that taxable income includes all labor compensation and
all net borrowings. The net amount put aside in savings is then subtracted to
determine net taxable income. Thus, the more individuals or families save, the
lower their taxes; they pay tax on savings only when savings are used to pay for
goods and services.

However, the new tax system does not tax government transfers explicitly
associated with low-income citizens, such as welfare, health care assistance,
and similar programs. Ultimately, when the Social Security and Medicare programs
are fully reformed, the Social Security checks and premium support that seniors
receive will not be taxed either. In the Social Security and Medicare transition
periods, a portion of the benefits of some seniors will be taxed if their income
is above a certain amount, just as many seniors’ Social Security is taxed
today.

Thus, the new tax system offers individuals and families a comparable or
lower tax rate and vastly improves their savings incentives to build wealth and
ensure their own financial security. It simultaneously improves the ability of
the economy to raise wages and provide more job opportunities. And filling out
tax forms will be a lot simpler.

An Alternative Option for Savings. For some purposes, many taxpayers
today prefer to save after-tax dollars as permitted through the current-law Roth
IRA rather than paying tax when funds are withdrawn as under today’s traditional
IRA. This Roth-style alternative maintains the principle of a single incidence
of taxation but may result in further increased saving by giving savers an
additional option. To allow such accounts for those who feel they need them, the
plan permits taxpayers to contribute after-tax dollars to an account,
contributing as they choose until the account balance reaches $100,000, with a
limit of one account per adult taxpayer. The income earned on the account is
tax-free, and disbursements from the account are tax-free for any purpose.

Few Deductions or Credits. Under the Heritage tax plan, the individual
income tax has only three deductions instead of the legion of deductions under
current law:

  • Higher education. Recognizing the role of higher
    education as a form of saving and investment in human capital, a deduction is
    allowed for tuition and expenses for higher education up to the average annual
    cost at a four-year public college or university.
  • Charitable donations and other gifts. Since the tax is
    levied on consumption, gifts are not taxable until they are spent by the
    recipient. Thus, per current law, gifts to nonprofit organizations are tax
    deductible if the organization is recognized as tax-exempt for tax purposes.
    Gifts to individuals and transfers through inheritance are deductible and become
    taxable to the recipient only when spent on consumption. And there is no death
    tax.
  • Mortgage interest. As under current law, homeowners can
    deduct mortgage interest while the lender continues to be taxed on mortgage
    interest income. Homeowners are also given the option of forgoing the deduction,
    in which case the lender is not taxed on mortgage interest income and market
    pressure would encourage the lender to offer a lower mortgage interest rate.

Protections for Low-Income Working Households. Current law hits
low-income workers and others with the full weight of today’s payroll taxes,
whatever their wage and salary income may be. The Heritage tax plan folds all
payroll taxes—or FICA—into the single tax system. It then eliminates all income
tax on low-income workers through the health insurance tax credit described
above (a $3,500 nonrefundable tax credit for families and $2,000 credit for
individuals). In addition, the Earned Income Credit is retained as part of the
overall system of financial support for low-income Americans. Further, the
calculation of taxable income excludes all other cash and noncash benefits
provided by the federal government through its anti-poverty programs, such as
food stamps. The net effect is that, compared to current law, this plan provides
substantial tax relief to low-income workers and families.

Protecting Low-Income Seniors. For Medicare-eligible senior citizens,
the measure of taxable income is modified to ensure that the flat benefit
amounts for Social Security and the Medicare defined contribution are tax-free.
Thus, lower-income seniors will not be pushed back into poverty by the tax
system after Social Security and Medicare have lifted them out of poverty. As
noted earlier, during the lengthy transition period for the Heritage plan’s
Social Security reform, some seniors above certain incomes with relatively high
benefits will pay tax on part of those benefits, but they will pay less than
many do today.

What does the Heritage Foundation have to say about potential tax reform:Study released May 10, 2011 (Part 1)

Tax Day By The Numbers

“Saving the American Dream: The Heritage Plan to Fix the Debt, Cut Spending, and Restore Prosperity,” Heritage Foundation, May 10, 2011 by  Stuart Butler, Ph.D. , Alison Acosta Fraser and William Beachis one of the finest papers I have ever read. Over the next few days I will post portions of this paper, but I will start off with the section on tax reform.

Tax Reform

Summary

The existing tax system is manifestly indefensible, especially in its
complexity and its drain on economic vitality. The complexity of the tax system
plagues taxpayers in all walks of life. Low-income citizens must navigate the
enormously complex Earned Income Credit. Those who save must sort through
multiple tax rates and tax regimes for different kinds of returns on those
savings, and there is a multitude of phaseouts of various credits, exemptions,
and deductions. As if this were not bad enough, Congress created a parallel
income tax called the Alternative Minimum Tax, so millions of taxpayers must
figure their taxes two different ways before they can know what to pay. Yet
these difficulties suffered by taxpayers are relatively minor compared to some
of the tortuous rules and exceptions inflicted on businesses large and
small.

The drain inflicted on economic vitality is even worse than the tax code’s
complexity. High marginal rates discourage all manner of productive activity.
The U.S. corporate income tax rate is the second-highest in the industrialized
world and much higher than the average tax rate of our international
competitors.

The current tax system actively discourages citizens from saving enough for
retirement, emergencies, or the large purchases in life, thus driving them
toward consumer debt. In turn, it artificially depresses the level of national
savings and makes domestic investment more dependent on foreign investment.

For decades, Congresses have tweaked and twisted a fundamentally flawed
system into knots, each time creating two new problems while attempting to solve
one old one. The income tax was a poor choice from the outset, and Congress
after Congress has consistently made it worse. The federal tax system need not
be so complex or damaging to our economy, nor should it be.

A stronger economy means higher wages for American workers and better returns
for America’s savers. A stronger economy means better opportunities for college
graduates and better economic security for families. It means that American
companies and workers can compete more effectively in the global economy. And a
stronger economy is a more resilient economy, able to withstand and overcome the
inevitable economic shocks of tomorrow.

A stronger economy also plays a vital role in improving federal finances. It
means sustained, normal levels of tax revenues and a lower level of spending to
meet the needs of those who are temporarily distressed because of unemployment.
A stronger economy offering better wages and better job opportunities is also
the most powerful antidote to persistent poverty, and less poverty reduces the
demands for anti-poverty spending.

Without a stronger economy, we will not solve our long-term problems of
federal overspending and overborrowing. Thus, tax reform to spur economic growth
is a critical component of the Heritage plan.

In broad terms, to promote growth, the federal tax system must be:

  • A single, low rate system to collect needed revenues
    without unnecessarily distorting economic decision making.
  • Simpler and far more transparent. A simple, transparent
    tax is needed so that taxpayers can anticipate and plan for the tax consequences
    of their actions and easily understand the full extent of their tax burden. It
    also provides greater confidence that other taxpayers are not exploiting tax
    complexities to underpay their taxes.
  • Neutral between savings and investment. Unlike the
    current system, it must not impose multiple levels of taxation on saved income.
    Treating savings neutrally gives individuals greater control of their economic
    futures while ensuring that the economy has the raw financial material to grow
    and encourages Americans to invest their savings in the most productive
    ventures.
  • Levied in a way that minimizes tax distortions and perverse
    incentives.
    This allows prices and market forces—not intentional or
    inadvertent government meddling—to decide how best to grow the economy. It also
    helps to keep the tax system simple.
  • Capable of collecting revenues equivalent to 18.5 percent
    of the economy.
    The modern average of tax revenue under normal economic
    conditions is approximately 18.5 percent of GDP. This is the upper limit that
    Americans have over many decades indicated to politicians they are prepared to
    accept. Thus, the tax system should be capped at collecting no more than this
    amount both to ensure a strong economy and to restrain the growth of government.

Using these essential elements, the Heritage plan will transform the current
tax system into a modern flat tax that taxes individual income only once and
replaces all federal income taxes, all payroll taxes, the death tax, and
virtually all excises. Specifically, for individuals, the current system will be
replaced with a new flat-rate tax applied to income after deducting all savings.
Taxable income will be reduced by the net amount contributed to savings, and
savings will be taxable only when spent. This eliminates the current-law bias
against saving and ensures that individuals pay taxes only on what they withdraw
from the economy and not on savings that they make available for investment in
the economy by others.

Today’s business tax code will be replaced by a flat business tax on domestic
sales of goods and services with deductions for labor costs and purchases from
other businesses, including expensing of capital purchases. All business
activity, including corporate, will be taxed under the new flat business
tax.

Senator Pryor asks for Spending Cut Suggestions! Here are a few!(Part 78)

Senator Mark Pryor wants our ideas on how to cut federal spending. Take a look at this video clip below:

Senator Pryor has asked us to send our ideas to him at cutspending@pryor.senate.gov and I have done so in the past and will continue to do so in the future.

On May 11, 2011,  I emailed to this above address and I got this email back from Senator Pryor’s office:

Please note, this is not a monitored email account. Due to the sheer volume of correspondence I receive, I ask that constituents please contact me via my website with any responses or additional concerns. If you would like a specific reply to your message, please visit http://pryor.senate.gov/contact. This system ensures that I will continue to keep Arkansas First by allowing me to better organize the thousands of emails I get from Arkansans each week and ensuring that I have all the information I need to respond to your particular communication in timely manner.  I appreciate you writing. I always welcome your input and suggestions. Please do not hesitate to contact me on any issue of concern to you in the future.

Here are a few more I just emailed to him myself:

GUIDELINE #5: Improve financial management and reform wasteful programs.
Congress must provide stronger financial management oversight for federal programs, which are losing billions of dollars every year from mismanagement. The following examples of inexcusable waste make a convincing case for reform:
  • The federal government cannot account for $24.5 billion spent in 2003.16
  • The U.S. General Accounting Office refuses to certify the federal government’s own accounting books because the bookkeeping is so poor.
  • Of the 26 departments and major agencies, 18 received the lowest possible rating for their financial management, meaning that auditors cannot even express an opinion on their financial statements.17
  • The Medicare program pays as much as eight times the cost that other federal agencies pay for the same drugs and medical supplies.18
  • The federal government made $20 billion in overpayments in 2001.
  • The Department of Housing and Urban Development’s $3.3 billion in overpayments in 2001 accounted for over 10 percent of the department’s total budget.19
  • Recently, the Department of Agriculture was unable to account for $5 billion in receipts and expenditures;
  • The Internal Revenue Service does not even know how much it collects in payroll taxes.20
  • Congressional investigators were able to receive $55,000 in federal student loan funding for a fictional college they created to test the Department of Education.21
  • The Army Corps of Engineers has been accused of illegally manipulating data to justify expensive but unnecessary public works projects.22
  • A recent audit revealed that employees of the Department of Agriculture (USDA) diverted as much as 3 percent of the USDA budget to personal purchases through their government-issued credit cards.23
  • Over one recent 18-month period, Air Force and Navy personnel used government-funded credit cards to charge at least $102,400 for admission to entertainment events, $48,250 for gambling, $69,300 for cruises, and $73,950 for exotic dance clubs and prostitutes.24

This is how bad it is getting:

Anti-Poverty Spending Is Surging

Anti-Poverty Spending Has Jumped 89 percent Since 2000

The characters referenced in Woody Allen’s movie “Midnight in Paris” (Part 25, T.S.Elliot)

I have really enjoyed going through the characters referenced in Woody Allen’s latest movie “Midnight in Paris.” Today I am going to discusss T.S. Eliot.

T.S. Eliot
Modernist poet
Friday, August 8, 2008

“The only hope, or else despair
Lies in the choice of pyre or pyre—
To be redeemed from fire by fire.”

The man who wrote the most despairing poem of the twentieth century is today mostly remembered as the author of doggerel verse made popular in the hit musical Cats. Besides his poetry (the serious, the light, and the profoundly Christian), he produced literary criticism and drama so fine he was awarded the 1948 Nobel Prize for Literature and the British Order of Merit.

Timeline
1867 The Dominion of Canada is Established
1876 Alexander Grahm Bell invents the telephone
1882 Formation of Standard Oil Company
1888 T.S. Eliot born
1965 T.S. Eliot dies
1966 Chinese Cultural Revolution

Brooding masterpiece
Thomas Stearns Eliot was born in St. Louis to a family descended from New England stock. There was no smoking or drinking in the Eliot household, and the literary-minded family—Tom, his brother, five sisters, and mother—would gather around his father, a wholesale grocer, as he read Dickens aloud. In fact, frail Tom spent much of his childhood curled up in a big leather armchair reading.

He was sent to New England to private schools and was accepted at Harvard University, where he studied under the likes of philosopher and poet George Santayana and completed his degree in three years. Though naturally shy, he gained a reputation as a dancer and party-goer, and when he decided he was too puny, he took boxing lessons.

Eliot won a traveling fellowship to Germany in 1914; he barely escaped getting caught by the war and made his way to Britain. It turned out to be a long stay. He never returned to take his oral examination, which was all that stood between him and a Harvard Ph.D.

After a year at Oxford University, then a stint at teaching history, Latin, French, German, arithmetic, drawing, and swimming in English schools, he became a banker with Lloyds of London. Later he became an editor with Faber and Faber (where he eventually became known as a prolific writer of blurbs for book jackets).

Meanwhile he brooded over the crumbling of European civilization.

His first masterpiece, the first “modernist” poem in English, was “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” a portrait of an aging man reviewing a life frittered away between timid hopes and lost opportunities:

For I have known them all already, known them all
Have known the evenings, mornings, afternoons
I have measured out my life with coffee spoons …

With the publication of “The Waste Land” in 1922, he came to international attention. The poem begins,

April is the cruelest month, breeding
Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
Memory and desire, stirring
Dull roots with spring rain.

It expresses the disillusionment and disgust after World War I, portraying a fearful world pursuing barren lusts, yearning desperately for any sign of redemption. It is considered by many to be the most influential poem of the twentieth century.

Redeemed from fire
Eliot’s despair, however, was short-lived. After reading agnostic Bertrand Russell’s essay “A Free Man’s Worship,” essentially an argument that man must worship man, Eliot decided its reasoning was shallow. He moved in the opposite direction and in 1927 was confirmed in the Church of England. The same year, he also gave up his American citizenship and became a British subject.

His faith became more widely known with the publication of “Ash Wednesday” in 1930, a poem showing the difficult search for truth (“Where shall the word be found, where will the word / Resound? Not here, there is not enough silence”) and the discovery of a faith that will last, expressed in the repeated phrase, “Because I do not hope to turn again.” Though criticized sharply by the literati for his turn to Christianity, he continued to express his faith in his poetry.

Eliot believed his finest achievement was writing the broadly religious poem “Four Quartets” (1943). It deals with the themes of incarnation, time and eternity, spiritual insight and revelation, culminating in an allusion to Pentecost:

The dove descending breaks the air
With flame of incandescent terror
Of which the tongues declare
The one discharge from sin and error.
The only hope, or else despair
Lies in the choice of pyre or pyre—
To be redeemed from fire by fire.

In The Idea of a Christian Society (1939), as well as other works, Eliot argued that the humanist attempt to form a non-Christian, “rational” civilization was doomed. “The experiment will fail,” he wrote, “but we must be very patient in awaiting its collapse; meanwhile redeeming the time: so that the Faith may be preserved alive through the dark ages before us; to renew and rebuild civilization, and save the world from suicide.”

He didn’t believe society should be ruled by the church, only by Christian principles, with Christians being “the conscious mind and the conscience of the nation.”

Eliot turned to writing plays in the 1930s and ’40s because he believed drama attracts people who unconsciously seek a religion. The year 1935 saw the premiere of Murder in the Cathedral, a play based on the martyrdom of Thomas Becket, in which Eliot reiterates that faith can live only if the faithful are ready to die for it. It was followed by The Family Reunion (1939) and The Cocktail Party(1949), his greatest theatrical success. In his plays, he managed to handle complex moral and religious themes while entertaining audiences with farcical plots and keen social satire.

Verse to the postman
More personally, Eliot’s first marriage was a disaster: his wife became increasingly unstable until she had to spend her last days in a mental institution. He then shared a flat with writer-critic John Hayward (who was almost completely paralyzed) until he married again in 1957.

Eliot enjoyed children, was a fan of Sherlock Holmes detective stories, addressed letters in verse (“Postman, propel thy feet / And take this note to greet / The Mrs. Hutchinson / Who lives on Charlotte Street … “), and made up rhymes about cats, which turned into his Old Possum’s Book of Practical Cats (1939). He was an Anglican of Anglo-Catholic persuasion and served for a time as church warden at his local parish.

_______________________________________

The impact of T.S. Eliot’s Christianity on his poetry

By Barry Spurr
ABC Religion and Ethics | 16 Aug 2010

By the time that T.S. Eliot, aged 39, was baptised and confirmed in the Church of England in 1927, his reputation as the leading Modernist poet had been secured by the publication of the revolutionary collection, Prufrock and Other Observations (1917) and The Waste Land in (1922).

These presented confronting analyses of the human condition in contemporary Western society which was emerging from the bloodbath of the Great War, in which the opposing sides had claimed the support of God.

Eliot focused on individual lives (in the monologues of such despairing figures as Prufrock, in his ironically-titled “Love Song,” and Gerontion, the little old man in the poem of that name). But he also criticised civilisation at large in the epic range of The Waste Land, where the title introduces the principal metaphor of the hopelessness it describes.

Eliot presented a post-Christian world, despairing of human and divine love or redemption from its despair. The best expression of this diagnosis, in his verse, came in “The Hollow Men” (1925), where Eliot’s speakers are discovered hopelessly – but, paradoxically, with an extraordinary lyrical beauty – on the brink of Hell.

Here was a poet, according to Eliot’s contemporaries, who had evoked the nihilism of modern lives and societies. Phrases from these poems still resonate powerfully, nearly a century later: “I have measured out my life with coffee spoons,” “This is the way the world ends / Not with a bang but a whimper,” “After such knowledge, what forgiveness?” and so on.

It might have been expected, after Eliot’s conversion a few years later, that his recognition of the promise of salvation which Christianity proposes would have been reflected in revolutionary changes in his poetic subjects and techniques.

Instead, it is the consistency of Eliot’s poetry, from 1927 onwards, with what he had been writing before that most often strikes us.

Several powerful metaphors remain, such as, for example, that of the journey (which we encounter, for instance, in “Prufrock” and in the quest-motif in The Waste Land).

Indeed, Eliot’s first “Christian” poem is called “Journey of the Magi” (1927). What is notable about this work is the perilousness of the undertaking (“A cold coming we had of it”), underlined by the contingency of the outcome and the lack of final resolution as a single Magus meditates upon the journey at the end.

These wise men, while recalling the biblical figures who were drawn to the Christ-child, are more tellingly interpreted as the worldly-wise men of modern life – people much like Eliot himself – who must struggle to reclaim the experience of faith and cannot even be sure of the character or implications of that experience when they have had it.

His Magi travel backwards through time, past the scene of suffering at the crucifixion (dimly represented as “three trees on the low sky”), to the baby at Bethlehem.

It is an encounter with the source of faith – “it was (you may say) satisfactory,” they note flatly – apprehended after intense and protracted personal and universal suffering and attended by the ever-present temptations of worldliness (“silken girls bringing sherbet”) and in the face of contemporary, irreligious derision – “with the voices ringing in our ears, saying / That this was all folly.”

This was precisely how Eliot’s conversion was regarded by many of his friends and literary associates in these years.

The Magi return from their encounter with the Incarnation to a now-alien people, “clutching their gods.” Incompleteness closes the poem as one of them yearns for a further dying to worldliness – “I should be glad of another death.”

For all its negativity, the poem is rich in Christian symbolism and, for the first time, there is at least the sense that the journey is not absolutely pointless, but, rather, a challenging experience.

Moreover, as it is undeniably focused on the Lord’s birth, it presents, in Eliot’s first recognisably Christian poem, that emphasis on the Word made flesh – the doctrine of the Incarnation – which is central to Anglo-Catholic theological, liturgical and spiritual life.

From this still point of “intersection of the timeless / With time” (as Eliot was later to put it, in Four Quartets) was derived the richly sacramental rule and practice of faith which dominated the rest of Eliot’s life, particularly in the Mass and in recourse to the sacrament of penance.

In “Journey of the Magi,” there is the symbol of a “water-mill beating the darkness.” It speaks of rejuvenation, conquering the darkness of sin and, sacramentally, of baptism. It has the potential to revive the desert landscape of The Waste Land where there “is no water.”

In 1930, in his most liturgical poem, Ash-Wednesday, Eliot presents an extended meditation on that aspect of spirituality which inspired his own quest for transcendence of the world of the wastelanders and the hollow men, and which had its source in his own abiding sense of unworthiness. This is his preoccupation with sin and purification.

In the liturgical calendar, Ash Wednesday is the first day of the penitential season of Lent. So, in this Lenten poem, Eliot’s speaker embarks on yet another journey – but this time, of renunciation and penitence.

Again, in its six sections, there is the dominant sense of the difficulty of the process, in the midst of worldliness, a condition characterised here as a “time of tension between dying and birth.”

One of the reasons that Eliot’s poetry of his “Christian” period speaks as strongly to the contemporary world as his earlier nihilistic works – which seem more aligned to its values – is that he never imagines that religious belief, or the behaviour which that belief entails, makes life or the acceptance of oneself, with all its demons, easier.

On the contrary, it is a more difficult journey. In Ash-Wednesday, scepticism about faith and lack of faith in the penitent’s own ability to rise to the demands of belief dramatically bedevil him as he makes his painful way through those several weeks to Easter and the mystery of the resurrection.

Typically, the poem only looks forward to this theological resolution, finding its centre, rather, in “this brief transit where the dreams cross,” the temporal dispensation of past, present and future which the speaker aspires to transcend now that he has recognised a higher reality beyond that dreamtime.

His glimpses of the beatific vision – Ash-Wednesday is much indebted to Dante for several of its references – encourage the speaker at the end, in quotation from the old prayer, Anima Christi, to plead, “Suffer me not to be separated / And let my cry come unto Thee.”

This “cry” is a prayer coming out of suffering. Such was Eliot’s faith.

Barry Spurr is Associate Professor in the Department of English at the University of Sydney. His most recent book is “Anglo-Catholic in Religion”: T.S. Eliot and Christianity (Lutterworth, 2010).

Below is an excellent article from Breakpoint.org:

A Costly Journey Print
threekings

By Diane Singer|Published Date: November 29, 2010

Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, saying, “Where is he who has been born king of the Jews? For we saw his star when it rose and have come to worship him.”
-–Matthew 2:1-2

Before he became a Christian in 1927, Nobel laureate T.S. Eliot wrote poems – such as The Waste Land and “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”– which characterized the despair, disillusionment, and nihilist spirit of the post-World War I period. But not long after his conversion and his confirmation in the Anglican Church, Eliot published “Journey of the Magi” [1] – a poem which imagines events from the viewpoint of one of wise men who followed the Christmas star in search of the king of the Jews. Eliot used the form of a dramatic monologue to reveal what the magi endured as they made the arduous journey toJudea, and how their encounter with the Christ child impacted their lives.

In the first twenty lines, the speaker is remembering – and not fondly – the difficult trek from their home in the east (tradition says they came from Persia) to Bethlehem. It’s a litany of complaints about the cold, the long distance, the stubbornness of the camels, the unreliability and crudeness of the camel drivers, and the filth and corruption they found in every village and town they passed through. On too many nights and days, they had good reason to regret their decision to undertake the journey, and reason enough to call themselves every kind of fool for leaving “the summer palaces” and “silken girls bringing sherbet” back home.

In the second stanza (lines 21-31), the speaker describes their disappointing arrival in Bethlehem. Despite the warmer climate, their mood is somber and puzzled because none of the locals seemed aware that something momentous has just occurred, the arrival of their long-awaited Messiah (Genesis 3:15; Jeremiah 23:5-6; Micah 5:2; Daniel 9:25).

Significantly, Eliot packs this section with images that foreshadow not the birth of Christ, but the agony of His death, such as “three trees on the low sky” and “[s]ix hands at an open door dicing for pieces of silver” – images which remind readers that Jesus was a newborn destined for a very particular kind of death (Psalm 22:17-18). And it is this juxtaposition of birth and death which leaves the speaker, decades after he sees the baby Jesus, longing for his own death.

In the last stanza (lines 32 -43), the setting shifts from the distant past to the aged speaker’s present as he mulls over the journey and tries to puzzle out what it meant. Rather than glowing words expressing joy, as we might expect, his words are uncertain, tentative, even pained. They found this infant’s birth “[h]ard and bitter agony for us, like Death, our death” (ll. 38-39). Though they left their gifts and returned to their homeland, they never again felt at home: “We returned to our places, these Kingdoms, / But no longer at ease here, in the old dispensation, / With an alien people clutching their gods” (ll. 40-42). He then ends his musings on a sigh, a longing: “I should be glad of another death” (l. 43).

“The Journey of the Magi” is an unusual Christmas poem in that it lacks the seasonal cheerfulness and celebratory mood that we generally expect from such fare. Instead, Eliot’s poem reveals the paradoxical nature of our Lord and of our own faith journey. While Jesus is the Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6) who came to reconcile God and man through His death on the Cross (Colossians 1:19-20), He is also the One who brought “a sword” (Matthew 10:34-39) that inevitably divides families, friends, and peers – as Eliot discovered when he converted, much to the disdain of his fellow members of the intelligentsia.

While Jesus offers His disciples abundant life, it comes at the cost of our old life, our old way of thinking, and our old values. And while He guarantees us a heavenly home, He leaves us with a nagging sense of alienation in our earthly ones. Therefore, like the magi, we may one day look back on our journey of faith and see much that disappoints and confuses us. But also like the magi, we can anticipate the day we will die and come face to face with our Lord. Then, we will understand that though it was a costly journey, it was well worth the price.

at_the_cross
For more insight to this topic, get the book,
Christians at the Cross, by N. T. Wright, from our online store. Or read the article, “The Humanity of Christmas: The Nativity Story,” by Charles Colson.


[1] The poem may be found at http://www.poetryarchive.org/poetryarchive/singlePoem.do?poemId=7070 where you can both read the text and hear Eliot reading the poem.

Comments: All comments are approved before posting.

Copyright © 2011 Prison Fellowship. All Rights Reserved

Lea Seydoux as Gabrielle and Owen Wilson as Gil in "Midnight in Paris." 2011 Roger Arpajou / Sony Pictures Classics

Lea Seydoux as Gabrielle and Owen Wilson as Gil in “Midnight in Paris.”

Owen Wilson portrays Gil Pender, a Hollywood screenwriter on holiday in Paris with his fiancée, Inez (Rachel McAdams) and her parents.  Gil is on vacation from being a Hollywood Hack and in the process of writing his “Great American Novel;” the theme of which is being enamored of the past.  You can tell from the beginning that he is not happy with either his life or his fiancé and wishes to be part of a better generation and era.

Inez, the direct opposite of Gil, is a materialistic ambitious character who is pretty much unlikable from the beginning.  Her mother is such a bitch that you cannot help but expect the same of her.  Her father is portrayed as a right-wing “tea bagger” who is constantly getting into arguments with the liberal Gil, mostly over politics.  There is never a point in the film when you feel the slightest sympathy for anyone in Inez’s family.  You just simply know that Inez will do something during the course of the film that will allow Gil to get out of the engagement and relationship.

There is not much more I can say without giving the major plot twist away.  However, I will say that the majority of  jokes and dialogue require the viewer to have a strong background in the material.  Anything short of that will leave the viewer perplexed and completely out of touch with the plot.  In fact, when I saw the film, there were many jokes where only about five people in the audience were laughing hysterically.  The remainder of the sold-out crowd just didn’t get it.

This is where the elitism and self-indulgent nature of Woody Allen shines.  If you are not part of the inside joke and well aware of the literary and artistic references throughout, you will be lost.  And, this, unfortunately, will be what kills this film commercially.  It will play very well in intellectual centers and areas where elitism shines.  But the mass general public throughout the world will almost definitely never see it.  In fact, I was mentioning this film to a Thai friend this morning and we were both sure that it will never see the light of day there.

As is always the case in Woody Allen films, the acting is outstanding.  Although, in my opinion, Owen Wilson tries a little too hard to play the nebbish character that Woody Allen himself has portrayed in all of his movies prior to the turn of the Century.

The Paris locales shine under the cinematography of Darius Khondji.  The use of rain and earth tones gives this film the feel needed to transport the viewer to another world.  The Costume and Set Design is also outstanding.

Three stars out of five.

____________________________________

How Should We Then Live – Episode 8 – The Age of Fragmentation

Published on Aug 6, 2015

Francis Shaeffer

__________

The above clip is from the film series by Francis Schaeffer “How should we then live?” Below is an outline of the 8th episode on the Impressionists and the age of Fragmentation and he spends some time on T.S. Eliot’s “The Wasteland.”

AGE OF FRAGMENTATION

I. Art As a Vehicle Of Modern Thought

A. Impressionism (Monet, Renoir, Pissarro, Sisley, Degas) and Post-Impressionism (Cézanne, Van Gogh, Gauguin, Seurat): appearance and reality.

1. Problem of reality in Impressionism: no universal.

2. Post-Impression seeks the universal behind appearances.

3. Painting expresses an idea in its own terms as a work of art; to discuss the idea in a painting is not to intellectualize art.

4. Parallel search for universal in art and philosophy; Cézanne.

B. Fragmentation.

1. Extremes of ultra-naturalism or abstraction: Wassily Kandinsky.

2. Picasso leads choice for abstraction: relevance of this choice.

3. Failure of Picasso (like Sartre, and for similar reasons) to be fully consistent with his choice.

C. Retreat to absurdity.

1. Dada , and Marcel Duchamp: art as absurd. (Dada gave birth to Surrealism).

2. Art followed philosophy but came sooner to logical end.

3. Chance in his art technique as an art theory impossible to practice: Pollock.

II. Music As a Vehicle of Modern Thought

A. Non-resolution and fragmentation: German and French streams.

1. Influence of Beethoven’s last Quartets.

2. Direction and influence of Debussy.

3. Schoenberg’s non-resolution; contrast with Bach.

4. Stockhausen: electronic music and concern with the element of change.

B. Cage: a case study in confusion.

1. Deliberate chance and confusion in Cage’s music.

2. Cage’s inability to live the philosophy of his music.

C. Contrast of music-by-chance and the world around us.

1. Inconsistency of indulging in expression of chaos when we acknowledge order for practical matters like airplane design.

2. Art as anti-art when it is mere intellectual statement, divorced from reality of who people are and the fullness of what the universe is.

III. General Culture As the Vehicle of Modern Thought

A. Propagation of idea of fragmentation in literature.

1. Effect of Eliot’s Wasteland and Picasso’s Demoiselles d’ Avignon

compared; the drift of general culture.

2. Eliot’s change in his form of writing when he became a Christian.

3. Philosophic popularization by novel: Sartre, Camus, de Beauvoir.

B. Cinema as advanced medium of philosophy.

1. Cinema in the 1960s used to express Man’s destruction: e.g. Blow-up.

2. Cinema and the leap into fantasy:

The Hour of the Wolf, Belle de Jour, Juliet of the Spirits, The Last Year at Marienbad.

3. Bergman’s inability to live out his philosophy (see Cage):

Silence and The Hour of the Wolf.

IV. Only on Christian Base Can Reality Be Faced Squarely

Sweden’s Voucher Program Part 8

HALT:HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth.com

Milton Friedman’s film series “Free to Choose” Episode on Education part 6. It was Friedman’s voucher plan that was put into practice in Sweden in 1993.

I read an excellent article called “School Choice in Sweden: An Interview with Thomas Idergard of Timbro,” (March 8, 2010) by Dan Lips and I wanted to share some of his answers with you below:

DL: Some express concerns that choice and competition would undermine the traditional public or government school system. How have traditional public schools responded to widespread choice?
TI: They have improved because they have been forced to—by competition.
Two major studies—one from the Institute for Future Studies (an NGO) and one from the National Board of Education (the highest governmental education authority)—have examined the public schools’ response to increased competition where independent schools were established. Both showed that public schools in these cities were more efficient and successful—both in using given resources and attaining higher student results—than the national average.
Why? Because they needed to improve in order to compete with the independent schools. Otherwise they would lose students and thus revenues, because the public schools’ funding from the local school boards is also paid as an amount per student.
Sweden’s school voucher program shows that competition truly works!

What does the Heritage Foundation have to say about our potential choices concerning federal spending:Study released May 10, 2011 (Part 5)

   Thomas Sowell – Welfare

“Saving the American Dream: The Heritage Plan to Fix the Debt, Cut Spending, and Restore Prosperity,” Heritage Foundation, May 10, 2011 by  Stuart Butler, Ph.D. , Alison Acosta Fraser and William Beachis one of the finest papers I have ever read. Over the next few days I will post portions of this paper, but I will start off with the section on federal spending reform.

Reforming the Federal Budget Process. When Congress established its current budget process in 1974, the United States was in debt by about a half-trillion dollars; it is now in debt over $14 trillion. Regrettably, for any proposal to deal with the nation’s fiscal problems, the budget process does little to help and in many ways impedes good and bold policy. For one thing, its focus on just 10 years diverts lawmakers from dealing with the mounting long-term challenges, such as retirement programs. For another, the lack of firm budget controls and enforcement procedures makes fiscal discipline very difficult. Reforming the budget process is therefore an implicit part of reforming the budget itself.

In the Heritage plan, we change the budget process to impose enforceable caps to reduce total federal spending to 18.5 percent of GDP by 2021 (including entitlement programs) and then keep spending at that level. Within those overall caps we also cap non-defense discretionary spending at 2.0 percent of GDP. Anti-poverty spending is also capped, as described above. These statutory restrictions on future spending are to be no higher than the modern historical level of federal revenues.

We also propose amending existing federal laws that provide permanent or indefinite appropriations for federal agencies or programs (including and especially entitlement programs), or that allow agencies or programs to spend funds they receive from fees or other sources, rather than depositing them in the U.S. Treasury, so as to retrieve congressional control of spending for those agencies and programs. Within our specific reforms for Medicare and Medicaid we also include a fixed budget amount for each program.

To make the budget process more visible, understandable, and accountable to the American people, we require Congress to estimate and publish the projected cost over 75 years of any proposed policy or funding level for each significant federal program. Any major policy change should also be scored over this long-term horizon.

Finally, in addition to calculating the costs of proposed congressional actions without regard to the response of the economy to those actions (known as “static” scoring), we require a parallel calculation that takes account of that response (known as “dynamic” scoring) so as to make more practical and useful cost information available to Congress when it decides whether to pursue the actions.

The Bottom Line

Runaway federal spending threatens to drown the nation in taxes and debt for generations to come. Promoting economic prosperity requires streamlining government, cutting spending, and empowering families and entrepreneurs.

The Heritage plan achieves those objectives by focusing Washington on performing a limited number of appropriate duties well rather than a wider range of questionable duties poorly. It transfers more power to state and local governments, which are closer and more responsive to the people; transfers functions to the private sector that the market can perform better; targets federal spending more precisely to those in need; and eliminates wasteful, unnecessary, and duplicative spending.

These steps will unleash the power of the private sector to meet market demands, create jobs, and raise living standards. Taking these steps, combined with entitlement and tax reform, means that Americans can look forward to opportunity and prosperity rather than a future of debt and economic decline.

The characters referenced in Woody Allen’s movie “Midnight in Paris” (Part 24, Djuna Barnes)

Paris The Luminous Years | PBSPremieres nationwide Wednesday, December 15 at 9 p.m. on PBS (check local listings). Discover the roots of our modern culture in this new documentary by pioneering filmmaker Perry Miller Adato. The first TV program to tell the story of Paris as vibrant incubator of creativity in the modern arts during the early 20th century (1905-1930), “Paris The Luminous Years” features Pablo Picasso, Marc Chagall, Igor Stravinsky, Ernest Hemingway, Serge Diaghilev, Jean Cocteau, Gertrude Stein, Aaron Copland, Josephine Baker, Marcel Duchamp, Langston Hughes, Sylvia Beach, Henri Matisse, Georges Braque, Vaslav Nijinsky, Joan Miró, Janet Flanner, Tristan Tzara, D.H. Kahnweiler, and many more. These key figures in the art world’s first international avant-garde recount why and how Paris transformed them and their work. Premieres nationwide Wednesday, December 15 at 9 p.m. on PBS (check local listings). For more information and to get the DVD, visit: http://www.pbs.org/parisWoody Allen’s movie “Midnight in Paris” has really educated me concerning a tremendous amount of talent that was in Paris during the 1920’s. Today I will be discussing Djuna Barnes.

Djuna Barnes was born June 12, 1892,
in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York on her family’s farm. Through her father and
grandmother, Barnes gained a great appreciation of and dedication to the arts
(the Barnes home was often frequented by such artistic greats as Jack London and
Franz Liszt).
Barnes did not have a formal education because her father
believed that the public school system was inadequate, and thus felt he felt
that home schooling was much more beneficial. Her only formal schooling came
after she left the home and moved to New York City.
In 1912 Barnes
enrolled as a student at Pratt Institute (1912-13) and the Art
Students League
(1915-16). While at Pratt, she began her writing career as a
reporter and illustrator for the Brooklyn Eagle. Barnes wrote mostly
feature articles and interviews. Douglas Messerli wrote in his foreword to I
Could Never be Lonely without a Husband, Interviews
by Djuna Barnes, “The
more I worked with [the interviews], the more I came to understand these pieces
less as standard journalism than as fascinating experiments in the
impressionistic characterization that Barnes would perfect in her novels and
poetry”. This is illustrated by Barnes’ choice of titles for her interviews,
such as “Interviewing Arthur Voegtlin is Something Like Having a Nightmare,”
“Nothing Amuses Coco Chanel After Midnight,” etc.
Barnes’ first
published her poetry in 1915 as a collection of “rhythms and drawings” entitled
The Book of Repulsive Women; four years later three of her plays were
produced by the Provincetown Players.
     In 1923, Barnes published
a collection of lyrical poems, stories, drawings, and one-act plays which she
entitled A Book. The publisher of A Book described it as “… a
chant which could be sung by those who are in the daily procession through the
streets and highways of our metropolis but which could also be sung by those who
are on balconies and house-tops viewing the eternal show of daily life.”

In 1921, Barnes was sent to Paris by McCall’s as a correspondant and
wrote articles for such magazines as Vanity Fair, Charm, and
The New Yorker; she stayed for almost twenty years.
While in
France, she was heavily immersed in the modernist scene in Paris where she
befriended such beneficial patrons as Natalie Barney and Peggy Guggenheim. This
circle of women, which included wwriters such as Mina Loy, Janet Flanner, Dolly
Wilde, and Gertrude Stein, became known as ‘The Academy of Women.’ (These days
they are reffered to as “The Literary Women of the Left Bank.”) Barnes wrote a
satirical work, Ladies Almanack, about this salon and the women who were
a part of it.
Her second novel, Nightwood (1936), is her
masterpiece of which * “T.S. Eliot wrote ‘It is so good a
novel that only sensibilities trained on poetry can wholly appreciate it.’ In
fact, it is often analyzed against the conventions of an extended poem rather
than a short novel. However, the one thing which critics are not divided upon is
the large sphere of influence that Barnes had upon other writers of her era. She
is often compared to Joyce, Pynchon and Nathaniel West and the circle of her
influence reaches out to include Truman Capote, William Goyen, Isak Dinesen,
John Hawkes, and Anais Nin. Along with Nathaniel West she has been identified as
one of the originators of Black Comedy and as Donald J. Greiner writes, it
“…stands out among post-World War I American novels as one of the first
notable experiments with a type of comedy that makes the reader want to lean
forward and laugh with terror” (p.54).”
Barnes also wrote a verse drama,
The Antiphon (1958).
When she returned to the United States, she
wrote little and lived a reclusive life in her apartment on Patchin Place in
Greenwich Village, where she died in 1982. Creatures in an Alphabet
(1982), a small book of alphabet rhymes for adults, and Smoke, and Other
Early Stories
(1982) were published posthumously.

*quote
cited from an article written by: Betsy Johnson, Karin Satrom, Ryan McGee &
Danielle Tarris, from the site “Women of the Left Bank”

__________________________—

 

chicagotribune.com

Movie review: ‘Midnight in Paris’

Woody Allen’s film is his warmest, mellowest and funniest venture in
years.

By Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times Film Critic

May 20, 2011

Here’s a sentence I never thought I’d write again: Woody Allen has made a
wonderful new picture, “Midnight in Paris,” and it’s his best, most enjoyable
work in years.

If you’re surprised to be reading that, think how I feel
writing it. I’ve been a tough sell on the past dozen or so Allen films, very
much including the well-acted but finally wearying “Vicky Cristina Barcelona.”
It seemed that everything he touched in recent years was tainted by misanthropy
and sourness. Until now.

With “Midnight in Paris,” Allen has lightened
up, allowed himself a treat and in the process created a gift for us and him.
His new film is simple and fable-like, with a definite “when you wish upon a
star” quality, but, bolstered by appealing performers like Owen Wilson, Marion
Cotillard and Rachel McAdams, it is his warmest, mellowest and funniest venture
in far too long.

This is also a film with an unanticipated twist, so the
less you know about it the better. Try to see it immediately, before
well-meaning friends tell you more than they should. “Midnight in Paris” is too
charming to be ruined by anything, but this is a case where ignorance really is
bliss.

Allen says he’s been enamored of Paris since he wrote and acted in
“What’s New Pussycat?” in 1965. You can sense his continued passion for the city
throughout the film, feel the extra pep in his step and pleasure in his
heart.

Seductively shot by Darius Khondji (whatever tax credits this film
got will be paid back with interest), “Midnight” opens with an extended montage
of Paris’ tourist landmarks, a montage that lasts longer than necessary to
simply establish location. Allen is saying: Pay attention — this is a special
place, a place where magic can happen.

That’s certainly the attitude of
Gil (Wilson), a successful Hollywood screenwriter who is an effusive enthusiast
for the City of Light in general, and the 1920s golden age of
Fitzgerald-Hemingway Paris in particular. So much so that Gil dreams of turning
his back on all that studio money and writing novels on the Left
Bank.

Gil’s fiancée, Inez (McAdams), doesn’t like the sound of that. She
and Gil are in Paris accompanying her wealthy parents on a business trip and she
doesn’t even want to think about anything that would diminish Gil’s
income.

Gil’s raptures are put on hold when he and Inez bump into Inez’s
friend Paul (Michael Sheen) and his wife. A professor whom Inez once had a crush
on, Paul is in Paris to lecture at the Sorbonne. It’s soon clear he’s an
insufferable bore so pedantic he gets into an argument with a guide at the Rodin
Museum (a brief cameo for French First Lady Carla Bruni).

As much to
escape Paul as anything else, Gil takes a late-night walk and just as the clock
strikes midnight on the Rue Montagne St. Genevieve, something happens that
throws everything in Gil’s life into disarray.

Perhaps most unsettling,
but in a good way, is Gil’s meeting with the beautiful and spirited Adriana
(Cotillard), an aspiring fashion designer who has a history of inspiring
artists. The connection between them is immediate but the barriers to any kind
of relationship are formidable.

With remarkable naturalness and
considerable charisma, Cotillard is just as she should be here, as are both
Wilson, one of the most likable of contemporary actors, and McAdams, who deftly
handles a part that is less amiable than usual for her.

Also great fun in
smaller roles are Kathy Bates and Adrien Brody as well as French stars Lea
Seydoux and Gad Elmaleh.

On display as well is Allen’s sharp and
satisfying script. It makes jokes about everyone from Djuna Barnes to Luis
Bunuel but also takes time to ponder the role of the artist and the importance
of not undervaluing the age we live in.

More than anything, obviously,
“Midnight” has Paris. For one film, at least, that extraordinary city has
changed Allen’s mood and altered his outlook on cinema and life. It may do the
same for you.

kenneth.turan@latimes.com


‘Midnight in Paris’

MPAA rating: PG-13 for some sexual
references and smoking

Running time: 1 hour, 34
minutes

Playing:In general release

Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times

 

Djuna Barnes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Djuna Barnes, ca. 1921.

Djuna Barnes (12 June 1892 – 18 June 1982) was an American writer who played an important part in the development of 20th century English language modernist writing and was one of the key figures in 1920s and 30s bohemian Paris after filling a similar role in the Greenwich Village of the teens. Her novel Nightwood became a cult work of modern fiction, helped by an introduction by T. S. Eliot. It stands out today for its portrayal of lesbian themes and its distinctive writing style. Since Barnes’s death, interest in her work has grown and many of her books are back in print.

Contents

[hide]

[edit] Life and writing

[edit] Early life (1892–1912)

Barnes was born in a log cabin on Storm King Mountain, near Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York. Her paternal grandmother, Zadel Turner Barnes, was a writer, journalist, and Women’s Suffrage activist who had once hosted an influential literary salon. Her father, Wald Barnes,[1] was an unsuccessful composer, musician, and painter. An advocate of polygamy, he married Barnes’s mother Elizabeth in 1889; his mistress Fanny Clark moved in with them in 1897, when Barnes was five. They had eight children, whom Wald made little effort to support financially. Zadel, who believed her son was a misunderstood artistic genius, struggled to provide for the entire family, supplementing her diminishing income by writing begging letters to friends and acquaintances.[2]

As the second oldest child, Barnes spent much of her childhood helping care for siblings and half-siblings. She received her early education at home, mostly from her father and grandmother, who taught her writing, art, and music but neglected subjects such as math and spelling.[3] She claimed to have had no formal schooling at all; some evidence suggests that she was enrolled in public school for a time after age ten, though her attendance was inconsistent.[4]

At the age of 16 she was raped, apparently by a neighbor with the knowledge and consent of her father, or possibly by her father himself. She referred to the rape obliquely in her first novel Ryder and more directly in her furious final play The Antiphon. Sexually explicit references in correspondence from her grandmother, with whom she shared a bed for years, suggest incest, but Zadel—dead for forty years by the time The Antiphon was written—was left out of its indictments.[5] Shortly before her eighteenth birthday she reluctantly “married” Fanny Clark’s brother Percy Faulkner in a private ceremony without benefit of clergy. He was fifty-two. The match had been strongly promoted by her father and grandmother,mother, brother but she stayed with him for no more than two months.[6]

[edit] New York City (1912–1921)

In 1912 Barnes’s family, facing financial ruin, split up. Elizabeth moved to New York City with Barnes and three of her brothers, then filed for divorce, freeing Wald to marry Fanny Clark. The move gave Barnes an opportunity to study art formally for the first time; she attended the Pratt Institute for about six months, but the need to support herself and her family—a burden that fell largely on her—soon drove her to leave school and take a job as a reporter at the Brooklyn Daily Eagle. Over the next few years her work appeared in almost every newspaper in New York; she wrote interviews, features, theatre reviews, and a variety of news stories, often illustrating them with her own drawings. She also published short fiction in the New York Morning Telegraph’s Sunday supplement and in the pulp magazine All-Story Cavalier Weekly.[7]

Clipping from World Magazine, September 6, 1914.

Much of Barnes’s journalism was subjective and experiential. Writing about a conversation with James Joyce, she admitted to missing part of what he said because her attention had wandered, though she revered Joyce’s writing. Interviewing the successful playwright Donald Ogden Stewart, she shouted at him for “roll[ing] over and find[ing] yourself famous” while other writers continued to struggle, then said she wouldn’t mind dying; as her biographer Phillip Herring points out, this is “a depressing and perhaps unprecedented note on which to end an interview”.[8] For a 1914 World Magazine article she submitted to force-feeding, a technique then being used on hunger-striking suffragists. Barnes wrote “If I, play acting, felt my being burning with revolt at this brutal usurpation of my own functions, how they who actually suffered the ordeal in its acutest horror must have flamed at the violation of the sanctuaries of their spirits.” She concluded “I had shared the greatest experience of the bravest of my sex”.[9] While she mocked conservative suffrage activist Carrie Chapman Catt when Catt admonished would-be suffrage orators never to “hold a militant pose”, or wear “a dress that shows your feet in front”,[10] Barnes was supportive of progressive suffragists. Barnes alluded that Catt’s conservatism was an obstacle to the suffrage movement when she tried to ostracize fellow suffragists Alice Paul and Lucy Burns, who sought the vote for women through media attention directed at their strikes and non-violent protesting. It was their mistreatment which motivated Barnes to experience for herself the torture of being force-fed.

This satirical drawing of a dandyish Greenwich Village resident accompanied Barnes’s 1916 article “How the Villagers Amuse Themselves”.

In 1915 Barnes moved out of her family’s flat to an apartment in Greenwich Village, where she entered a thriving Bohemian community of artists and writers. Among her social circle were Edmund Wilson, Berenice Abbott, and the Dadaist artist and poet Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven, whose biography Barnes tried to write but never finished. She also came into contact with Guido Bruno, an entrepreneur and promoter who published magazines and chapbooks out of his garret on Washington Square. Bruno had a reputation for unscrupulousness, and was often accused of exploiting Greenwich Village residents for profit—he used to charge tourists admission to watch Bohemians paint—but he was a strong opponent of censorship and was willing to risk prosecution by publishing Barnes’s 1915 collection of “rhythms and drawings”, The Book of Repulsive Women. Remarkably, despite a description of sex between women in the first poem, the book was never legally challenged; the passage seems explicit now, but at a time when lesbianism was virtually invisible in American culture, the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice may not have understood its imagery.[11] Others were not as naïve, and Bruno was able to cash in on the book’s reputation by raising the price from fifteen to fifty cents and pocketing the difference.[12] Twenty years later she used him as one of the models for Felix Volkbein in Nightwood, caricaturing his pretensions to nobility and his habit of bowing down before anyone titled or important.[13]

Illustration by Barnes of a scene from J. M. Synge’s play The Well of the Saints.

Barnes was a member of the Provincetown Players, an amateur theatrical collective whose emphasis on artistic rather than commercial success meshed well with her own values. The Players’ Greenwich Village theatre was a converted stable with bench seating and a tiny stage; according to Barnes it was “always just about to be given back to the horses”. Yet it played a significant role in the development of American drama, featuring works by Susan Glaspell, Edna St. Vincent Millay, Wallace Stevens, and Theodore Dreiser, as well as launching the career of Eugene O’Neill. Three one-act plays by Barnes were produced there in 1919 and 1920; a fourth, The Dove, premiered at Smith College in 1925, and a series of short closet dramas were published in magazines, some under Barnes’s pseudonym Lydia Steptoe. These plays show the strong influence of the Irish playwright J. M. Synge; she was drawn to both the poetic quality of Synge’s language and the pessimism of his vision. Critics have found them derivative, particularly those in which she tried to imitate Synge’s Irish dialect, and Barnes may have agreed, since in later years she dismissed them as mere juvenilia.[14] Yet in their content, these stylized and enigmatic early plays are more experimental than those of her fellow playwrights at Provincetown.[15] A New York Times review by Alexander Woollcott of her play Three From the Earth called it a demonstration of “how absorbing and essentially dramatic a play can be without the audience ever knowing what, if anything, the author is driving at…. The spectators sit with bated breath listening to each word of a playlet of which the darkly suggested clues leave the mystery unsolved.”[16]

Greenwich Village in the 1910s was known for its atmosphere of sexual as well as intellectual freedom. Barnes was unusual among Villagers in having been raised with a philosophy of free love, espoused both by her grandmother and her father. Her father’s idiosyncratic vision had included a commitment to unlimited procreation, which she strongly rejected; criticism of childbearing would become a major theme in her work.[17] She did, however, retain sexual freedom as a value. In the 1930s she told Antonia White that “she had no feeling of guilt whatever about sex, about going to bed with any man or woman she wanted”;[18] correspondence indicates that by the time she was 21 her family was well aware of her bisexuality,[19] and she had a number of affairs with both men and women during her Greenwich Village years.

Cover illlustration, The Trend magazine, by Djuna Barnes, issue of October 1914.

Of these, the most important was probably her engagement to Ernst Hanfstaengl, a Harvard graduate who ran the American branch of his family’s art publishing house. Hanfstaengl had once given a piano concert at the White House and was a friend of then-Senator Franklin Delano Roosevelt, but he became increasingly angered by anti-German sentiment in the United States during World War I. In 1916 he told Barnes he wanted a German wife; the painful breakup became the basis of a deleted scene in Nightwood. He later returned to Germany and became a close associate of Adolf Hitler. Starting in 1916 or 1917, she lived with a socialist philosopher and critic named Courtenay Lemon, whom she referred to as her common-law husband, but this too ended, for reasons that are unclear. She also had a passionate romantic relationship with Mary Pyne, a reporter for the New York Press and fellow member of the Provincetown Players. Pyne died of tuberculosis in 1919, attended by Barnes until the end.[20]

The Fountain of the Four Bishops in Paris’s Place Saint-Sulpice, an important location in Nightwood.

[edit] Paris (1921–1930)

In the 1920s, Paris was the center of modernism in art and literature; as Gertrude Stein remarked, “Paris was where the twentieth century was”.[21] Barnes first travelled there in 1921 on an assignment for McCall’s Magazine. She interviewed her fellow expatriate writers and artists for U.S. periodicals and soon became a well-known figure on the local scene; her black cloak and her acerbic wit are remembered in many memoirs of the time. Even before her first novel was published, her literary reputation was already high, largely on the strength of her story “A Night Among the Horses”, which was published in The Little Review and reprinted in her 1923 collection A Book.[22] She was part of the inner circle of the influential salon hostess Natalie Barney, who would become a lifelong friend and patron, as well as the central figure in Barnes’s satiric chronicle of Paris lesbian life, Ladies Almanack. They probably also had a brief affair, but the most important relationship of Barnes’s Paris years was with the artist Thelma Wood. Wood was a Kansas native who had come to Paris to become a sculptor, but at Barnes’s suggestion took up silverpoint instead, producing drawings of animals and plants that one critic compared to Rousseau. By the winter of 1922 they had set up housekeeping together in a flat on the Boulevard Saint-Germain.[23]

Barnes’s drawing of James Joyce illustrated her 1922 interview with him in Vanity Fair.

Barnes arrived in Paris with a letter of introduction to James Joyce, whom she interviewed for Vanity Fair and who became a friend. The headline of her Vanity Fair interview billed him as “the man who is, at present, one of the more significant figures in literature”, but her personal reaction to Ulysses was less guarded: “I shall never write another line…. Who has the nerve to after that?”[24] It may have been reading Joyce that led Barnes to turn away from the late 19th century Decadent and Aesthetic influences of The Book of Repulsive Women toward the modernist experimentation of her later work.[25] They differed, however, on the proper subject of literature; Joyce thought writers should focus on commonplace subjects and make them extraordinary, while Barnes was always drawn to the unusual, even the grotesque.[26] Then, too, her own life was an extraordinary subject. Her autobiographical first novel Ryder would not only present readers with the difficulty of deciphering its shifting literary styles—a technique inspired by Ulysses—but also with the challenge of piecing together the history of an unconventional polygamous household, far removed from most readers’ expectations and experience.[27]

Despite the difficulties of the text, Ryder’s bawdiness drew attention, and it briefly became a New York Times bestseller. Its popularity caught the publisher unprepared; a first edition of 3,000 sold out quickly, and by the time more copies made it into bookstores, public interest in the book had died down. Still, the advance allowed Barnes to buy a new apartment on Rue Saint-Romain, where she lived with Thelma Wood starting in September 1927. The move made them neighbors of Mina Loy, a friend of Barnes’s since Greenwich Village days, who appeared in Ladies Almanack as Patience Scalpel, the sole heterosexual character, who “could not understand Women and their Ways”.[28]

Due to its subject matter, Ladies Almanack was published in a small, privately printed edition under the pseudonym “A Lady of Fashion”. Copies were sold on the streets of Paris by Barnes and her friends, and Barnes managed to smuggle a few into the United States to sell. A bookseller, Edward Titus, offered to carry Ladies Almanack in his store in exchange for being mentioned on the title page, but when he demanded a share of the royalties on the entire print run, Barnes was furious. She later gave the name Titus to the abusive father in The Antiphon.[29]

Barnes dedicated Ryder and Ladies Almanack to Thelma Wood, but the year both books were published—1928—was also the year that she and Wood separated. Barnes had wanted their relationship to be monogamous, but had discovered that Wood wanted her “along with the rest of the world”.[30] Wood had a worsening dependency on alcohol, and she spent her nights drinking and seeking out casual sex partners; Barnes would search the cafés for her, often winding up equally drunk. Barnes broke up with Wood over her involvement with heiress Henriette McCrea Metcalf (1888–1981), who would be scathingly portrayed in Nightwood as Jenny Petherbridge.[31]

[edit] 1930s

Much of Nightwood was written during the summers of 1932 and 1933, while Barnes was staying at Hayford Hall, a country manor in Devonshire rented by the art patron Peggy Guggenheim. Fellow guests included Antonia White, John Ferrar Holms, and the novelist and poet Emily Coleman. Evenings at the manor—nicknamed “Hangover Hall” by its residents—often featured a party game called Truth that encouraged brutal frankness, creating a tense emotional atmosphere. Barnes was afraid to leave her work in progress unattended because the volatile Coleman, having told Barnes one of her secrets, had threatened to burn the manuscript if Barnes revealed it. But once she had read the book, Coleman became its champion. Her critiques of successive drafts led Barnes to make major structural changes, and when publisher after publisher rejected the manuscript, it was Coleman who pressed T. S. Eliot, then an editor at Faber and Faber, to read it.[32]

Faber published the book in 1936. Though reviews treated it as a major work of art,[33] the book did not sell well. Barnes received no advance from Faber and the first royalty statement was for only £43; the U.S. edition published by Harcourt, Brace the following year fared no better.[34] Barnes had published little journalism in the 30s and was largely dependent on Peggy Guggenheim’s financial support. She was constantly ill and drank more and more heavily—according to Guggenheim, she accounted for a bottle of whiskey a day. In February 1939 she checked into a hotel in London and attempted suicide. Guggenheim funded hospital visits and doctors, but finally lost patience and sent her back to New York. There she shared a single room with her mother, who coughed all night and who kept reading her passages from Mary Baker Eddy, having converted to Christian Science. In March 1940 her family sent her to a sanatorium in upstate New York to dry out.[35] Furious, Barnes began to plan a biography of her family, writing to Emily Coleman that “there is no reason any longer why I should feel for them in any way but hate”. This idea would eventually come to fruition in her play The Antiphon. After she returned to New York City, she quarrelled bitterly with her mother and was thrown out on the street.[36]

[edit] Return to Greenwich Village (1940–1982)

Patchin Place, where Barnes lived for 42 years.

Left with nowhere else to go, Barnes stayed at Thelma Wood’s apartment while Wood was out of town, then spent two months on a working ranch in Arizona with Emily Coleman and Coleman’s lover Jake Scarborough. She returned to New York and, in September, moved into the small apartment at 5 Patchin Place in Greenwich Village where she would spend the last 42 years of her life. Throughout the 40s she continued to drink and wrote virtually nothing. Guggenheim, despite misgivings, provided her with a small stipend, and Coleman, who could ill afford it, sent US$20 a month. In 1946 she worked for Henry Holt as a manuscript reader, but her reports were invariably caustic and she was soon fired.[37]

In 1950, realizing that alcoholism had made it impossible for her to function as an artist, Barnes stopped drinking in order to begin work on her verse play The Antiphon. The play drew heavily on her own family history, and the writing was fuelled by anger; she said “I wrote The Antiphon with clenched teeth, and I noted that my handwriting was as savage as a dagger.”[38] When he read the play, her brother Thurn accused her of wanting “revenge for something long dead and to be forgotten”, but Barnes, in the margin of his letter, described her motive instead as “justice”, and next to the word dead she wrote “not dead”.[39]

After The Antiphon Barnes returned to writing poetry, which she worked and reworked, producing as many as 500 drafts. She wrote eight hours a day despite a growing list of health problems, including arthritis so severe that she had difficulty even sitting at her typewriter or turning on her desk lamp. Many of these poems were never finalized and only a few were published in her lifetime.[40]

During her Patchin Place years, Barnes became a notorious recluse, intensely suspicious of anyone she did not know well. E. E. Cummings, who lived across the street, would check on her periodically by shouting out his window “Are you still alive, Djuna?”[41] Bertha Harris put roses in her mailbox, but never succeeded in meeting her; Carson McCullers camped on her doorstep, but Barnes only called down “Whoever is ringing this bell, please go the hell away.”[42] She was angry that Anaïs Nin had named a character Djuna,[43] and when the feminist bookstore Djuna Books opened in Greenwich Village, Barnes called to demand that the name be changed.[44] Barnes had a lifelong affection for poet Marianne Moore since she an Moore were young in the 1920’s. Barnes was bitter at the end, but underneath her sometimes formidable facade she was warm and always amusing, with an almost Shakespearean vocabulary (despite having not had much formal education).[45]

Although Barnes had other female lovers, in her later years she was known to claim “I am not a lesbian, I just loved Thelma.”

Barnes was elected to the National Institute of Arts and Letters in 1961. She was the last surviving member of the first generation of English-language modernists when she died in New York in 1982.

[edit] Works

[edit] The Book of Repulsive Women

Illustration from The Book of Repulsive Women.

Barnes’s chapbook The Book of Repulsive Women (1915) collects eight “rhythms” and five drawings. The poems show the strong influence of late 19th century Decadence, and the style of the illustrations resembles Aubrey Beardsley‘s. The setting is New York City, and the subjects are all women: a cabaret singer, a woman seen through an open window from the elevated train, and, in the last poem, the corpses of two suicides in the morgue. The book describes women’s bodies and sexuality in terms that have indeed struck many readers as repulsive, but, as with much of Barnes’s work, the author’s stance is ambiguous. Some critics read the poems as exposing and satirizing cultural attitudes toward women.[46]

Barnes herself came to regard The Book of Repulsive Women as an embarrassment; she called the title “idiotic”, left it out of her curriculum vitae, and even burned copies. But since the copyright had never been registered, she was unable to prevent it from being republished, and it became one of her most reprinted works.[47]

[edit] Ryder

Barnes’s novel Ryder (1928) draws heavily on her childhood experiences in Cornwall-on-Hudson. It covers fifty years of history of the Ryder family: Sophia Grieve Ryder, like Zadel a former salon hostess fallen into poverty; her idle son Wendell; his wife Amelia; his resident mistress Kate-Careless; and their children. Barnes herself appears as Wendell and Amelia’s daughter Julie. The story has a large cast and is told from a variety of points of view; some characters appear as the protagonist of a single chapter only to disappear from the text entirely. Fragments of the Ryder family chronicle are interspersed with children’s stories, songs, letters, poems, parables, and dreams. The book changes style from chapter to chapter, parodying writers from Chaucer to Dante Gabriel Rossetti.[48]

Both Ryder and Ladies Almanack abandon the Beardsleyesque style of her drawings for The Book of Repulsive Women in favor of a visual vocabulary borrowed from French folk art. Several illustrations are closely based on the engravings and woodcuts collected by Pierre Louis Duchartre and René Saulnier in the 1926 book L’Imagerie Populaire—images that had been copied with variations since medieval times.[49] The bawdiness of Ryder’s illustrations led the U.S. Postal Service to refuse to ship it, and several had to be left out of the first edition, including an image in which Sophia is seen urinating into a chamberpot and one in which Amelia and Kate-Careless sit by the fire knitting codpieces. Parts of the text were also expurgated. In an acerbic introduction, Barnes explained that the missing words and passages had been replaced with asterisks so that readers could see the “havoc” wreaked by censorship. A 1990 Dalkey Archive edition restored the missing drawings, but the original text was lost with the destruction of the manuscript in World War II.[50]

[edit] Ladies Almanack

Cover of Ladies Almanack.

H U S, from L’Imagerie Populaire.

Ladies Almanack (1928) is a roman à clef about a predominantly lesbian social circle centering on Natalie Clifford Barney‘s salon in Paris. It is written in an archaic, Rabelaisian style, with Barnes’s own illustrations in the style of Elizabethan woodcuts.

Barney appears as Dame Evangeline Musset, “who was in her Heart one Grand Red Cross for the Pursuance, the Relief and the Distraction, of such Girls as in their Hinder Parts, and their Fore Parts, and in whatsoever Parts did suffer them most, lament Cruelly”.[51] “[A] Pioneer and a Menace” in her youth, Dame Musset has reached “a witty and learned Fifty”;[52] she rescues women in distress, dispenses wisdom, and upon her death is elevated to sainthood. Also appearing pseudonymously are Elisabeth de Gramont, Romaine Brooks, Dolly Wilde, Radclyffe Hall and her partner Una Troubridge, Janet Flanner and Solita Solano, and Mina Loy.[53]

The obscure language, inside jokes, and ambiguity of Ladies Almanack have kept critics arguing about whether it is an affectionate satire or a bitter attack, but Barnes herself loved the book and reread it throughout her life.[54]

[edit] Nightwood

Barnes’s reputation as a writer was made when Nightwood was published in England in 1936 in an expensive edition by Faber and Faber, and in America in 1937 by Harcourt, Brace and Company, with an added introduction by T. S. Eliot.

The novel, set in Paris in the 1920s, revolves around the lives of five characters, two of whom are based on Barnes and Wood, and it reflects the circumstances surrounding the ending of their relationship. In his introduction, Eliot praises Barnes’ style, which while having “prose rhythm that is prose style, and the musical pattern which is not that of verse, is so good a novel that only sensibilities trained on poetry can wholly appreciate it.”

Due to concerns about censorship, Eliot edited Nightwood to soften some language relating to sexuality and religion. An edition restoring these changes, edited by Cheryl J. Plumb, was published by Dalkey Archive Press in 1995.

Dylan Thomas described Nightwood as “one of the three great prose books ever written by a woman,” while William Burroughs called it “one of the great books of the twentieth century.” It was number 12 on a list of the top 100 gay books compiled by The Publishing Triangle in 1999.[55]

[edit] The Antiphon

Barnes’s verse play The Antiphon (1958) is set in England in 1939. Jeremy Hobbs, in disguise as Jack Blow, has brought his family together at their ruined ancestral home, Burley Hall. His motive is never explicitly stated, but he seems to want to provoke a confrontation among the members of his family and force them to confront the truth about their past.[56] His sister Miranda is a stage actress, now “out of patron and of money”;[57] her materialistic brothers, Elisha and Dudley, see her as a threat to their financial well-being. Elisha and Dudley accuse their mother Augusta of complicity with their abusive father Titus Hobbs. They take advantage of Jeremy’s absence to don animal masks and assault both women, making cruel and sexually suggestive remarks; Augusta treats this attack as a game.[58] Jeremy returns with a doll house, a miniature version of the house in America where the children grew up. As she examines it, he charges her with making herself “a madam by submission”, since she failed to prevent Titus from orchestrating Miranda’s rape by “a travelling Cockney thrice [her] age”.[59] The last act finds Miranda and Augusta alone together. Augusta, at once disapproving and envious of her daughter’s more liberated life, exchanges clothes with her daughter and wants to pretend she is young again, but Miranda refuses to enter into this play.[60] When Augusta hears Elisha and Dudley driving away, she blames Miranda for their abandonment and beats her to death with a curfew bell, falling dead at her side from the exertion.

The play premiered in 1962 in Stockholm, in a Swedish translation by Karl Ragnar Gierow and U.N. Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjöld.

[edit] Creatures in an Alphabet

Jacques-Louis David’s portrait of Madame Récamier. In Creatures in an Alphabet, Barnes wrote:

The Seal, she lounges like a bride,
Much too docile, there’s no doubt;
Madame Récamier, on side,
(if such she has), and bottom out.

Barnes’s last book, Creatures in an Alphabet (1982), is a collection of short rhyming poems. The format suggests a children’s book, but it contains enough allusiveness and advanced vocabulary to make it an unlikely read for a child: the entry for T quotes Blake‘s “The Tyger“, a seal is compared to Jacques-Louis David‘s portrait of Madame Récamier, and a braying donkey is described as “practicing solfeggio“. Creatures continues the themes of nature and culture found in Barnes’s earlier work, and their arrangement as a bestiary reflects her longstanding interest in systems for organizing knowledge, such as encyclopedias and almanacs.[61]

[edit] Legacy

Barnes has been cited as an influence by writers as diverse as Truman Capote, William Goyen, Karen Blixen, John Hawkes, Bertha Harris, and Anaïs Nin. Writer Bertha Harris described her work as “practically the only available expression of lesbian culture we have in the modern western world” since Sappho.[citation needed]

[edit] Bibliography

  • The Book of Repulsive Women: 8 Rhythms and 5 Drawings (1915)
  • A Book(1923) – revised versions published as:
  • Ryder (1928)
  • Ladies Almanack (1928)
  • Nightwood (1936)
  • The Antiphon (1958)
  • Selected Works (1962) – Spillway, Nightwood, and a revised version of The Antiphon
  • Vagaries Malicieux: Two Stories (1974) – unauthorized publication
  • Creatures in an Alphabet (1982)
  • Smoke and Other Early Stories (1982)
  • I Could Never Be Lonely without a Husband: Interviews by Djuna Barnes (1987) – ed. A. Barry
  • New York (1989) – journalism
  • At the Roots of the Stars: The Short Plays (1995)
  • Collected Stories of Djuna Barnes (1996)
  • Poe’s Mother: Selected Drawings (1996) – ed. and with an introduction by Douglas Messerli
  • Discanto, poesie 1911–1982, Roma, Edizione del Giano, 2004 a cura di Maura Del Serra
  • Collected Poems: With Notes Toward the Memoirs (2005) – ed. Phillip Herring and Osias Stutman
  • _____________________________________________________-

Maria Shriver files for divorce (Pictures of Arnold and Maria through the years)

Maria Shriver and former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger have four children together.

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – Former California first lady Maria Shriver filed for divorce on Friday from her estranged husband,Arnold Schwarzenegger, the ex-governor and film star who has admitted fathering a child out of wedlock more than a decade ago.

Shriver, 55, a former television journalist and a daughter of theKennedy political dynasty, filed papers seeking to dissolve her 25-year marriage to Schwarzenegger, 63, in Los Angeles County Superior Court, citing irreconcilable differences.

According to the four-page, standard-form divorce filing, Shriver seeks unspecified spousal support and joint custody of the couple’s two minor children, Patrick, 17, and Christopher, 13. They have two adult children together, Katherine 21, and Christina, 19.

A spokesman for the former “Terminator” film star declined comment. Representatives for Shriver could not be reached immediately.

Shriver and Schwarzenegger, the Austrian-born former bodybuilder turned Hollywood action star and politician, announced their separation in May, just four months after he left office as California governor.

A week later, Schwarzenegger stunned the world by acknowledging publicly that he had fathered a child more than 10 years earlier with a member of his household staff.

He said then that he had revealed the affair and his out-of-wedlock child to Shriver shortly after his two terms in office ended in January.

SCORN AND RIDICULE

The admission drew a torrent of scorn and ridicule in the media, with some comparing it to scandal over Woody Allen’s affair with Soon-Yi Previn, the adopted daughter of his longtime companion, actress Mia Farrow, in 1992.

Comic and co-host of TV’s “The View” Joy Behar, among others, promptly dubbed Schwarzenegger “the Sperminator.”

Schwarzenegger and Shriver met at a charity tennis tournament in New York in 1977 and married in April 1986.

As one of the most high-profile but improbable couples in American public life — a powerful Republican politician married to a stalwart Democrat — the pair endured years of persistent allegations about Schwarzenegger’s extramarital dalliances and sexual misconduct.

Shriver was widely credited with saving Schwarzenegger’s successful 2003 gubernatorial campaign by steadfastly standing by her husband amid a swirl of media accounts at the time reporting on his history of groping other women.

Their split came at a time of upheaval and change in both their lives.

Shriver, forced to give up her NBC News career while acting as California’s first lady, posted a video message to supporters on YouTube shortly before their separation saying she found it “stressful to not know what you’re doing next.” Her parents both died during the past two years.

Her mother, Eunice Kennedy, was the sister of assassinated President John F. Kennedy, and her father, Sargent Shriver, was the first director of the Peace Corps and the 1972 Democratic nominee for vice president.

Schwarzenegger said shortly after leaving office that he planned to resume his Hollywood career. But days after the scandal broke over his extramarital affair with a housekeeper and their secret child, now a 13-year-old boy, he said he was putting a number of show-business projects on hold, including a proposed new “Terminator” movie.

While Schwarzenegger has largely retreated from the public eye in recent weeks, Shriver made a nationally televised appearance more than a week after their split on a star-studded tribute to TV talk show queen Oprah Winfrey.

(Additional reporting by Alex Dobuzinskis and Dan Whitcomb; Editing by Jerry Norton)

Casting their ballots

Schwarzenegger and Shriver meet with the media after voting in Brentwood in 2006. (Anne Cusack / Los Angeles Times)

An American citizen

 

( Wally Fong / Associated Press )

Arnold Schwarzenegger and Maria Shriver with Schwarzenegger’s U.S. citizenship papers on Sept. 16, 1983.

Married in Massachusetts

 

(Associated Press)

Shriver and Schwarzenegger outside St. Francis Xavier Church in Hyannis, Mass., after their wedding on April 26, 1986.

On the Hollywood scene

 

(Paul Morse / Los Angeles Times)

Shriver and Schwarzenegger at the 2000 Oscars in Los Angeles.

Golden State governor

 

(Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times)

Shriver and Schwarzenegger celebrate his victory in the 2003 gubernatorial election.

At the De Laurentiis funeral

 

(Reuters)

Arnold Schwarzengger and Maria Shriver attend funeral services for Italian film producer Dino De Laurentiis in Los Angeles in November 2010.

Other posts with Arnold and Maria:

Maria Shriver files for divorce (Pictures of Arnold and Maria through the years)

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – Former California first lady Maria Shriver filed for divorce on Friday from her estranged husband,Arnold Schwarzenegger, the ex-governor and film star who has admitted fathering a child out of wedlock more than a decade ago. Shriver, 55, a former television journalist and a daughter of theKennedy political dynasty, filed papers seeking to dissolve her […]

Will Maria Shriver’s marriage survive Arnold Schwarzenegger’s admission of infidelity? I hope so (Part 34)

Arnold Schwarzenegger FILE – In this April 4, 2011 file photo, actor and former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, poses after receiving the insignia of Chevalier in the Order of the Legion of Honor during the MIPTV (International Television Programme Market) in Cannes, southern France. Schwarzenegger delayed his Hollywood comeback Thursday, May 19, 2011 as he […]

Will Maria Shriver’s marriage survive Arnold Schwarzenegger’s admission of infidelity? I hope so (Part 33)

Arnold Schwarzenegger: News On Woman & Love Child TMZ Scoop Maria Shriver Asks – How Do You Handle Transitions in Your Life? Arnold Schwarzenegger admitted to his wife several months ago that he had fathered a child about 10 years ago with a member of their household staff. Maria moved out, but has not filed […]

Fathers Day 2011

For almost three months I have been thinking a lot about the issue of fatherhood and marriage.  I have started two new series which have been very popular. The first series deals with Kate Middleton and Prince William and the second series has been concerning Arnold and Maria. I will post some links to past […]

Will Maria Shriver’s marriage survive Arnold Schwarzenegger’s admission of infidelity? I hope so (Part 32)

_ Arnold Schwarzenegger, Maria Shriver and family – “The Longest Yard” Los Angeles premiere, May 19, 2005   _____________________________________ California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, his son Christopher, 9, and his wife Maria Shriver hold hands as they walk to their vehicle after voting inthe U.S. midterm elections at the Crestwood Hills Recreation […]

Arnold Schwarzenegger’s response to Mildred’s revelation, “Cool!”

A month after it was revealed that she fathered a love child with Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Sperminator’s low-key housekeeper is finally talking. In a sit-down with Hello! magazine, Mildred Baena said that when she first told her now-13-year-old son that his real dad was none other than Schwarzenegger, his response was short and sweet: “Cool!” […]

Mildred Baena speaks out about her child

June 3, 2011 picture Mother of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s lovechild speaks out The mother of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s lovechild has spoken out about the scandal for the first time, confirming her son was fathered by the actor. The Terminator star stunned fans by splitting from his wife of 25 years, Maria Shriver, last month and subsequently revealing […]

Arnold Schwarzenegger and Maria Shriver: Dr. Gary Chapman offers hope

  Arnold Schwarzenegger and Maria Shriver: Dr. Gary Chapman offers hope By Radell Smith, Atlanta Pop Culture Examiner May 19, 2011 10:39 am ET   With over four million copies of his bestseller “The Five Love Languages” under his belt, Dr. Gary Chapman went on to write other popular books as well, and one of […]