[RAW VIDEO] Terrorist attack on Oslo, Norway – July 22, 2011

[RAW VIDEO] Terrorist attack on Oslo, Norway – July 22, 2011

Chuck Colson: True Christians renounce violence and promote human freedom

 
  • Smoke rises from the central area of Oslo Friday, July 22, 2011 after an explosion. Terrorism ravaged long-peaceful Norway on Friday when a bomb ripped open buildings including the prime minister's office and a man dressed as a police officer opened fire at a nearby island youth camp. (AP Photo/Scanpix, Jon Bredo Overaas) NORWAY OUT

    Smoke rises from the central area of Oslo Friday, July 22, 2011 after an explosion. …

Today there is a big debate caused by the tragic events in Norway where an extremist associated with a Christian group that opposed multiculturalism has killed over 90 people.

In the article below Chuck Colson noted, “True Christians renounce violence and promote human freedom, which is why the major human-rights movements of the past centuries were inspired by and fueled by Christianity.” That is why I believe it is clear that the terrorist in Norway was not a true Christian. The Bible does not teach jihad.

Wars of Religion?

The ‘Economist’ Gets It Wrong

By Chuck Colson|Published Date: November 28, 2007

colson2As part of the Economist magazine’s coverage of religion’s role in the twenty-first century, a recent story covers the “new wars of religion.”

The magazine’s emphasis on religion represents a nearly 180-degree turn from the publication’s 1999 declaration that belief in God had “passed into history.” But while the magazine is looking in the right direction, it does not understand what it is seeing.

The graphic accompanying the story could not be less subtle: an arm reaching down from heaven holding a hand grenade. According to the story, “faith will unsettle politics everywhere this century; it will do so least when it is separated from the state.”

We are not even into the story, and there is already a problem: There is a world of difference between mixing faith with politics and the kind of violence suggested by the hand-grenade graphic.

Even if you think that faith and politics should be completely separate, it is absurd to equate—as theEconomist does—the actions of American Christians with those of al-Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood. The article unintentionally exposes this absurdity: The only mention in the article of a Christian resorting to political violence was the Gunpowder Plot of 1605! Even there, calling Guy Fawkes a “Catholic Jihadist” is a bit of a stretch—a desperate attempt to draw a moral equivalency where none exists.

That’s because it has been 400 years since Christians settled religious disputes with explosives. (No, Northern Ireland, you may be thinking, but that was political.) Yet Islamic, and even Hindu, uses of political violence make headlines nearly every day.

Clearly, this is the case in the two countries the magazine spotlights: Nigeria and India. In Nigeria, when Muslim-majority states in the North adopted sharia law, the Christians faced possible flogging and mutilation, as well as restrictions on practicing their faith.

The adoption of the sharia law was followed by attacks on Christian neighborhoods and businesses. While it is true that some Christians fought back, that does not change the fact that in almost all cases Muslims initiated the violence.

In India, Hindu nationalists use their political power to oppress Muslims and Christians. Two thousand Muslims were killed in anti-Muslim riots five years ago.

It is simply grotesque to compare Hindu nationalists, as the Economist does, to Focus on the Family and my friend Jim Dobson—almost as grotesque to lump Christian efforts at social reform with the imposition of sharia law.

The Economist is still looking through a lens distorted by secularism. Maybe we cannot blame it, because so much today in our politically correct culture tells us that all religions are alike: All that matters is that we worship God, and we worship the same god. When I criticize Muslims, I have often been attacked.

We need to lovingly make the case to our neighbors that all religions are not alike. True Christians renounce violence and promote human freedom, which is why the major human-rights movements of the past centuries were inspired by and fueled by Christianity.

We cannot expect our critics to get it right, but we can teach our secular friends. I have done this from time to time and watched their attitudes dramatically change. We have a great case—all we have to do is make it, and let people know that worldviews do matter.

Do Christians or Muslims commit more acts of terror?

Smoke rises from the central area of Oslo Friday, July 22, 2011 after an explosion. Terrorism ravaged long-peaceful Norway on Friday when a bomb ripped open buildings including the prime minister's office and a man dressed as a police officer opened fire at a nearby island youth camp. (AP Photo/Scanpix, Jon Bredo Overaas) NORWAY OUT

Today the world has learned that yesterday’s tragic events in Norway where over 90 individuals were killed, was NOT THE ACT OF A MUSLIM AS EARLIER REPORTED.  Actually now it seems that this person may have been a member of an extremist Christian group that opposed multiculturalism. At least that is the information that we are getting now. This has prompted people on the Arkansas Times Blog to ask for Christian leaders to apologize. However, it is my view that Christianity is truly a religion of peace and that Islam does have a large element in their group that hold to principles of jihad. What is the results of the last few decades? Why not examine the list of terror acts? Here it is below taken from wikipedia.

Terrorist attacks

Estimate↓ Name↓ Country↓ City↓ Date↓
2,982 September 11 attacks United States New York City, The Pentagon, Arlington, Virginia, Shanksville, Pennsylvania 2001
796 Yazidi communities bombings Iraq Qahtaniya and Adnaniyah 2007
422 Cinema Rex fire Iran Abadan 1978
334 Beslan school siege Russia Beslan 2004
329 Air India Flight 182 Atlantic Ocean, South of Ireland   1985
309 1983 Beirut barracks bombing Lebanon Beirut 1983
293 1999 Russian apartment bombings Russia Moscow 1999
270 Pan Am Flight 103 United Kingdom Lockerbie, Scotland 1988
257 1993 Mumbai bombings India Mumbai 1993
252 2001 Angola train attack Angola   2001
238 MV Dara Southwest Asia Persian Gulf 1961
237 1998 United States embassy bombings Kenya, Tanzania Nairobi, Dar es Salaam 1998
215 Sadr City bombings Iraq Sadr City 2006
209 Mumbai train bombings India Mumbai 2006
202 2002 Bali bombings Indonesia Bali 2002
198 April 18, 2007 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2007
191 March 11, 2004 Madrid train bombings Spain Madrid 2004
178 Ashoura Massacre Iraq Kerbala and Baghdad 2004
175 2008 Mumbai attacks India Mumbai 2008
171 UTA Flight 772 Niger   1989
170 Moscow Theatre Siege Russia Moscow 2002
168 Kizlyar-Pervomayskoye hostage crisis Russia Kizlyar, Pervomayskoye and Sovetskoye 1996
168 Oklahoma City bombing United States Oklahoma City 1995
155 25 October 2009 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2009
152 2007 Tal Afar bombings and massacre Iraq Tal Afar 2007
150 St Nedelya Church assault Bulgaria Sofia 1925
148 Gyaneshwari Express train derailment India   2010
140 Budyonnovsk hospital hostage crisis Russia Budyonnovsk 1995
136 2007 Karachi bombing Pakistan Karachi 2007
135 February 3, 2007 Baghdad market bombing Iraq Baghdad 2007
133+ January 2011 Iraq suicide attacks Iraq   2011
130 Rafiganj train disaster India Rafiganj 2002
128 Xiamen Airlines Flight 8301 China Guangzhou 1990
127 8 December 2009 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2009
127 2005 Al Hillah bombing Iraq Al Hillah 2005
125 Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961 Indian Ocean   1996
120+ Mountain Meadows Massacre United States Utah 1857
120 2007 Al Hillah bombings Iraq Al Hillah 2007
117 28 October 2009 Peshawar bombing Pakistan Peshawar 2009
117 2004 Irbil bombings Iraq Irbil 2004
116 2004 SuperFerry 14 bombing Philippines   2004
114+ 10 May 2010 Iraq attacks Iraq Baghdad 2010
113+ 2 November 2010 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2010
112 2006 Digampathana bombing Sri Lanka Digampathana 2006
112 September 14, 2005 Baghdad bombing Iraq Baghdad 2005
112 Avianca Flight 203 Colombia   1989
112 Gulf Air Flight 771 United Arab Emirates Dubai 1983
110 10 October 2008 Orakzai bombing Pakistan Orakzai 2008
105 2010 Lakki Marwat suicide bombing Pakistan Lakki Marwat 2010
104 Mohmand Agency attack Pakistan Mohmand Agency 2010
102 First Tyre truck bombing attack Lebanon Tyre 1982
101 19 August 2009 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2009
100+ 10 May 2010 Iraq attacks Iraq   2010
100 2008 Kandahar bombing Afghanistan Kandahar 2008
98 May 2010 attacks on Ahmadi mosques in Lahore Pakistan Lahore 2010
98 1 February 2008 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2008
98 Musayyib fuel tanker bombing Iraq Musayyib 2005
91+ 2011 Norway attacks Norway Oslo and Utøya 2011
91 King David Hotel bombing Mandatory Palestine Jerusalem 1946
90 Central Bank Bombing Sri Lanka Colombo 1996
90 2005 Sharm el-Sheikh attacks Egypt Sharm el-Sheikh 2005
89 Russian airplane bombings Russia Moscow 2004
88 TWA Flight 841   Ionian Sea 1974
88 22 January 2007 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2007
86 AMIA Bombing Argentina Buenos Aires 1994
85 April 2010 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2010
85 Buratha Mosque bombing Iraq Baghdad 2006
85 Stazione Centrale bombing Italy Bologna 1980
83 2002 Grozny truck bombing Russia Grozny 2002
83 Imam Ali Mosque bombing Iraq Najaf 2003
81 2008 Assam bombings India Assam 2008
80 Jaipur bombings India Jaipur 2008
80 1985 Beirut car bombing Lebanon Beirut 1985
76 February 12, 2007 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2007
76 2010 Maoist attack in Dantewada India Dantewada, Chattisgarh 2010
75 2007 Baghlan sugar factory bombing Afghanistan Baghlan 2008
74 July 2010 Kampala attacks Uganda Kampala 2010
74 2005 Khanaqin bombings Iraq Khanaqin 2005
74 21 April 2004 Basra bombings Iraq Basra 2004
74 2004 Kufa shelling Iraq Kufa 2004
73+ September 2010 Quetta bombing Pakistan Quetta 2010
73 20 June 2009 Taza bombing Iraq Taza 2009
72+ March 2010 Lahore bombings Pakistan Lahore 2010
70+ July 2010 Baghdad attacks Iraq Baghdad 2010
70 2008 Wah bombing Pakistan Wah 2008
70 2007 Baghdad Mustansiriya University bombing Iraq Baghdad 2007
69+ 17 August 2010 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2010
69 24 June 2009 Baghdad bombing Iraq Baghdad 2009
68 6 March 2008 Baghdad bombing Iraq Baghdad 2008
68 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings India   2007
68 2004 Baqubah bombing Iraq Baqubah 2004
67 19 December 2004 Karbala and Najaf bombings Iraq Karbala 2004
66 2010 Darra Adam Khel mosque bombing Pakistan Darra Adam Khel 2010
63 Luxor massacre Egypt Luxor 1997
63 February 18, 2007 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2007
63 DAS Building bombing Colombia Bogotá 1989
63 Iraqi Airways Flight 163 Saudi Arabia Arar 1986
63 April 1983 US Embassy bombing Lebanon Beirut 1983
62 1999 Vladikavkaz bombing Russia Vladikavkaz 1999
62 July 1, 2006 Sadr City bombing Iraq Sadr City 2006
62 29 October 2005 Delhi bombings India Delhi 2005
62 24 June 2004 Mosul bombings Iraq Mosul 2004
60 2005 Amman bombings Jordan Amman 2005
60 EgyptAir Flight 648 Greece Athens 1985
60 Second Tyre truck bombing attack Lebanon Tyre 1983
59 2003 Znamenskoye suicide bombing Russia Znamenskoye 2003
58 2010 Baghdad church attack Iraq Baghdad 2010
58 6 April 2010 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2010
58 April 2010 Kohat bombings Pakistan Kohat 2010
58 2008 Indian embassy bombing in Kabul Afghanistan Kabul 2008
58 1948 Ben Yehuda Street bombing Mandatory Palestine Jerusalem 1948
57 Nishtar Park bombing Pakistan Karachi 2006
57 2003 Istanbul Bombings Turkey Istanbul 2003
56 2008 Ahmedabad bombings Pakistan Ahmedabad 2008
54 1 February 2010 Baghdad bombing Iraq Baghdad 2010
54 December 2009 Lahore attacks Pakistan Lahore 2009
54 Islamabad Marriott Hotel bombing Pakistan Islamabad 2008
53+ 25 August 2010 Iraq bombings Iraq Kut 2010
52 7 July 2005 London bombings United Kingdom London 2005
52 2003 Mumbai bombings India Mumbai 2003
51 2009 African Union base bombings in Mogadishu Somalia Mogadishu 2009
51 17 June 2008 Baghdad bombing Iraq Baghdad 2008
50+ Dera Ghazi Khan bombings Pakistan Dera Ghazi Khan 2011
50+ December 2010 Mohmand Agency bombings Pakistan Mohmand Agency 2010
50 5 April 2010 Peshawar bombings Pakistan Peshawar 2010
50 July 2010 Lahore bombings Pakistan Lahore 2010
48 27 January 2011 Baghdad bombing Iraq Baghdad 2011
48 2009 Jamrud mosque bombing Pakistan Jamrud 2009
47 December 2010 Bajaur bombing Pakistan Khar 2010
47 14 September 2004 Baghdad bombing Iraq Baghdad 2004
47 2008 Parachinar bombing Pakistan Parachinar 2008
46 2003 Stavropol train bombing Russia Stavropol 2003
46 2003 Casablanca bombings Morocco Casablanca 2003
44 Kaspiysk bombing Russia Kaspiysk 2002
43+ 7 August 2010 Basra attacks Iraq Basra 2010
43 2009 Pishin bombing Iran Pishin 2009
43 2009 Karachi bombing Pakistan Karachi 2009
43 2008 Issers bombing Algeria Issers 2008
42 25 August 2007 Hyderabad bombings India Hyderabad 2007
42 April 4, 2010 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2010
42 February 2004 Moscow metro bombing Russia Moscow 2004
41 30 September 2004 Baghdad bombing Iraq Baghdad 2004
41 25 January 2010 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2010
41 December 11, 2007 Algiers bombings Algeria Algiers 2007
40+ 9 March 2011 Peshawar bombing Pakistan Peshawar 2011
40 Nadahan wedding bombing Afghanistan Kandahar Province 2010
40 2010 Moscow Metro bombings Russia Moscow 2010
39 May 2010 Mogadishu bombings Somalia Mogadishu 2010
38 Coastal Road massacre Israel Coastal Highway 1978
38 2010 Chabahar suicide bombing Iran Chabahar 2010
38 October 2009 Lahore attacks Pakistan Lahore 2009
38 December 2009 Rawalpindi attack Pakistan Rawalpindi 2009
38 2001 attack on Jammu and Kashmir legislative assembly India Srinagar 2001
38 Wall Street bombing United States New York City 1920
37 2006 Malegaon blasts India   2006
36 2011 Domodedovo International Airport bombing Russia Moscow 2011
35+ 2010 Dantewada bus bombing India Dantewada 2010
35 September 2010 Lahore bombings Pakistan Lahore 2010
35 27 October 2003 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2003
35 November 2009 Rawalpindi bombing Pakistan Rawalpindi 2009
35 2009 Beledweyne bombing Somalia Beledweyne 2009
35 2009 Lahore bombing Pakistan Lahore 2009
35 September 2008 Peshawar bombing Pakistan Peshawar 2008
35 15 July 2008 Baquba bombings Iraq Baqubah 2008
35 Riyadh compound bombings Saudi Arabia Riyadh 2003
34 6 April 2009 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2009
34 Sinai bombings Egypt Taba, Nuweiba 2004
33 Akshardham Temple attack India Gandhinagar 2002
33 December 2009 Dera Ghazi Khan bombing Pakistan Dera Ghazi Khan 2009
33 3 March 2010 Baqubah bombings Iraq Baqubah 2010
33 11 April 2007 Algiers bombings Algeria Algiers 2007
33 Pan Am Flight 110 Italy   1973
33 1998 Coimbatore bombings India Coimbatore 1998
33 Dublin and Monaghan Bombings Ireland Dublin, Monaghan 1974
32 2009 African Union base bombings in Mogadishu Somalia Mogadishu 2009
32 Muna hotel attack Somalia Mogadishu 2010
32 28 September 2008 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2008
31+ 19 September 2010 Baghdad bombings Iraq Baghdad 2010
30 13 September 2008 Delhi bombings India Delhi 2008
30 February 2010 Khyber Mosque bombing Pakistan Khyber Agency 2010
30 Passover massacre Israel Netanya 2002
30 2007 Dellys bombing Algeria Dellys 2007
29 Attack on the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires Argentina Buenos Aires 1992
29 Omagh Bombing Northern Ireland Omagh 1998
28 2003 Nasiriyah bombing Iraq Nasiriyah 2003
28 2009 Nevsky Express bombing Russia Bologoye 2009
28 2006 Varanasi bombings India Varanasi 2006
27+ 24 January 2011 Iraq bombings Iraq Baghdad 2011
27+ July 2010 Zahedan bombings Iran Zahedan 2010
27 1994 Baku Metro bombings Azerbaijan Baku 1994
26 First Jaffa Road bus bombing Israel Jerusalem 1996
25+ Assassination of Benazir Bhutto Pakistan Rawalpindi 2007
25+ February 2010 Karachi bombings Pakistan Karachi 2010
25 2009 Hotel Shamo bombing Somalia Mogadishu 2009
25 September 2007 bombings in Rawalpindi Pakistan Rawalpindi 2007
25 2009 Nazran bombing Russia Nazran 2009
25 19 April 2010 Peshawar bombing Pakistan Peshawar 2010
24 2011 Alexandria bombing Egypt Alexandria 2011
23 2009 Pakistan Army General Headquarters attack Pakistan Punjab 2009
23 2006 Dahab bombings Egypt Dahab 2006
23 Shmuel HaNavi bus bombing Israel Jerusalem 2003
22 Rizal Day bombings Philippines Metro Manila 2000
22 2004 Khobar massacre Saudi Arabia Khobar 2004
22 2007 Batna bombing Algeria Batna 2007
22 2004 Forward Operating Base Marez bombing Iraq Mosul 2004
22 Canal Hotel bombing Iraq Baghdad 2003
22 Dizengoff Street bus bombing Israel Tel Aviv 1994
22 Beit Lid massacre Israel   1995
21 Kosheh massacre Egypt Kosheh 2000
21 1987 Hipercor bombing Spain Barcelona 1987
21 Los Angeles Times bombing United States Los Angeles 1910
21 Birmingham pub bombings United Kingdom Birmingham 1974
21 Dolphinarium discotheque suicide bombing Israel Tel Aviv 2001
21 Maxim restaurant suicide bombing Israel Haifa 2003
20+ Pan Am Flight 73 Pakistan Karachi 1986
20 2011 Faisalabad bombing Pakistan Faisalabad 2011
20 2009 Zahedan explosion Iran Zahedan 2009
20 2011 Mumbai bombings India Mumbai 2011
19 Patt Junction Bus Bombing Isreal Jerusalem 2002
19 Rome and Vienna airport attacks Italy, Austria Rome, Vienna 1985
19 Khobar Towers bombing Saudi Arabia [[Khobar] 1996
19 USS Cole bombing Yemen Aden 2000
19 2003 Karbala bombings Iraq Karbala 2003
19 2008 American Embassy attack in Yemen Yemen Sana’a 2008
19 February 2010 Khyber bombing Pakistan Khyber 2010
18 Pakistan CID building attack Pakistan Karachi 2010
18 1985 El Descanso bombing Spain Madrid 1985
18 Christmas Eve 2000 Indonesia bombings Indonesia Jakarta, Pekanbaru, Medan, Bandung, Batam Island, Mojokerto, Mataram, andSukabumi]] 2000
18 2007 Zahedan bombings Iran Zahedan 2007
18 May 2010 Kabul bombing Afghanistan Kabul 2010
18 February 2010 Kabul attack Afghanistan Kabul 2010
17 2008 Istanbul bombings Turkey Istanbul 2008
17 Munich massacre Germany Munich 1972
17 2003 Jordanian embassy bombing in Baghdad Iraq Baghdad 2003
17 2009 Kabul Indian embassy attack Afghanistan Kabul 2009
17 2010 Pune bombing India Pune 2010
17 Haifa bus 37 suicide bombing Israel Haifa 2003
17 2010 Vladikavkaz bombing Russia Vladikavkaz 2010
16 2011 Marrakech bombing Morocco Marrakech 2011
16 2001 Bahawalpur church attack Pakistan Bahawalpur 2001
16 January 2010 Bajaur bombing Pakistan Bajaur 2010
16 2009 Lahore police academy attacks Pakistan Lahore 2009
15 2011 Imbaba church attacks Egypt Imbaba 2011
15 Matza restaurant suicide bombing Israel Haifa 2002
15 Sbarro restaurant suicide bombing Israel Jerusalem 2001
14 2011 Minsk Metro bombing Belarus Minsk 2011
14 Karkur junction suicide bombing Israel   2002
14 2008 Shiraz explosion Iran Shiraz 2008
13 1999 Istanbul bombings Turkey Istanbul 1999
13 2002 Karachi bus bombing Pakistan Karachi 2002
13 Fort Hood shooting United States Texas 2009
13 Sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway Japan Tokyo 1995
13 2006 Moscow market bombing Russia Moscow 2006
13 Dizengoff Center suicide bombing Israel Tel Aviv 1996
13 2008 Beni Amrane bombings Algeria Beni Amrane 2008
12+ 2010 Hakkâri bus attack Turkey Hakkâri Province 2010
12 October 2010 Abuja attacks Nigeria Abuja 2010
12 2001 Indian Parliament attack India New Delhi 2001
12 2002 US consulate bombing in Karachi Pakistan Karachi 2002
12 Remembrance Day bombing United Kingdom Enniskillen 1987
12 M62 coach bombing United Kingdom Yorkshire 1974
12 December 2009 Lower Dir mosque bombing Pakistan Lower Dir 2009
12 2010 Kizlyar bombings Russia Kizlyar 2010
12 2008 Vladikavkaz bombing Russia Vladikavkaz 2008
11 Nag Hammadi massacre Egypt Nag Hammadi 2010
11 2002 Zamboanga City bombings Philippines Zamboanga City 2002
11 1987 Zaragoza Barracks bombing Spain Zaragoza 1987
11 Deal barracks bombing United Kingdom Deal 1989
11 Hyde Park and Regent’s Park bombings United Kingdom London 1982
11 Café Moment bombing Israel Jerusalem 2002
11 Kiryat Menachem bus bombing Israel Jerusalem 2002
11 Jerusalem bus 19 suicide bombing Israel Jerusalem 2004
10 13 March 2003 Mumbai train bombing India Mumbai 2003
10 2007 attack on tourists in Yemen Yemen Mareb 2007
10 August 2004 Moscow metro bombing Russia Moscow 2004
10 2010 Badakhshan massacre Afghanistan Badakhshan Province 2010
10 February 2010 Lower Dir bombing Pakistan Lower Dir 2010
9 2007 Ankara bombing Turkey Ankara 2007
9 Camp Chapman attack Afghanistan Khost Province 2009
9 1991 Vic bombing Spain Vic 1991
8 2006 Central Mindanao bombings Philippines Central Mindanao 2006
8 July 2009 Mindanao bombings Philippines Mindanao 2009
8 2008 Danish embassy bombing in Islamabad Pakistan Islamabad 2008
8 1995 Paris Metro bombing France Paris 1995
8 2009 attack on the Sri Lanka national cricket team Pakistan Lahore 2009
8 2010 Stavropol bomb blast Russia Stavropol 2010
8 2009 UN guest house attack in Kabul Afghanistan Kabul 2009
8 Mercaz HaRav massacre Israel Jerusalem 2008
7 1977 Moscow bombings Russia Moscow 1977
7 1972 Aldershot Bombing United Kingdom Aldershot 1972
6 April 2005 Cairo terrorist attacks Egypt Cario 2005
6 2010 Chechen Parliament attack Russia Grozny 2010
6 Batasang Pambansa bombing Philippines Quezon City 2007
6 2009 International Islamic University bombing Pakistan Islamabad 2009
6 Harrods bombing United Kingdom London 1983
6 2003 Red Square bombing Russia Moscow 2003
6 1993 World Trade Center bombing United States New York City 1993

[edit]

Brummett: Congress abdicates political responsibility to make wise cuts, but we don’t need balanced budget amendment (Part 6)

Senator Conrad calls Balanced Budget Amendment is laughable, but I think it is laughable when you look at the lack of resolve of Congress to make the necessary cuts!!!

John Brummett in his article “It may get personal in debt-limit end game,” Arkansas News Bureau, July 19, 2011 noted:

The White House is quietly encouraging the Reid-McConnell talks.

Meantime, there is talk of pandering to the tea party radicals in the unwieldy House by letting them pursue referral of a balanced-budget amendment to the Constitution.

Ratification would take years. If enacted, such an amendment would amount to the same abdication of political responsibility to make wise and responsible cuts in spending as has been evident in the debt-ceiling debate.

It is obvious to me that the Balanced Budget Amendment is needed because of the “abdication of political responsibility to make wise and responsible cuts in spending” that Brummett is talking about and we have all seen for decades.

The real debate in my view should be which variety of amendment should we pass. This is a series of posts I am doing on that subject. They come from Brian Darling’s excellent article, ” The House and Senate Balanced Budget Amendments: Not All Balanced Budget Amendments Are Created Equal,” Heritage Foundation, July 14, 2011. 

Abstract: Republicans in the House and Senate have announced that they will force votes on balanced budget constitutional amendments. While the Senate and House versions of the current BBA are similar, there are some important differences that Members of Congress and the American people need to understand. For example, the Senate version makes it more difficult to enact revenue-neutral tax reform, while the House version would waive its tax limitation in times of military conflict. How Congress resolves these differences could determine whether future Congresses and Presidents balance the budget without increasing taxes.

Conclusion

These proposed balanced budget amendments differ on some fundamental issues that would dramatically affect the way Congress attempts to balance the budget. The House version, for example, is easier to waive. There is a lower threshold to declare military conflict in the House version that would allow for an easier waiver. Also, the tax limitation—forcing a two-thirds vote to increase taxes—would be waived in times of military conflict in the House version. The House version allows a lower supermajority threshold to pass an unbalanced budget than the Senate version does.

The Senate version makes it more difficult to enact revenue-neutral tax reform. The provision that forces a two-thirds vote to raise any tax would make it more difficult to modify the tax code in a revenue-neutral manner to implement a flat tax. For a flat tax to work, some Americans might have their tax rates increased as a means to make every American pay the same rate.

Also, neither version contains the complete ban on judicial enforcement that is necessary to prevent activist judges from setting budget priorities, which is a job reserved for the political branches of government.

The differences between the House and Senate BBAs may seem small to those who are not steeped in the budget process, but they will have a dramatic impact on the lives of all Americans. Ultimately, these differences would need to be reconciled in a manner that leads to a balanced budget without jeopardizing U.S. military interests or punishing taxpayers.

“Midnight in Paris” movie review

Hemingway talks about the fear of death in the latest Woody Allen film “Midnight in Paris.” This is one of Allen’s themes that visits often in his films.

This is the Golden Age; “Midnight in Paris” is effortlessly lovely

by Nick Christian, Editor-In-ChiefPDFPrint

Volume 16, Issue 34

June 14, 2010

The CNM Chronicle gives “Midnight in Paris” 4.3-of-5 stars

Woody Allen’s 45th directed film “Midnight in Paris” is aesthetically appealing, whimsical, and harkens a respect for the past in a world society that perpetually looks to the future.

“Midnight in Paris” (Which was writ­ten and directed by Allen) stars Owen Wilson as Gil Bender on vacation with his fiancée Inez, played by Rachel McAdams.

The movie begins with a series of shots of Paris land­marks, some in regular weather and some in rain, synched to change shots along with the upbeat in the score. Like other Allen movies, the first dialog is heard from Gil against the black title credits which progress to reveal Inez and Gil walking through Monet’s Garden in Giverny.

Throughout the early daylight scenes of “Midnight in Paris,” Gil and Inez walk through a series of landmarks. Gil, an American television writer working on his first novel, professes his love of the city of Paris, how the people operate and his desire to live, write there while Inez cannot wait to return stateside.

Gil and Inez are in Paris along with Inez’s parents John, played by Kurt Fuller, and Helen, played by Mimi Kennedy, who are in town on a business venture for John. Along the way Gil and Inez meet up with Inez’s Gil-termed “Pedantic” friend Paul played by Michael Sheen and Carol played by Nina Arianda.

Paul invites Gil and Inez along with he and Carol to tour Rodin’s museum where Paul proceeds to give a tour to an attentive Inez and Carol, and an unwilling Gil.

There is a shot in front of Rodin’s museum where the two women follow Paul with a rapt focus while Gil follows as if he becomes more uninterested and annoyed at Paul with each step he takes. It’s in a scene like this where Wilson shines play­ing the Allen surrogate role of Gil. While Wilson may not appear as cynical or sharp as Allen would in the role, there is a believ­able mocking quality to the way Wilson plays the character.

After a day of listening to Paul bemoan about the history of Paris and the various works of art that contribute to the city’s prestige, Gil excuses himself to walk around the city. Eventually Gil finds himself lost on the streets of Paris, and sits on a city street stairway in the Latin Quarter. As the clock strikes midnight a Duisenberg strolls up to where he is sitting and the inhabitants of the car invite him to come along.

After Gil gets out of the car, he finds himself in the 1920’s France world of Cole Porter (played by Yves Heck) music, late-night parties and stimulating conversa­tion. Eventually, he finds himself talking to Zelda (played by Alison Pill) and Scott Fitzgerald (played by Tom Hiddleston) and joining them in escaping the boring party in which they go to a bar where they meet up with Ernest Hemmingway (played by Corey Stroll).

Throughout the process Gil is entranced by each author or artist he meets. After asking Hemmingway to read his novel-in-progress, Hemmingway declines but prom­ises to bring him to the only person he trusts with his work, Gertrude Stein (played by Kathy Bates).

During the next day Gil tells Inez about his night and she devalues everything he says. Throughout the day the growing disconnect between Gil and Inez becomes more obvi­ous as they argue over where they should live after getting married.

The next night Hemmingway takes Gil to Stein where he is thrust into an argu­ment between her and Pablo Picasso about a painting. The painting was a portrait of a woman, Adriana (played by Marion Cotillard), whom Picasso had been seeing. Gil talks with Adrianna in the next room and they bond over a common bond, a love of the past.

There are many great performances in “Midnight in Paris,” the most notable being any with Hemmingway. Stroll plays an engag­ing Hemmingway who rivets all he talks to with poignant words and elegant phrases. Throughout the movie Hemmingway deliv­ers bits like “All Cowardice comes from not loving,” and “You will never write well if you fear dying.” But the best bit of Hemmingway in this movie is a conversa­tion between him and Adrianna at a party thrown by the Fitzgerald’s.

Hemmingway says to Adrianna, “Have you ever shot a charging lion?” Adriana responds no and Hemmingway responds with “would you like to?”

Bates is also brilliant as the poetess Stein. She is forceful and abrupt which allows her to motivate Wilson in his writing career.

Cotillard is, as Wilson describes, “Effortlessly Lovely.” The chemistry between Adrianna and Gil is enchanting and propels the movie forward.

Lastly, McAdams is abrasive as Inez which is most likely the point of her char­acter. She constantly puts down Gil which makes her character hard to care about.

The movie has been proclaimed in many critics reviews as a love note to Paris. While each image on screen is beautiful and filmed with the perfect amounts of light, weather and blocking, the content of the movie seems to be more focused on Allen’s post famous career.

Wilson plays a writer trying to find a living where he isn’t a corporate hand making things that are moronic and simplis­tic. He hates the fact he spends his life ridi­culed by pedantic people who have no clue what they are talking about and indoctrinate the naively willing.

What Allen is beckoning for through a love letter to Paris is a return to writ­ing or self-expression before the corporate takeover of the arts realm. In the words of Inez in an early scene, “Midnight in Paris” Is Allen willfully stating that he would give it all up just to struggle.

Brummett: Congress abdicates political responsibility to make wise cuts, but we don’t need balanced budget amendment (Part 5)

Uploaded by on Oct 4, 2010

Politicians and interest groups claim higher taxes are necessary because it would be impossible to cut spending by enough to get rid of red ink. This Center for Freedom and Prosperity video shows that these assertions are nonsense. The budget can be balanced very quickly by simply limiting the annual growth of federal spending.

_________________________________

Below in the clip you can see President Reagan asking for a balanced budget amendment back in the 1980’s. How much heartache would we have avoided if we had one back then?

John Brummett in his article “It may get personal in debt-limit end game,” Arkansas News Bureau, July 19, 2011 noted:

The White House is quietly encouraging the Reid-McConnell talks.

Meantime, there is talk of pandering to the tea party radicals in the unwieldy House by letting them pursue referral of a balanced-budget amendment to the Constitution.

Ratification would take years. If enacted, such an amendment would amount to the same abdication of political responsibility to make wise and responsible cuts in spending as has been evident in the debt-ceiling debate.

It is obvious to me that the Balanced Budget Amendment is needed because of the “abdication of political responsibility to make wise and responsible cuts in spending” that Brummett is talking about and we have all seen for decades.

The real debate in my view should be which variety of amendment should we pass. This is a series of posts I am doing on that subject. They come from Brian Darling’s excellent article, ” The House and Senate Balanced Budget Amendments: Not All Balanced Budget Amendments Are Created Equal,” Heritage Foundation, July 14, 2011. 

Abstract: Republicans in the House and Senate have announced that they will force votes on balanced budget constitutional amendments. While the Senate and House versions of the current BBA are similar, there are some important differences that Members of Congress and the American people need to understand. For example, the Senate version makes it more difficult to enact revenue-neutral tax reform, while the House version would waive its tax limitation in times of military conflict. How Congress resolves these differences could determine whether future Congresses and Presidents balance the budget without increasing taxes.

Enforcing Legislation

The House and Senate versions differ on the authorization for legislation to enforce the BBA. Section 7 of the House version allows Congress to enforce and implement the BBA “by appropriate legislation, which may rely on estimates of outlays and receipts.” Section 10 of the Senate version, however, allows enforcement “by appropriate legislation, which may rely on estimates of outlays, receipts, and gross domestic product.” The Senate’s version specifically references GDP, whereas the House version is silent on this point.

—Brian Darling is Senior Fellow for Government Studies in the Department of Government Studies at The Heritage Foundation

Senator Pryor asks for Spending Cut Suggestions! Here are a few!(Part 98)

 

Senator Mark Pryor wants our ideas on how to cut federal spending. Take a look at this video clip below:

Senator Pryor has asked us to send our ideas to him at cutspending@pryor.senate.gov and I have done so in the past and will continue to do so in the future.

On May 11, 2011,  I emailed to this above address and I got this email back from Senator Pryor’s office:

Please note, this is not a monitored email account. Due to the sheer volume of correspondence I receive, I ask that constituents please contact me via my website with any responses or additional concerns. If you would like a specific reply to your message, please visit http://pryor.senate.gov/contact. This system ensures that I will continue to keep Arkansas First by allowing me to better organize the thousands of emails I get from Arkansans each week and ensuring that I have all the information I need to respond to your particular communication in timely manner.  I appreciate you writing. I always welcome your input and suggestions. Please do not hesitate to contact me on any issue of concern to you in the future.

Here are a few more I just emailed to Senator Pryor myself:

Government auditors spent the past five years examining all federal programs and found that 22 percent of them—costing taxpayers a total of $123 billion annually—fail to show any positive impact on the populations they serve.

 

  • Congress has ignored efficiency recommendations from the Department of Health and Human Services that would save $9 billionannually.
  • Taxpayers are funding paintings of high-ranking government officials at a cost of up to $50,000 apiece.
  • The state of Washington sent $1 food stamp checks to 250,000 households in order to raise state caseload figures and trigger $43 millionin additional federal funds.
  • Suburban families are receiving large farm subsidies for the grass in their backyards—subsidies that many of these families never requested and do not want.
  • Homeland Security employee purchases include 63-inch plasma TVs, iPods, and $230for a beer brewing kit.
  • The National Institutes of Health spends $1.3 millionper month to rent a lab that it cannot use.
  • Congress recently spent $2.4 billionon 10 new jets that the Pentagon insists it does not need and will not use.

Government spending has got too high in the USA

Max Brantley of the Arkansas Times Blog is very fond of quoting Paul Krugman concerning his view that the worst thing we could do now is cut federal spending. However, federal spending doesn’t work to pull us out of a recession.

 

Federal Spending Doesn’t Work

by Chris Edwards

Despite ongoing federal deficits of more than $1 trillion a year, many liberals are calling for more government spending to “create jobs.” At the same time, liberals are opposing budget cuts because that would supposedly hurt the economic recovery. And then there is the perennial problem of Democrats and Republicans defending spending on their particular favored programs.

With all these forces arrayed against budget sanity, it’s time to take a back-to-basics look at the role of government spending in the economy.

Federal spending has soared over the past decade. As a share of gross domestic product, spending grew from 18 percent in 2001 to 24 percent in 2011. The causes of this expansion include the costs of wars, growing entitlement programs, the 2009 stimulus bill and rising spending on discretionary programs such as education.

The reality is that Washington is very bad at trying to micromanage short-term economic performance.

New projections from the Congressional Budget Office show that without reforms spending will keep rising for decades to come. The CBO’s “alternative fiscal scenario” shows spending growing to 34 percent of GDP by 2035. Thus, the federal government is on course to gobble up almost twice as much of the U.S. economy 24 years from now as it did just a decade ago.

America is becoming a big-government nation

Sadly, America is rapidly becoming a big-government nation. Data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development compares spending by all levels of government among its 31 high-income member countries. This year, government spending in the United States hit 41 percent of GDP, meaning that more than 4 out of every 10 dollars that we produce is consumed by our federal, state and local governments.

We used to have a substantial government size advantage compared to other countries. But Figure 1 shows that while government spending in the United States was about 10 percentage points of GDP smaller than the average OECD country in the past, that gap has now shrunk to just 4 points. A number of high-income nations — such as Australia — now have smaller governments than does the United States.

This is very troubling because America’s strong growth and high living standards were historically built on our relatively small government. The ongoing surge in federal spending is undoing this competitive advantage that we have enjoyed in the world economy.

CBO projections show that federal spending will rise by about 10 percentage points of GDP between now and 2035. If that happens, governments in the United States will be grabbing more than half of everything produced in the nation by that year. That would doom future generations of Americans to unbearable levels of taxation and a stagnant economy with fewer opportunities.

Government spending doesn’t stimulate

There is renewed talk in Washington about further spending measures to try and stimulate the weak economy. That idea is remarkably naïve and misguided. It is now more than two years after passage of the $821 billion stimulus package in 2009, and it is obvious that that effort was a hugely expensive Keynesian policy failure.

The Obama administration’s attempt to pump up “aggregate demand” in the economy simply hasn’t worked. In Keynesian theory, the total amount of deficit spending is the amount of “stimulus” delivered to the economy. Well, we’ve had deficit spending of $459 billion in 2008, $1.4 trillion in 2009, $1.3 trillion in 2010 and $1.4 trillion in 2011.

Yet despite that enormous deficit-spending stimulus, U.S. unemployment remains stuck at more than 9 percent and the recovery is very sluggish compared to prior recoveries. Indeed, the current recovery appears to be slower than any since World War II, according to a recent Joint Economic Committee study.

Obama administration economists had claimed that the Keynesian “multipliers” from government spending are large, meaning that spending would give a big boost to GDP. But other economists have found that Keynesian multipliers are actually quite small, meaning that added government spending mainly just displaces private-sector activities. Stanford University economist John Taylor took a detailed look at GDP data over recent years, and he found little evidence of any benefits from the 2009 stimulus bill. Any “sugar high” to the economy from recent increases in government spending was at best very small and short-lived.

The reality is that Washington is very bad at trying to micromanage short-term economic performance. Its failed stimulus actions have just put the nation further into debt, which will harm our long-term prosperity. Harvard University’s Robert Barro calculated that any short-term benefit that the 2009 stimulus bill may have provided is greatly outweighed by the future damage caused by higher taxes and debt.

The government’s leaky bucket

Let’s take a look at how government spending damages the economy over the long run. Spending is financed by the extraction of resources from current and future taxpayers. The resources consumed by the government cannot be used to produce goods in the private marketplace. For example, the engineers needed to build a $10 billion government high-speed rail line are taken away from building other products in the economy. The $10 billion rail line creates government-connected jobs, but it also kills at least $10 billion worth of private jobs.

Indeed, the private sector would actually lose more than $10 billion in this example. That is because government spending and taxing creates “deadweight losses,” which result from distortions to working, investment and other activities. The CBO says that deadweight loss estimates “range from 20 cents to 60 cents over and above the revenue raised.” Harvard University’s Martin Feldstein thinks that deadweight losses “may exceed one dollar per dollar of revenue raised, making the cost of incremental governmental spending more than two dollars for each dollar of government spending.” Thus, a $10 billion high-speed rail line would cost the private economy $20 billion or more.

The government uses a “leaky bucket” when it tries to help the economy. Former chairman of the Council of Economics Advisors, Michael Boskin, explains: “The cost to the economy of each additional tax dollar is about $1.40 to $1.50. Now that tax dollar … is put into a bucket. Some of it leaks out in overhead, waste and so on. In a well-managed program, the government may spend 80 or 90 cents of that dollar on achieving its goals. Inefficient programs would be much lower, $0.30 or $0.40 on the dollar.” Texas A&M economist Edgar Browning comes to similar conclusions about the magnitude of the government’s leaky bucket: “It costs taxpayers $3 to provide a benefit worth $1 to recipients.”

The larger the government grows, the leakier the bucket becomes. On the revenue side, tax distortions rise rapidly as tax rates rise. On the spending side, funding is allocated to activities with ever lower returns as the government expands. Figure 2 illustrates the consequences of the leaky bucket. On the left-hand side, tax rates are low and the government initially delivers useful public goods such as crime reduction. Those activities create high returns, so per-capita incomes initially rise as the government grows.

As the government expands further, it engages in less productive activities. The marginal return from government spending falls and then turns negative. On the right-hand side of the figure, average incomes fall as the government expands. Government in the United States — at more than 40 percent of GDP — is almost certainly on the right-hand side of this figure.

In his 2008 book, Stealing from Ourselves, Professor Browning concludes that today’s welfare state reduces GDP — or average U.S. incomes — by about 25 percent. That would place us quite far to the right in Figure 2, and it suggests that federal spending cuts would substantially increase U.S. incomes over time.

All the official projections show rivers of red ink for years to come unless federal policymakers enact major budget reforms. Unless spending is cut, the United States is headed for economic ruin. We need to cut entitlements, domestic discretionary programs and defense spending, as Cato has detailed at http://www.DownsizingGovernment.org.

Cutting spending would boost the economy because many federal programs have very low or negative returns. Many programs cause severe economic distortions. Other programs damage the environment and restrict individual freedom. And the federal government has expanded into hundreds of areas that would be better left to state and local governments, businesses, charities and individuals.

With the upcoming debt-limit vote, fiscal conservatives in Congress have a real chance to start turning the tide. If they don’t stick to their guns, the “life, liberty and pursuit of happiness” we celebrate this July 4 will become meaningless as Washington usurps an ever larger share of our incomes and our economy

A Christian response to Papa Roach’s song “The Last Resort” (Part 1)

Papa Roach – Last Resort (Censored Version)

Amy Winehouse died at the young age of 27 and she had lived a life filled with drug and alcohol addiction. This series on Papa Roach is meant to provide answers to those who feel trapped. Hopefully it will people to avoid  troubles like Amy Winehouse experienced. 

Today I am starting a series of posts on this song  “The Last Resort” by Papa Roach.

The band’s place in the pop music landscape was established with the release of their breakout single, “Last Resort,” which was quickly picked up by MTV and nominated for a “Best New Artist Video” award at the 2000 Video Music Awards. The song is a gut-wrenching first-person chronicle of hopelessness that’s gone so deep the singer is seriously contemplating suicide.  For casual listeners, the song is very confusing. Listening to the song reveals the criticisms claiming the song promotes suicide could certainly be warranted. Kids who are riding the fence because of numerous other problems in their lives could interpret the song in a way that would give them permission to go over the edge, especially if they don’t know the story behind the song.

But the band is adamant about the fact that the song is about fighting to survive by overcoming depression, rather than allowing it to lead to suicide. “It’s not saying I can’t go on living. It’s saying I can’t go on living this way,” says Dick (Spin, 10/00). He also says, “Last Resort” has “a positive edge to it, as far as like, ‘Don’t succumb to it. Keep yourself afloat.’ With these problems in your life, find a friend you can confide in” (Sonicnet.com).

I know there are some curse words in the following song. I have eliminated both times the curse word is used. I really think that there needs to be a response to the young people who are saying things like the words in this song Here are some of the words:

Do you even care if I die pleading, Would it be wrong, would it be right, If I took my life tonight, Chances are that I might, and I’m contimplating suicide, ‘Cause I’m losing my sight, losing my mind, Wish somebody would tell me I’m fine, Nothing’s alright, nothing is fine, I’m running and I’m crying, I never realized I was spread too thin, Till it was too late andI was empty within, Hungry, feeding on my chaos and living in sin, Downward spiral, where do i begin, It all started when i lost my mother, No love for myself and no love for another,Searching to find a love upon a higher level, finding nothing but QUESTIONS AND DEVILS, I can’t go on living this way, Cut my life into pieces, This is my last resort.

Is there hope for youth that feel this way? There is hope in my view only if you realize that God exists and cares for you and your future. Seeking God is the answer just like Solomon found out in the Book of Ecclesiastes. Chris Martin of the rock group Coldplay seems to be on a similar quest to find spiritual answers.

Below is a portion of the article “Papa Roach—Infesting and reflecting youth culture by Walt Mueller.  

Twenty years ago I lived in Florida. The sun was always bright. The air was always warm. The ocean water was always blue. The tropical flowers were always beautiful. And my apartment was always home to an army of Palmetto bugs that somehow managed to survive visits from the exterminator and frequent fumigations. There were three other things I learned about these critters when I lived down south. First, everyone had them in their houses. Second, calling them “Palmetto bugs” was just a nice way of forgetting that the indestructible bugs were really nothing more than roaches. And third, there was really nothing you could do to get rid of them. 

For a home­­­-owner, the roach population’s ability to live and thrive even after being targeted for destruction is a nightmare. To kids who have experienced the chaos of relational upheaval in today’s confusing, selfish and oft-hopeless culture, the indestructible longevity of a roach can become an admirable quality.

Jacoby Shaddix is a young man whose difficult background left him close to hopeless and hanging on to life by a thread. Now 24 years old and known as Coby Dick, he’s the lead singer of the band named Papa Roach. While the name was originally taken from Shaddix’s Grandpa Roatch, there’s more to it than meets the eye. “We look at ourselves like cockroaches,” says Dick. “We’re survivors” (Rolling Stone,8/31/00). Judging from the band’s recent rise to mainstream music popularity, Dick and his bandmates are putting forth a message that’s resonating with a youth culture hoping to survive like indestructible roaches in a world seemingly bent on destroying their youthful hopes and dreams.

Turn on your radio and/or MTV and it won’t be long until you realize the music and message of Papa Roach has connected with today’s mainstream youth culture. What is it that’s made them connect with so many young ears, eyes, minds and hearts? What’s the message and worldview communicated in and through the music of Papa Roach? Is there anything we can learn from their growing influence among our kids? As with all other popular music, there’s more to Papa Roach than meets the ear. We need to dig deeper to look beneath the band’s lyrics and music to discover who they are and how that identity has facilitated their growing connection with kids. Looking more deeply at the Papa Roach history, music and appeal offers deep insight into the collective and individual values, attitudes and behaviors of today’s children and teens. 

Papa Roach’s Story

The roots of Papa Roach go back to Vacaville, a small town in California where the kids say there’s little or nothing to do. Like so many other kids in Vacaville, Coby Dick says he was “a wild kid” (Rolling Stone, 7/6-20/2000). When he describes his “rough” childhood he talks openly about his hyperactivity, mood swings and bed-wetting until the age of 16. When Dick was barely into his middle school years, his father left home and didn’t speak to him for 12 years—and only after Dick called his dad while writing the band’s current album, Infest.  

Always interested in music, Dick became proficient on the bass clarinet and played in an award-winning woodwind ensemble while in high school. By the age of 17, Dick had left home to live on his own in a rented room while making money as a dishwasher. When he was 19, he decided to deal with his personal issues by writing his life down in the form of lyrics as “a way to vent frustrations with things that’ve happened in my life. This is the perfect way for me to get some things off my mind and come to peace with certain situations” (Alternative Press, 10/00). Dick wears the chaos on his left bicep where there’s a tattoo of a house engulfed in flames. “It’s a representation of my family falling to pieces” (Spin, 10/00). Today, Coby Dick is the band’s lead singer, lyricist and songwriter. The music of Papa Roach reflects his thoughts on the first 24 years of his young life.

Drummer David Buckner (age 24) hooked up with Dick in 1993 when they were playing football together back inVacaville. An accomplished violinist, Buckner opened his family’s garage for the band’s original rehearsals. At that time, the band consisted of Dick, Buckner, bass player Will James and a trombone player. They made their performance debut at a high school talent show.

After a short time they canned the trombone player and added guitarist Jerry Horton (age 25). To this day, Horton doesn’t fit the stereotype of a rock and roll musician. He remains committed to being “straight-edge,” a moniker describing his decision to never take drugs, never smoke and never use alcohol. His bandmates claim they’ve never heard him use profanity. 

During the early years, the band played club shows, and handed out a series of self-released EPs and demos on the street. They released Potatoes For Christmas (1994) and Coca Bonita (1995) before Will James left the band because his ongoing involvement in a church camp kept the band from practicing over the summer months. Their local following grew and they hired their roadie Tobin Esperance (age 20) in 1996 to replace James.

The band self-released two more albums: Old Friends From Young Years … Let ‘Em Know (1997) and Five Tracks Deep (1998), the latter of which convinced the folks at Warner Brothers to finance a demo record for Papa Roach. But in a strange turn of events, Warner Brothers abruptly dropped plans for the band as they were rejected by several record labels. Then in October 1999, the band signed on with Dreamworks.

In the months since then, Papa Roach released an album, joined the Summer of 2000 Vans’ Warped Tour, and has toured with Korn.

For more information on resources to help you understand today’s rapidly changing youth culture, contact the Center for Parent/Youth Understanding.

Help for the Suicidal

God offers you true, living hope–not a false hope based on your death.
By David Powlison

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

Are you having suicidal thoughts and feelings? Perhaps you are convinced that life is not worth living. You feel like your world is collapsing in on you. Your life seems hopeless—like a black hole with all love, hope, and joy sucked out. If you are contemplating suicide, you have already done a lot of thinking about your life.

But have you thought about how God views your life?

Right now you are living in a world of despair. You can’t see any solution to your problems. You’re not looking forward to anything. The future seems empty.

God’s perspective on your life is very different. Your life is precious to Him. He knows everything about you—even how many hairs are on your head (Matthew 10:30). Your life is so significant to Him that He forbids you to take it. God says that all murder is wrong, and that includes the self-murder of suicide (Exodus 20:13).

Bring your hopelessness to God

God is not surprised or put off by your hopeless feelings. He wants you to bring your despair to Him, and cry for help right now, in the middle of your darkness and pain. Throughout history God’s children have cried to him and He has helped them. Listen to the voice of David who cried out his despair to God thousands of years ago, “In the day of my trouble I call upon you, for you answer me” (Psalm 86:7).

Today is your day of trouble. Tell God all your sorrows, all your troubles, and all the reasons suicide is on your mind. Do you feel, like David, that you are in the “depths of the grave”? Ask God to hear your prayer and listen to your cry for grace (Psalm 86:6). On this day the living God promises to listen to you and help you.

Your reasons for despair; God’s voice of hope

Why are you feeling hopeless? Are you struggling with physical suffering? A broken relationship? Shame and guilt from mistakes and failures? An unrealized dream? What problem do you believe suicide will solve?

Your suicidal feelings and actions don’t come out of the blue. They have reasons you can discover and understand. Your particular reasons will show you how you’re experiencing, interpreting, and reacting to your world. When you discover your reasons, you will also be describing what is most important to you. The loss or pain that makes you feel like your life is not worth living points to the thing that you believe would make your life worth living.

We will look at four kinds of reasons for hopelessness. As you read, look for the specific reasons you are feeling hopeless. And then listen to what God says to you about your particular troubles that brings hope.

1. Unrelenting suffering. Your hopelessness might stem from overwhelming suffering. The death of someone close to you, your own chronic pain and illness, postpartum depression, a broken relationship, poverty, racial prejudice, etc., are all situations that can fill you with despair.

If this is why you feel hopeless, read through Psalm 31. Written by David, these words vividly capture the feeling of wasting away with grief.

Be gracious to me, O LORD, for I am in distress;
my eye is wasted from grief;
my soul and my body also.
For my life is spent with sorrow,
and my years with sighing;
(v. 9-10)

Is this what your life is like?

But this psalm is also filled with hope. David remembers that God sees him in his affliction and knows all about his troubles. He remembers that in God’s presence he is safe:

Oh, how abundant is your goodness, which you have stored up for those who fear you and worked for those who take refuge in you, in the sight of the children of mankind! In the cover of your presence you hide them from the plots of men; you store them in your shelter from the strife of tongues.” (v. 19-20)

David’s life, like yours, was full of troubles and discouragement, yet because God was with him, he has hope. He says, “But you heard the voice of my pleas for mercy when I cried to you for help” (v. 22). And he ends with this call: “Be strong and let your heart take courage, all you who wait for the Lord” (v. 24). David is able to endure with courage because God is with him.

God is calling you to persevere in your suffering, but not by simply gritting your teeth. Persevering through suffering is only possible when you put your hope in the living God. He promises to come near to you, to be present with you, and to let you experience His goodness right in the middle of your pain and difficulty.

2. Personal failure. Your suicidal thoughts and feelings might be related to mistakes and failures. Is your hopelessness an attempt to atone for your sins, to punish yourself, to avoid feelings of shame? Perhaps you are so full of guilt and shame that you don’t want to be around people or even continue to live. Can you find hope when you’ve blown it so badly that you think you will never be able to hold your head up again?

The amazing thing about the Bible is that it is full of real people who made serious missteps—just like you. David wrote Psalm 32 after he committed adultery, got a woman pregnant, and then tried to cover things up by arranging to have the woman’s husband killed. You can read the whole story in 2 Samuel 11-12.

In Psalm 32:3-4 he vividly describes his experience of despair. Perhaps you are also feeling like this:

… my bones wasted away through my groaning all day long.
For day and night your hand was heavy upon me;
my strength was dried up as by the heat of summer.

David’s experience of guilt and failure comes partly from God and partly from his own conscience. But why is this psalm full of joy instead of shame? Because of what God has done for him in the middle of his nightmare of guilt. His joy comes from God’s forgiveness of him and from God’s promise to guide him (Psalm 31:1-2, 8).

Here’s someone, like you, who is living with terrible personal failure. But instead of meditating on his failures and turning his sins and mistakes over and over in his mind, he chooses to remember who God is. He knows the God who forgives. He trusts the God who promises to keep his eyes on him, who will personally instruct, lead, and counsel. So he ends like this, “steadfast love surrounds those who trust in the Lord,” and adds a call to joy, “Be glad in the LORD, and rejoice, O righteous, and shout for joy, all you upright in heart!” (Psalm 32:10-11).

What an amazing turnaround—someone who knows his sinfulness, but also knows God’s mercy, can be called righteous by the grace and mercy of God. You, too, can experience what David experienced. But to do so, you must seek this Lord. David described how he felt after his sin was exposed, but he hadn’t confessed his sins to God. His vitality drained away, he felt hopeless and lifeless. If that is how you feel, then do what David did—go to God with your sins and failures.

Here is a wonderful description of seeking God in the middle of your failure and guilt, David says, “I acknowledged my sin to you, and I did not cover my iniquity; I said, ‘I will confess my transgressions to the LORD,’ and you forgave the iniquity of my sin” (Psalm 32:5). Notice that David is turning to God with his failures—not to those around him. He doesn’t live in shame anymore because he is forgiven. He can hold up his head, even though everyone knows about his failures, because God is with him.

And then David gives the key to having God with him, “Therefore, let everyone who is godly offer prayer to you.”   He knows that prayer brings him into God’s presence where he is safe from trouble, even the trouble he brought upon himself.

3. Failed dreams. You can also struggle with hopelessness when the thing that has given your life meaning is taken from you. Perhaps it’s a job you didn’t get, an unrealized life goal, or your children turning out a certain way. Whatever you have organized your life around, its absence can leave you feeling empty and despairing.

Perhaps you didn’t know how important your dream was to you until it didn’t happen. Now you are experiencing the hopelessness of a failed dream. But what does your failed dream reveal about where you find meaning? When what you have lived for is taken from you, it can feel like you are dying. You are in so much pain that suicide seems like your only alternative. But God has a better way. He will give you true, lasting hope that can never be taken away from you.

God says, in Psalm 33, that it is He who “frustrates the plans of the peoples” (Psalm 33:10). Later in the psalm he says why—because all those hopes are futile. “The king is not saved by his great army; a warrior is not delivered by his great strength. The war horse is a false hope for salvation, and by its great might it cannot rescue” (Psalm 33:16, 17).

These are things that people trusted in thousands of years ago. What you trust in—those things on which you built your life, your identity, your success—are different, but the result is the same. Anything you trust in besides God’s steadfast love for you is futile. When you put your hope in God’s love, He will deliver your soul from death (Psalm 33:18, 19).

Let the death of your dreams be the door into putting your trust in God’s love for you. He will be your help and shield. As you “trust in His holy name,” He will deliver your soul from death, from thoughts of death, and from trying to take your own life.

4. False hopes. Perhaps your suicidal thinking is not from hopelessness, but from false hopes. Dreaming about and planning your suicide is what brings you hope. You believe that killing yourself will bring about some wonderful answer or solution to your problems. If you have been deeply hurt by someone, you might see suicide as a way to make others suffer. You might hope that suicide will bring an end to your suffering and those you love will be better off without you. Or you might hope that your suicidal gesture will get you what you want—attention, love, or even a break from the pressures of life. But whatever your hopes are—“I’ll be in a place of peace,” or “Then everyone will know how much they made me suffer”—if they include suicide as a solution they are a false hope.

Suicide is never an answer. Two wrongs never make a right—don’t forget that suicide is a great wrong. If you have been wronged, please don’t think that suicide is the way to make that wrong better. God offers you true, living hope—not a false hope based on your death. Hope from God comes in the midst of evil and trouble and it is a hope that will never end.

Paul talks about true and living hope in the second half of Romans 8. True hope comes from knowing God as your Father and receiving His Spirit as a gift. Living as a child of God means that instead of responding to trouble by hurting yourself, you go to your heavenly Father for help. He gives you his Spirit to help you in your weakness and even teach you how and what to ask for (Romans 8:15, 16). It’s the Spirit of God that will teach you that your present sufferings “are not worth comparing with the glory that is to be revealed” in you (Romans 8:18).

We live in a world where bad things happen. But you have received the best gift of all: the Spirit of life, the Holy Spirit of Jesus. You have been given the gift of a relationship with God now that will lead to an indestructible life forever. There is nothing in this world that can separate you from God’s love—not trouble, distress, hardship, or anything in all creation (Romans 8:35). God’s love will keep you safe, and it’s yours for the asking.

The resurrection—your reason for hope

How do you know that the promises God makes to you are true? How do you know that the living God gives true, substantial hope? Because Jesus defeated death when He died on the cross and rose again. Peter explains it this way, “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, ” (1 Peter 1:3-4).

Jesus is alive. His resurrection is your guarantee that real hope can be yours. Your hope is not based on a vague belief that changed circumstances, time passing, or a new set of friends will cure how horrible you feel. It’s a living hope based on the physical fact of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Because the resurrection really happened, your story will end in life.

The passage goes on to say, “to an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading.” When you have this living hope, then what you get out of life (your “inheritance”) won’t be destroyed or ruined by your troubles.

Related posts:

A Christian response to Papa Roach’s song “The Last Resort” (Part 2)

Papa Roach – Last Resort (Censored Version) This series of posts concerns the song “The Last Resort.” Amy Winehouse died today and it was a tragic loss. That really troubled me that she did not seek spiritual help instead of turning to drugs and alcohol. This post today will give hope to those we feel like […]

Heartbreaking story of Amy Winehouse

  I am in the middle of a series on the Papa Roach song “Last Resort” which deals with suicide and then today I hear this sad story about Amy Winehouse. Inside Amy Winehouse’s troubled life With the news that British R&B star and tabloid target Amy Winehouse has died from as yet undisclosed causes, […]

A Christian response to Papa Roach’s song “The Last Resort” (Part 1)

Papa Roach – Last Resort (Censored Version) Today I am starting a series of posts on this song  “The Last Resort” by Papa Roach. The band’s place in the pop music landscape was established with the release of their breakout single, “Last Resort,” which was quickly picked up by MTV and nominated for a “Best […]

5 reasons class warfare is stupid, response to “Sound Policy” blogger

President Obama and other politicians are advocating higher taxes, with a particular emphasis on class-warfare taxes targeting the so-called rich. This Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation video explains why fiscal policy based on hate and envy is fundamentally misguided. For more information please visit our web page: www.freedomandprosperity.org.

______________________

Today I read this below from the Arkansas Times Blog:

Since the top 20% of Americans have roughly 91% of the total wealth, any solution to the budget deficit should call on those 20% to be responsible for AT LEAST 91% (I would argue 100%) of what it costs to balance the budget. To do otherwise would be a reverse Robin Hood, taking from the poor and middle class to give to the rich.

Posted from my Chamber of Commerce work computer on C of C time.

Posted by Sound Policy on July 22, 2011 at 11:21 AM | Report this comment

_______________________________________

The video clip above gives 5 reasons why class warfare is stupid. The article below also addresses some of the same reasons.

The White House Has Declared Class War on the Rich, but the Poor and Middle Class Will Suffer Collateral Damage

Posted by Daniel J. Mitchell

The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts are scheduled to expire at the end of this year, which means a big tax increase in 2011. Tax rates for all brackets will increase, the double tax on dividends will skyrocket from 15 percent to 39.6 percent, the child credit will shrink, the death tax will be reinstated (at 55 percent!), the marriage penalty will get worse, and the capital gains tax rate will jump to 20 percent. All of these provisions will be unwelcome news for taxpayers, but it’s important to look at direct and indirect costs. A smaller paycheck is an example of direct costs, but in some cases the indirect costs — such as slower economic growth — are even more important. This is why higher tax rates on entrepreneurs and investors are so misguided. For every dollar the government collects from policies targeting these people (such as higher capital gains and dividend taxes, a renewed death tax, and increases in the top tax rates), it’s likely that there will be significant collateral economic damage.

Unfortunately, the Obama Administration’s approach is to look at tax policy only through the prism of class warfare. This means that some tax cuts can be extended, but only if there is no direct benefit to anybody making more than $200,000 or $250,000 per year. The folks at the White House apparently don’t understand, however, that higher direct costs on the “rich” will translate into higher indirect costs on the rest of us. Higher tax rates on work, saving, investment, and entrepreneurship will slow economic growth. And, because of compounding, even small changes in the long-run growth rate can have a significant impact on living standards within one or two decades. This is one of the reasons why high-tax European welfare states have lost ground in recent decades compared to the United States.

When the economy slows down, that’s not good news for upper-income taxpayers. But it’s also bad news for the rest of us — and it can create genuine hardship for those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder. The White House may be playing smart politics. As this blurb from the Washington Post indicates, the President seems to think that he can get away with blaming the recession on tax cuts that took place five years before the downturn began. But for those of us who care about prosperity more than politics, what really matters is that the economy is soon going to be hit with higher tax rates on productive behavior. It’s unclear whether that’s good for the President’s poll numbers, but it’s definitely bad for America.

Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner took the lead Sunday in continuing the Obama administration’s push for extending middle-class tax cuts while allowing similar cuts for the nation’s wealthiest individuals to expire in January. …The tax cuts, put in place between 2001 and 2003, have become an intensely political topic ahead of the congressional elections this fall. Republicans have argued that extending the full spectrum of tax cuts is essential to strengthening the sluggish economic recovery. Geithner rejected that notion, telling ABC’s “This Week” that letting tax cuts for the wealthiest expire would not hurt growth. …On Saturday, the president used part of his weekly address to chide House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (Ohio) and other Republicans who oppose the administration’s approach, saying the GOP was pushing “the same policies that led us into this recession.”